• expired

Casio G-Shock Classic $66.01, GBD200 Blue $158, Purple $160, Yellow $165, Black $167, Rangeman $271 Delivered @ Amazon AU

800
Casio G-Shock Classic $66.01, GBD200 Blue $158, Purple $160, Yellow $165, Black $167, Rangeman $271 Delivered @ Amazon AUAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 21:28 amazon.com.au (3669 clicks)
Last edited 10/02/2025 - 09:36
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Casio G-Shock Classic DW9052-1V… $66.01 delivered. Camel.

6.5% Cashback @ Cashrewards

  • Crystal/Lens - Mineral
  • 48.5mm x 43mm x 14.7mm (Sizes from Casio)
  • EL Backlight with Afterglow
  • Daily Alarm
  • Countdown Timer - Input range: 1 minute to 24 hours
  • Stopwatch - Measuring mode: elapsed time, split time, 1st-2nd place times
  • Hourly Time Signal
  • Auto Calendar (pre-programmed until the year 2099)
  • 12/24 Hour Formats
  • Water Resistant - 200 Metres

https://twobrokewatchsnobs.com/casio-g-shock-dw9052-1v-revie…
G-Shock Highfashion Review
I've got one, looks heaps better on the wrist than the stock pics.

Casio G-Shock GBD200-2D (blue)… $158.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock GBD200SM-1 (purple)… $160.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock GBD200-9D (yellow)… $165.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock GBD200-1D (black)… $167.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock Rangeman GW9400-1B… $271.00 delivered

Casio MRW200H-1B (resin lens)… $35.00
Casio Solar AQ-S810W-1A (resin lens)… $57.35
Casio Royale AE1200WHD-1A (resin lens)… $62.78 delivered
Casio MDV107D-1A3… $124.82 delivered.
Casio MDV107D-1A2… $125.97 delivered.

Casio G-Shock GA-2100-1A Casioak 'Stealth' $118.47 Delivered.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
Fashion & Apparel Casio Watch

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

Comments

  • HolyCr4p on 29/01/2025 - 21:35
    +3

    I’ve got one

    You are bald 😆

    • bdl on 29/01/2025 - 22:54
      -1

      2 watch 2 furious

      • Mr Bob Dobalina on 31/01/2025 - 19:29

        ?

        • G-rig on 01/02/2025 - 06:46
          +1

          Toretto.. stop watch right there!

  • inamberclad on 29/01/2025 - 21:37
    +1

    I've got one, looks heaps better on the wrist than the stock pics

    WN you haven't aged a bit!

  • xmchen on 29/01/2025 - 21:38
    +4

    the G-SHOCK GSTS110-1A (https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015ZXDJN6) and GSTS100G-1B (https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B01LYH2JEX) looks good deals too

  • MS Paint on 29/01/2025 - 21:47
    +2

    Where's the negative display disclaimer?

    • WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 21:57
      +2

      Casio GBD models have a MIP display which stands out like dogs balls.

      I think it would look good on you.

      • bdl on 29/01/2025 - 22:54
        +1

        GBD = G Balls Dog

      • MS Paint on 30/01/2025 - 08:44
        +1

        I understand that but it's not a watchnerd Gshock post without the disclaimer. I feel ripped off.

      • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 09:30

        Agree, MIPS is the only negative display I would buy.

        @MS Paint Disclaimer: the watch case and band is resin!

    • G-rig on 29/01/2025 - 23:03

      MIPS is the only negative you should buy

  • Jimothy Wongingtons on 29/01/2025 - 21:48
    +1

    GBD200SM-1

    Is this ever going to go sub 150 sigh

    • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 30/01/2025 - 22:51
      +1

      I think 8% CR on watches now brings it below $150.

      160-16=144
      144x0.08=11.52
      160-11.52=148.48.

  • flapperino on 29/01/2025 - 22:54

    All time low on these Mudmasters too:

  • flapperino on 29/01/2025 - 22:56

    For some reason, Amazon won't deliver the DW9052-1V to PO Boxes. They will for the others though.

