This was posted 6 years 7 months 11 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Dell S2417DG 165hz 1440p G-SYNC 24" Monitor $515.41 Shipped @ Dell Australia

230
Dell S2417DG 165hz 1440p G-SYNC 24" Monitor $515.41 Shipped @ Dell AustraliaAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
exit on 13/04/2018 - 18:54 dell.com (1075 clicks)
Last edited 13/04/2018 - 19:25
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Great deal. Looks like it's the cheapest it has ever been. Also almost $100 less than the popular deal recently on the 27inch version. Previous local deal on this monitor was $680

DESCRIPTION:
Premium visuals fit for a champion.
Experience gaming like never before with professional NVIDIA® G-SyncTM technology and our fastest refresh rate available.
Supreme performance: NVIDIA® G-SyncTM , rapid 1ms response time, and QHD resolution ensure clear graphics even in the heat of battle.
See the difference: The possibilities are amazing with options for multiple monitors to craft your ideal gaming setup.
Get comfortable. Game longer: Easily maneuver your monitor, swap between systems, and set your sights on a marathon gaming session with a flicker-free screen.

Overview

Supreme performance. Superior gameplay.
Game like the pros with high-performance visuals.
    Undistorted graphics: No matter how fast you’re moving, you’ll be able to see gameplay with crisp clarity thanks to the fastest refresh rate (165 Hz) and NVIDIA® G-SyncTM. No screen tearing, no stuttering and no ghost images means there is nothing to get in the way of your performance.
    Responsive and on-point: There’s no place for lag in a boss fight. Experience swift and real-time gameplay with a rapid, 1-millisecond panel response time
    Double the pixels. Enhance your experience: Picture every detail in stunning clarity with QHD (2560x1440) resolution. A stellar 3.68 million pixels – nearly twice as many as Full HD – means that you see the game as developers intended.
Panoramic perfection.
The ultrathin bezel lets you enjoy a seamless dual or multi-monitor setup for your battle station. And with the power to customize your settings or delve into 3D, you get an ultimate, tailor-made gaming experience.

Get gaming faster:Preset modes for RPG, FPS or RTS let you find the optimal visual setting and customize with a click. Plus, with such an easy setup, you can spend more time gaming and less time reconfiguring your settings.
Get comfortable. Game longer.
All-night gaming sessions can be stressful, but with these convenient and thoughtful designs, you can get comfortable and game to your true potential.
    Exactly how you like it: Tilt, pivot, swivel and adjust your monitor to just the right position for ergonomic comfort and enhanced game play.
    Keep your eyes on the prize: A flicker-free screen optimizes eye comfort so you can keep gaming and keep winning.
    Convenient switching: Changing between systems is now easier than ever. The wide range of connectivity ports lets you switch from PC gaming to your secondary gaming console without rearranging your cords.
Computing 24inch Computer Peripheral Dell LCD Monitor

Related Stores

Dell
Dell

closed Comments

  • Detective Pikachu on 13/04/2018 - 18:56
    +1

    Other than screen size, how does this compare with something like the ASUS PG279Q?

    • exit on 13/04/2018 - 18:58
      +1

      That has IPS panel instead of TN. That's really it.

      Btw, the Acer Xb271HU is equivalent to PG279q but with better quality control AFAIK and that goes for ~$800 during ebay sales.

    • airal3rt on 13/04/2018 - 19:27
      +3

      TN panels have improved over the years, but saying they're a poor man's IPS doesn't do the disparity justice. TN is a homeless degenerate crack addict's IPS.

      If you're spending more than two or three hundred dollars on a monitor, pony up a little extra for the enhanced viewing experience of IPS.

      • ManWithTwoCats on 13/04/2018 - 19:51
        -1

        Pony up a little extra for better car like Ferrari for enhanced experience.

        • airal3rt on 13/04/2018 - 20:12
          +2

          Pony up a little extra for mains water rather than drinking out of dirty puddles in the gutter. Nice reductionist logic though.

      • lostn on 13/04/2018 - 19:53
        +4

        This is a gaming monitor.

        Competitive gamers will give up the nicer viewing experience for shortened response time and higher hz. Getting advantages is better than it looking nice, if you play serious multiplayer.

        • airal3rt on 13/04/2018 - 20:15
          +1

          165hz = 165hz.

