• expired

50% Off All-Access Digital Annual Subscription: $100 (Normally $200) @ The Guardian

14314
50% Off All-Access Digital Annual Subscription: $100 (Normally $200) @ The Guardian
Go to Deal
humptydumpty on 31/12/2024 - 19:15 support.theguardian.com (667 clicks)
Last edited 01/01/2025 - 09:56 by 1 other user

Got this in my email today:

Time is running out to claim this rare opportunity to save 50% on an annual all-access Guardian subscription.

Subscribe before midnight on December 31 and enjoy a $100 saving.

  • Unlimited, unmetered access to the Guardian app
  • Ad-free reading on all your devices
  • Exclusive newsletter for supporters, sent every week from the Guardian newsroom
  • Far fewer asks for support
  • Unlimited access to the Guardian's new cooking app, Feast

Hopefully the link will work as is (I stripped the non-essential parts from it).

Update: I've removed the expiry because the offer is still available (at 6:40 am, 1 Jan 2025).

Books & Magazines Newspaper Subscription

Related Stores

The Guardian
The Guardian

Comments

  • DontNeedThis on 31/12/2024 - 23:44
    +15

    Calling The Guardian "fake news" is proof that our society is beyond repair.

    • Phoebus on 01/01/2025 - 00:02
      +5

      The Guardian is one of the worst. Even the BBC and CNN have higher standards. It's difficult to mention those propaganda rags without experiencing some reflux and a little vomit in the mouth.

      • jackspratt on 01/01/2025 - 03:07
        +8

        You need to see your doctor, although I doubt they can help.

    • arcticmonkey on 01/01/2025 - 00:32
      +3

      And people negging the deal purely on political grounds.

      They're making a mockery of OzBargain standards on invalid negative votes if any are enforced.

      • Phoebus on 01/01/2025 - 01:14
        +4

        Negging based on, The Guardian, doesn't deliver what they say they do. They deliver disinformation and propaganda, not journalism, not analysis. Please see OffGuardian

        • arcticmonkey on 01/01/2025 - 09:30

          Now try using English.

        • donkcat on 01/01/2025 - 09:57

          Thats your opinion, not backed up by evidence. If u dont like the deal then simply don’t partake in the deal instead of in here bitching about irrelevant points to the deal.

  • UFO on 01/01/2025 - 01:42
    +3

    Not expired. Just signed up to the $100 offer and it's almost 2am.

  • Binchicken22 on 01/01/2025 - 02:36
    +6

    Lol at the lefties being convinced to donate their money to billionaires propoganda machines for literally nothing in return.

  • VBO on 01/01/2025 - 06:35
    +2

    I'll consider to subscribe only if they pay me.

  • Vasilly6 on 01/01/2025 - 06:36
    +6

    Left wing garbage. You couldn't pay me enough to read this propaganda

    • MarisaEm on 01/01/2025 - 15:33
      +3

      Good thing no one's offering to pay you to read it then!
      Bunch of snowflake conservatives 😂

  • spazattack91 on 01/01/2025 - 07:36
    +14

    Wow, what a cesspit. I think the mods need to take down some of this stuff. I keep seeing angry men complaining about wokeness on every single post, regardless of product . The word has lost its meaning.

    While I don't agree with everything the guardian writes I do think it's worth getting of you read a lot of news. They cap their monthly articles if you're not paying.

    I think the quality of journalism is a lot better than the rubbish you read from the Murdoch press.

    • Corgsta on 01/01/2025 - 09:20
      +9

      100%. This is what ozb has become unfortunately. Every time a Tesla or other EV deal is posted, there are 250+ comments within hours. I wonder if the mods set a new rule for no political and offtopic discussion (as in, not about the actual deal price and availability), how that would go.

      I think it’s worth adding links to mediabiasfactcheck.com for people to check out. They rate the Guardian as left-centre, not hard left as various people here say. Those people should read the website and see how they came to that rating. But I suspect those people will not and instead mistakenly write off mediabiasfactcheck as some left wing political website.

      https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

      https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian-a-closer-look-at…

      You can also look up the Herald Sun, the Age, The Australian, etc to compare.

      Personally, as I said earlier in this thread, I stopped reading the Guardian months ago due to the political bias. But I think they are a good journalistic organisation and their website is nice to use (unlike ABC, Inkl, etc). I donated to them years back and read it daily.

