This was posted 11 years 9 months 29 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Free 10 Track Decca Classical Music Compilation - 192K MP3 Download (SONOS Promotion)

680
Free 10 Track Decca Classical Music Compilation - 192K MP3 Download (SONOS Promotion)
Go to Deal
Cashback
SteveAndBelle on 24/01/2013 - 09:15 sonos.com (1954 clicks)
Last edited 24/01/2013 - 10:11

Just got this in my inbox and thought I'd share it with yuzall. It's a compilation of Classical music so it may not be everyones cup of tea but hey give it a go and chuck it in one of your playlists. Who knows, you may actually like it ;)

Only 10 tracks and only 192K MP3s but it's free so 'meh'.

Enjoy.

PS, BTW & FYI: You don't need a SONOS system to play these tracks, they are just plain-Jane MP3s.

Entertainment Classical Music Decca Music

Related Stores

Sonos
Sonos

closed Comments

  • Leonard on 24/01/2013 - 09:22
    +3

    Thanks for that. Looks like a great compilation

    • peeweekathi on 24/01/2013 - 10:06
      +3

      He's right, it is a good compilation! Thanks OP!

      • roguescholar on 24/01/2013 - 10:15

        Thanks OP, some nice tracks on there.

  • lixin420 on 24/01/2013 - 09:26

    " Only 10 tracks and only 192K MP3s but it's free so 'meh' "

    Exactly. I am not gonna complaint about 192K MP3 since it's free.

  • erd on 24/01/2013 - 09:53
    +10

    "yuzall" in a classical music post. I just love the vast versatility of fellow ozbargainers.

    • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2013 - 10:58
      +7

      yeah we are all bike riding beer drinking classical music listening adventure seeking gadget addicted gamers

  • Light in Water on 24/01/2013 - 10:29
    +1

    It is unlikely that 196k is any worse than higher bitrates for most use. http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Transparency

    • SteveAndBelle on 24/01/2013 - 10:35

      Agreed. Higher bitrates have the placebo effect of perceived higher quality. I'm even guilty of that and I know I know better :) MOST people wouldn't be able to tell the difference but hey if I have the choice of using an MP3 or a FLAC of the exact same track of course I'll go for the FLAC version.

    • ilikebargains on 24/01/2013 - 10:38

      most human ears will tell VERY little difference.

    • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2013 - 11:00
      +1

      the bass in higher bitrate songs sounds a hell of a lot better than lower qualities

    • Elijah on 24/01/2013 - 13:10

      All my tunes have a var. bit of around 320kbps…

  • zoomzoomzoom on 24/01/2013 - 11:08

    Nice find OP. I specially like track 1.

  • m0nkeycheese on 24/01/2013 - 13:24
    +1

    I love my sonos :D

  • EarlyBird on 24/01/2013 - 15:21

    Some very good tracks here. Thanks.

  • jacknthebeanstalk on 24/01/2013 - 17:11

    thanks, op. This will aid in my studying.

  • Icedvovo on 24/01/2013 - 21:22

    Great find.

  • snapper on 24/01/2013 - 23:57

    Nice post, well found.
    I can vouch for the recording quality of Decca and Deutsche Grammophon releases, they have been first class in classical music for decades. As mentioned previously, 192kb/s MP3s are good enough quality, any perceived difference (on pro audio equipment) would be minimal, let alone on your average stereo/ipod/headphones.
    And as for the compilation - a nice selection (I have a couple of the full albums). Best of all, it is free! Enjoy

  • ozy on 25/01/2013 - 10:54

    Wicked beats yo! I'm loving the free additions to my classical genre in itunes!
    Thanks OP

  • petestrash on 31/01/2013 - 07:31

    expired.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join