Cracking prices on these popular line of TV's from JB. Perks code required.
KEY FEATURES
- Display: 4K Ultra HD Self-lit OLED EVO with Brightness Booster
- Picture smoothness: 200 Motion Rate, AMD FreeSync Premium & up to 144Hz VRR
- Smart stuff: Powered by ThinQ AI with Chromecast Built-in and Voice Commands
Enjoy!
77 is the new 65.
https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/lg-65-oled-evo-c4-4k-uhd-… just in case $2545.75
77" is cool but quite large.. although if I could I'd still get one in my tight media room
Showing $2995 for me.
Agreed 77 is now my go to size.
For a living room, absolutely. Wouldn’t go anything smaller.
As always it depends on your distance from the screen.
@burns13: Sure, and that’s fine, however if that’s not your objective then why spend big money on a larger 77” or an 85” in the first place, a 55” would suffice… Furthermore, for people that tell others that a 77” and 85” is the go to size nowadays and they can’t live without it, if immersion isn’t their goal and they’re not sitting quite close to the TV, then essentially they’re in a similar position and their experience won’t be all that different to people that own a 55” or 65” TV or smaller who they’re telling that those sizes are too small.
@nikoris: Great rebuttal. Not at all, you told me that I am wrong and “not to try to act like” 77” and 85” TV’s are too small, I merely posted the photo to demonstrate that you accusing me of that is an incorrect judgement, and you’re assessment with regards to the immersion that a 77” and 85” TV provides at a distance of 2.1-2.4 metres is inaccurate.
@[Deactivated]: I dont want to have to dart my eyes left and right to see details. Especially if ive got sub titles on.
@Jklaro: So what are you trying to say, a 120” projector screen sitting at a distance of 2.4 metres is too large, or a 120” TV is if you can afford it? Having to dart your eyes to one side of the screen to focus on “details” may be a problem if you install a screen that’s far too large, however if you picked the right size screen to cover your peripheral vision at your seating position then it shouldn’t be a problem.
I don’t put subtitles on, my eye sight is fine when I have my prescription glasses on, and English is my primary language, it’s only the odd foreign language film I watch and some Hollywood productions where subtitles are essentially mandatory when I view subtitles.
@[Deactivated]: Yes, it is. The optimal viewing distance is based on both field of view and resolution.
I couldn’t imagine anything worse than being able to see the pixels on a 120inch TV at 2.4m away
@cille745: Plenty of people who post all over home theatre forums that own 120” projector screens seem to manage fine with it at that distance or similar and don’t have that complaint, and many of them are like me, they care and watch their content in the highest picture and audio quality available, which is generally on 1080p Blu-ray and 4K Blu-ray.
@DiscountForThee: When sitting on my home theatre lounge seating if I don’t pull the recliners up and lay back, my eye height is above the bezel at the bottom of the a95L TV probably closer to where the top height of my floor standing speakers are. From floor to ceiling it’s 2.4 metres in my lounge room. There’s only 10 centimetres between the top of the centre speaker and the bottom of the TV (if I still owned a Paradigm Studio v5 CC-690 centre speaker then there would be no gap), the wall mount was originally installed for use with a 65” Panasonic VT60 plasma, that TV was perfectly positioned just above the centre speaker.
The vesa holes are positioned quite poorly on the Sony a95L they are far too close to the bottom of the TV (the vesa holes on the back of the 65” LG C9 I had prior to purchasing the a95L were quite low too, it left a 5cm gap between the top of the centre speaker and the bottom of the C9).
For the sake of 10cm I’m not going to remove the TV mount and drill new holes in the wall to drop it down a little, especially when I live in an apartment and there’s water pipes in the wall directly behind my TV… And I’m certainly not getting rid of my centre speaker, amps, all my Oppo and Panasonic BD/4K players, and gaming consoles to install a smaller TV cabinet and downgrade to a tiny sissy soundbar, for the sake of being able to lower the TV to a little bit so that my eye height is level with the middle of the TV screen.
@Jklaro: Rotfl, thanks for tip. I acknowledged that in the post you just responded to, and gave my reasoning why I haven’t and am not doing that.