    • arcticmonkey on 01/01/2025 - 09:26
      +5

      100%. Mods were useless in resolving the numerous reports I made ('no action taken'). That is a political action in itself.

      These types of junk comments need to be better resolved or it'll turn OzBargain into a cesspit.

    • Phoebus on 01/01/2025 - 16:02

      It's about time the mods disabled comments on deals for woke left wing products.. Like how The Guardian does.

      • HamesJoffman on 01/01/2025 - 17:31
        +4

        Everything I don’t like is woke!

        • Koffee on 01/01/2025 - 22:17

          Same as everything you don't like is political bias!

  • fishnzz on 01/01/2025 - 08:17
    +3

    Link still active. Just joined.I subscribe to the Sydney Morning Herald and now the Guardian.I too am happy to subscribe to papers other than the right wing biased Murdoch press.I am just amazed at the anti left wing attacks in the comments here.

  • mathematicalcoffee on 01/01/2025 - 09:23
    +2

    Wow, these comments!
    I am a big fan of the Guardian cryptic crossword. It can be done for free on the browser but I would like to do it on their app as it works a bit better with screen size etc. Does anyone know if this level of subscription allows me to do that? The past few times I was tempted to subscribe, you needed the top tier subscription to get the puzzles, and this is the only bit of the subscription I'm interested in. I don't mind paying a smaller amount of money in the hopes that the setters of the crosswords are paid enough to keep setting! (SMH cryptic is best as Guardian is usually too hard but I think their subscriptions are more)

    • mathematicalcoffee on 01/01/2025 - 10:07

      ahh, apparently the Guardian Puzzles app (which had good crossword experience) is discontinued and one must do the crosswords on the main app - you can't get any of the other puzzles on that app, and the main app has the same problems as doing it on the browser in your phone - can't see the grid and clues on the one screen, etc.

      Other puzzlers - the Telegraph has $5 for the first yr offer (if you try to open a crossword this will pop up, otherwise you get $49/yr - I have no idea if the $5/yr only has puzzles and nothing else, if so that suits me perfectly). Independent has $1 for 6 months. Reddit says the crossword app experience for these should be OK, so it's just whether I can get used to the setting styles. The Independent cryptic is available free online so I could try before committing to an app (which will save my progress and be more convenient for doing puzzles out and about or in transit). Telegraph cryptic appears not to be available free online.

  • LaTerrible on 01/01/2025 - 09:31
    +5

    Lol

    OzB showing its rear end today

  • ChickenAdobo on 01/01/2025 - 10:50
    +3

    The rightie telling other people they are right and opinion about this news outlet is factually right. LOL 😂 you can’t make this stuff up.

    • The Wololo Wombat on 01/01/2025 - 10:51
      +5

      You think the guardian is ‘factually right?’ ROFL.

  • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 11:01
    +2

    The Guardian are a leftist, anti-semitic, anti-Christian, anti-male, pro every trash progressive cause trash of an organisation that is anti-free speech except for their outrageous bile.

    https://x.com/basil_tgmd/status/1871568376474341427?s=61

    https://x.com/eyakoby/status/1870914431414145043?s=61

    https://x.com/blueblur2023/status/1871450766382383331?s=61

    https://x.com/chrismartzwx/status/1862307453368443075?s=61

    https://x.com/slatzism/status/1856703588531044535?s=61

    • team teri on 01/01/2025 - 11:24
      +7

      Good morning to you too. I hope this new year will brighten your mood :-)

    • GordonD on 01/01/2025 - 11:41
      +2

      The Guardian are a leftist, anti-semitic, anti-Christian, anti-male

      All of those are true.

      All but one of those annoy me.

      The remaining one is why I read it. As a correspondent to Ha'aretz wrote some years ago:
      "Jews can’t support occupation, genocide and ethnic cleansing then shout “anti-Semitism!!”, because then anti-Semitism becomes a moral obligation of the first order. If Jews support Zionism then anti-Semitism is justified, moral and necessary."

      And the rest of the mainstream media does not have the moral courage to stand up for what they claim are their principles on that subject.

      • gravel on 01/01/2025 - 11:56
        +1

        Now why doesn't that surprise me. Have you considered the possibility that the Guardian and Ha'aretz are not showing moral courage but rather the same bias that you might consider applies to the other media.
        In other words your championing a source that fits neatly into your own ideas and beliefs.

      • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 12:15
        +1

        The only occupation, genocide and ethnic cleansing is from Israel’s opponents. Jews have been ethnicity cleansed from all the neighbouring states, even in the Arab parts of Israel Jews are not safe alone.

        Zionism is simply a desire for a Jewish state, you complain about this while advocating for another completely intolerant murderous Islamic state, one of many.

        But yeah, go with the progressive line that Israel should allow its enemies to group, arm, prepare and plan to attack Israel and be left alone to do it.

        • Phoebus on 01/01/2025 - 16:37

          you do realize that Jews are one of the biggest ethnic groups in Iran right?

    • iBuzz7S on 01/01/2025 - 11:48
      +4

      https://x.com/basil_tgmd/status/1871568376474341427?s=61

      Losing your marbles over a screenshot of a mock headline posted from a parody account.

      https://x.com/grauniadmeme/status/1871468353316938076

      • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 12:19
        +3

        It’s funny though because it’s true. People can’t tell the difference, it’s completely plausible.

        This is where The Guardian is today, even the most outrageously woke headline is believable from them.

        Here’s another woke headline that would probably be to too unbelievable for a parady site

        https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/28/hate-body-od…

  • dclee12 on 01/01/2025 - 11:11
    +1

    Ha, Android vs Apple is old news now , Guardian vs Murdoch is where the OzB action is.

    I don’t mind the Guardian, the actual news is ok , and the entertainment section is good.
    It’s very open about its left wing credentials so at least you know what to expect.
    The opinions section can be fashionably lefty to the point of being comical.
    Not sure i would actually pay to read it , but im glad some people do , as presumably this keeps it paywall free.

    No news is entirely unbiased. Read two opposing sources and make your own mind up. That’s about all you can do.

    Twitter started out being good for breaking local news and announcements. But it mostly turned into a giant left (now right) wing opinions column. Its ok as a secondary source i guess.

    And of course Elon is marketing it as the “real” source of truthful news, he owns it and makes money from it. it would be weird if he didn’t hype it up.

    • wisdomtooth on 01/01/2025 - 11:45
      +1

      It’s very open about its left wing credentials

      The problem is not being leftist; the problem is being faux leftist, supporting technocracy at every step of the way.

      so at least you know what to expect.

      True, if you know it isn't actually leftist, but a corporate technocracist propaganda outlet in leftist drag.

    • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 12:22
      +4

      X only seems right wing now because before Elon bought it right wingers and conservatives were simply banned for the tiniest of infractions or criticisms of liberals.

      It is now balanced.

      https://x.com/0rf/status/1860087400917270840?s=61

      The difference now for progressives and the establishment is stark!

      • HamesJoffman on 01/01/2025 - 17:36

        It’s not balanced. I’m sure you won’t be convinced otherwise, though. You only believe CNN when they say something you agree with, otherwise they it’s fake news.

        • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 20:22
          +1

          Go to Bluesky and say anything right wing and see how you go. You will find the typical progressive authoritarianism and refusal to accept differing points of view.

          You probably think is a fair and balanced site.

          • HamesJoffman on 01/01/2025 - 20:24

            @Grok: So you’re unable to refute so you bring up a different social media site? I can see where this is heading.

            • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 20:27
              +2

              @HamesJoffman: CNN are hot trash as well, their ratings are in the toilet. So if even they admit X is more balanced now that should say something,

              X feeds you what you are interested in, follow, search or read right wingers it will feed you more.

              Follow lefties and you get more of that.

              So you want X to start banning people you don’t like?

              • HamesJoffman on 01/01/2025 - 20:34
                +1

                @Grok: https://www.techdirt.com/2024/12/30/free-speech-absolutist-e…

                Leon is already doing that.

                • Grok on 01/01/2025 - 22:18

                  @HamesJoffman: Complete rubbish.

                  Few if any people are banned. No-one has the right to be prioritised. The story is a complete beat up from haters.

                  The bans from BlueSky are legendary, that is what the left do.

                  • jackspratt on 01/01/2025 - 23:53
                    +1

                    @Grok:

                    …. from haters.

                    Haters is a term I would more associate with your ilk.

                    • Grok on 02/01/2025 - 10:55

                      @jackspratt: No-one hates more than the left, their ideology can’t handle critical analysis. The left is the home of cancel culture and social ostracisation.

