This was posted 12 years ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 670 **4GB** $499 DELIVERED + FREE Assassins 3 Game, @ Storm Computers, WA

60
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 670 **4GB** $499 DELIVERED + FREE Assassins 3 Game, @ Storm Computers, WA
Go to Deal
Store RepStorm Computers on 22/11/2012 - 13:15 stormcomputers.com.au (270 clicks)
Last edited 22/11/2012 - 17:37

GIGABYTE GTX670 with 4GB GDDR5 MEMORY! (specs futher down)

$499 DELIVERED + FREE Assassin's Creed 3 PC GAME (COUPON)(GAME is worth $50)

WE ALSO HAVE SPECIAL CLEARANCE ON THE GIGABYTE GTX580
GIGABYTE N580UD-15I, GTX580, 772Mhz, DDR5, 1536M, 384BIT, PCIE2.0, ATX, DISP, HDMI, DVI
$199 + shipping (select regular australia post and we will send via courier or registered australia post for no extra).
http://www.stormcomputers.com.au/catalog/product_info.php?pr…

GIGABYTE GV-N670OC-4GD GTX670 4GB -

GIGABYTE Ultra Durable VGA Series
Powered by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 GPU
Integrated with the first 4096MB GDDR5 memory and 256-bit memory interface
Features Dual link DVI-I/ DVI-D/ HDMI/ DisplayPort with HDCP protection
Core Clock: Base / Boost clock：980 / 1058 MHz
PCI-E 3.0 interface
Support NVIDIA 3D Vision® Surround and SLI technologies
Support NVIDIA® CUDA™ Technology
Support NVIDIA® PhysX™ Technology
Support NVIDIA® FXAA / TXAA Technology
Support NVIDIA® Adaptive Vertical Sync Technology
System power supply requirement: 550W

http://www.gigabyte.com.au/products/product-page.aspx?pid=43…

  • FREE ASSASSINS Creed 3 GAME (COUPON) WITH every GIGABYTE GTX670 4GB
Computing Computer Component Gigabyte Video Card

Related Stores

Storm Computers
Storm Computers

closed Comments

  • lostn on 22/11/2012 - 13:37
    +1

    I got one of these 6 months ago for $399. No free AC3 though. But prices have dropped since $499. You sure this isn't a typo?

    • foobar on 22/11/2012 - 13:37

      4GB or 2GB?

      • lostn on 22/11/2012 - 13:48

        According to DXdiag I have 4GB on my card.

        However, I'll retract and grant that $499 is a lower price than what's going around (PCCG is $509).

        I think that's expensive though. I'd rather get a 680 for these prices. If the only difference is 2GB… I have seen 680s go for cheaper than this.

    • Store RepStorm Computers @ Storm Computers on 22/11/2012 - 13:39
      +1

      This is the 4GB Edition

      • foobar on 22/11/2012 - 13:45

        I missed the 4GB bit on my first read of it for some reason, just didn't jump out.

  • hellbound on 22/11/2012 - 13:48

    Given a 2GB GTX680 can be had for cheaper, would the extra 2GB of ram really make this worthwhile over a more powerful GPU?

    • lostn on 22/11/2012 - 13:49

      4GB is overkill. It will only be used in super high resolutions > 1080p. Or maybe if you have a 120hz screen with 3D.

    • foobar on 22/11/2012 - 13:50

      I was wondering what kind of insane resolutions and texture sizes would need 4GB. Seems a bit over the top for the moment but I'm sure we'll need it down the track by which time todays cards will be doorstops or landfill.

      • lostn on 22/11/2012 - 13:54

        You would need a 30"+ monitor. 2160p or 1600p like the Nexus 10 does. Basically a 4K display.

        Or a 120hz monitor, and going for 120 fps.

        Or a 3D monitor which has to render each frame twice.

        Maybe the RAM will still be overkill.

        • gummibears on 22/11/2012 - 14:02

          Curious as to why you got the 4GB version?

        • lostn on 23/11/2012 - 02:58
          +1

          I wasn't specifically looking for it, but I just saw it on Amazon for a good price, so I had it delivered. They don't deliver to Melb, so I had to use Borderlinx to forward it to me, but I had a $40 off Borderlinx coupon from AMEX, which meant I only paid the surcharge which was about $7. Basically paid $7 for shipping from Amazon to Melb.

          Now, if it dies on me, I'm not sure how I will do warranty…

          I knock on wood twice a day.

    • get-innocuous on 22/11/2012 - 13:58

      If you like to use mods which use super-high-resolution textures it would be useful.

  • Merlict on 22/11/2012 - 14:08
    +1

    Personally I think the 7970 3gb (Stock / low end for ~$400, fancier models for $450) offers better value in most uses at this price

  • Mirage on 22/11/2012 - 14:20

    I wonder if you can SLI a 2GB Gigabyte gtx670 windforce with this 4GB version (placing the 4GB version as the primary card first)?