@Jklaro: You’re absolutely correct, that was my point for the beginning, I own a Sony 77” a95L QD-OLED TV, which is classed as the 2023 TV of the year, it had an RRP of $9495 (I paid $6520), and regardless whether it’s mounted approximately 200mm higher than is ideal or not, it will never fill a persons peripheral vision sitting 2.1-2.4 metres away from it and an immersive experience unless they sit 1 metre or less from it, therefore my 77” a95L and 85” TV’s are too small in my opinion.
@[Deactivated]: After reading your replies I was really looking forward to the photo. I was so disappointed, how can someone so passionate about home theater have such an ugly looking set up. It's an eye sore.
@OzzyBrak: And that’s fine for you to have that view, it’s not your setup, it’s my setup for me to use the way I want and it’s exactly how I want it to be… It’s purpose isn’t looks and to impress and show off to strangers on the internet that I don’t know and would never invite around, and for people that I do know and invite around I don’t show it off to them either. My TV cabinet in my lounge room is 18 years old now (it was bought in 2006 when flat panel LCD and Plasma TV’s were just starting to really take off), and it’s far more practical and can hold a lot more components than the majority of TV cabinets today designed for only minimalist purposes. I have a 1080p Blu-ray and 4K Blu-ray Disc collection of approximately 5000 titles, and a collection of video games, plus other forms of physical media. My setup is set up for using all the of my content, not to win a beauty contest.
I see so many setups today that I think are quite ugly and an eye sore, this includes all soundbar sets (where many men nowadays pick aesthetic over performance and kind of behave like women with regards to wanting pretty nice shiny things), and anyone that uses coloured backlighting.
@OzzyBrak: Oh, I forget to mention in my previous response one of my other pet peeves when I see other peoples setups that I think also looks ugly and is an eye sore, and is also a stupid location to place a TV, which is wall mounting a TV above a fire place.
@[Deactivated]: All valid points. I should have used more care in my reply, now that I reread it, it sounds a little snarky.
It would likely be better summed up that I was looking forward to seeing it as you’re clearly very passionate about home theatre. However your style isn’t to my taste. I prefer a more modern style, where most of the equipment is hidden away.
Enjoy your weekend :)
@DiscountForThee: Furthermore, the position of my 77” a95L QD-OLED TV on the wall mount appears higher than it actually is in the photo I posted because I was sitting down when I took the photo… There’s actually 550mm of space between the top of the TV bezel and the ceiling, the height of the bottom of the TV bezel measures 980-985mm from the floor. And again this is in a 2.5 metre floor to ceiling room (I just measured it again, the 2.4 metres from floor to ceiling I previously posted was slightly off).
@[Deactivated]: I feel like we're all collectively waiting for your mum to cut off your internet to end this conversation.
@[Deactivated]: If you're happy with it, go for it. Just a warning for others to not really take anything you say serious or to consider this as helpful advice
@DiscountForThee: You need to explain that further for anyone to take you seriously, and so that it’s clear why you should be listened to and not me. Anybody that owns and is knowledgeable about separate audio component home theatre equipment (that doesn’t use a crappy inferior tiny soundbar) is aware that a compromise regarding either the height position of the centre speaker or the TV screen has to be made because both can’t be in what’s considered to the optimal position for each. When you have a centre speaker and a screen above it, the height of one of them isn’t going be 100% ideal… The centre speaker is supposed be positioned at ear level which mine essentially is, that means for people who choose to do this to get the best quality out of their audio setups they can’t also have the centre of their TV screen at eye level if their centre speaker is placed at ear level. Your options are either to place the centre speaker lower than where it’s supposed to be at ear level to accommodate the position of your TV so that your eyes are level with the centre of the screen, or to place the TV higher than it’s supposed to be at eye level to accommodate the position of your centre speaker so that your ears are level with the centre speaker.
Also I didn’t give any advice, all I have said right from the beginning as an owner of a Sony a95L 77” QD-OLED TV is that 77” and 85” TV screen sizes in the grand scheme of things aren’t really all that large from the seating position distances that the majority of people sit back from them (especially when compared to a larger 120” home theatre projector screen), and don’t fill your peripheral vision at a 2.1-2.4 metre seating distance or greater providing an immersive experience, which is a fact, however if they were to sit within 1 metre from a 77” or 85” screen then this comes close to filling your peripheral vision and therefore is much more immersive.
