Our car was parked out on the road at home, when I hear a massive crash sound. Neighbour came over saying our car had been hit. The perp (for lack of a better word) was still there with her car immobile as front guard had crushed back into the front wheel. Our car had a minor dent. Don't buy a brand new honda civic lol.
Anyway she and I are both fully comp insured. yay.
My insurer, RACV, accepted my "claim" (even though technically I'm not making a claim against them), I'm just using them to assist as part of my fully comp policy. Isn't that what I'm supposed to do?. I'm taking it to their assessor soon to find out damage and how long it will take etc.
But then RACV tried to tell me I'd have to pay for the hire car while mine is getting repaired. I have comp insurance with RACV but no hire car option. I said "but won't you just bill the perps insurance company for the hire car, its irrelevant whether or not I have hire care option on my own insurance package." They said no. Seems rather strange to me.
Does this mean I'm better off just claiming against the perps insurer directly? I have her claim number. I thought comp insurance policy was supposed to do all this on my behalf, not to try to scam me out of what I'm rightfully entitled to?
TLDR; Hire car cover on my own policy is irrelevant when the at fault driver has been identified and has full liability. So then why are RACV trying to tell me I can't have a hire car?
You can use the specific hire car companies like right2drive or compass claims and they'll deal with it for you.