This was posted 7 years 6 months 28 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Bose SoundLink Mini II Bluetooth Speakers $180 Delivered @ Videopro on eBay (RRP $249)

740
Bose SoundLink Mini II Bluetooth Speakers $180 Delivered @ Videopro on eBay (RRP $249)
Go to Deal
Cashback
Rialonda on 20/06/2017 - 15:06 ebay.com.au (2501 clicks)
Last edited 20/06/2017 - 15:10 by 1 other user
CTAX20

I've been shopping for the Bose Soundlink Mini 2 recently.
In JB/HVN/standard bricks and mortar stores it is currently at $249, however, with the latest eBay Coupon code you can get it for $180 delivered, which I think is an amazing discount for a great product!

Also don't forget Cash Rewards to get it for even a touch cheaper!

Reference to main 20% off eBay deal: Original 20% off Selected Stores on eBay Deal Post

In addition to Black, you can also get it in Silver from the same seller (same price).

eBay store: videopro_online /Video Pro Online
Black Colour
Silver Colour

Electrical & Electronics Bluetooth Speaker Bose

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
Videopro
Videopro

closed Comments

  • [Deactivated] on 20/06/2017 - 15:27
    +3

    Excellent device, you won't believe the quality and depth of sound that this thing puts out for its size. I got one free with Peri Perks, I would not have bought one at $250 but if you're after a mini speaker with serious quality then this is the one you want.

    • Andard on 20/06/2017 - 15:31

      Peri perks? How many points was it? Agree about the sound it's amazing.

      • [Deactivated] on 20/06/2017 - 15:33

        2400 points. It shows up as the version 1 on their site so I was happy when this one arrived.

        • WillisAU on 20/06/2017 - 16:03
          +1

          +1 for the sound on this thing. I was soooo skeptical when my wife ordered it (through frequent flyer points) but am amazed at the sound, particularly bass, that it produces.

        • Tm15 on 20/06/2017 - 16:19

          so is that $2400 on nandos?

        • [Deactivated] on 20/06/2017 - 16:33
          +7

          @Tm15: I think it's Peri Peri nice

        • kevinMario on 20/06/2017 - 17:40
          +1

          @Where's_That_Cake: that was beautiful

    • elektron on 20/06/2017 - 21:14
      -8

      Excellent device, you won't believe the quality and depth of sound that this thing puts out for its size. I got one free with Peri Perks, I would not have bought one at $250 but if you're after a mini speaker with serious quality then this is the one you want.

      Feel free to neg me but I think this is typical Bose fanboism and this statement only holds true if you have not compared it side-by-side with any other speaker in the same price range.

      By the way, looking at the front page photo, I thought this was an eBay printer sale.

      • Rialonda on 20/06/2017 - 21:55
        +1

        Don't think it's necessarily fanboism - I personally have listened to this and quite a few others in its price point side by side in the stores, and I personally much preferred this product over the others (brands aside). That said, what do I know?…I liked the sound profile of this speaker even better than the Soundlink Revolve when I listened to it in person, which is supposedly much newer and expensive (and also from Bose).

      • [Deactivated] on 20/06/2017 - 22:00
        +1

        I've never owned a Bose speaker or anything Bose before now and I also said I wouldn't have bought one but for it being free. Not sure how that makes me a fanboy, perhaps you should consider your own position. That said it's bloody brilliant and everyone that has been around mine and heard it has commented on it's excellent sound quality.

        • Bruce13 on 21/06/2017 - 03:46

          A totally ridiculous comment! You have no idea what you are talking about. This speaker is loud, compact and portable. It is definitely the best sounding speaker for the price by a long way! It has nothing to do with the brand name!

  • angelkulit025 on 20/06/2017 - 16:44

    I have been watching this bose bluetooth speaker for over a year now and it hasnt gone down to less than 150 :(

    • bluedez_man on 20/06/2017 - 17:28

      When was it $150? I've never seen this less than $170.

      • sywater on 20/06/2017 - 20:20

        Days ago microsoft ebay had it for $199 and with 15% it was under $170.

        • bluedez_man on 20/06/2017 - 20:50

          By 85c….I rounded up :)

    • Hinee on 20/06/2017 - 17:37
      +8

      For the sake of $30 you're kidding yourself if you don't get on this if it's something you want that bad.

    • Hamlet on 20/06/2017 - 18:04

      Same here. Been watching since last year. Finally got it for $185 a few weeks back with 15% discount. Worth it.

