This was posted 5 years 2 months 1 day ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Uluru (Ayers Rock) Return from $156 Brisbane / $164 Melbourne Flying Jetstar @ Flight Scout

80
Uluru (Ayers Rock) Return from $156 Brisbane / $164 Melbourne Flying Jetstar @ Flight Scout
Go to Deal
Store Repflightscout on 21/10/2019 - 11:04 flightscout.co (311 clicks)
Last edited 21/10/2019 - 15:44

Just scouted sale fares to Ayers Rock from $156/$164 return departing Brisbane/Melbourne.

All prices quoted are for return fares and include taxes. Luggage and meals are usually extra with Jetstar.

Sample Travel Dates

click through to see more

Brisbane from $156 return

28 Oct 2019 - 13 Nov 2019
30 Oct 2019 - 29 Nov 2019
01 Nov 2019 - 13 Nov 2019
01 Nov 2019 - 18 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019 - 13 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019 - 18 Nov 2019
20 Nov 2019 - 27 Nov 2019
25 Nov 2019 - 29 Nov 2019

Melbourne from $164 return

30 Nov 2019 - 03 Dec 2019

Subscribe to our deals alert for deals like this every day in your inbox

Or to find all the best deals from your nearest city: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Gold Coast, Canberra, Hobart, Darwin, Cairns, Townsville

Travel Airfare Jetstar Northern Territory Uluru

Related Stores

Flight Scout
Flight Scout
Marketplace
Jetstar Airways
Jetstar Airways

closed Comments

  • jv on 21/10/2019 - 11:05
    -4

    28 Oct 2019 - 13 Nov 2019
    30 Oct 2019 - 29 Nov 2019

    Last dates for climbing…

    • Zapo on 21/10/2019 - 11:12
      +2

      The ban comes into effect on October 26.

      • jv on 21/10/2019 - 11:47
        +1

        Oh no !!!

        I thought it started in November…

        I'll need to catch an earlier flight.

        • vovka on 21/10/2019 - 17:55

          Even if you get earlier, climbing is not open every day - subject to weather conditions.

      • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 12:33
        +1

        No climbing from and including 26 October - that's this Saturday.

  • ets27 on 21/10/2019 - 11:17
    +18

    They probably know that after the ban the interest in Uluru will drop significantly

    • HighAndDry on 21/10/2019 - 12:49
      -1

      Yup, and then the 'traditional owners' will no doubt ask for more handouts from the government because they're no longer making enough money.

      • Julesxzzz on 21/10/2019 - 14:24
        -1

        'traditional owners' working there don't want the ban, yuppy activists do

      • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 16:05
        -1

        Are their handouts bigger than yours? What's your address, we'll come around and camp and climb all over your house during Christmas.

        • HighAndDry on 21/10/2019 - 16:58
          -2

          I live in my house. And when I can, I let it out on Airbnb. And pay taxes on that income.

          Apply that to your sorry attempt at an analogy.

          • [Deactivated] on 22/10/2019 - 15:43
            -2

            @HighAndDry: I asked about your handouts not your sorry lifestyle. No surprise that you didn't understand the analogy but I'll make it simple for you. Ever heard of the Golden Rule? Look it up.

    • SirFlibbled on 21/10/2019 - 19:29
      +1

      Why would it? The number of climbers have plummeted in the last 20 years from over 75% of visitors to under 15% last year. If they allowed the climb to continue, the number of climbers would likely drop further, not increase.

      • ets27 on 21/10/2019 - 21:34

        Perhaps you're right. But it was super busy in the last weeks probably because of the imminent ban

        • SirFlibbled on 21/10/2019 - 22:44

          There's certainly an element of ignorants getting one last go at pissing on the top of Uluru but supposedly the hotels are heavily booked for November, so take that as you will.

  • Kawaii on 21/10/2019 - 11:18
    +11

    Yeah stupid ban I think

    • ets27 on 21/10/2019 - 11:26
      +5

      Couldn't agree more.

    • miicah on 21/10/2019 - 11:26
      +2

      Yeah why am I banned from climbing the Statue of Liberty! Stupid ban

      • Big Paddy on 21/10/2019 - 11:37
        +12

        Bad example as you can actually climb the Statue of Liberty đź—˝

        • ThithLord on 21/10/2019 - 11:39
          +1

          Only the inside.

        • SirFlibbled on 21/10/2019 - 19:31
          +1

          See what happens when you try to piss on it.

