Casio G-Shock Classic $66.01, GBD200 Blue $158, Purple $160, Yellow $165, Black $167, Rangeman $271 Delivered @ Amazon AU

710
Casio G-Shock Classic $66.01, GBD200 Blue $158, Purple $160, Yellow $165, Black $167, Rangeman $271 Delivered @ Amazon AUAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 21:28 amazon.com.au (2751 clicks)
Last edited 29/01/2025 - 21:52
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Casio G-Shock Classic DW9052-1V. Camel.

6.5% Cashback @ Cashrewards

  • Crystal/Lens - Mineral
  • 48.5mm x 43mm x 14.7mm (Sizes from Casio)
  • EL Backlight with Afterglow
  • Daily Alarm
  • Countdown Timer - Input range: 1 minute to 24 hours
  • Stopwatch - Measuring mode: elapsed time, split time, 1st-2nd place times
  • Hourly Time Signal
  • Auto Calendar (pre-programmed until the year 2099)
  • 12/24 Hour Formats
  • Water Resistant - 200 Metres

https://twobrokewatchsnobs.com/casio-g-shock-dw9052-1v-revie…
G-Shock Highfashion Review
I've got one, looks heaps better on the wrist than the stock pics.

Casio G-Shock GBD200-2D (blue)… $158.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock GBD200SM-1 (purple)… $160.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock GBD200-9D (yellow)… $165.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock GBD200-1D (black)… $167.00 delivered
Casio G-Shock Rangeman GW9400-1B… $271.00 delivered

Casio MRW200H-1B (resin lens)… $35.00

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
Fashion & Apparel Casio Watch

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

Comments

  • HolyCr4p on 29/01/2025 - 21:35
    +3

    I’ve got one

    You are bald 😆

    • bdl on 29/01/2025 - 22:54

      2 watch 2 furious

  • inamberclad on 29/01/2025 - 21:37
    +1

    I've got one, looks heaps better on the wrist than the stock pics

    WN you haven't aged a bit!

  • xmchen on 29/01/2025 - 21:38
    +3

    the G-SHOCK GSTS110-1A (https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015ZXDJN6) and GSTS100G-1B (https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B01LYH2JEX) looks good deals too

  • MS Paint on 29/01/2025 - 21:47
    +2

    Where's the negative display disclaimer?

    • WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 21:57
      +2

      Casio GBD models have a MIP display which stands out like dogs balls.

      I think it would look good on you.

      • bdl on 29/01/2025 - 22:54
        +1

        GBD = G Balls Dog

      • MS Paint on 30/01/2025 - 08:44
        +1

        I understand that but it's not a watchnerd Gshock post without the disclaimer. I feel ripped off.

      • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 09:30

        Agree, MIPS is the only negative display I would buy.

        @MS Paint Disclaimer: the watch case and band is resin!

    • G-rig on 29/01/2025 - 23:03

      MIPS is the only negative you should buy

  • Jimothy Wongingtons on 29/01/2025 - 21:48
    +1

    GBD200SM-1

    Is this ever going to go sub 150 sigh

    • n3ck3ntry8bort0rgasm on 30/01/2025 - 22:51
      +1

      I think 8% CR on watches now brings it below $150.

      160-16=144
      144x0.08=11.52
      160-11.52=148.48.

  • flapperino on 29/01/2025 - 22:54

    All time low on these Mudmasters too:

  • flapperino on 29/01/2025 - 22:56

    For some reason, Amazon won't deliver the DW9052-1V to PO Boxes. They will for the others though.

  • treefidi on 29/01/2025 - 23:10
    -2

    I honestly wouldn't pay more than $30 for a DW9052, it's just so lacking in functionality compared to any other G-shock that it's not worth it. I can't remember if I ever got around to replacing the battery when it died, because I didn't like to wear it most of the time.

    Those of you who do buy or have a GBD200 or GBD100 and have an Android phone, you can try Gadgetbridge instead of the official app. It's open source and pretty functional.

    • G-rig on 29/01/2025 - 23:16

      Yes it's too expensive and wears very big. Get a more iconic one like a square or DW-6900 etc. I got a blue gbd200 and best to turn all that stuff off and run in airplane mode, will save battery too.

      It's all relative though as most things have undergone inflation and watch reviewed ramping up the prices, increasing demand.

      • WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 23:23

        Huh it's 43mm wide which is small for a G-Shock.

        • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 04:37
          -1

          Huh your pic shows The Rock wearing it.

          I meant it may not wear the best on smaller wrists (long ways it lug to lug)v but haven't tried it on personally.

          You got any other G-Shocks to compare it to?

          @treefidi $60 is honestly not bad, a lot of the classics have doubled in price. The A158/A168 aren't worth more than $35 or $40 either.

          Smart watches aren't casios forte and the 2move app sucks so wouldn't be buying the GBD200 for that.

      • pennypacker on 30/01/2025 - 11:39
        -1

        Yes it's too expensive and wears very big

        nekminit

        haven't tried it on personally

        🤔

        • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 11:51
          -1

          not too expensive
          I don't consider $60 too expensive but old mate above does. Maybe they were $30 in 1995.

          I paid $120 for a DW6900U-1, re-release but the older ones were even more. Those have easily doubled in price.

