• long running

[SUBS] Inside Out 2 (2024) - Streaming from 25 Sep 2024 @ Disney+

1890

Spotted on their Instagram ad - available to watch on 25 Sep 2024.
One of the best sequel animation in 2024!

Hope they make more animation movies like this!


Users who wish to Block "Additions to Streaming Services" can do so by clicking on the Streaming Service Addition tag, then clicking the 3 dot menu, then clicking hide on new deals and/or front page. Ensure that on the home page, the new front page is selected for customisation to show. Video Instructions here or more info here.

Related Stores

Disney+
Disney+

Comments

  • +4

    Got an email from Disney+ offering 3 months for $13.99. Kind of want to see Inside out 2 but still not sure its worth it.

    • +4

      3 months for that price I think kind of worth it. You can also watch some other movies added recently or some of their TV shows are good too.

    • +3

      I got 6 months free and I still don’t think it’s worth it…

    • +2

      Careful posting deals here fella

    • +2

      Just sail the seven seas for it honestly.
      EDIT: Or import the Blu-Ray from somewhere, then either play it on your own player or rip the disc for your server.

    • +1

      $13.99 each month or for all 3 months? If for all 3 just do it, it's cheaper than a movie ticket, and gives so much more. There's tons of other great stuff on there like Andor, Orville, Solar Opposites, etc.

    • The $13.99 plan is only 1080p and 2 screens.
      The $17.99 plan is 4k and 4 screens.

      I believe you can upgrade during the offer to the 4 screens and 4k by paying the difference for each month.

      See - https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/866203

    • +1

      Pixar made this.

      • Pixar, MarvelFilms, LucasAss, all Disney Original now baby

        • +3

          Explains why their movies have been rather poor lately. Except for this, it was ok.

            • +10

              @CptnObvious: Disney should make a movie about accepting others can have differing opinions and then you should watch it.

              • +1

                @PainToad: Dreamworks beat them to it in 2016.

              • -1

                @PainToad:

                Disney should make a movie about accepting others can have differing opinions and then you should watch it.

                if they did that all the racist hateful LWNJ at Lucas Film and other Disney subsidiaries might not like the fact there narrasistic views and opinons are not the 'only ones' that matter

    • +6

      So because you have horrible taste it means that the crap that Disney has been pumping out isn’t worthy of criticism?
      Oh and I take offence to “whining like little girls”, sexist.

      • -8

        As you should. You know yourself well.

      • -1

        So because you have horrible taste it means that the crap that Disney has been pumping out isn’t worthy of criticism?
        Oh and I take offence to “whining like little girls”, sexist.

        he is trolling you boss no one enjoyed the acolyte even the woke nutters admited it was rubbish but had to support it so more woke rubbish gets made

        im glad Disney is losing bucket loads of cash

        not just because they are woke' they are 'allowed' to be 'woke' but because they are "blaming fans" for not liking their 'woke rubbish' like most Woke/LWNJ they think their ideals and opinions are 'right' and are the only ones that matter - they refuse to take critism or feedback - legit ive heard 'if you dont like it dont watch' so many times now people arent watching it the same wackos are complaining its because of 'racism' i mean GTFO it is because you're content is bad, the writing is bad, your actors are really bad and you shit on the lore of which the fan base is built

        same thing is happening with Amazons rings of power also starting to happen to War Hammer 40k

    • +6

      should not have to answer to anyone but their shareholders

      I mean the viewers/customers are stakeholders which do carry weight in decision making.

      • -5

        Not if these viewers carry no weight. Not all customers are the same.

        • +7

          I agree but I think Disney is too quick to blame viewers when a show flops
          In my opinion they're overlooking their shortcomings and simply write off any criticism as toxic fans

    • +5

      they are entitled to and should not have to answer to anyone but their shareholders

      so they need to answer to lots of people haha

      • -6

        Their shareholders are worried about cost challenges. The sooner Disney can replace live-action and voice actors with AI the better.

        • +1

          The sooner Disney can replace live-action and voice actors with AI the better.

          I suppose you also want AI written scripts and AI produced soundtracks.
          I can't think of anything more miserable.

          • -1

            @FireRunner: Why, if AI can provide same or better level of creativity? If they can't yet shouldn't we cultivate them? Are we as humans so petty as to hold back advancing intelligence because we see them as a threat? If the Old Ones thought the same way as us we as humans would not exist today.