  • seamonkey on 20/06/2017 - 17:39
    +1

    This looks like a great deal. Unrelated, but I've got the UE Megaboom. Compared them and had a preference to the Megaboom, though you will not pick it up for much cheaper than $220. This deal looks great though. :-) I hear great things about the speaker from people that have used it longer than me.

    • elektron on 20/06/2017 - 21:17

      Have you actually compared the Megaboom with the Boom 2? Paradoxically, the latter is actually the better speaker of the two?

      • seamonkey on 21/06/2017 - 08:38

        No I have not. If the Boom 2 is better than the Megaboom then I absolutely need one. I would imagine it comes down to portability vs a 'bigger noise'.

  • starspawn on 20/06/2017 - 18:12

    Best piece of technology I have ever owned! I think I got for like $180 at JB-HIFI 2 years ago.

    Honestly I travelled with this through the US & Mexico - it just simply shreds!

    The sound quality is seriously impressive for something so small, take it to the park, take it anywhere!

    • Frugal on 20/06/2017 - 18:53

      If you place it a few cms from the wall, it becomes amplified. It's acoustically magic.

      • [Deactivated] on 20/06/2017 - 22:02

        This, I have it in the space above my recessed fridge.

    • ego22 on 20/06/2017 - 23:42
      +1

      Really?! Thats a big call.
      You sound like a guy who has never owned a dyson stick vac before… You'd shit your pants…

      • [Deactivated] on 21/06/2017 - 06:12
        +1

        I've got a Dyson stick, this sounds better unless the kids throw the Bieb on it :P

  • pointnlarf on 20/06/2017 - 18:27

    this or UE BOOM 2?

    • Yaren24 on 20/06/2017 - 19:16

      BOSS, or Mega Boom

      • pointnlarf on 20/06/2017 - 19:34

        not sure about BOSS??? but Mega Boom are about $100 more , yes?

        • Yaren24 on 20/06/2017 - 20:36
          +3

          Sorry my bad, should be BOSE :) , I tried a few speakers including JBL charge 3 and Xtreme, Bose, and Sony, UE products. I can give you my preference

          UE Mega Boom - Clearest of all, great sound for all the music; JBL charge 3 and Xtreme are great but you try in person you will hear there is muddy sound when you turn the volume bit higher. I know all youtube comments suggest for JBL, my initial thoughts were JBL but after trying UE Mega Boom, I would say you will not be disappointing, and it is better than JBL. The price is expensive >$200, but I am sure it is a better overall product when you comparing sound, portability, build quality and battery life with other products.

          The Bose mini is good, it will destroy UE boom in any sound contests, but it is still not good as Mega boom. I recalled there was a deal here for Mega boom for $200 last year, absolutely that was, but I did not grab one…

          If you don't travel that much, Harman Kardan speakers are great as well, just bit big though.

          I personally have a small Chinese bass speaker, cost me $25 via Ebay, very good priced for what it is. But I am hoping to upgrade to Mega boom in the future when more deals are released
          :)

          Hope it helps

        • elektron on 21/06/2017 - 09:53

          @Yaren24: Out of curioucity, which Sony did you try? I picked up the SRS-X55 early last year (I think it's now discontinued / superseded) for $153 and it absolutely kills the Soundlink Mini II (and Soundlink III, for that matter) in sound quality. Also has a much more even / flat frequency response.

        • Yaren24 on 21/06/2017 - 12:52

          @elektron: I tried XB30 and XB40, the newest ones. The sound to me is about slightly different to JBL, slightly clearer but less bass overall. but I am not a big fan of Sony products, most of them are expensive for what they are. If they can price it under $200 then I would look at it. The sound from XB30 or 40 seem very similiar to my ears, just one is bit louder bit more bass, there is no creativity in Sony at all.

          If you pay close attention, Sony trying to make their products look really good from the outside, but the real quality is not comparable to the others in the same price range. I suggest you try Harvey Norman or JBHIFI, you will see the difference between UE products and Sony. You will not go wrong with Megaboom. So in my opinion, for around $250, Megaboom is the best in the competition. That's why you don't see it priced down like JBL products or Sony. If you search on youtube, you will see most of people prefer the JBL or Sony, but I personally will pick the UE Megaboom. Go to stores, try it, let us know your thoughts :)

          Hope it helps

    • d3ft on 20/06/2017 - 19:35
      +4

      I'm not a big fan of Bose but I've listened to both and this thing wrecks the Boom 2, it's really not even a contest.

      • Frugal on 20/06/2017 - 19:51

        Blasphemy!

    • billsky on 20/06/2017 - 20:28

      I have the same question as well.

    • halley on 20/06/2017 - 20:39

      I have both the UE Megaboom and Bose Soundlink Mini II.