@[Deactivated]: You sound like the kind of guy to willingly sit front row at a cinema and say it's the superior option lol
@DiscountForThee: There is no sounds like with you, it’s obvious that you’re the typical kind of amateurish guy that posts online who clearly doesn’t know much about HT audio equipment and home theatre in general but comments online as though you do.
I certainly don’t sit in the front row or close to the front row at the cinemas, however I don’t sit right at the back either, both the front and the back are not the best places to sit if you want to maximise the quality of both the visual and audio experience at the cinema.
@[Deactivated]: What about your goal of "filling your peripheral vision" for a "providing an immersive experience"? Feels like front row kind of vibes
Expressing my opinion and this probably will help the logic behind @Cevolution argument. I noticed the majority of the movies I am streaming now are not full screen or they are (extra) widescreen movies. With the top and bottom of the screen chopped off you'd be lucky if you ended up with 3/4 of the screen. That's a considerable downsize of the picture. And starting to look rather smallish compared to the screen size. I know it feels different when I am watching movies vs TV broadcast.
So that's why we always lust for bigger screens. The only thing that would limit it other than your pocket is the room size and getting rid the old TV. If I could get 83" to fit on my wall and I know I could get 10 years life out of it. I'd buy it in a heartbeat. $500 a year isn't bad for a good quality premium TV.
I remember 10 years ago looking at the Samsung displayed on the display window at Bing Lee, it seems so massive and expensive yet fantastic and majestic. How times have changed.
I noticed the majority of the movies I am streaming now are not full screen or they are (extra) widescreen movies.
No offense, but are you 13? This has been a thing since the popularization of the VHS lol
@DiscountForThee: Lol, none taken. Classic example how people like to take wordings out of context. No offense, but I don't think you know what you're talking about. What you are saying is that programs with black bars top and bottom are common in the days of the CRT. I can't stop laughing. With the old analogue it was always shown in full screen ON TV, regardless of the aspect ratio of the movies. Even in the early days of the flat screen TV, rarely transmitted programs would be shown in anything other than full screen. But if you're only 10 I can understand.
@Deal Or-No Deal: Letterboxed movies have been a thing since the VHS. A minute on google can confirm this for you. But I'm glad you've started noticing it's existence in recent streaming experience!
77 is the new 65.
I remember when 42" was considered massive…
The price isn't however. Needs to be 3k
any c3 42" on sale? thinking it for a monitor
I'm so tempted to grab a c4 42 as a monitor…. Undecided between that and a 32" oled
im using a 32" 2k atm, its good for 2k, i wont like it for a 4k. I am a coder
I use a 42" c2 and love it. Having some custom snapping zones for windows let's you use it as if it was a 32" or any other combo and size the black real black it looks fine. Clarity is great, even with text and code.
Yeah I think the 42 is the way, especially with glossy finish which will work perfect since I have no lighting issues in my office.
Luckily I have a good friend who works as a manager at a JB, So i'll go in a few weeks when i get tax return and he said he can give me staff pricing which is slightly less than the sale price.
pretty sure the C3s are sold out everywhere now and replaced by the C4?
(profanity) what?
yea looking to grab a bargain
If I recall, don't those need an application to send Wake On Lan packets to the TV?
I need some convincing not to grab the 77 c4
My 65 c7 is still good …
Yea you don't need the 77". You need the 83"
I'm doing a 120" projector and can't go back to a 75"
I don’t think I can fit the larger is one..
Sure you can. Just stick it on a wall!
Just get a larger house
Go the 83” ..
I regretted not getting the Sony mini LED and had been debating this, an a80L and a x90l (is oled worth the price / screen burn..?)
Pulled the trigger on this! Hopefully a better deal doesn’t pop up tomorrow
Which Sony Mini LED? There is more than one.
HN has a slightly lower list price than JB - does anyone know if JB will price-match before applying the 15% discount code?
I don’t see why not? They’ll send you a price match link and you would use the code the same way.
