Columbia Newton Ridge Plus II Waterproof Hiking Brown or Black Boots $103.20 Delivered/Pickup/In-store (RRP $220) @ David Jones

450

Go to Deal

Cashback

save50 on 04/01/2024 - 09:33 davidjones.com (4889 clicks)
Last edited 05/01/2024 - 22:46 by 2 other users

$103.20 after extra 20% off in cart

CLASSIC, WATERPROOF HIKER A durable, lightweight hiking boot, with coated leather, built for comfort, protection, and style. MADE FOR THE ELEMENTS Featuring a waterproof, seam-sealed construction, this boot won t let rain, muck, and puddles get inyour way. SURE FOOTED Responsive, supportive cushioning and super-grippy rubber outsoles are geared for miles over rocks, grass, gravel, and roots. - PU coated leather, suede, and mesh upper

• Omni-Tech waterproof breathable seam-sealed membrane bootie construction
• Metal hardware
• Techlite lightweight midsole for long lasting comfort, superior cushioning, and high energy return
• Omni-Grip non-marking traction rubber outsole
• Weight: 15.9 oz / 452g (Size 9, 1/2 pair)
• Uses: Hiking

Materials: Upper: Leather / Suede / Mesh Midsole: Techlite EVA Outsole: Omni-Grip Rubber

Related Stores

David Jones

• 

  diddy50 on 04/01/2024 - 09:38

  +3

  Columbia boots are so good! This is an absolute bargain

  • 

    Top G on 04/01/2024 - 10:08

    -1

    I prefer Venezuelan

• 

  asa79 on 04/01/2024 - 10:01

  +3

  shame no half sizes

• 

  pablo1 on 04/01/2024 - 10:13

  +2

  fyi for those wanting to buy these for hiking, most hikers who know what they are doing have moved to trail runners instead of boots

  • 

    87percent on 04/01/2024 - 10:15

    Like the Nike Pegasus 4 ?

  • 

    Supercool on 04/01/2024 - 10:16

    NB Hierro for the win! Would only wear boots if I had a heavy pack.

    Anyone know if these run wide?

  • 

    [Deactivated] on 04/01/2024 - 10:30

    -3

    Spoken by a city slicker who spends almost no time in the Aussie bush. LOL

    • 

      pablo1 on 04/01/2024 - 10:53

      +1

      Nah wrong I am out in the bush for work most of the year - remote area fieldwork and primarily off track in national parks

      Trail runners much lighter and cooler + more comfortable you can cover way more distance with less weight on your feet. Also ankle support is a myth there is no peer reviewed evidence to show that it does anything

      If I’m out in paddocks doing farm work, sure boots are great. Wouldn’t be using hiking boots for that though

      • 

        [Deactivated] on 04/01/2024 - 11:19

        Sorry mate your wrong, I'm in the bush several times a week, often walking off trail and always use boots. With the amount of copperheads around here you would have to be stupid to wear trail runners, that's just asking for trouble.

        • 

          pablo1 on 04/01/2024 - 11:26

          @[Deactivated]: The chance of being bitten by a snake on your feet is incredibly small - how many times would you say you have been bitten on your feet/at all? The extra protection offered by a mid height boot is pretty negligible imo.

          • 

            [Deactivated] on 04/01/2024 - 11:35

            +1

            @pablo1: I see at least one copperhead or brown snake every time I go out. And yes the Mids I wear weigh more a WHOLE 30 grams more to be precise.

          • 

            MeagerDollarBucks on 04/01/2024 - 12:14

            +4

            @pablo1: "Lower extremity was the most common site (66.27%) for snakebite and has been observed in various similar other studies. One reason that can be attributed to this is accidental stepping on the snake. Foot and toe were the most affected regions in the right lower limb"

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041039/

            • 

              us3rnam3tak3n on 04/01/2024 - 12:33

              +1

              @MeagerDollarBucks: Leather boots will repel that but a lightweight hiking boot or trail runner probably won't do much. Though I've copped a stingray through the top of my sneaker and I think it did reduce the amount of venom that got into my foot - painful but not as bad as I've heard they can be.

