Feature | Specification |
---|---|
Display Size | 31.5 Inches |
Resolution | 1920x1080 |
Max Resolution | 1920 x 1080 Pixels |
Brand | LG |
Series | 32ML600M |
Model Number | 32ML600M-B |
Dimensions (LxWxH) | 20.9 x 72.9 x 51.3 cm |
Weight | 6.6 kg |
Manufacturer | LG |
ASIN | B07VVGVDC4 |
Country of Origin | China |
Date First Available | November 4, 2020 |
LG 32ML600M-B 32-Inch Full HD IPS 75Hz Monitor with HDR 10 $208 Shipped @ Amazon AU
Last edited 18/02/2024 - 15:50 by 1 other user
Related Stores
closed Comments
Yeah 1440 would be ok but really need 4k in a screen that's 32 or up if it's for work purposes
Yep that's 68.84 ppi (pixelx per inch), that'll look atrocious.
Sit further back, like 10 or 12 feet. :)
yeah this could have been a tv, instead they made it into a PC monitor
Would be great if it's LG 32 inch 4K at $208 lol
Good for excel and word
Would be good for old folks who like their text big.
good for a second or 3rd monitor for random things
It's actually not too bad for general office work - the additional real estate makes it much better than 24" FHD screens.
Of course 4K or 2K would be better but they are considerably more expensive - especially if you are getting a few of them it starts to rack up.
Our office recently replaced 8 year old 3x 24" screens per person with 2x 32" curved FHD screens per person and everyone seems pretty happy with the change.
There's no additional real estate. It's still just HD, so everything is bigger, ie. you fit the same desktop into a 18" full hd screen and 40" full hd screen.
"32" full HD" curved screen sounds like you can almost see the curve on a single pixel ;)
I meant the screens are bigger physically, so our users shrunk their fonts etc. and fit more on screen and could still read it - so effectively they got more space to play with.
Our users saw as extra and like it.
Sorry if I got the terminology wrong. :-)
All good, I get it - you did get more real estate, but I need to pointing out that you can shrink fonts even on a big 800x600 screen to get more real estate, but it's going to be blurred by antialiasing, or pixelated. Might not be to everyone liking, because either way the picture is not as aesthetic and might be more tiring, unlike on a higher resolution screen.
@pizzaguy: Absolutely. Horses for courses :-)
32" @ 1080 = large pixels!