            • +3

              @CptnObvious: You might as well get rid of art and other creative human endeavours if that’s how things are going, in my opinion.

              AI isn’t intelligent. That’s number one. Number two is, the models we have now just regurgitate what it has learned and mashed together from actual human creation. If you remove the humans, the “AI” models will just reproduce repetitive boring scripts and actors.

              I don’t see this as being successful for a long time, thankfully.

              As Albert Einstein said, the only thing more important than intelligence is imagination. That’s what humans have that “AI” doesn’t.

              • @GeneralSkunk: Wrong, that's the state of AI now. By not cultivating it it will never be as intelligent or exceed our intelligence.

  • watched this on plex a few weeks ago, not a bad movie, arguably better than the first.

    • Deffo not better than the first with no Bing Bong

  • +14

    If it's your thing, this has been on certain seas for a while now

    • +1

      I get distracted with other things on those high seas.

    • +5

      would you steal an ozbargain account???????

    • +6

      Stremio is king

  • I cried. Great movie!

  • +3

    I enjoyed it, but not as good as the 1st movie IMO. Worth a watch for sure.

  • "Maybe this is what happens when you grow up. You feel less joy."

    Straight into the feels 🥺

    • I experienced joy once. It was awful.

  • My 7 yo loved it, I kind of enjoyed it too

  • -1

    Disney has lost so much money since they hired woke activists who have hijacked all their projects and Pixar were caught up in that ad well, the Pixar movies released exclusively for Disney+ during the days of closed cinemas and COVID were barely worthy of the Pixar name and nothing destroyed the brand more than Lightyear in 2022, which was supposedly set in 1995, yet full of DEI and “The Message” where they had to have a lesbian couple with a baby, and kiss on screen, plus a supporting character who was female who made Buzz Lightyear look like an idiot in multiple scenes of the movie - despite the 84% rating from 5000 users, I noted that for a movie set in 1995 it definitely didn’t feel like that, and that Pixar had clearly been caught up in the DEI attitude of all of Disney. How Kathleen Kennedy still has her job beggars belief when she has ruined their most valuable IP, and I’m not the only one who says this, some of the most watched critics on YouTube say the same thing and they have millions of followers. With Disney’s share price dropping down to 2014 levels, CEO Bob Iger was largely responsible for allowing Marvel, Pixar and Lucasfilm to churn out crap. The response was a 3.5 billion cut to the production budget for all studios owned by Disney including Disney+

    The staggering amount of money that has been spent on films doesn’t help as it typically requires 2.5 times the budget of the movie for a studio to break even. Test audiences crapped on the latest Captain Marvel movie to the point they are reshooting well over 90% of it, making it a ~$400 million film that will never recover that budget the same way Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny burned through a staggering budget but brought in a around $384 million which was largely seen as a failure whether you like the film or not. The budget was around the $295 million, though I heard a figure it was considerably more than that.

    Disney only made decent money on Guardians of the Galaxy 3, which brought in a touch under $900 million.

    Deadpool & Wolverine is looking like they may break a billion for the first time in five years because the movie is not only a p1ss take about Disney buying Fox there are so many jokes about the state of Disney, and while they kept their US R rating, which was something Disney rarely if every before has done, it could not have been a Deadpool movie without it.

    People want Disney to give them family entertainment and be able to take their under 12 kids along and no be confronted with DEI and The Message, but with Disney having to come up with USD$34 billion to buy out Comcast’s share of Hulu which was always on the cards, Disney will have to sell assets in order to cover those costs and with their biggest investor who had two seats on the board Nelson Peltz was going to force Bob Iger out, instead he sold all his stock in Disney back in May for around US$120 a share, and only making about a Billion out if the deal. This guy is a Billionaire already and he was the biggest threat to Bob Iger. This leaves Institutional investor Vanguard with the biggest stake in Disney and institutional investors don’t put up with continued losses for very long.

    I’m only writing this to show that Disney is trading about USD $90 a share which as I said is arpubd their share price just as Marvel was starting to bring consistently large grossing movies,

    Ironically “Avengers End Game” proved to be just that with Marvrl Phase 4 was a mix of Disney+ projects and Spider-Man: No Way Home is technically a Sony film, and yes that did make money but Disney only saw a small percentage of it, the rest of Marvel Phase 4 was largely seen as a failure with most projects failing to get a significant audience, and the fact that Disney has released their Disney+ Phase 4 projects on Physical Media to try to pick up a bit of extra revenue, it essentially lost them hundreds of millions and Disney+ is has put their price up twice in two years, with the cost of living, most people aren’t going to pay it.