    • Merlict on 22/11/2012 - 14:23

      You would not benefit from the extra memory, making this rather silly

    • Alzori on 22/11/2012 - 15:20

      The way I understand it when using SLI the memory contents need to be mirrored in the storage of each card, meaning you still have effectively 2gb memory overall capped by the smaller card (assuming mixing 2gb and 4gb versions even works, I don't know).

  • Stryke on 22/11/2012 - 14:37
    +1

    Gigabyte GTX580 in SLI for $400 (+ shipping) = nice. Oh and faster than the 670 for $499 (+ shipping) if your PC can handle two GTX580's (power, size & heat).

    • Alzori on 22/11/2012 - 15:22
      +1

      Wow, that is nice! That would be some amazing power if as you say your rig could handle it :)

    • furythree on 22/11/2012 - 16:22

      I was going to ask this as well
      is 2x580 better than 1 670/680?

      They consume more power i assume tho

      is it worth upgradeing from Gtx 295 to this setup?

      any features in the kepler cards over the 5xx series? besides power consumption?

      • Thrawn on 22/11/2012 - 17:22

        I have 2 x 580s, a couple of 670s, 680s and a 295.

        580s use over 100 watts more than a 680 each. So there is a considerable difference. GTX 295 sits halfway in between a 580 and 680 in power usage. No DX11 support for GTX 295 and its basically just plain old now.

        2 x GTX 580 is around 20% better than a 680 in 3DMark11. But the power consumption would be very high requiring something like a decent 850W PSU realistically. Its idle power is also around 30 watts higher per card over the 680 and since you have two of them it makes it even worse. And then of course SLI might have its own issues in games.

        Anyway, its not a clear-cut win one way or another.. it depends on what're doing with it, how much you tolerate noise, power usage, etc.

        • furythree on 22/11/2012 - 19:54

          So from what you are saying, if 1 580 was half the price of a 680

          And you ran 580 in sli vs 1 x 680 to compare like for like

          Then for the same money, you would be paying more in power usage for the SLI setup but gain 20%

          Since currently a 680 is a bit more in cost. you would be actually paying more to get 20% less performance against a 580 SLI, but you would be saving 100watts in power

          That being said, if i wanted to upgrade from 295 to the most powerful setup i can get for this price while maintaining power consumption, then i would actually be better off getting the 580 SLI
          Since you said that 295 sits between 580 sli and 680 in power usage. and a 580 SLI will have more power than 295 or 680

          Meaning with a 580 SLI setup i would be paying less than a 680, and be using less power than i am now (but more than a 680) and get 20% better performance than a 680

          If the above assumptions hold, then i would only get a 680 if the power saving offsets greater than the cost difference of the 680 to the 580 sli setup by more than 20% (to offset the performance as well)

        • Thrawn on 22/11/2012 - 20:09
          +2

          Thats 100 watts saving PER CARD at 3DMark11 load. So 100 Watt saving for 1st card plus around 300 watts for the 2nd for a total of 400 watts. Of course these are peak 3DMark11 load so in average it'd be much less. Especially if you're mostly idling doing browsing, etc as most people do.

          Also forgot to mention that these Watts are at the wall so already accounts for PSU inefficiency.

          And I said that GTX 295 sits halfway between a single GTX 580 and a single GTX 680.

          And for actual numbers..

          GTX 580 SLI peak = 725 watts
          GTX 680 peak = 325 watts
          GTX 295 peak = 400 watts

          GTX 580 SLI idle = 135 watts
          GTX 680 idle = 80 watts
          GTX 295 idle = 120 watts

          Also don't forget that just because the 580 SLI benches 20% better in 3DMark11, it doesn't mean in actual gameplay its actually better due to SLI complications. Mind you I spend surprisingly little time in games despite all my equipment, so I can't comment too much on this :)

        • furythree on 23/11/2012 - 09:34

          thanks for the detailed comment

          Looks like ill pick up a 680 because it blows the 295 out of the water, and is comparible to 580 sli will using less power than my 295

          alternatively i could wait for a gtx 780 lolz

    • Thrawn on 22/11/2012 - 17:23

      Thats a fantastic price. Gigabyte GTX 580s go for around $230 each secondhand nowadays (too much, I think given GTX 660 is the same price new, but people are paying that) . I'd suspect its a misprice.

      • Store RepStorm Computers @ Storm Computers on 22/11/2012 - 17:38

        Not a misprice.. price will be $199 until sold out or end of the month (30th November)..

  • BurnZ on 22/11/2012 - 17:21
    +1

    Assassin's Creed 3. Not Assassin's 3. ;)

    • ProspectiveDarkness on 23/11/2012 - 03:06

      The OP couldn't fit the full 'Assassin's Creed 3' in the title, due to the character cap. Though 'AC3' probably would've sufficed.

      • BurnZ on 23/11/2012 - 12:14
        +1

        They had it as Assassins 3 in the description also. But after I commented, they fixed it.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join