      • ets27 on 21/10/2019 - 11:52
        -3

        not exactly the same thing… climbing the Uluru (btw is more of a hike - and before you ask, yes I climbed it) would be the same as banning climbing Mount Perisher or banning sunbathing at Hyams beach. Totally nonsense.

        • Zapo on 21/10/2019 - 12:01
          +13

          It's not actually. It's culturally insensitive to the traditional owners of the land who have asked people to not climb it as it's a sacred site.

          Are there groups with a reasonable claim to Perisher or the beach claiming you can't climb or bathe there? No, so stop building your strawman.

          They tried the nice way by saying 'please don't climb it' and people still did…so now the body who manages it is going to make it illegal to climb.

            • Zapo on 21/10/2019 - 12:04
              +14

              @ets27: I added the word REASONABLE because I could forsee your moronic response.

              Please do not go to Uluru after the climbing ban, no one will lose a freakin' tear and everyone else who goes will be far better off without your ilk being there.

              • ets27 on 21/10/2019 - 12:06

                @Zapo: Of course I won't.

          • HighAndDry on 21/10/2019 - 12:50
            +2

            @Zapo: What the hell does "culturally insensitive" even mean and why does it get any thrift?

            • Maverick-au on 21/10/2019 - 13:10
              +3

              @HighAndDry: It's a bullshit way of justifying something stupid. No explanation will ever be forthcoming….

          • wittyusername on 21/10/2019 - 15:35
            +2

            @Zapo: I believe in the 80's the traditional owners (Paddy Uluru et al.) said there was no cultural significance and welcomed people to come climb it if they were stupid enough to want to.

            • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 16:11
              -1

              @wittyusername: What you believe is irrelevant. Thankfully the world has moved on and aborigines have not only embraced their own skin and culture but they've also won rights we accept as a given.

            • SirFlibbled on 21/10/2019 - 19:36

              @wittyusername: ONE traditional owner said this in the 1970's but never publicly and the claim is only based on the recollections of a white park ranger.

              8 current traditional owners (who make up the majority of the National Park Board) made a decision based on community consultation to close the climb.

              I believe we should respect the wishes of 8 people (at least) who have made their wishes clear over the reported possible claim from another traditional owner some 40+ years ago via hearsay.

              What gets me about the right wing media when ever they trot out the 'Paddy Uluru' comment is that surely they can find a single anangnu who is actually alive to make this statement publicly…

    • Zapo on 21/10/2019 - 11:29

      There are plently of other rocks you can climb.

      Plus if you're going out that way and the only reason you're there is to climb the rock I pity you. It's a beautiful place regardless.

      • jv on 21/10/2019 - 11:50
        +15

        and the only reason you're there is to climb the rock

        Nobody said it's the only reason… But if you can't climb the rock then there less reason to go…

        • Maverick-au on 21/10/2019 - 13:12
          +3

          I agree with JV…. Wonders never cease!

          Why would I bother going that far to walk around Ayers Rock? I'm pretty sure that tourism will drop substantially after this week.

          • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 16:20
            -1

            @Maverick-au: To educate yourself and broaden your horizons perhaps? You could take a cultural tour (cough) but given your obviously narrow-mindedness there's always the sunset on the rock spectacle (where people watching is at least as interesting as the colour changes), walks around Kata Tjuta, and the spectacle of Kings Canyon is not too far away.

            https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-19/uluru-closure-tourism…

      • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 11:54

        Thanks for the pity. I have stuffed it in my sock draw with all the other pities. They are having a pity party.

        Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 11:54 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
      • richadam on 21/10/2019 - 11:51

        They are closing it because of safety concerns. It's not like they care about the cultural significance of it. Otherwise they would of closed it years ago.

        • ets27 on 21/10/2019 - 11:53

          oh please…. then let's shutdown all the coastal walks as well

          • maxwellian on 21/10/2019 - 12:00
            +2

            @ets27: Please don't put that thought out in the public :(

        • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 12:46
          +3

          There is not just a single reason as you claim.

          Whole bunch of factors have kicked in to this, and it's been a long time coming.

          Shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

          • richadam on 21/10/2019 - 12:59

            @[Deactivated]: @TheGhostWhoWalks their official statements really only mention deaths and safety though.

            • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 13:02

              @richadam: Here's what i'm relying on.

                • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 13:09

                  @richadam: Oh yeah, but it is anchored to culture - they do mention "respecting our law and culture".

                  But i take your point - marketing isn't restricted to white folk.

        • Maverick-au on 21/10/2019 - 13:14

          Bollocks, they're closing it because they can not for safety reasons.