            • 

              pablo1 on 04/01/2024 - 17:24

              @MeagerDollarBucks: Indian study, in Aus the only figure I can find is 33% feet, but sure.

              Either way your chance of actually being bitten anywhere at all is incredibly low. Much more likely to die on the road driving to your trail than die being bitten by a snake. Most snake bites/deaths in aus occur near the home.

              India is a bit of a different story due to much higher population density - more likely to have human snake interactions.

              • 

                MeagerDollarBucks on 04/01/2024 - 18:14

                @pablo1: Mid height boots aren't just for snakes, though if I were to get bitten I'd rather be bitten on the boot than the flesh.
                I bush walk and camp in QLD, everything here bites and stings, snakes, spiders, ants, plants (Suicide Bush/gympie-gympie etc). Mid height is like insurance, might not need it everytime but very thankful when I do need it.

      • 

        Pacify on 04/01/2024 - 12:14

        +1

        In dry conditions, yeah Trail runners are the best choice (or lightweight mid ones, that feel more like runners than boots).

        But in any mud or rain or anything, full leather is the only choice. So for a long multi-day hike, I'd still take leather full boots, unless again you are in aussie outback where rain or any kind of moisture is just a dream

  • 

    Alkaline69 on 04/01/2024 - 11:07

    Imagine buying trail runners over these for snow hikes? Someone does not know what they are doing

    • 

      pablo1 on 04/01/2024 - 11:28

      I mean snow hiking in Australia is a very niche use case, but I probably wouldn’t choose the columbias for that either - grip is not sufficient

  • 

    Jetyy on 04/01/2024 - 11:13

    as someone who does overnight hiking i feel like the censuses is its up to personal preference still…

  • 

    snep on 04/01/2024 - 11:47

    Depends on the terrain imo. Not much fun starting a hike with wet boots from day 1. For tracks which I'm confident won't have much mud or snow I take runners, but that's not so many in tassie.

• 

  easternculture on 04/01/2024 - 10:16

  +3

  Same price on amazon for some sizes and colors

  • 

    pinnacle on 04/01/2024 - 11:22

    Thanks OP & easternculture. The size was oos on DJ, could order it on Amazon for $109.95.

• 

  sauce2k on 04/01/2024 - 10:16

  damn no size 9.5

• 

  Subada on 04/01/2024 - 10:18

  +1

  https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/shoes-and-boots/hikin…

  Mixed review from outdoor gear lab, sounds like it'd be a good budget option especially at this price.

• 

  sauce2k on 04/01/2024 - 10:19

  +1

  yeh not working anymore

  It's either be OZB'd or they pulled out lol

• 

  iatnuy on 04/01/2024 - 10:33

  +1

  Brown colour now OOS.

  Black colour still has plenty of sizes left, I got a pair.

• 

  Homerlovesbeer on 04/01/2024 - 10:50

  Only size 9 left

• 

  savemesomemoney on 04/01/2024 - 10:59

  Had one of these that lasted for yeaaaaars. Tried replacing them with other Columbia boots when BCF had the clearance sale more than a year ago
  https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/693858
  but they got nothing on these boots. The BCF sale ones were too tight so I ended up giving them away. Personally, the brown boots look way better and looked good with jeans so I used them for going out (not hiking 😅). Bought a pair. Thank you OP!

  • 

    richmond12 on 04/01/2024 - 11:28

    You went out with hiking boots? What were you wearing lol

    • 

      savemesomemoney on 04/01/2024 - 11:44

      Like I said, jeans. They looked alright (for me anyway) as it's winter when I used them as they're boots.

• 

  richmond12 on 04/01/2024 - 11:43

  Difference between plus and plus II?

• 

  burns13 on 04/01/2024 - 14:12

  Damn all out