This was posted 11 years 10 months 13 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Canon EOS 1100D DLSR Camera with 18-55mm Lens $358 @ HN

140
Canon EOS 1100D DLSR Camera with 18-55mm Lens $358 @ HN
Go to Deal
[Deactivated] on 11/02/2013 - 14:27 harveynorman.com.au (470 clicks)

Canon EOS 1100D DLSR Camera with 18-55mm Lens $358 @ HN

Electrical & Electronics Camera Canon DSLR

Related Stores

Harvey Norman
Harvey Norman

closed Comments

  • [Deactivated] on 11/02/2013 - 14:38

    That's an awesome camera. My wife has a Nikon D3000 though, I'm assuming the bigger number means it's better…

    • ca6leguy on 11/02/2013 - 14:55

      Hahha, you got the wrong way around.

    • idonteven on 11/02/2013 - 15:32

      They aren't even the same brand. The 1100D and D3000 are the basic entry-level cameras for beginners.

    • bich.light on 11/02/2013 - 15:55

      Nikon D7000 is better than D3000.
      However… Nikon D300 is better than D7000.

      It's a little weird but as you can see from that simple example, the bigger number doesn't mean it's better.
      Also, a Canon 600D is better than a 1100D. Generally, lower the number is better in Canon's cameras.

      • ca6leguy on 11/02/2013 - 16:34

        Ie. D800 is a higher model compared to D90. Nikon does not follow the numbering series compared to Canon. The most consistent way to figure out which camera is better is by the size. The bigger the better.

        • medium_tight on 11/02/2013 - 23:35

          Nikon D100 actually older than D90 … doh :(

      • Gecko on 12/02/2013 - 11:36

        Although a Canon 30D is worse than a Canon 60D. So confusing.

    • [Deactivated] on 12/02/2013 - 02:27

      I say the same thing when I play golf.

  • superforever on 11/02/2013 - 14:41

    Seems is a good deal with lens.

    http://www.shopbot.com.au/pp-canon-eos-1100d-price-297734.ht…

  • millhouse on 11/02/2013 - 14:42
    +1

    It's ok. The lens included doesn't have stabilisation (non-IS, or non-VR in Nikon terms).

    As a Canon shooter, I'd still recommend a Nikon D3100 w/18-55 VR over this. Full HD video, stabilised lens, etc. More expensive? Yes, but a better buy.

  • lostincanberra on 11/02/2013 - 15:08

    Decent price. Use the money you DON'T spend to buy a decent lens or three. Perhaps start with a cheap one like the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II for $100 or less.

  • Tycn on 11/02/2013 - 15:15
    +4

    As much as I dislike pimping my own deal, the K-r can be bought for a similar price and is a better camera in almost every way.

    http://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/91497

    http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-1100D-vs-Pentax_K-r

    • ca6leguy on 11/02/2013 - 16:41

      What's a Tampax?

  • bich.light on 11/02/2013 - 16:02

    I owned this camera before and it was alright. It has all the functions that you need and is simple to use.
    It is very user-friendly, light-weight and portable.

    I will comment that I upgraded out of this camera in a year of buying it simply because I pretty much love photography and enjoy taking photographs. If you already have a keen interest in taking photographs, I would possibly recommend buying a better camera.

    • ca6leguy on 11/02/2013 - 16:38

      What camera did you upgrade to?

      • Foma2 on 11/02/2013 - 17:02

        I bet it was Canon 600D.
        60D is a better one but much more expensive.

      • bich.light on 11/02/2013 - 17:58

        Haha you wouldn't guess it.

        EOS-1Ds Mk II

        Family friend bought new camera (wedding photographer) and gave it to me for cheap :)

        • ca6leguy on 11/02/2013 - 21:09

          Sounds more like a downgrade. The newer entry level performs better than the antique 1Ds mk ii.

        • bich.light on 12/02/2013 - 02:41

          I don't think I can exactly say that for myself.

  • SumaraiPizzaCat on 11/02/2013 - 17:13

    This one seems even cheaper..
    http://www.techrific.com.au/product_info.php?products_id=153…

    • Chris McMahon on 11/02/2013 - 17:22

      This one seems even cheaper..

      Shipping Charges: Anywhere in Australia(+AU$112.95)

      AU$436.95 inc delivery.

      • aim54x on 11/02/2013 - 17:30
        +1

        I can't work out if that is grey stock or cabin Australia stock…. But I did spot the included shipping so I'm not sure where you got that shipping charge

  • spychiatrist on 11/02/2013 - 21:51
    -1

    c'mon sub-$300 dslr!

  • [Deactivated] on 12/02/2013 - 02:57

    I'm only thinking of it because my step daughter is enjoying photography at school, and her mother has the 600d. Is there any issue with swapping lens' between the two? I would assume not, but I don't want to make a $300 mistake over a false assumption.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join