This was posted 5 years 6 months 7 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Samsung Tab A 10.1" (2019) Tablet $279 + Delivery (Free C&C) @ The Good Guys eBay

900
Samsung Tab A 10.1" (2019) Tablet $279 + Delivery (Free C&C) @ The Good Guys eBay
Go to Deal
Cashback
LBrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 21:30 ebay.com.au (3089 clicks)
Last edited 16/06/2019 - 21:34 by 1 other user
PGOODGUYS

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1" (2019) $279 @GOODGUYS eBay
20% Good Guys Ebay: Original 20% off The Good Guys on eBay Deal Post
Product Specs: Item specifics
Condition:
Brand New: A brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging (where packaging is … Read more
Brand: Samsung
MPN: SM-T510NZKDXSA RAM: 2 GB
Manufacturer's Warranty: 24 Months Storage Capacity: 32 GB
Maximum Expandable Memory: Up to 512GB Features: Built-In Rear Camera, Integrated Speakers, Built-In Front Camera
Display Resolution: 1920x1200 (WUXGA) Screen Size: 10.1 in
Memory Expansion: Micro SD Type: Tablet
GPS: Yes Colour: Black
Processor model: Exynos 7904A Processor: Octa Core
Storage Size: 32GB Operating System: Android
What's In The Box: Tablet, Travel Adaptor, Data cable, Recycling bag, Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Rear Camera: 8.0MP CMOS, Auto Focus & F1.9 Processor Speed: 1.60 GHz, 1.80 GHz
Processor Cores: Octa Core Hardware Connectivity: Bluetooth, USB 2.0
RAM Size: 2GB RAM Internet Connectivity: Wi-Fi
Weight (g): 470 Manufacturer Colour: Black
Front Camera: 5.0MP CMOS, F2.2 Connection Ports: USB Type C 2.0 x1, Micro SD, 3.5mm Audio Jack

FYI: First Time poster so any feedback welcome

Computing 10.1inch Samsung Tablet Android

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
The Good Guys
The Good Guys

closed Comments

  • BrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 21:32
    +1

    Hi guys, never really used OW Pricebeat but would i be able to show this deal in store and get 5% off, thanks for your help :)

    • Kazerui on 16/06/2019 - 21:35
      +4

      If OW is higher than $349.00, then they'll beat that by 5%. Not the $279

    • MrChadley on 16/06/2019 - 21:35
      +2

      Probably not with the 20% discount, just off the normal price. Might be possible though

    • otter-raptor on 16/06/2019 - 21:36
      +4

      Ow doesn't do price match on eBay coupons , just listed price

      • BrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 21:43

        Thanks guys, looks like ill be paying 279

  • Xizor on 16/06/2019 - 21:56
    +4

    It's quite remarkable my Galaxy Note 10.1 2014, a 5 year old tablet, in many ways is much the same as this. Better in some too.

    • BrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 22:16

      In some ways im intrigued but also I dont want to know so i dont regret my purchase lol

    • serpserpserp on 16/06/2019 - 22:18
      +14

      Remarkably, it was probably more expensive at the time too.

      • Xizor on 16/06/2019 - 22:35

        True, it was $400ish on a deal.

        • [Deactivated] on 16/06/2019 - 22:59
          +2

          Then you should really compare it with Tab S5E which comes with 4G RAM.

    • DadBangr on 16/06/2019 - 23:08
      +3

      Still rocking my note 10.1 2014 too and was thinking the exact same thing! These specs are not much better than a 5 year old model.

  • shrewduser on 16/06/2019 - 22:26

    does it support s-pen?

    • BW296 on 16/06/2019 - 22:32
      +1

      Nope

  • harryzee on 16/06/2019 - 22:32
    +1

    How does this compare? Same price but bigger screen and 3GB ram

    https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/NEW-Samsung-SM-T590NZAAXSA-Galax…

    • Bigboomboom on 16/06/2019 - 22:44
      +5

      Surprisingly reviews said the 10.1 with 2GB RAM run much smoother than 10.5 with 3GB RAM, thanks to newer OS (Pie) and better SoC (Exynos 7904 vs SD 450).

