This was posted 13 years 6 months 16 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

16bg Class10 Elite Pro SDHC Cards Bonanza $19.95 + $6.95 shipping- 32GB $44.75 - 64GB $79.95

35
16bg Class10 Elite Pro SDHC Cards Bonanza $19.95 + $6.95 shipping- 32GB $44.75 - 64GB $79.95
Go to Deal
Ljd4free on 07/06/2011 - 00:42 zazz.com.au (402 clicks)
Last edited 07/06/2011 - 00:52

16bg $19.95
32GB $44.75
64GB $79.95
Shipping for first unit: $6.95 anywhere in Australia
Shipping for additional units: just $2.00 extra per unit

Class10 SDHC Cards Bonanza
The fastest class SD cards on the planet
''A Class Above''
Specifications:

16GB / 32GB / 64GB capacity
Complies with SD card specification standards
Operating Temperature: -25º C to 85 º C
Storage Temperature: -40º C to 85º C
Write protection switch
Data transfer rate of greater than 66x or 12 Megabytes per second
Asymmetrically shaped to ensure the card is not inserted upside down
8 Pin connection
Operating voltage – 2.7 to 3.3 volts

Testing Notes:

With any hard drive (including SD cards), 1GB = 1000MB, not 1024MB (which is actually what a GB is), this means that 32GB is actually 32000MB which is 31.25GB (according to the system).

Card 1 (16GB):
Warning: Only 1024 of 15856 MByte tested.
Test finished without errors.
Writing speed: 12.1 MByte/s
Reading speed: 16.7 MByte/s

Card 2 (32GB):
Warning: Only 1024 of 31643 MByte tested.
Test finished without errors.
Writing speed: 13.9 MByte/s
Reading speed: 17.8 MByte/s

Card 3 (64GB):
Warning: Only 1024 of 63339 MByte tested.
Test finished without errors.
Writing speed: 12.7 MByte/s
Reading speed: 17.7 MByte/s

Shipping Options:

Delivery is just $6.95 for the first unit, anywhere in Australia
Order additional units for only $2 more postage/handling
Limit 5 per member

Warranty:12 months from Zazz

Electrical & Electronics

Related Stores

Zazz
Zazz

closed Comments

  • inertia on 07/06/2011 - 00:57
    +19

    32GB $44.55 with Free shipping at greenbox.

    http://staticice.com.au/cgi-bin/search.cgi?q=32GB+class+10+S…

    Not an amazing bargain, hardly seems like a bargain at all?

    • inertia on 07/06/2011 - 03:41
      +17

      Lol, what is the world coming to when I link the product CHEAPER, and I get down-voted??!

      I guess I should really apologise for doing everyone a favour…

      • ferndale on 07/06/2011 - 07:31
        +4

        inertia: you got my +ve vote, thanks for saving my money, I was about to order 2 of these 32gb cards from Zazz.

  • uraha on 07/06/2011 - 00:59

    never heard of this brand, what chip does it use?

  • jd4free on 07/06/2011 - 01:20

    Not sure what chip is used inside, can't seem to find info on it,but noticed it mentions that:
    "These SD cards are made in the same factories as all those bigger brands that you know and love.
    The companies spend mega bucks building their brand image and brand equity which little guys like Elite Pro Don't need to worry about" I have had a bad run of cheap memory cards lately, oils aint oils so it seems.

    Anyone out there got any feedback for the cheaper A-RAM memory cards ?
    anyone possibly with some R/W speeds ? thanks

    • uraha on 07/06/2011 - 01:35
      +1

      same factory as the big factory means nothing, foxconn build products for so many companies.

      thanks for the info

  • shaun-o on 07/06/2011 - 06:50
    +4

    I'd never risk keeping photos on a dodgy no-name brand SD.

    • jcsantos on 07/06/2011 - 09:32

      Agree with this one

  • theguru1 on 07/06/2011 - 08:50
    +3

    Why do they only test 1024 MB?

    • JayM on 07/06/2011 - 09:05
      +3

      Because the rest of the MB doesn't really exist? :)

  • cameldownunder on 07/06/2011 - 09:57

    WHAT THE ….

