This was posted 8 years 3 months 22 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Cockatoo Ridge Varieties $15 for Any 2x 1 Litre @ Dan Murphy's (Members Only)

60
Cockatoo Ridge Varieties $15 for Any 2x 1 Litre @ Dan Murphy's (Members Only)
Go to Deal
SydOzber on 02/08/2016 - 12:20 danmurphys.com.au (235 clicks)
Last edited 02/08/2016 - 12:26

Member only offer
Can select from 4 varieties(2 Red and 2 White)

Groceries

Related Stores

Dan Murphy's
Dan Murphy's

closed Comments

  • jv on 02/08/2016 - 12:29
    -1

    Dupe

    https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/259565

    jv on 02/08/2016 - 12:29 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
    • sween64 on 02/08/2016 - 14:19

      But technically not.

      • jv on 02/08/2016 - 15:08

        ethically it is…

    • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 00:46
      -2

      Duplicates
      Exceptions:
      The original deal is a list of multiple items and the item is not contained in the title of the original deal.

      https://www.ozbargain.com.au/wiki/help:deal_posting_guidelines

      Maybe learn the rules before making false allegations

      • jv on 03/08/2016 - 09:56

        I wasn't referring to the rules. This item is already listed in another post…

        https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/259565

        Maybe learn to read the comments before making false allegations

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 11:07
          -1

          I know you weren't referring to the rules. If you had read the guidelines, you wouldn't have made the false allegation that the deal posted was a dupe.

          FACT: The deal is not a duplicate according to the guidelines.
          FACT: I did not make any false allegation and any allegation that I did is false.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 11:26

          @ripsnorter:

          The deal is not a duplicate according to the guidelines.

          My comment was not about the guidelines.
          It was a statement of fact.

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 11:39
          -1

          @jv:

          Exactly where did I say your comment was about the guidelines? The fact that you haven't relied on the guidelines in your false "statement of fact" is exactly why I quoted the guidelines to you and provided the source.

          This deal is not a duplicate and your first comment is factually incorrect according to the guidelines.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:17

          @ripsnorter:

          Exactly where did I say your comment was about the guidelines?

          your first comment.

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 12:36

          @jv:

          WHERE? Quote me back at me. Or stop telling lies.

          I didn't say anything in my first comment that said your comment was about the guidelines. Any fool can see that. All I did was quote the guidelines to you and provide a link to them. Pretty simple to understand.

          You could just admit that you were wrong in your first comment. It's not difficult. You seem to enjoy pointing out the errors of posters but cannot seem to accept the fact that you are ever wrong. In this case it is black and white.

          Just admit it: "I was wrong". You can even say it in boldface if you like. Or you can continue to deny a fact and the guidelines and be stubborn, irrational and bitter. Your choice.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:38
          -1

          @ripsnorter:

          WHERE?

          your first comment in this thread.

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 12:51

          @jv:

          Stop trolling me, jv. Nowhere did I say your comment was about the guidelines. Your refuse to engage in any intelligent conversation because you are wrong. 100%.

          I am not going to continue this conversation any further. Any sane person reading this thread will know the truth.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:53

          @ripsnorter:

          Stop trolling me, jv.

          oh the irony…. lol…

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:55

          @ripsnorter:

          because you are wrong

          My initial comment is just a fact…

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:56

          @ripsnorter:

          Your refuse to engage in any intelligent conversation

          I tailor my responses based on who I'm talking to…

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 12:58
          -1

          @jv:

          It is wrong. It is not a fact. You even impliedly admit it.

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 12:58
          -2

          @jv:

          Exactly- you tell lies and deny truth in response to me because you are a troll.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:59

          @ripsnorter:

          It is not a fact

          Yep, it is…

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 12:59
          +1

          @ripsnorter:

          you tell lies

          Nope, it was listed in the other deal, take a look

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 12:59

          @jv:

          Your comment is incorrect. Factually incorrect.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 13:00
          +1

          @ripsnorter:

          Your comment is incorrect.

          That's just your opinion…

          My first comment is true, look at the link…

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 13:00

          @jv:

          That wasn't the lie I was referring to.

          I never said it wasn't listed in the other deal. Der.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 13:01
          +1

          @ripsnorter:

          That wasn't the lie I was referring to.

          I'll copy it for you…

          Wines
          - Cockatoo Ridge 1L 2 for $15

          there you go… :)

          It's a dupe…

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 13:01

          @jv:

          You're a dupe. That's my opinion. That's how stupid you sound.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 13:03
          +1

          @ripsnorter:

          You're a dupe. That's my opinion. That's how stupid you sound.

          and that about sums up you entire argument….

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 13:04

          @jv:

          Did I EVER say it wasn't lised in the other deal? Quote me where I said that. You can't, because I never said that.

          Duplicates
          Exceptions:
          The original deal is a list of multiple items and the item is not contained in the title of the original deal.

          All I ever indicated was that it not a duplicate according to the guideline.

          Simple question - is this deal a duplicate according to the guidelines?

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 13:06
          +1

          @ripsnorter:

          is this deal a duplicate according to the guidelines?

          I wasn't referring to the guidelines in my original comment, I was just stating a fact

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 13:07

          @jv:

          Refusing to answer the question, what a suprise.

        • jv on 03/08/2016 - 14:16
          +1

          @ripsnorter:

          I did answer it, read my comments.

        • ripsnorter on 03/08/2016 - 15:14

          @jv:

          No you didn't.

          Simple question - is this deal a duplicate according to the guidelines?

          Yes or no?

        • ripsnorter on 04/08/2016 - 10:53

          @jv:

          Refusing to answer the question, what a surprise.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join