      • harryzee on 16/06/2019 - 22:55
        +2

        what to do? first world problems.

    • BrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 22:51
      +3

      The main features are that the 2019 model (2gb RAM) has full metal body and newer android os

      • [Deactivated] on 16/06/2019 - 23:38
        +4

        Tab A 10.5 (2018) is receiving Pie Update, though. Source.

  • ash2000 on 16/06/2019 - 22:34

    2GB RAM ….yikes!

  • [Deactivated] on 16/06/2019 - 22:41

    Just retired my nearly 5yo galaxy tab S
    It has 3gb ram.

    • BrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 22:52
      +2

      The software has improved, programs require less memory when they are refined more efficiently

    • pancaeks on 16/06/2019 - 22:58

      Thinking about retiring mine soon too… What was your replacement?

      • [Deactivated] on 17/06/2019 - 07:33

        Just an old iPad at the moment, until I work out what I want.
        I might go for the S5e as it’s ~$530 at the Samsung Edu shop. But I’m still not convinced.

        It was a forced retirement, it keeps powering off. I re-flashed it & I can’t even complete the setup :-(

        • pancaeks on 17/06/2019 - 07:36

          Yeah mine will be a forced retirement too… I only use the thing for reddit and youtube and it's still trying to kill itself :(
          The S5e sounds like a decent option but I heard the S5 might be released in a few months?

        • Homr on 17/06/2019 - 12:48

          My mum's tab S is heading towards retirement, the battery won't hold

          Looking and waiting patiently for a replacement for a decent price. The s5e seems like an ideal replacement but I'm worried about the wifi issue.

        • lomo on 17/06/2019 - 16:01

          I'm thinking of getting the S5e as its so light and thin. only downsides are theres no headphone jack and apparently your hand shields the wifi antenna on the top left when in landscape mode. havent had chance to try in shop yet to see how bad this really is

    • [Deactivated] on 16/06/2019 - 23:05

      Galaxy Tab S 10.5 was about $599 when it was launched in Australia. You should compare it with it with Galaxy Tab S5E or the upcoming S5.

      • GregMonarch on 16/06/2019 - 23:33

        Or drop Samsung entirely. Apart from the RAM and four year old specs, here's some other Samsung 'gems'… Copying apple by dropping the headphone socket when so many apple users complain about losing it; dropping Android for Windows 10 [gag!]; no 12" model while apple are obviously selling the ipad pro… Samsung's marketing AND R&D departments have lose the plot.

        • [Deactivated] on 16/06/2019 - 23:42
          +1

          Both Exynos 7904 (Tab A) and SD 670 (S5E) were released in this year. They aren't hardly 'four year old specs' and I am pretty sure LDDR4 wasn't around here 4 years ago either. Plus, Tab A has kept the headphone jack unlike so many Chinese brands, which makes this deal even sweater.

          • GregMonarch on 16/06/2019 - 23:52

            @[Deactivated]:

            They aren't hardly 'four year old specs'

            Oh, ok - others here suggested it was similar specs to 4 years ago.

            • elusive on 17/06/2019 - 00:09
              +2

              @GregMonarch: Those others were comparing a old high-end to a new budget model. You really need to either compare like for like or accept that getting the cheap model means you get "last gen"'s specs.

          • GregMonarch on 16/06/2019 - 23:54

            @[Deactivated]: Oh - and I was referring to changes to various models they've released - not necessarily only this one (as the Win 10 and 12" points illustrate).

      • [Deactivated] on 17/06/2019 - 07:58

        I only paid $490, which is about what this was when it was released.

        But my point was the 2gb of ram is pretty underwhelming, even for an entry level device in 2019, especially when you consider the mid-level 5yrs ago was 3gb.

        Of course if there wasn’t the large amount of bloatware Samsung attach, it mightn’t be so bad.