      I find the Bose Soundlink Mini II sounds much better. Better bass, better mids, and much better treble.
      The UE Megaboom does seem to go louder than the Bose, but doesn't sound as good as the Bose.

    • giventofly on 21/06/2017 - 11:14

      I like the UE Boom for its loudness and ingress protection. Use it in my workshop and plaster nor dust has affected it.

  • cheepwun on 20/06/2017 - 18:32
    +2

    The depopulation agenda is working well.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

    • syousef on 20/06/2017 - 21:02

      Amazing how much money you can make peddling fear.

      https://qz.com/677772/huge-australian-study-says-cell-phones…

      • cheepwun on 20/06/2017 - 21:15

        brain cancer: one point of many in the video; no exaggerated figures provided. Peddling fear must be down to your interpretation of the video.

        • syousef on 21/06/2017 - 08:28

          It's okay. You can just put on your tin foil hat and it will create a Faraday cage for you.

          This lady does questionable science and that is well documented.

        • cheepwun on 21/06/2017 - 10:21

          @syousef:
          Everyone has a detractor (from various vested interests, as it turns out). Your arguments against are weak. Love those tinfoil hat comments, they are usually what people resort to when they have nothing valid to say. And we have long since moved to aluminium, anyway. The mere fact that manufacturers give us warnings about RF in various wi-fi, bluetooth and phone devices should tell you something is not right. They wouldn't bother if it weren't to save their butts.

        • syousef on 21/06/2017 - 14:50

          @cheepwun:

          Your arguments for WIFI and phone radiation being harmful are fringe. The onus of proof is squarely on you to disprove the scientific consensus, not me.

          The manufacturers are catering to their paranoid uneducated customers and defending against spurious claims that are costly to defend against. If that comment reflects your standard of proof, you have a lot to learn about science.

        • cheepwun on 21/06/2017 - 14:51
          -2

          @syousef:

          Your arguments for WIFI and phone radiation being harmful are fringe. The onus of proof is squarely on you to disprove the scientific consensus, not me.

          The scientific consensus is that it's harmful on multiple levels. It's only a question of how much.

        • syousef on 21/06/2017 - 14:56

          @cheepwun:

          No it isn't. Take a look at the quotes from MULTIPLE health and regulatory authorities worldwide.

          www.amta.org.au/files/AMTA-position-on-The-Scientific-Consen…

          If you continue to insist that the consensus supports your point of view, go find someone else to argue with.

        • cheepwun on 21/06/2017 - 15:00

          @syousef:
          Yes, fantastic. The government…bought & paid-for. Naturally impartial. Immune to bribes from the biggest companies. Naturally open to debate on the harmful effects noted in countless independent studies. Well done.

        • syousef on 21/06/2017 - 15:11

          @cheepwun:

          Which government? Let me guess. All of them right? And you wonder why the tinfoil hat comment?

          And which government is the World Health Organization part of? And the Royal Society of Canada? There are also international committees and agencies on that list. Some set up to be independent. Did you even bother to look?

          We were talking about consensus. THIS is consensus. Whether you think it was bought and paid for or not. (It wasn't). Whether you agree with it or not. (You don't). Your claim that consensus is harm is completely disproven.

        • cheepwun on 21/06/2017 - 15:38

          @syousef:

          Which government? Let me guess. All of them right? And you wonder why the tinfoil hat comment?

          The WHO is part of the UN (global government). Which we all pay for, in more ways than one. Whose directors live tax-free. On your back. I don't wonder about tinfoil hat arguments (they are the refuge for weak arguments), but I do wonder how you can so easily dismiss the countless independent studies that have proven microwaves are unsafe.

          We were talking about consensus. THIS is consensus. Whether you think it was bought and paid for or not. (It wasn't).

          Your belief. And you're free to believe microwaves have no effect on human health, despite evidence to the contrary. Just as you're free to drill into asbestos and smoke at your own free will.

        • syousef on 21/06/2017 - 15:54

          @cheepwun:

          Now the UN is the global government huh? And I suppose the Royal Society of Canada is in charge of keeping the population subdued with chemtrails.

          You have provided me with no evidence. Just a speech given at a university by a fringe scientist. Why are you so incredibly unwilling to believe the work of multiple scientific organisations scattered around the globe but one lady who makes money out of lecturing about her unsubstantiated fear mongering point of view gets a free pass. You see there's skepticism and then there's selective paranoia.

          I'm not going to argue with you any more. Either your education has failed you or you need professional help and possibly medication. Either way, I'm wasting my time and antagonising you achieves absolutely nothing. You're certainly not prepared to change your views.