  • treefidi on 29/01/2025 - 23:10
    -2

    I honestly wouldn't pay more than $30 for a DW9052, it's just so lacking in functionality compared to any other G-shock that it's not worth it. I can't remember if I ever got around to replacing the battery when it died, because I didn't like to wear it most of the time.

    Those of you who do buy or have a GBD200 or GBD100 and have an Android phone, you can try Gadgetbridge instead of the official app. It's open source and pretty functional.

    • G-rig on 29/01/2025 - 23:16

      Yes it's too expensive and wears very big. Get a more iconic one like a square or DW-6900 etc. I got a blue gbd200 and best to turn all that stuff off and run in airplane mode, will save battery too.

      It's all relative though as most things have undergone inflation and watch reviewed ramping up the prices, increasing demand.

      • WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 23:23

        Huh it's 43mm wide which is small for a G-Shock.

        • G-rig on 03/02/2025 - 08:15
          +1

          Update: Received the DW9052. This model actually fits the best for smaller wrists vs typical classics like the G9000 & DW6900 (which have those wings that push the straps out). As i suspected the straps drop down vertically. The digit size is almost the same.

          It is a very similar 90s style watch to the DW6900, classic 90s styling. It's the ultimate beater and cheapest G-Shock around for $66.

      • pennypacker on 30/01/2025 - 11:39
        -1

        Yes it's too expensive and wears very big

        nekminit

        haven't tried it on personally

        🤔

          • pennypacker on 30/01/2025 - 15:49

            @G-rig: If you're replying to me, I was commenting on your "wears very big" comment despite not having worn it, haha.

            I own the watch and it doesn't wear too big (7.25" wrist).

        • G-rig on 03/02/2025 - 15:16

          H.E. I've now tried it on and amended my post , it's a good wearing G-Shock for smaller wrists. The strap will take some time to get more curvature but drops straight down. You and WN can rest at ease now.

          Ps. No doubt the Amazon stock is recycled. Still new but seems already a bit curved for me (and the spring bars click if you move it around but would be normal with this old basic design).

    • WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 23:19
      +1

      Seems a bit harsh, it's a 200M watch that will last 10 years or more on the 1 battery depending how often you the backlight.

      Yes it doesn't have a lot of functions but for some it has plenty in this day & age when your phone is never far away.

  • Thrifty Dan on 29/01/2025 - 23:39
    -4

    I don't know where to begin. The watches are very retro, and I had to wear my sunglasses to look at some of the brighter ones.

    • lew380 on 30/01/2025 - 19:31

      It is an attractive style to some, it's rugged. In my teens, the rugged casios were awesome. I wouldn't wear one today, I go for minimalist military or low profile watches. Bertucci make indestructible watches for a good price. Style is subjective.

  • Jono05 on 30/01/2025 - 00:56
    +2

    Tempted to get the blue one….
    Add it to my G Shock collection which is currently at 5.

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 30/01/2025 - 09:49
      +2

      Do it bro

      • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 10:00
        +3

        Agree I got the blue one and it looks great. #YOLO

        https://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/213835/119408/pxl_2024…

        • Jimothy Wongingtons on 30/01/2025 - 10:12

          If the ‘yellow’ was proper yellow I’d get one

          • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 10:20
            +1

            @Jimothy Wongingtons: Yeah like canary yellow. I sold that yellow GA2100, didn't end up wearing it really.

            Seemed to have gathered a few G-Shocks now.. about 5 or 6.

            • Jono05 on 30/01/2025 - 13:04

              @G-rig: Nice collection. Which ones do you have? I keep wanting more G-Shocks. Really want to get the MTGB2000D-1A, just waiting for the price to be right.

              • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 14:22

                @Jono05: Haven't got too many too quickly really and sold one or two before getting others.

                GD350-8, DW6900U-1, GW-B5600MG, DW5000R-1, G9000, GBM-2100- X1, GDB200 (Blue)

                • Jono05 on 03/02/2025 - 13:28
                  +1

                  @G-rig: Nice collection there. I’ll have to google them. Decided not to get the blue one. If it was solar I would’ve got it. Going to wait the MTG one I want to be sub $1000.

                  • G-rig on 03/02/2025 - 15:18
                    +1

                    @Jono05: Yeah everyone wants a solar without all the smartwatch bs. Would make a lot of their other range redundant so don't count on it (ever).