    • too_much_boost on 17/06/2019 - 08:21

      I still use my tab s as a daily media consumption device. Its a shame samsung don't support OS updates as the hardware in the original tab s is still very good, even by today's standards

      • overcoat on 17/06/2019 - 09:02

        I run LineageOS 14.1 on my Tab A 2016, see if it's available for your Tab S

        • xoom on 17/06/2019 - 12:45

          Im running lineageos on my tab s.

  • Lord Ra on 16/06/2019 - 22:52

    Can't decide between this or the s5e.

    • BrokeB-tch on 16/06/2019 - 22:53
      +1

      Depends on your use really, if just streaming content, internet browsing etc this should do just fine :)

      • Lord Ra on 19/06/2019 - 16:31

        Bought one!
        Edit: but from BingLee Ebay and paid $254.15!

  • SydneySurvivor on 16/06/2019 - 22:54

    Never buying a Samsung Tablet bloated slow pieces of garbage!

    • DadBangr on 16/06/2019 - 23:09
      +6

      Links or facts?

      • [Deactivated] on 17/06/2019 - 08:01
        +1

        If you own a Samsung device, look at all the default apps you can’t remove.
        You can disable, but they all get re-enable with the next update. Rooting & removing, or flashing with vanilla Android makes a big difference.

    • DannyBoy on 16/06/2019 - 23:35
      +2

      Totally agree but then again so are their phones. Personally the only Samsung tech I would spend money on would be a TV and maybe certain whitegoods

  • paloverde88 on 16/06/2019 - 23:19
    +3

    this one is a bit slow who even makes 2 gigs ram with 32 gigs memory for one UI in 2019 the value of this technology is $149 had it been Lenovo
    This tablet has nothing to write home about, and absolutely nothing going for it the lowest of the low low tech in America it will be sold in K mart, it will be help yourselves in a pile on the floor.
    GG and Jb are really good at putting glitter on poo

  • [Deactivated] on 16/06/2019 - 23:24
    +11

    I don't understand people complaining about RAM, especially those who have a Tab S tablet. This is Tab 'A'. A cheaper tablet. You should compare your S tablet with its direct successors such as S4 or even S5E.

    People choose a tablet based on their needs and budget.

    Tab A comes with a decent SoC (7904) and 2 year Australian warranty. It is good enough for many of us.
    And Come on guys, Lenovo is selling their Android tablet for $449 with 4gb RAM. However, it is slower than almost $200 cheaper Tab A 2019 because of its SoC (SD450). For those who don't want to gamble with imported Chinese tablets and just want to buy a tablet from Australian retailers for various reasons, there aren't many cheaper and decent alternatives.

    Plus, there is a 3GB RAM variant with 128gb internal memory available through TGG ebay store.

    • [Deactivated] on 17/06/2019 - 08:14

      Don’t get too excited. I’m just pointing out how underwhelming 2gb of ram is and that a mid-level 5yo tablet came with more. SO one would expect an entry level device 5yrs on would have at least the same.

      It’s like getting a windows device with 4gb ram. Sure it’ll run, but you might regret it in a year when it’s running slow. This is a great kids tablet (I’ve got a nearly 4yr 2gb TabA (t530) for one of my kids and it generally works well for them.

      The big plus for this is its sub $300, so you can write it off on your tax next month.

    • cakesyy on 17/06/2019 - 08:15
      -2

      People are complaining because 2gb is not enough for a tablet. Not that complicated.

  • mayor of bargaintown on 16/06/2019 - 23:58
    +2

    I got this Tablet with a Telstra bundle a few months back. While it obviously comes with a bit of their bloatware, its a pretty good tablet. I'd recommend for browsing and movies. Great for the kids, although as many others are saying, its not going to be amazing.

  • BrokeB-tch on 17/06/2019 - 01:13

    Hey Guys, whats the best deal for a microsd suitable for this tablet atm? Say 64gb or higher

  • Tea-Aholic on 17/06/2019 - 06:10
    +1

    If this puppy had an OLED display it would be a winner for content consumption.

  • cakesyy on 17/06/2019 - 08:14

    2gb ram, less than most phones, and a process from 2017.

    • eug on 17/06/2019 - 12:08
      +1

      How much RAM do you need to watch YouTube/Netflix and read your emails?