    "Testing Notes:
    Card 1 (16GB):
    Warning: Only 1024 of 15856 MByte tested.
    Test finished without errors. Writing speed: 12.1 MByte/s Reading speed: 16.7 MByte/s"

    Why on earth would you test only the first 1GB and not the whole card?
    Maybe because the only difference between the cards is the sticker on them and they are all 1GB cards????
    To test the 16BG that would have been 20 mins, with the speed indicated

    Card 2 (32GB):
    Warning: Only 1024 of 31643 MByte tested. Test finished without errors. Writing speed: 13.9 MByte/s Reading speed: 17.8 MByte/s

    Card 3 (64GB):
    Warning: Only 1024 of 63339 MByte tested. Test finished without errors. Writing speed: 12.7 MByte/s Reading speed: 17.7 MByte/s

    • Rumbaar on 07/06/2011 - 11:00
      +2

      The program only does the write/read test on the first part of the card. There isn't any difference in speeds like a HDD from the start of end of the drive, so why test the speeds of the whole card?

      A silly reason to negative. Only valid is the price of the 32GB cards compared to other linked supplier.

      • theguru1 on 07/06/2011 - 11:57

        "There isn't any difference in speeds like a HDD from the start of end of the drive,"

        Unless this has changed with recent drives, HDD's can be up to 2x faster at the start of the drive compared to the end. Being different technologies I don't really see the comparison apart from both being storage.

        • Hintswen on 07/06/2011 - 12:36
          +1

          HDD Speeds vary from the start to finish because they use round platters that spin, data is stores from the outside inwards, so revolution of the platter has more space on the outside edge than the inside edge. SD cards on the other hand don't have spinning platters and don;t suffer from this problem.

      • stumo on 07/06/2011 - 14:04

        Those look like h2testw results, in which case you can test the whole card. The whole point of which is to test the whole card to make sure it isn't a rebadged 1GB card.

        Therefore this looks suspicious, I mean if you were selling these and posting the results, why not leave it for half an hour to do the full test? Unless you had something to hide.

    • SomeGuyOnOzB on 07/06/2011 - 11:02
      +1

      If I remember this correctly, when you first start writing to a blank formatted card the speed can be really good. As the card fills up though, if tested properly, speed goes down.

      That test sounds lacking.

      • Rumbaar on 07/06/2011 - 11:35
        +1

        Speed will only be affected by fragmentation of available space, to increase non-linear writes to the card. If you write 'in order' it will not be affected by the contents of the card or if you were writing at the start or end of the card.

        • stumo on 07/06/2011 - 14:03
          -1

          Lookup "erase write". That will effect the write speed of flash no end. That's what we're talking about.

        • SomeGuyOnOzB on 07/06/2011 - 14:10

          Sorry, yes, both Rumbaar and Stumo are right.

          A great big sequential write should show maximal speeds.

          However, an erase write test can produce very different results to a sequential write test.

          If the card is filled up gradually, with files being erased along the way (eg if one were using the card to store files or photos you might erase images here and there), then an erase write test might be better to show what the card will do in practice, for you.

        • stumo on 07/06/2011 - 14:24

          That's right foundit. Its another good reason why you should run a full h2testw on the whole card first, then run benchmarks after that.

  • Look Up on 07/06/2011 - 11:11
    +1

    It's risky enough these days to buy branded flash from online retailers.

    Buying no name flash from a cheap deal of the day website is asking for trouble.

    And zazz, the SDHC format only supports max 32gig so the 64gig is either fake or SDXC.

    • g12345567 on 07/06/2011 - 11:53

      Agree. Capacities above 32gb are called SDXC Not SDHC.

      Not a very good deal for a first post.

      If you are going to test these cards why not test the hole card, to verify that these cards match the stated speeds and capacity.

      As for class 10? How do we know these are actually class 10 cards. All I can see is High Speed written on them. Most other manufacturers have the class number and/or speed clearly written on there cards.

      I'd rather spend a bit more and get the genuine Sandisk SDHC cards from other Ozbargain deals, than these no name cards.

  • katsuya on 07/06/2011 - 16:28

    Many times i see a Zazz product, the warranty is done through Zazz themselves, which makes me to believe that Zazz simply imports those items so they get extra margins on them.
    Brand? always no brand.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join