          Like one of their arguments I saw on TV recently for closing it was people used to drop batteries from cameras and the wrappers from film! Why use that as your argument when that problem solved itself many years ago.

        • jv on 21/10/2019 - 13:22
          +4

          They are closing it because of safety concerns.

          If it was for really for safety concerns, it would have been closed immediately…

        • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 16:24
          -3

          Do some reading ffs. Here's just one of many decent summaries:

          https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/destinations/ocean…

      • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 11:56

        Did you have to look up how to spell those words on wokeleftist.com?

        • miicah on 21/10/2019 - 11:58
          +3

          Because caring about other cultures is so 'woke' right?

          • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 12:00
            +2

            @miicah: Yes, but I shouldn't really tell you because it's secret women's business.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindmarsh_Island_bridge_contro…

          • ThithLord on 21/10/2019 - 12:30
            +1

            @miicah: I love how showing compassion for anyone outside of my immediate circle is branded leftist, lmao. They’re cute, aren't they, Miicah?

            • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 12:47
              +1

              @ThithLord: I love any post about prices to fly to Ayers Rock. It always descends into hand-wringing identity politics so easily. To stay on topic, it's a good deal.

              • ThithLord on 21/10/2019 - 13:16
                -2

                @Daabido: It’s called Uluru. Why be intentionally disrespectful?

                • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 13:30
                  +1

                  @ThithLord: "Ayers Rock was the most widely used name until 1993, when the rock was officially renamed Ayers Rock / Uluru – the first feature in the Northern Territory to be given dual names. … That means you can use either Uluru or Ayers Rock to refer to the rock. However, in the national park we always use the original name: Uluru."

                  https://parksaustralia.gov.au/uluru/about/ayers-rock-or-ulur…

                  I don't reside in the national park, so I can call it what I want.

            • entropysbane on 21/10/2019 - 13:27
              +1

              @ThithLord: Is it actually compassion, or a debating tactic aimed at delegitimizing the culture and opinion of those opposed?

          • HighAndDry on 21/10/2019 - 12:52

            @miicah: Caring is fine. Restricting what others can do because of sky fairies, wherever the denomination? Yes.

            • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 13:06
              +1

              @HighAndDry: It's not just "sky fairies" as you ignorantly claim - there are very practical matters driving this as well.

              You sound like one of those guys that trample over others, but if anyone dared to inadvertently crush a chrysanthemum in your garden would scream breach of your human rights.

            • [Deactivated] on 22/10/2019 - 22:17
              -1

              @HighAndDry: It's a simple matter of rights pal. You expect to have rights over your land and property but seek to deny the same for others. Hypocrisy and ignorance - certainly, underlying racism - probably. There are restrictions on what people can and can't do in every part of this country (esp in tourism) but for some reason (often ignorance, just as often covert racism) you and your ilk only want to focus on one tiny group. Try venturing onto mining company leases and see how you go.

  • Stinge Master on 21/10/2019 - 11:25
    +21

    I'll get more of a rush climbing it after the ban is in place cheers

    • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 12:32
      +3

      Such a tough-guy keyboard you have there…

      • jv on 21/10/2019 - 13:25
        +4

        i got scared just looking at his gravatar…

      • Stinge Master on 21/10/2019 - 15:34

        It's hello kitty… You like it? And @jv did you just assume my gender…I identify as a genderless Avocado thanks

  • pjm on 21/10/2019 - 11:42
    +3

    This Saturday (26th October) is the last date you can climb the rock, they are removing the chain walkway from the 28th.

    No rock to climb = no reason to go there.

    • cnut on 21/10/2019 - 11:44
      +3

      You can still go to see a big rock in the middle of the desert for only $156.

      • pjm on 21/10/2019 - 11:45
        +3

        I can see it just fine on google photos for free, other than that there is just hot/dry desert and lots of red dust to breath. No thanks.

        • josepet on 21/10/2019 - 11:51
          +7

          And flies. Don't forget the f*ing flies.

      • jv on 21/10/2019 - 11:53
        +3

        You can still go to see a big rock in the middle of the desert

        If I just want to see it, I'll use Google Images…

      • ziggy1312 on 21/10/2019 - 17:30

        no its another $30 something to actually go to the rock :) 3day pass

    • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 12:30
      -2

      No it's not.

      Last day is the 25/10. No climbing from and including 26/10.

      And tourism will continue to kick on there anyway.
      Until they introduced the ban hardly anyone climbed it in any case.

      Reality is the rock is owned by the local indigenous community, with a lease-back. There were always conditions to potentially restrict the climb, and several have been met. If you've got a problem with that then tell me where your house is so i can climb on that whether you like it or not.