      Entry-level tablets like these weren't designed to be multitasking powerhouses like much more expensive tablets. They're for light use, and they do that job fine.

  • Austaurean on 17/06/2019 - 08:35

    My old Telstra branded 2012 Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 - 4G model is still going ok, slow, but ok..
    It seems as soon as the system update came out it killed it,
    like all updates it seems best to wait for user reports of what people do or don't like before updating…

    I would love to go back to the original software as it operated much quicker, no experience with flashing etc,
    and for the variant required on sammobile, you have to be a paid member unlike some of the other software.
    Usually 15 euro, but currently on special at 8.50 euro

    • Edwardrw on 17/06/2019 - 09:35

      if you go back to the original software, some apps might not work.

      • Austaurean on 17/06/2019 - 12:14

        Yes, so very true, but if it makes it more useable, then might be worth it, quite a few apps already dont work with it due to its age and android version.

  • Edwardrw on 17/06/2019 - 09:33
    +2

    It all depends on your purpose with a tablet.

    I had Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 which has better specifications than this. However, I replaced it to this model 3 weeks ago as 8.0 inch was a bit small.
    I was considering other tablets such as IPad 6 gen or Lenovo.

    The reason why I use a tablet is mainly for reading PDF files and watching Netflix or YouTube. I do not play games on a tablet or a mobile phone as I've got PS4 and Nintendo. It's got a perfect ratio to watch movies. So, this tablet was chosen among other options.

    No complaints with this tablet so far.

  • PukeyLuke on 17/06/2019 - 09:58
    +1

    I had the Samsung Tab A 2016, now I have the Tab S4, both tablets are great. A lot of people here complaining about the RAM on these Samsung devices.
    I've never had any RAM issues with either of these devices, nor have my child who plays games and uses drawing/painting apps.
    I'm not sure what people are doing to their tablets that are causing them so much RAM grief, but I/we have never had any issues.
    I'm considering buying this or the Tab A 2018 for my child to use. Samsung seems to have shown reluctant interest in introducing Android updates lately.
    My only complaint is the bloatware they install.

    • syousef on 17/06/2019 - 12:33

      No 4GB memory = No Fortnite

      • eug on 17/06/2019 - 13:50

        That's like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple-A titles.

        People buying cheap entry-level tablets wouldn't … or shouldn't be expecting to play high-requirement games on them.

        • syousef on 17/06/2019 - 20:26

          "nor have my child who plays games and uses drawing/painting apps.
          I'm not sure what people are doing to their tablets that are causing them so much RAM grief,"

          I answered his question. Nothing more. Fortnite is probably still the most popular game amongst school age kids at the moment. No idea why you then think it's ridiculous.

          Btw my daughter plays Fortnite on a Celeron from 2014 on low settings. So it's hardly top of the line when it comes to gaming.

          • eug on 18/06/2019 - 00:04

            @syousef:

            I answered his question. Nothing more.

            It would have helped if you specifically quoted the part you were responding to, and said more than just 5 words with no reasoning given.

            Fortnite is probably still the most popular game amongst school age kids at the moment. No idea why you then think it's ridiculous.

            Please point out where I said it was ridiculous.

            I said that people shouldn't be buying entry-level tablets to play high-requirement games.

            It's like buying an entry-level desktop to play Apex Legends and wondering why it isn't running properly.

            Btw my daughter plays Fortnite on a Celeron from 2014 on low settings. So it's hardly top of the line when it comes to gaming.

            Do keep in mind you're comparing running the same game on an entry-level tablet running on processor that's designed to use as little power as possible to a full-blown desktop CPU with no power budget that can happily draw 100 watts if it feels like it.

            • syousef on 18/06/2019 - 20:54

              @eug:

              It would have helped if you specifically quoted the part you were responding to, and said more than just 5 words with no reasoning given.

              I can't help it if you didn't bother reading the guy's 5 line post I wasn't responding to. It wasn't War and Peace mate.