          • pennypacker on 30/01/2025 - 15:49

            @G-rig: If you're replying to me, I was commenting on your "wears very big" comment despite not having worn it, haha.

            I own the watch and it doesn't wear too big (7.25" wrist).

            • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 15:51

              @pennypacker: Not replying to anyone in particular, doesn't worry me

              Yeah I'll try one on but seen plenty of reviews. Got enough similar ones, prefer the DW6900 with 5600 strap.

    • WatchNerd on 29/01/2025 - 23:19
      +1

      Seems a bit harsh, it's a 200M watch that will last 10 years or more on the 1 battery depending how often you the backlight.

      Yes it doesn't have a lot of functions but for some it has plenty in this day & age when your phone is never far away.

  • Thrifty Dan on 29/01/2025 - 23:39
    -4

    I don't know where to begin. The watches are very retro, and I had to wear my sunglasses to look at some of the brighter ones.

    • lew380 on 30/01/2025 - 19:31

      It is an attractive style to some, it's rugged. In my teens, the rugged casios were awesome. I wouldn't wear one today, I go for minimalist military or low profile watches. Bertucci make indestructible watches for a good price. Style is subjective.

  • Jono05 on 30/01/2025 - 00:56
    +2

    Tempted to get the blue one….
    Add it to my G Shock collection which is currently at 5.

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 30/01/2025 - 09:49
      +2

      Do it bro

      • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 10:00
        +2

        Agree I got the blue one and it looks great. #YOLO

        https://files.ozbargain.com.au/upload/213835/119408/pxl_2024…

        • Jimothy Wongingtons on 30/01/2025 - 10:12

          If the ‘yellow’ was proper yellow I’d get one

          • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 10:20
            +1

            @Jimothy Wongingtons: Yeah like canary yellow. I sold that yellow GA2100, didn't end up wearing it really.

            Seemed to have gathered a few G-Shocks now.. about 5 or 6.

            • Jono05 on 30/01/2025 - 13:04

              @G-rig: Nice collection. Which ones do you have? I keep wanting more G-Shocks. Really want to get the MTGB2000D-1A, just waiting for the price to be right.

              • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 14:22

                @Jono05: Haven't got too many too quickly really and sold one or two before getting others.

                GD350-8, DW6900U-1, GW-B5600MG, DW5000R-1, G9000, GBM-2100- X1, GDB200 (Blue)

  • ForkSnorter on 30/01/2025 - 07:20
    -8

    Holy crap, $270 for an ugly as hell Casio watch made of plastic. My refurbished Apple Watch 7 was less than that.

    • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 07:41
      +5

      Having to charging a watch every day would be annoying..

      They aren't even similar enough to compare and no one cares about your used shitty apple watch.
      You also don't need to spend that much on a Casio (it has a few different sensors).

      Funny how no one has a hissy when people spend a fortune on apple watches or GFX cards lol.

      • illz on 30/01/2025 - 08:17
        +1

        ^This

      • ForkSnorter on 30/01/2025 - 09:22
        -1

        Having to charging a watch every day would be annoying..

        Doesn't matter what kind of watch I wear, I will always be taking it off when I go to bed, and putting it on my bedside table (where the charger is). Because wearing a watch to bed would be annoying…

        • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 10:22

          No sleep and health tracking for you then (which is one of the main benefit of those smart watches.

          I would have thought an iPhone watch is minimal enough that you wouldn't notice it (my Fitbit is).

  • matthewpoon on 30/01/2025 - 10:35
    -1

    Can anyone recommend a good kids watch? (aged 8-10). Step counter a bonus, but not essential.

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 30/01/2025 - 12:46
      +1

      my 5 year old has one of these GLXS5600-7B - its classed as a 'womens' watch - but obviously is unisex.

    • G-rig on 30/01/2025 - 12:57
      +1

      Maybe a Fitbit or something.

      An analogue would be good if they want to tell the time.
      Eg swatch (lifetime free battery replacement).

      If they are locked into the ecosystem get an apple watch 6 or 7 etc.

    • Jono05 on 30/01/2025 - 13:06
      +1

      Check out the Baby-G range.

  • Grazz989 on 30/01/2025 - 14:03
    -2

    How are these so expensive? They're made with resin like every other cheap digital watch, and for the most part they've got the same type of display. I'm sure there's a billion similar watches that mimic the same look, made with the same materials, with the same display, that do the same functions (not that 99% of people use any of the functions anyway).

    Am I crazy, or were casios dirt cheap a couple decades ago?

    • WatchNerd on 30/01/2025 - 14:20
      +1

      Yes this post got over 60 upvotes because it's expensive lol.

    • lew380 on 30/01/2025 - 19:27
      +1

      I have a rangeman from 15 years ago, still works just fine as it's solar, but the resin frame where the pins attach is long gone, all cracked and brittle. I've glued it back together and its still good but not my style these days.

      Nothing compares to watches like the bertucci's with a 1 piece frame with fixed lugs, very minimalistic but it's also boringly indestructible. Each has its perks.

      • asusman96 on 30/01/2025 - 22:07

        I’ve had a GW9400 for 15 years too!
        Replaced band+bezel once. Looks brand new :)

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join