T&cs say it’s ticket price only
*Offer ends 11.59pm AEST 23/6/2024. Discount of 15% applies to the current price of relevant products. Excludes Ffalcon, pre-orders & delivery. Coupon cannot be used in conjunction with any other coupon offer. Offer can be redeemed by adding the coupon to your online transaction, or by presenting the coupon at Australian stores, excluding Airport locations. This offer applies to the current ticketed/advertised price of relevant products, and not off any lower negotiated price. Prices of some products are likely to have changed and may have increased prior to this offer. Because of this and as we regularly negotiate on price, some products are likely to have been sold below the current ticketed/advertised price prior to this offer. Prices may change after this offer.
Well spotted!
What are the downsides of using C4 42 as a monitor, similar to using C2 as a monitor, is it better or worse than C2?
Finicky HDMI ports and annoying auto-dimming was my experience with the CX.
Bought a 65” C2 and seems small already ,
Could easily go a 77” or even a 83” .
These are the lightest TV,s around ,
65” is 20kg and able to move yourself if that’s a positive ,
but the bigger ones should be easily moved around with two people,
even if your wife is little .
Wish I'd held off! Just bought a LG 77" C4 for $4350 through The Good Guys a week ago. Does anyone know if gold service extras 30 day price guarantee would cover this deal?
Thank you! Just bought the 83” G4 for $6754 delivered!
Where do you find your perks code?
How did you get the G4 for that price?
I ended up getting a refund. HN and Bing Lee have the same 15% off deal on their price which works out to be cheaper. Got it for $6505.
How's the 83" C4 compare to the Samsung S90D? https://www.jbhifi.com.au/products/samsung-83-s90d-oled-4k-s…
Are they both using the LG WOLED panel? And if that is the case, is there any major difference?
Thanks OP, bought the 83" C4 for $4920 delivered after using 4.5% off JB Hifi cards through Bupa life rewards.
I bought 1 of the 10 gift cards gift card to test and it came through straight away. Bought the remaining 9 and there was about a 25 minute delay for them to be delivered via email. I was very worried as they say it can take up to 72 hours which would put me outside the sale window, and I could have had $4500 worth of gift cards that I didn't want. A nerve racking 25 minutes.
That's always a worry ain't it.😂
Very helpful to share your issues with Bupa life rewards for other people. I was thinking about doing the exact same thing but with the 42 or 48
I think for your sanity it’s best to just buy them one at a time, ie 10 cards in 10 transactions. Ur worst case scenario if they stop delivering them on time is that you are stuck with a $500 jb gift card.
As someone who's knows very little about TVs, is this probably the best value/quality TV's around at the 75/77" mark?
Looking to purchase one for an TV/theatre room.
Oh and if makes any difference, TV would likely be wall hung.
Thanks
Yeah the best you can get at that size.
Thank you.
Would paying up for this as opposed to something like the QNED86 either 75 or 86" potentially be worth it for everyday general use - Netflix, watching regular TV etc.
Or is the average person i.e me, not going to notice a huge difference?
Thanks
I don't think the average person would notice too much difference. However, the C4 display is incredible. Sony have very good TVs and I would place them as my first choice for a non OLED TV
Local JB and Good Guys stores couldn't get the 83" G4 with delivery and wallmount install for under $7000.
So I passed. I just couldn't stomach spending over $7000 on a TV. Regardless of it being a good deal.
So 6995 vs 7000 is a big difference? (just joking btw)
Glad i didnt buy it anyways. The Harvey Norman price was way better.
C4 77 or g3 77??? What you reckon
In case you missed it - Harvey Norman have come to the party and the C4 is even lower there.
Went around negotiating at a few stores today and managed to pick up a LG G4 83" OLED TV + LG S95TR sound bar for a total of $7000 delivered from JB Hi-Fi
![[Perks] LG OLED C4 TV (2024): 42" $1508.75, 48" $1766.30, 55" $2120.75, 77" $4075.75, 83" $5095.75 + Del ($0 C&C) @ JB Hi-Fi](https://files.ozbargain.com.au/n/63/852563.jpg?h=d90c2e35)
Most popular size is missing!