              Do keep in mind you're comparing running the same game on an entry-level tablet running on processor that's designed to use as little power as possible to a full-blown desktop CPU with no power budget that can happily draw 100 watts if it feels like it.

              The entry level tablet likely draws similar wattage to the higher end tablet so this is completely irrelevant and may even use the same battery. My phone draws even less and plays Fortnite fine.

              And none of that is relevant to my response which was to the question of what you'd need more for.

              • eug on 18/06/2019 - 22:46
                -1

                @syousef:

                I can't help it if you didn't bother reading the guy's 5 line post I wasn't responding to.

                His post had many sentences. Your five-word reply would have different meanings depending on which sentence you're replying to. Only you know which specific sentence you were replying to - that is why people normally quote the specific line they're replying to.

                e.g. it could be read this way:

                He said (and this is the gist of it):

                A lot of people here complaining about the RAM on these Samsung devices.

                You said:

                No 4GB memory = No Fortnite

                So I said:

                That's like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple-A titles.
                People buying cheap entry-level tablets wouldn't … or shouldn't be expecting to play high-requirement games on them.

                If you went out and bought the cheapest HP desktop you could find, and your game runs terribly or not at all, would you blame HP or yourself for buying something blindly?

                I answered his question. Nothing more.

                Incidentally, he never actually asked a question.

                The entry level tablet likely draws similar wattage to the higher end tablet so this is completely irrelevant

                "Irrelevant" would be comparing a desktop computer with a desktop-class processor and GPU to an entry-level tablet with a mobile processor designed to sip power from a battery.

                And none of that is relevant to my response which was to the question of what you'd need more for.

                And going back to my point - if you quoted what you were responding to, your response would have made sense.

                Interestingly though, if you read through all the complaints about RAM, everyone seems more concerned about how smoothly the tablet runs on 2GB than being able to run Fortnite. Nobody else has mentioned Fortnite.

                • syousef on 19/06/2019 - 07:35
                  -1

                  @eug:

                  His post had many sentences.

                  I count 7. Which is a lot fewer than you just wrote. 7 is too many for you and 1 is too few. Perhaps you should consider changing your user name to goldilocks.

                  Incidentally, he never actually asked a question.

                  "I'm not sure what people are doing to their tablets that are causing them so much RAM grief, but I/we have never had any issues." may not have been phrased as a question, but anyone that bothered to actually read what I was replying to wouldn't be questioning what I was replying to.

                  Seriously, get over yourself. People aren't here to cater to you specifically. Someone else might complain that you quote too much, and might have complained if I had quoted. People aren't going to write messages the way you want them too. They aren't copies of you behind a keyboard. If you interact with people online it is obnoxious to go around telling them how they should word things just so that it is to your liking.

                  "Irrelevant" would be comparing a desktop computer with a desktop-class processor and GPU to an entry-level tablet with a mobile processor designed to sip power from a battery.

                  You made that relevant the moment you said "That's like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple-A titles" because an old entry level piece of PC gear is playing the game we are discussing. Fortnite's requirements aren't particularly high. Is the problem that I did not quote that sentence for you? Did I need to remind you of what you'd just said? Do you have a problem with memory that I should be aware of? Or perhaps with comprehension since you seem to be unable to relate a response to a piece of the text that is being responded to. I'm not just being flippant. I'm serious.

                  Otherwise I don't have any idea if you're trolling or if you seriously interact with people this way regularly but you sound really high maintenance.

                  Nobody else has mentioned Fortnite.

                  Which is why my 1 line response was contributing something new. Fortnite, in case you're living under a rock, is (or has recently been) an extremely popular game, especially with kids.

                  • eug on 19/06/2019 - 13:13
                    -1

                    @syousef:

                    I count 7. Which is a lot fewer than you just wrote.

                    Nice dodge.

                    People aren't going to write messages the way you want them too.

                    Sure. And looking at your initial 5-word reply with no context, people aren't going to read your posts the way you want them to.

                    You made that relevant the moment you said "That's like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple-A titles" because an old entry level piece of PC gear is playing the game we are discussing.

