Marketplace
PLUGIT20
Was looking for a new headset this seemed a good deal $129 elsewhere
Razer MEKA D.Va Analog Gaming Headset $78.40 Delivered @ Treasure PC eBay
50
Related Stores
closed Comments
Possibly worst looking headset ever?
Hahahahaha, yeah you got me there
"Wasp..this is Ant Man…Wasp?…Wasp?"
please change your profile pic to you wearing this headset when you get it
absolutely
To all budget gamers, get the Koss UR40
Not impressed with Koss's gaming headset range. I'd get a separate mic if its not a dealbreaker.
Personally for budget I’d reccomend a standard gaming style headset from a reputable brand. Buying a pair of proper audio headphones and a seperate mic would probably be for people looking to be more serious with their sound as it takes away the convenience in exchange for quality, not to mention it can be a bit more expensive and this isn’t a viable thing to do if your purpose is for use on a console.
@DecoAus: Ideally you want to use an audiophile headphone that has a detachable cable. You'd then want to change to a Vmoda BoomPro Mic. However, that would be much more expensive.
Massdrop Koss Porta Pro is a great option for those happy with an on-ear design.
What Voltron wears when he games.
There's a weird warning on the official razer website for these
"WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including diethylhexyl phthalate(DEHP), which is known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov"
This is a warning that is on millions of products sold in the US. I export Steel products from China to the US and have to have this on every bit of packaging.
I see that warning everywhere. California thinking everything will cause cancer apparently.
Europe banned this compound because it causes cancer.
The USA and Australia are happy allowing higher corporate profits in exchange for people contracting cancer at low rates because they're oligarchies (run by the wealthy to benefit the wealthy at the expense of everyone else).
I see you are on the side of causing higher rates of cancer after California responsibly informed you about it.
Of course no one (including myself) want to encourage any form of cancer. It may just be how it's worded that makes the warning seem "weird".
The >wierd warning
is informing you that that you will contract cancer at low rates if you use this product.
Wonder how the State of California hid this information from other states for so long…
I offered $20, they wouldn’t budge.