    There is a reckoning about to happen in Hollywood with most of the studios, all losing huge amounts of money over the past four or more years.

    Warner Media Discovery have licensed a significant amount of their premium content from HBO Max (which is in the process of launching to 65 countries, they’ve already started anywhere they hadn’t had an exclusive licence with some local Pay TV provider, and as those contracts finish, they won’t be renewing them, instead looking to significantly expand their subscriber base which is around 92 million presently, probably putting them around number 6 in the world, with Netflix still sitting at the top with around 277 million world wide, with Amazon coming at number 2 with 230 million (but Amazon’s main business is in Web s/ Cloud services and their retail market). Disney+ sits at number 3 with approx 153 million, a big gap.

    Anyway, Disney+ will lose more subscribers in countries like OZ where cost of living is too high.

    Paramount/CBS is in talks to be sold to. Skydance TV, they are probably in the most financial difficulty and their streaming service is even less than HBO Max.

    With something like 90 streaming services available, many are country specific - realistically, people cannot afford to spend $100+ a month or buy yearly and spread them out over the course of a year, which is what I do, but if I had to cut all but one, I’d only keep Netflix, Amazon Prime is a nice side bonus, AppleTV+ who actually have the highest quality nitrate for their original shows, are building up a nice library, but they too had a price rise, and it’s not like Apple need to jack up their TV streaming subscription prices - but it fits with their subscription for as much as possible approach. They do have some good shows, which have won Emmy awards and Golden Globes. You might say they are more about quality than quantity

    How much longer these streaming wars will last when most of the bigger studios are under serious financial stress. Firstly, let’s start with bringing back movies people want to watch, I’m all for have DEI if it adds to the storyline and its age appropriate, most people are over “girl-bosses” and the box office reinforces that regularly.

    Movies that do OK, will be ones that have a strong storyline. It’s a business first, and if you continue to push DEI / “The Message” in every TV show on streaming and movies, whether they are made for streaming or made for cinema release, everyone is hurting, even Netflix missed growth numbers, but people are dropping their subs to ad supported tiers.

    Most people who are in the know will get their content from “other sources” sailing the seven seas etc, because once upon a time it was affordable and one service the one that still dominates worldwide were showing other studios content. It will either die a slow death, as one by one they shut down, but raising your subscription fees in order to cover your losses is a bad idea, will only hurt themselves in the short term and potentially make it unviable in the long term.

    Anyway, why I spent a few minutes here and there over a couple of hours, I sort of lost the point, and after all this is not a place where I should be blogging my personal views, it started off short, but somehow blew out to this.

    Apologies for this wall of text.

    • +14

      Wth..

      • -8

        First time seeing paragraphs?

      • +2

        I liked the part about Pixar having the highest quality nitrate for their shows

    • -1

      NotDman1

    • +1

      Weird how triggered some people get over Disney. Perhaps go outside get some fresh air and forget about culture wars for a day.

    • Pretty accurate. I think Kathleen keeps her job on historical success with Back to the future and Indiana jones etc.

  • Found it very strange and maybe a little inappropriate that they made the new emotion in the show horniness

    • Which new emotion in Inside Out 2 is horniness?
      I've watched it a few times now, so I look forward to your insights!

      • -1

        The Pee-wee Herman looking one

    • +1

      There's no libido character. How's that for suppressing emotions and mixed messaging?

      • You'd think the parents would have unlocked it by now. I guess Disney wanted to portray them as being in a loveless, failing marriage

    • +2

      I would say you navigated to a mistitled island in the oceans. Better check your map!

      • I hope it's not the island all those former presidents loved going to. Would be unbecoming of the king of Spain

    • +1

      You are sick bro.

      • Dude, gross. Why you have to bring siblings in to this discussion?

    • +2

      SpainKing is just trolling. Ignore them.

      • +1

        This guy gets it

        • You better believe that's a paddlin'

  • +3

    Really enjoyed this film, probably as much as I enjoyed the first one. Really great continuation of the story and representation of the new emotions. WIll probably watch it again once it hits my tv

  • How is this a deal? You're paying for a subscription to a movies streaming service and they're providing you with movies…

Login or Join to leave a comment