                    Right, I see the source of confusion there - you think Fortnite is a triple-A title while I don't consider it to be one. The definition can be fluid so I should have been clearer on that - I meant classic AAA games like PUBG, Apex Legends, GTA, and CoD where you need a beefy computer to have a good gaming experience.

                    Fortnite doesn't have high system requirements for a desktop compared to classic AAA games, so it's not surprising that it runs on a 5-year old computer.

                    Perhaps you should consider changing your user name to goldilocks.
                    Otherwise I don't have any idea if you're trolling or if you seriously interact with people this way regularly but you sound really high maintenance.

                    It's a pity you had to resort to personal insults. Discussions can be held without having to resort to childish tactics.

                    Which is why my 1 line response was contributing something new.

                    OK, that's one way to look at it. The other way is that people aren't really buying entry-level tablets to play high-requirement (for a mobile device) games.

                    • syousef on 19/06/2019 - 19:00
                      -2

                      @eug:

                      Nice dodge.

                      Dude, you're annoyed if I'm too brief, yet you won't read 7 lines of text.

                      people aren't going to read your posts the way you want them to.

                      That's right. You can choose to be a jerk to me, and I have no control over that. But I am going to point it out.

                      Right, I see the source of confusion there - you think Fortnite is a triple-A

                      So you complain about my reply being irrelevant when I bring up Fortnite and your response is about triple A games on PC?

                      Now you're trying to clarify that Fortnite is not a triple A game? Then why did you bring it up? Your entire response was clearly based on the premise that Fortnite was not meant to run on low end equipment and that I was foolish to expect it to.

                      I said

                      No 4GB memory = No Fortnite

                      You replied

                      That's like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple-A titles.
                      People buying cheap entry-level tablets wouldn't … or shouldn't be expecting to play high-requirement games on them.

                      There's nothing confusing here. Your implication here was clear. To recap:
                      - You brought up PCs then complained that I brought them up.
                      - You said I shouldn't expect Fortnite to run on lower end hardware and when I gave an example of it doing that, you called it irrelevant.
                      - Each time I show you how unreasonable you're being you shift the goal posts and revise what you've said, while calling my direct responses irrelevant.

                      It's a pity you had to resort to personal insults. Discussions can be held without having to resort to childish tactics.

                      So is your standard tactic to frustrate anyone arguing with you by gaslighting them and then accusing them of "childish attacks" when they respond? "Goldilocks" wasn't exactly a tirade of name calling, and as far as I'm concerned you absolutely deserved it.

                      I have to assume that you're trolling at this point.

                      • eug on 20/06/2019 - 23:19
                        -1

                        @syousef:

                        Dude, you're annoyed if I'm too brief, yet you won't read 7 lines of text.

                        Evidently you do not see that the 7 lines of text has more than just one sentence in it. Your five-word reply did not include a quote to show what exactly you were replying to, so it looked like simply a reply to the gist of the post.

                        That's right. You can choose to be a jerk to me, and I have no control over that. But I am going to point it out.

                        Once again, discussions can be had without resorting to childish insults.

                        So you complain about my reply being irrelevant when I bring up Fortnite and your response is about triple A games on PC?

                        It is called an analogy. Note how the sentence starts with "that's like". "That's like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple A titles."

                        i.e. saying an entry-level tablet cannot play Fortnite is like saying a cheap desktop cannot play triple A titles. It's not something that would be unexpected.

                        You then said your daughter can play Fortnite on a five-year old PC. Fortnite is not a classic triple A title which typically have higher system requirements - so it was not relevant to what I said. I never said you cannot play Fortnite on an old desktop PC - I said you cannot play triple A titles on a cheap (i.e. slow/low-spec) PC.

                        So is your standard tactic to frustrate anyone arguing with you by gaslighting them and then accusing them of "childish attacks" when they respond? "Goldilocks" wasn't exactly a tirade of name calling, and as far as I'm concerned you absolutely deserved it.

                        Childish attacks involve resorting to personal insults. Discussions can be held without having to go down to that level.

