This was posted 9 years 3 months 24 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Reid Commuter Bikes. Reid City 2 $349.99 (Save $150), Reid City 1 $249.99 (Save $100)

120

Reid Spring It On weekly special sale.

I think the Reid City 1 (http://www.reidcycles.com.au/reid-city-1-0-bike.html) and/or
the Reid City 2 (http://www.reidcycles.com.au/reid-city-2-0-bike.html)
looks like a good buy for an entry level commuter bike.

Also might still be able to use this deal https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/206438 to get an extra $10 off (worked for me on 2/9 @ 11pm).

Related Stores

Reid Cycles
Reid Cycles

closed Comments

  • +1

    reid has good value.
    caveats:
    city 1 has old-style freewheel (limited range, prone to breaking axle)
    city 2 has suspension - pointless extra weight and cost for a commuter bike.

    • -7

      suspension is a good thing. Makes the tires grip the road much better.
      Though dual suspension is ideal of course.

      • +3

        Absolutely false. For climbing in particular, you want a frame as stiff as possible, so that all your energy is transferred to the road rather than simply making the frame flex back and forth. For road biking, a suspension fork is bad, full suspension bikes are worse.

        • +1

          you want a frame as stiff as possible

          Not quite. It is not the spring that absorbs energy, but the damping. A bit of elastic frame flex is OK.
          Making the frame stiffer means adding weight, so it is a compromise.

        • -1

          Omg.
          You obviously have zero experience.
          Full suspension adds about 3 kilos to your bike. If you're not in a competition this makes almost no difference up hills. On the flats and down hill a road bike has no chance of keeping pace up.

        • @manic: fair enough, I have ridden high end steel frames, and they are springy, but in a good way. A dampened suspension bike is crap for climbing up hills.

        • +1

          @Phoebus: you'd better tell that to the boys in the Tour de France then mate. Those poor blighters are pedalling all over the countryside without a single suspension fork between them.

      • "Grip the road better"

        That's patently false - it can help in cars, but the nature of bike suspension is that it softens bumps, that's it.

        • So it does make sense to have suspension on a commuter bike then - for the erect sitters that commuter bike riders are to have a smoother ride?

        • @blahman:
          Front suspension is good and usually all you need. When you add front and rear suspension they get a bit heavy.

        • @blahman: No. The overall weight of bike and rider is low enough that pneumatic tyres, frame flex, etc provide enough dampening. If you really are concerned about bumps, then a sprung seat should provide enough further dampening to you.

  • Reid City 2 Specs:
    Rear Derailleur: Shimano Acera M390 9 Speed
    Freewheel/Cassette: Shimano 8-speed Cassette (11-32t)
    Shoorly Shum Mishtake?

  • +2

    Best way to get the right answer on the internet is to not ask the right questions, but to initially supply the wrong answer and just wait.

  • Pity no disc brakes, be nice to have a comfy commuter without the weight of a mtb, even road bikes are coming out with disc brakes

Login or Join to leave a comment