This was posted 7 years 6 months 12 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Invicta 17039 Pro-Diver (Seiko Auto Movement) US$65.72 (~AU$87.25) 9403 Black & Red Bezel $72.65 (~AU$96.50) Shipped @ Amazon

240
Invicta 17039 Pro-Diver (Seiko Auto Movement) US$65.72 (~AU$87.25) 9403 Black & Red Bezel $72.65 (~AU$96.50) Shipped @ AmazonAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
WatchNerd on 11/06/2017 - 06:25 amazon.com (1253 clicks)
Last edited 11/06/2017 - 14:41
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Invicta 17039 Pro-Diver (Seiko Automatic Movement) US$56.24 + $9.48 Shipping = $65.72 (approx AU$87.25)
Camel Price Check
Cashrewards has 6% cashback on watches

  • Crystal/Lens - Mineral
  • Diameter - 40mm
  • Band width - 20mm
  • Case Thickness - 13mm
  • Seiko NH35A Automatic Movement With Hand Winding & Hacking
  • Screw-down crown
  • Unidirectional Bezel
  • Luminous Hands/Markers
  • Magnified Date Window
  • Exhibition Caseback
  • Water resistant to 200 Metres

Also thanks to ilikeit, this is a similar model with black & red bezel -
Invicta 9403 Pro-Diver (Seiko Automatic Movement) US$63.71 + $8.94 Shipping = $72.65 (approx AU$96.50)
Lowest Price on Camel Since 2010

These watches have INVICTA stamped on the edge of the case. Play the short video on Amazon to see.

Very similar to the very popular Invicta 8926OB (different bezel) - US$85.98 + $7.62 Shipping
Which has a big following on Watchuseek for modding

Invicta 22947 I-Force (Seiko Automatic Movement) US$44.42 + $7.23 Shipping = $51.65 (approx AU$69.00)

  • Crystal/Lens - Mineral (Flame Fusion, which means sapphire coated)
  • Diameter - 42mm
  • Band width - 22mm
  • Case Thickness - 14mm
  • Seiko NH35A Automatic Movement With Hand Winding & Hacking
  • Exhibition Caseback
  • Water resistant to 30 Metres - In general, withstands splashes or brief immersion in water, but not suitable for swimming or bathing

I picked these watches out of the Invicta Sale

Don't forget you can use a parcel pick up point and save US$1.00.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
Fashion & Apparel Invicta Watch

Related Stores

Amazon US
Amazon US

closed Comments

  • Shame on 11/06/2017 - 07:38
    +1

    Great deal. Got one as a gift.

  • ilikeit on 11/06/2017 - 07:49
    +2

    Add this one too WatchNerd: Invicta Men's 9403 Pro Diver Collection Automatic Watch for AUD $100.22 delivered.

    Cheapest ever on Camelx3

  • [Deactivated] on 11/06/2017 - 08:10

    Sorry noob here

    I have relatively small wrists, will the band fit comfortably?

    • ilikeit on 11/06/2017 - 08:12
      +1

      what is small (usually measures in inches)? 40mm width and 13mm thick is a traditional size for a diver. Rolex sub is 40mm. This will fit fine, even on a small wrist.

      • [Deactivated] on 11/06/2017 - 08:14
        +1

        Thanks m8

    • PJC on 11/06/2017 - 11:36
      +2

      It would after removing links.

      • HentaiEnjoyer on 11/06/2017 - 18:08

        Very misleading advice!!! Depends on case size. Some cases will be wider than some people's wrist.

        • PJC on 11/06/2017 - 20:05

          We know the case size (40mm) and Member Jason Genova knows the size of his wrist. Is there another way to make the band fit comfortably?

        • HentaiEnjoyer on 11/06/2017 - 20:12

          If the diameter of the case is disproportionate to the length of his wrist, then it can't be made comfortable, which in case you should look for a smaller watch, obviously.

          I fell into the same trap with the IWC big pilot, which is only 6mm longer in case diameter and is classified as a huuge watch.

        • ilikeit on 11/06/2017 - 21:54
          +2

          @zailiner: I would hardly call PJC's comment very misleading. Jason said his wrist is relatively small so it's fair to assume his wrists are less than 7in, but not girly. This is a 40mm watch with a 48mm lug to lug measurement and curved lugs that will taper to the wrist. These measurements are a conservative size by today's standards. You don't hear people commenting that a Rolex sub (to which this is a homage of) is too big (just the DSSD) and diver genre watches are designed to wear larger than a dress or sports watch.

          You mention your IWC (nice watch by the way) is only 6mm longer. In watch terms, an extra 6mm is massive! Yes, I know pilots are supposed to be large too. If you want an example of a watch that will have lugs hanging over the wrist, look no further than a Steinhart Ocean 1. Despite its totally wearable 42mm, its case is extremely flat with very minimal taper.

          At this price point, Jason should go for it and remove links. It's an easy eBay flip if he doesn't like it.

        • HentaiEnjoyer on 11/06/2017 - 21:58

          @ilikeit:

          Very good points, I stand corrected.

  • Captain Hindsight on 11/06/2017 - 08:53
    +2

    Nice looking watches these, if only they had sapphire lenses. I've scratched too many crystal watches.

  • HandsomeMonkey on 11/06/2017 - 10:22

    What's the difference between Invicta 17039 Pro-Diver and the Invicta Pro-Diver 8926? Looks the same to me.

    • ilikeit on 11/06/2017 - 10:25

      8926, 17039 & 17044 are all the same as far as I can tell.

  • [Deactivated] on 11/06/2017 - 11:17
    +2

    Automatics lose a few seconds every day. Quartz are much more accurate, cheaper and not so ridiculously big.

    The only problem with the Invicta quartz is that the crown doesn't screw down and I've accidentally changed/stopped the time a few times. Apart from that it's absolutely perfect.

  • PJC on 11/06/2017 - 11:40
    +3

    That I-Force is tempting. Amazon claim the window is Sapphire Crystal but Invicta do not. https://www.invictawatch.com/watches/detail/22947-

    • ilikeit on 11/06/2017 - 13:45

      "Crystal/Lens - Mineral (Flame Fusion, which means sapphire coated)". I think the dimensions are slightly large for a dress watch, hard to ignore the specs though for a cheapy.

  • dcep on 11/06/2017 - 13:51

    is the bezel the only difference between the 9403 and 17039 ?

  • garage sale on 11/06/2017 - 15:13

    Bought the 17039 ….. I'm not a big fan of auto watches due to the cost of servicing every 5 years so they keep time, but at this price I will give it a go …….. nobody seems to complain of the quality, and I have some ecodrives already for diving.
    the 8926 OB is interesting but the serration around the bezel doesn't make it look shirt cuff friendly, where as the 17039 had smoother edges around bezel.

    guess the 8926OB had that "vintage rolex / tudor look".

    • ilikeit on 11/06/2017 - 15:19

      The bezel is Omega Seamaster 300 'inspired.' It's a sub/seamaster love child.

    • WatchNerd on 11/06/2017 - 15:32
      +1

      Who told you a Seiko Auto has to be serviced every 5 years?

      From what I have read they should last 20-25 years before needing a service.

      • tonyjzx on 11/06/2017 - 16:13
        +1

        seiko autos are disposable at under $100

        no need to service, just buy a new one and even so, how do you know if they need service? They either work or they dont.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join