      There have been other issues with the climbing. People are having a dump at the top, causing the whole site to get polluted so they can't drink the water even if they wanted to. It's also driving a scar into the rock itself. If you're ok with that then send me your mother's ashes so i can dump in that as well. Your culture won't like that, so if you expect me to have any respect for it you should respect the local indigenous clans culture as well.

      Cue racist jerks…

      • cnut on 21/10/2019 - 13:42
        +4

        I get where you’re coming from, but your hyperboles are pretty stupid.

  • Manny Calavera on 21/10/2019 - 11:51

    If you wanted somewhere to stay while you climbed, you would have had to book your room two months ago.

    • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 12:03

      I hear that the VentraIP Tesla Time Machine will take you back to 1955.

      • Manny Calavera on 21/10/2019 - 12:56
        +1

        Beauty! The airstrip was at the rock base back then.

  • Froot Loops on 21/10/2019 - 12:05
    +1

    Prices will remain cheaper now there is the ban. They will lose alittle bit of tourism as a result

  • Almost Banned on 21/10/2019 - 12:07
    +4

    If you want to climb the world's largest monolith you can still do it
    https://parks.dpaw.wa.gov.au/park/mount-augustus

    • entropysbane on 21/10/2019 - 13:30
      +1

      I’ve been there. It’s just a big hill.

      • Almost Banned on 21/10/2019 - 13:31
        +1

        Yep - but its a LOT bigger than that other rock.

  • mtfranklin on 21/10/2019 - 12:29
    +9

    The Uluru is beautiful and magnificent, you don't have to climb and pee on it to appreciate its beauty. There are no designated toilets on top of the rock, and most tourists who do climb answer the nature's call on top of what is a sacred site to the traditional owners of that land. How would you react when moronic tourists, climb your religious / sacred sites like a Church/ mosque or even Gallipoli and shit on it.

    The base walk around the Uluru is 10KM and will take you 3hrs to complete the walk if you are fit enough, it is bigger that you think and good luck capturing all that magnificence on a photograph usually taken from 5KM away.

    • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 12:50
      +1

      Or take a segway!

      • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 12:52

        South Park Jesus and The Phantom don't need a Segway. That would be a pretty cool way though. Thanks.

        • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 12:59
          +1

          It's possible that The Phantom is booked to go to the rock very soon, and if the segway path wasn't so expensive would probably use them.

          Climbing is an interesting though - when i was a kid it was almost a right of passage to take a bus trip to the rock and climb it. But i'm cool with the ban, and i'm surprised they didn't hit it earlier.

          • Daabido on 21/10/2019 - 13:09

            @[Deactivated]: I'm neither here not there, but I am glad that alternatives (like Segwaying) have been introduced. Hopefully there is no downturn, for the sake of those who work there or benefit from the tourism.

            • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 13:14
              +2

              @Daabido: The management plan mentions three independent bases for the climbing ban, one being that the Board "is satisfied that adequate new visitor experiences have been successfully established".

              My take is they waited for a suite of tourist options to get well established before introducing the ban.

    • HighAndDry on 21/10/2019 - 12:54
      -1

      you don't have to climb and pee on it to appreciate its beauty

      This applies to a lot of things. You don't have to ski to appreciate Perisher. Ban skiing there and see how it fares as a tourist destination.

    • justtoreply on 21/10/2019 - 13:03

      If it took 3 hours and I didn't make it clear that I expect tourists to follow a "shit in your handbag" policy, I'd probably say "fair enough"

      The poo should not be a gamechanger because it can be dealt with responsibly. I don't leave turds/wee from my toilet training kids wherever I go.

      Native title and safety issues.. that's another matter.

    • justtoreply on 21/10/2019 - 13:09

      Not trying to be an ass here, but I presume 10,000 years ago, people still answered nature's call all over the rock. We shouldn't be doing it as a mark of respect, but it's not as though it never happened before white people.

      • Maverick-au on 21/10/2019 - 13:21
        +5

        Hush, don't dare to use logic when you have so many snowflakes waiting in the shadows to be offended!

        They could easily get around that issue by placing a few portable toilets at the top and charge you $10 to cover costs.

        • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 16:49
          -1

          An IQ test at the park entrance would be simpler.

      • [Deactivated] on 21/10/2019 - 16:41

        Yes but we do it far "better". Read any of the "outback" 4WD and camping/touring websites and you might be surprised at just how filthy some travellers are in their own country.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join