                        The crux of this discussion is that you do not agree that there is a possibility that your initial five-word response with no quoted context can be read many different ways. That is it. As long as you're of that opinion, this will go nowhere. So be it then.

                        • syousef on 21/06/2019 - 00:45

                          @eug:

                          Evidently you do not see that the 7 lines of text has more than just one sentence in it.

                          Evidently you resort to straw men.

                          Your five-word reply did not include a quote to show what exactly you were replying to, so it looked like simply a reply to the gist of the post.

                          I am not an English teacher and can't help you learn comprehension. You just won't admit that you didn't bother to read the context of my message before replying. Not my problem.

                          Once again, discussions can be had without resorting to childish insults.

                          There is nothing childish about calling you out for being a jerk towards me.

                          It is called an analogy.

                          Condescending too.

                          I see that when I say something about PCs it's "irrelevant" but if you wax lyrical with your analogies that's perfectly fine right? Unreasonable.

                          It's not something that would be unexpected.

                          I'm amazed at how much I'm suppose to infer from your replies, yet from me you demand absolute precision to the point of quoting exactly lines I'm replying to. You are being unreasonable.

                          Childish attacks involve resorting to personal insults. Discussions can be held without having to go down to that level.

                          All I can say is that you are either very easily offended or easily claim to be offended.

                          If you're so deeply wounded by someone mockingly suggesting you change your name to goldilocks, perhaps the Internet is not for you, eh? If you're going to be unreasonable expect to be called out on it.

                          And on and on it goes. Just be adult about it and admit you didn't bother to read the conversation you were replying to properly for goodness sake. Or don't. I don't care anymore. I'm completely bored with you.

                          • eug on 22/06/2019 - 15:10

                            @syousef:

                            I see that when I say something about PCs it's "irrelevant"

                            You were trying to counter my analogy with an irrelevant comment. I was talking about slow PCs running high-requirement games, you said you can run a low-requirement game on an old PC just fine.

                            I'm amazed at how much I'm suppose to infer from your replies

                            I'm amazed at how much I'm supposed to infer from your five-word contextless reply.

                            If you're so deeply wounded by someone mockingly suggesting you change your name to goldilocks,

                            Not sure how you inferred that I was "so deeply wounded". I just feel there is no need to stoop to childish tactics like name-calling when having a discussion.

                            And on and on it goes. Just be adult about it and admit you didn't bother to read the conversation you were replying to properly for goodness sake.

                            I did. You just do not agree that your five-word contextless reply can be read more than one way, because you did not quote the specific sentence you were replying to.

                            Please do yourself a favor and block me. You can do that by clicking the hide button under this post.

                            • syousef on 22/06/2019 - 17:04

                              @eug:

                              You were trying to counter my analogy with an irrelevant comment

                              Your analogy was relevant though? You don't even see the irony do you?

                              I'm amazed at how much I'm supposed to infer from your five-word contextless reply.

                              The context was 7 lines of text above that you couldn't be bothered reading.

                              Not sure how you inferred that I was "so deeply wounded". I just feel there is no need to stoop to childish tactics like name-calling when having a discussion.

                              Perhaps you repeatedly fixating on it, and complaining about personal attacks being childish implying that I'm being childish (which in itself is a personal attack)? Just maybe?

                              I did. You just do not agree that your five-word contextless reply…

                              My patience is running out. The context was above it. You couldn't be bothered with the context. You couldn't be bothered asking for clarification. If there was so little context, why did you not seek clarification before commenting? Is that my fault too?

                              Please do yourself a favor and block me. You can do that by clicking the hide button under this post.

                              You could easily do the same, but again you want to put the burden on me to do it. You engaged me. Take your own advice, if you wish. But do not expect me to comply with your absurd and unreasonable demands just because you wish it.

                              • eug on 22/06/2019 - 19:07

                                @syousef:

                                Your analogy was relevant though? You don't even see the irony do you?

                                Yes, because it was in response to your original reply.
                                Your followup was not an analogy. It was an example to counter my analogy, but it was inaccurate.

                                The context was 7 lines of text above that you couldn't be bothered reading.

