This was posted 14 years 21 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

9289.com.au - Pay $9.99 for $20 Voucher. For use with min spend of $200.

30
9289.com.au - Pay $9.99 for $20 Voucher. For use with min spend of $200.
Go to Deal
zzyss on 01/11/2010 - 21:23 store.9289.com.au (245 clicks)
Last edited 02/11/2010 - 02:36 by 1 other user

Pay just $9.99 for a $20 9289 voucher.

  1. Sign up and become a 9289 member and subscribe to our mailing list,
  2. 9289 voucher can only be used on your next purchase where the order amount, excluding shipping, exceeds $200,
  3. 9289 voucher is non-refundable,
  4. 9289 voucher is limited to one per order,
  5. Limit of two 9289 vouchers per member.

(Basically "up to 5% off" - they have some OK deals sometimes. No mention of expiry date or how long the vouchers are good for.)

MOD: Edited savings value and title to include minimum spend.

Other

Related Stores

9289.com.au
9289.com.au

closed Comments

  • Inferno_Gunz on 01/11/2010 - 21:31

    yay save $10 by using $10

    • ngf on 01/11/2010 - 21:36
      +2

      …and spending at least $181 more

  • Trance N Dance on 01/11/2010 - 21:37
    +3

    It's basically save 5% (at best) not worth the trouble and definately not a bargain.

  • retiredfeline on 01/11/2010 - 21:42
    +4

    No OP, your maths is faulty, it's not 10% off. At best you pay $210 to get $220 worth. That's less than 5%.

    • POWERevolution on 01/11/2010 - 21:48
      +1

      +1
      NO DEAL!

    • camelgrass on 02/11/2010 - 01:42

      No, at best you pay $190 for $200.01 order total.

      Just over 5% off.

      $200.01 (order total over $200) - $20 (voucher) + $9.99 (amount you payed for voucher) = $190 (amount it actually cost you).

      • lazed on 02/11/2010 - 17:29

        It says the voucher can only be used if the order exceeds $200. So it would appear you need to reach $200.01 before being able to apply the voucher.

        Plus the $9.99 to buy the voucher

        = $210 out of your wallet

        • camelgrass on 02/11/2010 - 19:46

          You forgot to apply the value of the voucher.

          $210 - $20 = $190 out of your wallet.

  • toomuchdogfur on 01/11/2010 - 21:48

    This baffles me. What's wrong with going "$10 off your next purchase over $200"?

    This is needlessly complicated, and just makes me suspicious of what they're doing with this…

    • anthony on 01/11/2010 - 23:03

      What’s wrong with going “$10 off your next purchase over $200”?

      Because doing it this way means you do not need to purchase any components immediately.

      Buying the voucher now means that you can make the purchase when ever you like as there is no expiry for the voucher you purchase.

  • kennethk on 01/11/2010 - 22:14

    they are hoping that some idiots would not read the fine print!!

    • POWERevolution on 01/11/2010 - 22:16
      +2

      or some one skip the maths like OP :)

  • jdr on 01/11/2010 - 22:51
    +2

    Was this a late Halloween joke? The deal is so token that it's embarrassing!

  • arcticmonkey on 01/11/2010 - 23:15
    +1

    Pathetic deal. This place is for real bargains - not offers full of terms and conditions that are worth only 4-5%.

  • fellator on 01/11/2010 - 23:21

    There is no value in this 'bargain'. Getting a maximum of 5% off on already overpriced foods is a neg for me.

  • esq on 02/11/2010 - 01:06

    Promotion fail.

    I remember these guys used to have a very communicative and obliging rep last year, but haven't been seeing her in any of their recent deals. They don't have shit prices but nothing lately that screams "what a great deal".

  • pauly on 02/11/2010 - 02:35
    +2

    For those wondering where their negative votes have gone, I've removed them as per our voting guidelines. If you have voted based on the OP's comment on 10% savings, I've already corrected this so the negatives are removed. If it's not based on this, then your negative vote is not really justified. I don't see anything seriously wrong with the deal apart from the OP's inaccurate comment on the savings.

    Yes the bargain value in this deal may seem trivial but nonetheless, it may still benefit some people that may be purchasing something over $200 from 9289. If you don't think this is a bargain or don't like the deal, then a no-vote would be appropriate. This alone will eventually bury the post if it's not popular.

    By voting negative on this deal just because you don't think it is a good bargain, not only will you cause others who may find the deal useful to lose out, but you are also essentially putting the OP into a temporary ban from posting further deals. The OP has been a member for over 3 years and have shared quite a few good bargains in the past, so I have no doubt that the OP's intentions are to share this deal with those who may benefit from it.

    • POWERevolution on 02/11/2010 - 10:06
      +1

      The OP has been a member for over 3 years and have shared quite a few good bargains in the past, so I have no doubt that the OP’s intentions are to share this deal with those who may benefit from it.

      Maybe Scott should look into it… any members age 1.5+ yr should be excluded from the banned list!

  • zzyss on 02/11/2010 - 12:34

    Hi guys. Sorry about the big fuss. I didn't read my own post properly, where it said you could only use 1 voucher per order. Hahaha…

    My bad. I'm sorry.

    Mods: thanks for being good about it.

    Anyway, thanks to all who pointed out the mistake. I will certainly try to be more diligent in future.

  • Popo on 02/11/2010 - 12:39

    I'm probably not going to use it but THANK YOU for letting us know.

  • outlander on 02/11/2010 - 12:42

    Margins are slim I guess, and most people here would save this until they where buying something that was cheap anyway. I would have gone with $20 for $50, it has a much better ring to it.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join