• expired

Cetaphil Kids Liposomal Lotion SPF 50+ 150ml $17.39 ($15.65 S&S) + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $59 Spend) @ Amazon AU

130
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Amazon are currently price matching Priceline but save extra using Subscribe and Save.
Priceline

The bottle that got delivered to me had an expiry of 06/2026.

Sun protection for kids' sensitive skin. 4 hours water resistant.
With a pump dispenser for reliable protection. Non-greasy, Fragrance free, Paraben free, Hypoallergenic Dermatologically tested.

The only liposomal kids sunscreen in Australia.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • $100/litre for sunscreen? You must be joking.

    • +1

      liposomal isn't cheap

      • -3

        Snake oil never was.
        This is a barrier that goes on you outer, dead, skin layer. Not a drug.

      • +1

        yeah i think liposomal has a better safety profile than conventional amphotericin, but i don't know how this translates to sunscreens

  • +1

    Could also just get this also on special 500ml for about the same price lol

    https://www.amazon.com.au/Cancer-Council-Sunscreen-Lotion-mi…

    • My kids react to this one, but not the one in the deal.
      No idea why. Just rich skin I guess

    • +1

      Cancer Council is great, but this Cetaphil one is even better as it has a number of modern chemical filters providing a higher level of protection.

  • +1

    Stupid question, but why do kids need a sunscreen designed just for them?

    • +5

      As an ADULT I buy only Kid's sunscreen, because once you've tried it you'll never go back.

      Two features stand out to me
      1: It doesn't sting your eyes if the sunscreen runs into them, which sucks if you have sunscreen on your forehead and sweat.
      2: It doesn't have that greasy feeling or turn you into the sandman when you sit down, which is perfect for beach use.

      I learnt about these secrets during my disability services work days, because people on the spectrum didn't flip out when this was applied to them. So another advantage if you have sensitive people.

      • What is the trade off? Obviously there must be.

        • $$ it's more expensive and not every protect comes in a "kids" version, not that you'd use the inferior one once you've tried it.

          • @Deadalready: The question is why only "kids" version has those properties. Why not a more expensive one marketed as non-greasy, non-stinging? What do we mean by "greasy"? The grease must be there for a reason. e.g. prevents the important chemicals being lost when swimming or from sweat. Or results in more even distriubtion, easier application.

            Why use avobenzone, oxybenzone, and octinoxate if they sting eyes? They must be superior in some ways to alternatives?

  • +1

    Used this for a few years as one of kids sensitive to lots of others. To be honest was okay but ended up moving to cancer council as it was much easier to apply. Been using cancer council on all of us now and its been great

  • -1

    Is this that Diddy lotion?

    • +1

      This is sunscreen. Not baby oil.

  • +1

    I have tried and used many other sunscreens for my two boys (2 and 4), and I have found this one to be the best, with the Cancer Council one coming in a close second. Also, it has a very handy dispenser action. For those scoffing, perhaps you haven't tried to put on sunscreen for toddlers before. I can assure you anything to make it easier is better!

  • Back in stock!

Login or Join to leave a comment