        • cheepwun on 21/06/2017 - 23:31

          @syousef:

          You're certainly not prepared to change your views.

          I was about to say the same of you. Everyone makes money some way or another. Governments don't, you reckon? They are bankrolled by their sponsors. Bribes every day of every year in order to get things approved and rolling.

          Chemtrails are real. So are tainted vaccines. So are radio frequencies. I fail to see why you changed the subject here. Plenty of evidence which you choose to ignore. All you're doing is giving me your opinion. That's fine. But you cannot tell me all scientists unanimously agree that microwaves are harmless. That's absolute nonsense.

        • syousef on 21/06/2017 - 23:57

          @cheepwun:

          When you show me that the scientific consensus has changed, I will happily change my view.

          If you had a background in science you'd realise that the whole chemtrail thing is not just absolute nonsense, but that believing it completely ruins any hope you ever had of being credible. You might as well tell me that your source is Santa Claus and that he took you for a ride on his sleigh. You see not only would it not be practical to use the vapour trails left by airplanes to distribute toxins without being discovered, if you somehow managed to do so you'd be using one of the least effective methods available to poison anyone.

          As for "tainted" vaccines, let me tell you what's real. The iron lung is a thing of the past and every year that people take flu vaccines and don't whine about how they still caught a cold anyway, we are another year less likely to end up with a repeat of the Spanish flu that killed more people than all the fighthing in World War I in a fraction of the time.

          Your views are FAR more dangerous than any harm that could be caused by non-ionizing radiation.

        • cheepwun on 22/06/2017 - 00:02

          @syousef:

          When you show me that the scientific consensus has changed, I will happily change my view.

          Not my job here to change your view. Like I said eariler, you are welcome to keep it.

          If you had a background in science you'd realise that the whole chemtrail thing is not just absolute nonsense, but that believing it completely ruins any hope you ever had of being credible.

          I'm listening. Love to hear your theory on what is going on here.

          As for "tainted" vaccines, let me tell you what's real. The iron lung is a thing of the past and every year that people take flu vaccines and don't whine about how they still caught a cold anyway, we are another year less likely to end up with a repeat of the Spanish flu that killed more people than all the fighthing in World War I in a fraction of the time.

          What's real is people are willingly accepting tainted vaccines, causing all manner of problems to the trusting populations.

          Your views are FAR more dangerous than any harm that could be caused by non-ionizing radiation.

          Who are they a danger to? Love to hear your views. You are outright dismissing unpopular thought, speaking as if you hold the truth, and anything else can safely be squashed, all because government says so. Government is some nations says NO on wi-fi…so I guess they are also fear-mongers without basis in any fact.

        • syousef on 22/06/2017 - 00:08

          @cheepwun:

          It absolutely is your job. You insisted it was the consensus and I showed you were wrong. The onus is 100% on you with the unorthodox, unaccepted and repeatedly disproven view to provide solid evidence that I am wrong.

          Chemtrails are mostly water condensation. If you don't understand how steam works I can point you at physics resources.

          Anti-vax nonsense leads to very real deaths. Preventable extreme diseases that surge and cause small children to die. THAT is real. THAT is well documented.

          And now I'm pretty much done with you so go on have the last word so I can ignore it.

        • cheepwun on 22/06/2017 - 00:16

          @syousef:

          You insisted it was the consensus and I showed you were wrong.

          You proved no such thing. For every 'it's safe' statement there is at least another 'its not'. You choose to ignore this. Instead, you insist that large orgs and govs have the truth and dismiss the rest as nonsense.

          The only thing I insisted on was that "proven safe" was not a universal truth. ie. people have different ideas of it.

          Chemtrails are mostly water condensation. If you don't understand how steam works I can point you at physics resources.

          Water condensation? Really. I'll remember this as I trawl through countless geoengineering articles online, as well as countless youtube videos on the subject. You're a genius.

          Anti-vax nonsense leads to very real deaths. Preventable extreme diseases that surge and cause small children to die. THAT is real. THAT is well documented.

          Don't let me knock your beliefs. You are free to keep them. I wish the best for you and your family.

          And now I'm pretty much done with you so go on have the last word so I can ignore it.

          OK. Welcome back anytime.

        • syousef on 22/06/2017 - 00:18

          @cheepwun:

          Look up "consensus" in the dictionary.

        • cheepwun on 22/06/2017 - 00:33

          Your arguments for WIFI and phone radiation being harmful are fringe. The onus of proof is squarely on you to disprove the scientific consensus, not me.