          Are you saying the PG279Q isn't a gaming monitor when I've owned both?

          If you're at the point where 1ms vs 4ms makes a difference, you're a heavily sponsored pro gamer who has their monitors stipulated under a sponsorship agreement. Don't get defensive if you spent your own money on a TN panel.

        • exit on 13/04/2018 - 20:35
          -5

          @airal3rt: What you're saying is valid but no doubt TN is better if you don't care about looks and play to win. If I wanted graphics to look nice, I'll go outside instead of playing games.

        • Xizor on 13/04/2018 - 20:49
          +3

          @shot: By that logic just lower the rez and turn everything off…. bugger that! Smooth, responsive, and pretty. Have it all. Just like a good woman!

        • Diji1 on 13/04/2018 - 20:57

          @airal3rt: >If you're at the point where 1ms vs 4ms makes a difference, you're a heavily sponsored pro gamer

          You clearly do not understand blur and how it affects competitive FPS games.

          I own an IPS and a 240hz TN. Guess which one is better for competitive FPS games.

        • theHMASfriendship on 13/04/2018 - 21:06
          +2

          No this is Ozbargain

        • FabMan on 14/04/2018 - 08:18

          @Diji1: Does your IPS monitor refresh at 165hz with a response time close to 4ms? If so, when you reduce your TN to 165hz do you notice a significant difference between the two regarding performance? If your IPS isn't 165hz, or the TN isn't reduced to 165hz for a comparison then your point is mute for the sake of this discussion.

          The poster above recommended spending more to go from a 2560x1440 @ 165hz TN with 1ms response time to 2560x1440 @ 165hz IPS with 4ms response time, which is a very reasonable point as you'd get the same resolution, same refresh rate, slightly lower response time but significantly higher image quality.

          Response time is important for twitch gaming, especially for professional gamers in LAN environments, however if you are using an Internet connection you already have increase in response times, on top of the response times inherent from the keyboard/mouse, the additional response time from TN to IPS is barely noticeable.

          Of course, do people think the additional $380ish is worth it for the improved visuals? $380 is a lot of Happy Meals.

        • lostn on 14/04/2018 - 23:57

          @Xizor:

          By that logic just lower the rez and turn everything off…. bugger that! Smooth, responsive, and pretty. Have it all. Just like a good woman!

          That's actually what gamers used to do back in the 90s. To get 120 fps, they turn stuff off, but the advantage is that it makes it easier to see other players. When money is on the line, you take an ugly game if it gives you an advantage.

          If you're at the point where 1ms vs 4ms makes a difference, you're a heavily sponsored pro gamer who has their monitors stipulated under a sponsorship agreement.

          Not necessarily. Some gamers aren't pro and don't make any money, but they just like to win. Some play for fun, others get a lot of satisfaction in winning. If you play to win, every small advantage counts.

          Don't get defensive if you spent your own money on a TN panel.

          I don't see how I was being defensive. You're the one being defensive here. I did not buy a TN screen and tend to avoid them like the plague. I'm just saying who the target market is, and those people want TN until IPS can have the advantages TN has without giving up the better picture quality of IPS, you have to choose one or the other.

      • MahyarJ on 14/04/2018 - 09:57
        -1

        All these experts, and no one wanted to mention that there is a problem with backlight bleed when comparing IPS to a TN panel?

        • FabMan on 14/04/2018 - 10:16

          Well it looks like the real expert turned up, you. Tell us more oh enlightened one.

          Want to mention the complete difference between them? Response times of grey to grey, input lag, refresh rates, colour reproduction, contrast ratio both static and dynamic, viewing angles both horizontal and vertical, back light bleed, ghosting, brightness, gamma, bezel thickness, power consumption, environmental damage in production and recycling, heat generation, operational conditions such as humidity, cost.

  • [Deactivated] on 13/04/2018 - 22:22
    +1

    i need this in 27" 2K please.

      • [Deactivated] on 15/04/2018 - 09:16

        It’s expired
        Plus IPS is what I’d idealy want

        • exit on 15/04/2018 - 10:47

          The Acer XB271HU is around $800~ if you are willing to fork that much. Haven't seen deals for less than that.

  • CorporalCat on 28/04/2018 - 17:50

    Is this deal still on? How do I claim it for $515.41?

    • exit on 28/04/2018 - 19:43

      Deal has expired.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join