                    $1k bit different to $150 but sounds good.
                    I'd be tempted to get a full metal square G but tap out at $500 (plus you'd be worried about scratching it).

  • ForkSnorter on 30/01/2025 - 07:20
    -8

    Holy crap, $270 for an ugly as hell Casio watch made of plastic. My refurbished Apple Watch 7 was less than that.

    • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 07:41
      +5

      Having to charging a watch every day would be annoying..

      They aren't even similar enough to compare and no one cares about your used shitty apple watch.
      You also don't need to spend that much on a Casio (it has a few different sensors).

      Funny how no one has a hissy when people spend a fortune on apple watches or GFX cards lol.

      • illz on 30/01/2025 - 08:17
        +1

        ^This

      • ForkSnorter on 30/01/2025 - 09:22
        -2

        Having to charging a watch every day would be annoying..

        Doesn't matter what kind of watch I wear, I will always be taking it off when I go to bed, and putting it on my bedside table (where the charger is). Because wearing a watch to bed would be annoying…

        • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 10:22

          No sleep and health tracking for you then (which is one of the main benefit of those smart watches.

          I would have thought an iPhone watch is minimal enough that you wouldn't notice it (my Fitbit is).

  • matthewpoon on 30/01/2025 - 10:35
    -1

    Can anyone recommend a good kids watch? (aged 8-10). Step counter a bonus, but not essential.

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 30/01/2025 - 12:46
      +1

      my 5 year old has one of these GLXS5600-7B - its classed as a 'womens' watch - but obviously is unisex.

    • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 12:57
      +1

      Maybe a Fitbit or something.

      An analogue would be good if they want to tell the time.
      Eg swatch (lifetime free battery replacement).

      If they are locked into the ecosystem get an apple watch 6 or 7 etc.

    • Jono05 on 30/01/2025 - 13:06
      +1

      Check out the Baby-G range.

  • Grazz989 on 30/01/2025 - 14:03
    -2

    How are these so expensive? They're made with resin like every other cheap digital watch, and for the most part they've got the same type of display. I'm sure there's a billion similar watches that mimic the same look, made with the same materials, with the same display, that do the same functions (not that 99% of people use any of the functions anyway).

    Am I crazy, or were casios dirt cheap a couple decades ago?

    • WatchNerd on 30/01/2025 - 14:20
      +1

      Yes this post got over 60 upvotes because it's expensive lol.

    • lew380 on 30/01/2025 - 19:27
      +1

      I have a rangeman from 15 years ago, still works just fine as it's solar, but the resin frame where the pins attach is long gone, all cracked and brittle. I've glued it back together and its still good but not my style these days.

      Nothing compares to watches like the bertucci's with a 1 piece frame with fixed lugs, very minimalistic but it's also boringly indestructible. Each has its perks.

      • asusman96 on 30/01/2025 - 22:07

        I’ve had a GW9400 for 15 years too!
        Replaced band+bezel once. Looks brand new :)

        • lew380 on 01/02/2025 - 11:42

          I've always wanted a desert Camo band and bezel for it, it would look amazing!

  • G-rig on 01/02/2025 - 09:27
    +2

    JOMW review
    https://youtu.be/1jc6jaWUgok?si=gLeSIIrPdIgHjGv7

    • WatchNerd on 01/02/2025 - 10:19
      +1

      Lol it's bizarre he said the lens is acrylic when even Amazon said it's mineral. Plus G-Shocks don't ever have an acrylic lens.

      • G-rig on 01/02/2025 - 10:22

        I missed that but read I haven't heard of an acrylic screen either. Amazing Amazon got the specs correct lol.

        Still considering this one.

        • WatchNerd on 01/02/2025 - 10:24
          +1

          He says it at 6 min mark. I think it would look good on you plus it hasn't been this cheap for years.

          People bagging it don't have a clue. It's pretty much the best beater you can buy atm for $66.

          • G-rig on 01/02/2025 - 12:14

            @WatchNerd: Yeah I should have got when 10% cashback.
            It would sit nicely next to the G9000 and DW6900.

            G-Shocks and casios are cheap enough to collect, I've got a lot of beaters 😂.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join