                                As I said earlier, your short reply can mean different things depending on which particular sentence you're replying to. Not providing that context leaves it up to the reader to decide.

                                Perhaps you repeatedly fixating on it, and complaining about personal attacks being childish implying that I'm being childish (which in itself is a personal attack)? Just maybe?

                                You do realise I only mention it because you continue to do it, right?

                                You could easily do the same, but again you want to put the burden on me to do it.

                                I could, but this discussion seems to have riled you up a lot more than me, judging from the angry tone of your responses. Life is too short for arguments online, so simply blocking me would save us both some time.

                                But do not expect me to comply with your absurd and unreasonable demands just because you wish it.

                                Alright, don't block me then. Have a good weekend anyway. There are plenty of good eBay deals at the moment. Hopefully the next time we cross paths will be under more cordial circumstances.

  • t_c on 17/06/2019 - 10:05

    Can it run Chrome?

    • Lord Ra on 19/06/2019 - 16:30

      Can it run…?

  • PukeyLuke on 17/06/2019 - 10:18
    +2

    For anyone considering the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 4G.
    Telstra has it on a 24 month plan with 10GB data and $20 monthly, that's only $480 over the life of the plan.
    Or you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 cellular 4G model on eBay The Good Guys 20% off sale right now is $349 inc postage.
    Or for an extra $130 over 2 years you can get a great travelling companion with an adequate amount of data for your commute to work or going on holidays etc.

  • hooray on 17/06/2019 - 10:38

    oh Please Google bring out a 2019 Nexus 7

  • azshade on 17/06/2019 - 11:01
    +2

    Is there a reason to not just get the Tab A 10.5"?

    It's bigger, it has an extra gig of ram. It's got a few compromises, such as a plastic body in places… But hey I think it's a good trade off.

    Oh and to be clear, it's the same price.

  • kennyboi on 17/06/2019 - 12:20
    +7

    Cheaper with the Bing Lee deal on Ebay #163663584732. Listed $299 and use PRIORITY10 = $269.10

    • Benatron on 17/06/2019 - 17:06

      Bugger bought this morning from GG.
      Already got click and collect confirmation but haven't picked up yet.
      Worth refunding and buying through BL? How easy to refund/cancel first order?

  • N1shant on 17/06/2019 - 12:27

    So should I buy this or wait for something else?

    • Edwardrw on 17/06/2019 - 12:30
      +2

      If you wanna buy this, get this. It is under 300. So, you can claim it in your tax return anyway.

      • N1shant on 17/06/2019 - 12:32

        Sweet ;)

      • BrokeB-tch on 17/06/2019 - 14:17

        If you don’t mind me asking what’s this everyone is talking abt claiming it on their tax bcos it’s less than 300?

        • Edwardrw on 17/06/2019 - 15:17

          If you work, you can claim work-related expense as a deduction. If the expense is less than 300 dollar, you do not need to present a written form evidence.

          See here: https://www.ato.gov.au/Individuals/Tax-return/2018/Tax-retur…

          You need to link this purchase to your work.

          • bort on 17/06/2019 - 21:12
            +1

            @Edwardrw: under 300 you can write it off rather than depreciate it over its useful life.(assuming is is purchased for work related purposes)

            you should get a receipt if you buy one of these so you have written evidence ….

            • OzBestDeal on 18/06/2019 - 09:45

              @bort: From past experiences, the receipt will show full amount (>$300), so it need to be depreciated

  • ady211 on 17/06/2019 - 15:51

    Bought from Binglee 10.1.

  • ravin321 on 17/06/2019 - 18:06

    Would this tablet be good as for Onenote and PDFs, using a stylus to highlight and draw etc?

    • belongsinforums on 17/06/2019 - 18:19

      No. You need one with pen support

      • ravin321 on 18/06/2019 - 12:37

        thanks mate

  • BrokeB-tch on 17/06/2019 - 23:21

    Hey Guys so just plugged in my portable HDD and it works to play movies tv shows etc!! I was told by a samsung rep that this would not be possible, useless baffoons. Imo this makes it so much better for my desired uses

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join