                  • HamesJoffman on 02/01/2025 - 05:54
                    +1

                    @Grok: Enjoy your delusion.

                    • Grok on 02/01/2025 - 10:52

                      @HamesJoffman: You’re in a bubble.

                      In any case, There is no need to believe any media today. I don’t. Everyone has the opportunity to see the same evidence as a journalist, often more. Almost everything is online, X is not censored for example, first hand raw footage or data is often there,

                      Don’t trust, verify yourself on the touchy subjects. For example, if the media says someone said something, go check. Listen to it in full context.

                      Often the media will outright lie if they are against the person or organisation.

                      • HamesJoffman on 02/01/2025 - 14:40

                        @Grok: Again, the irony still lost on you.
                        Good luck, babe!

                      • wisdomtooth on 02/01/2025 - 20:01

                        @Grok:

                        X is not censored for example

                        Try saying Zionists are racist ethnosupremacists 😉

  • Dyl on 01/01/2025 - 11:33
    +5

    Cheaper (free) at https://web.archive.org/

    And you don't get spam emails then :)

  • CheapBrah on 01/01/2025 - 11:51
    +6

    Most biased and low quality news outlet, not worth $0

  • heal on 01/01/2025 - 12:50
    +7

    One sided news site which does not give readers much opportunity to comment about their bias, shortcomings or failures to tell the full story. This is a good deal if you are only interested in groupthink.

  • Budju on 01/01/2025 - 13:08
    +3

    The left's attempt at fox news

  • mountaineer on 01/01/2025 - 13:20

    They wanna me paying for their horse st, oh, sorry, that’s an insult to the horse st, at least they are nutritious to the soil….and theirs are …%]%]%{^. No thanks…!

  • MarisaEm on 01/01/2025 - 15:36

    Hilarious how many money-obsessed Sky News-frothing boomers there clearly are using this website to snap up "bargains" who can't help but have a big whinge about "wokeness" the minute they get the opportunity to do so.. 😂

    • BarrytheBargain on 01/01/2025 - 17:46

      Boomers? Why does everyone resort to this crap when people don't agree with them. I dislike the guardian, but do sometimes read articles from them if I have nothing to rage about that day ;) and am no way near a boomer. There are young and old people with left and right views.

  • Phoebus on 01/01/2025 - 16:00
    +4

    Defund the ABC. Let them beg like The Guardian.

    • jackspratt on 01/01/2025 - 16:28
      +6

      Send me your bank details - I'll refund your 11 cents/day.

      • Phoebus on 01/01/2025 - 16:49
        +4

        each working Australian pays about $88/year in taxes for the government to brain wash them. At least Fox and The Guardian don't force people to pay.

        • LaTerrible on 01/01/2025 - 17:03
          +3

          Lol

        • HamesJoffman on 01/01/2025 - 18:02
          +2

          The irony appears lost on you.

      • pharcyde on 01/01/2025 - 19:49
        -3

        I know you tried to cook by minimising the financial impact and saying "11 cents per day" but I legitimately would rather the 11c per day and so would the other 26m Australians. We don't need the extreme left brainrot.

        • jackspratt on 01/01/2025 - 20:27
          +2

          What are you talking about?

          It is literally 11 cents/day (in round terms) for every Australian - that is a fact, and is not minimising anything.

          And you certainly don't speak for the other ~26.7 million Australians.

          Brainrot (sic) indeed.

          ps you are also welcome to send me your bank details.

  • Jared17 on 02/01/2025 - 06:52
    +1

    Yeah, no thanks. They are almost as bad as bbc, telegraph and nyt whitewashing Zionist genocidal crimes in Gaza. Stick to independent journalism.

    • wisdomtooth on 02/01/2025 - 20:02

      💯

      Everything corporate in the West is owned by Zionists.

  • roonie on 03/01/2025 - 15:03

    We subscribed recently and found that my wife devices couldn’t use the subscription in my name. ie. Guardian does not use Apple family sharing. What bs! That’s like having a newspaper delivered to your house but no one but the subscriber is allowed to read it,!!

  • Mike Nolan on 03/01/2025 - 18:38
    -1

    “Far fewer asks for support”
    So you give them money but they’ll still beg you for more? Hah no thanks.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join