          Here you act as if there is consensus. There isn't. If I respond to this, I can just as easily say there is consensus that it's harmful (and I did): there are certainly enough scientists saying that, and that have been saying it for ages. If I am too 'fringe' for you, then that's your personal issue, not mine. And in no way am I obligated to change your views. If you were interested enough in the subject you could easily see there are 'issues' with microwave radiation.

          I make decisions now based on the evidence I've seen (and felt). The masses can do what they want. If I present info, I present it so others may see the unpopular views of a 'dangerous' thinker (apparently that's what I am). A danger. To myself and others. I wear the label proudly.

          Your thoughts on chemtrails are the stuff of legend. I wish you luck in your research. But since I have been discredited by you (and I have been labelled 'fringe'), I guess my sincere regards for continued knowledge may come off as insincere, but I assure you it's not.

        • syousef on 22/06/2017 - 18:25

          @cheepwun:

          There is a consensus, even if you deny there is one. I honestly don't think you know what half of the words you are using actually mean.

          You are no more special than "the masses" you're ranting about.

        • cheepwun on 22/06/2017 - 20:20

          You are no more special than "the masses" you're ranting about.

          Yes, there is always a consensus when you only look where you want to. You can't get scientists agreeing worldwide on any issue. Sorry, just not going to happen. There is truth and there is vested interests muddying the truth. Always has, always will be.

          Mum says I'm special. Didn't know this was a rant. Chemtrails are just water vapour. Vaccines are good for you. More news at 6.

        • Rialonda on 22/06/2017 - 23:14
          +1

          @cheepwun:
          Annnd time to weigh in here :)

          I think our government sums it up the best and most accurately:

          "Evidence so far suggests that mobile phones aren’t harmful, but long-term risks and consequences are yet to be clarified."
          (https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/mob…)

          Also see the first two points at top of the page: acknowledging current consensus is that they don't cause cancer, but at the same time no long term population study done.

          i.e. Cautiously optimistic - and up to the user to protect themselves if they feel inclined to.

  • gembel on 20/06/2017 - 19:54
    +1

    it was around $160+ from Microsoft ebay store just few weeks ago.. Give it a few weeks and Microsoft ebay store will have 20% off again

    • andrewm71 on 20/06/2017 - 20:01

      Agree. I got it then and it is fantastic.

    • Romen on 20/06/2017 - 22:26

      I should have pulled the trigger then. Currently it's $299 on the MS store with no vouchers.

  • 8millpond on 20/06/2017 - 21:09

    have the ue boombox already… dont know why i need a second bluetooth portable speaker for what

  • djmm on 20/06/2017 - 21:42

    You can do much worse with 180 bucks. get this.

  • sgrusty on 20/06/2017 - 22:50

    Guys i got the bose revolve instead. It's newer model built in 2017. It is waterproof and has 360 degrees sound. The 20% OFF works as well for this site bringing it down to $229 delivered for me. Wife was awesome to let me choose my bday present!

    • ntt on 20/06/2017 - 22:59
      +1

      if I ask my wife for a present, she would answer "you have me as the one", and I don't think I need a speaker, 'cause I got the BIG ONE

    • Rialonda on 20/06/2017 - 23:44
      +2

      I was listing to both the soundlink mini 2 and revolve, and found the soundlink mini 2 sound profile more to my liking (I also had no need for 360 or waterproof).
      That said, they do have a substantial difference in the sound profile and feel to the music played between them - so as with most things in life, select the one that resonates with you most :)

      • dm01 on 21/06/2017 - 08:52

        Not to mention the revolve looks like a pepper shaker

  • abacus on 21/06/2017 - 00:33
    +1

    Thanks for posting, bought one.

  • Bruce13 on 21/06/2017 - 03:47

    This speaker is loud, compact and portable. It is definitely the best sounding speaker for the price by a long way!

  • Duram on 21/06/2017 - 09:57

    Can I stream audible 2 it?

  • wheretobuychocettes on 21/06/2017 - 11:55

    This is a great product, got this as a Christmas gift and have been using it near daily as a 'headunit' in my car which has no speakers/headunit. It's got a decent weight to it, and would probably last all week of commuting to and from work and playing bluetooth audio from my phone. As an added bonus, it does phone calls.

    Battery lasts significantly longer if you use AUX instead of bluetooth, but still a great device.

  • gembel on 24/06/2017 - 14:06

    $169 from Microsoft ebay store with 15% off code
    http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Bose-SoundLink-Mini-Bluetooth-Spe…

  • Hacheoy on 29/06/2017 - 13:47

    Has anyone received there's? I bought one on the 21st and it hasn't even been marked as shipped yet.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join