American Tourister Squasem Spinner Suitcase 55cm $116.50 and 66cm $149 Delivered @ Amazon AU

130

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

Bargainhunter83 on 26/12/2023 - 13:50 amazon.com.au (1221 clicks)

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Product details About this item

Strong polypropylene hardside case
Duosaf security zipper for extra protection
Optimov shock absorbing wheels to provide exceptional smoothness when rolling on the road
Expandability for extra storage space
Recycled and antimicrobial interior lining comes with cross straps
TSA Lock with USB Port
Description
Squasem is a strong polypropylene hardside case that includes premium features such as Duosaf™ security zipper for extra protection and Optimov™ shock absorbing wheels to provide exceptional smoothness when rolling on the road. Its design maximises packing capacity so that you can carry everything you need. All sizes include expandability for extra storage space. The recycled and antimicrobial interior lining comes with cross straps, multiple pockets and mesh divider to keep your belongings organised.

Price History at CamelCamelCamel.

This is part of Boxing Day Sales for 2023

Related Stores

Amazon AU

Marketplace

• 

  pizzaguy on 26/12/2023 - 14:20

  +4

  Why would anyone buy this not knowing its weight? Imagine it takes eg. 3 kg off your hand luggage allowance.

  Also this boggles my mind:

  TSA Lock with USB Port

  It should probably be "TSA Lock and USB Port", but I haven't looked it up properly and can't be sure if TSA can now open via USB or what.

  • 

    GreenRomeo on 26/12/2023 - 14:53

    +1

    Agreed. Weight is important for hand luggage’s and laptops, and can be a deal breaker in many cases, like this one, for me. But I’ve rarely seen it mentioned in the deals for some reasons.

    • 

      pizzaguy on 26/12/2023 - 15:18

      +2

      I’ve rarely seen it mentioned in the deals for some reasons

      Because - as you mentioned - it's a deal breaker for many, so "the marketing team" doesn't want to advertise it. Unaware people don't realise a bare suitcase can eat up half of the allowance and buy it.

      • 

        carrawa on 26/12/2023 - 23:40

        I always like to know the weight plus weight capacity of items. I have a 80L backpack i can no longer carry, so a luggage with wheels is necessary.

  • 

    PainToad on 26/12/2023 - 16:07

    +1

    I’ll buy it if it take 3kg off me.

• 

  swalloweda on 26/12/2023 - 14:30

  2.8kg per https://www.americantourister.com.au/squasem/spinner-55-exp/…

• 

  lachlantula on 26/12/2023 - 14:31

  +2

  55cm - 2.8kg
  66cm - 3.8kg

  note that the suitcases posted yesterday are a bit lighter, but unremarkably so: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/822474

• 

  pizzaguy on 26/12/2023 - 14:33

  Thanks to you two for checking. That's one heavy set of suitcases.

• 

  sonicentropy on 26/12/2023 - 21:20

  I bought a 1.8kg 4 wheel spinner for japan trip from bag stop it broke 1st day in tokyo. I now use a 1.4kg tote style bag with sholder staps. Max storage and weight for carry on. It allow me hands free to help with wife/childs luggage they are incapable of travelling light.

• 

  furyou on 26/12/2023 - 22:47

  Hey fellow cheepos, are these branded suitcases in any way better than stuff you get for $50 at paddy's markets or $70 at kmart?

  • 

    Bargainhunter83 on 27/12/2023 - 16:43

    I think it’s the warranty thats worth spending for with these brands. But personally no experience with the market/kmart brands.

    • 

      furyou on 27/12/2023 - 17:22

      market brand - well some of the plastics are brittle and break every flight
      some are OK, seem bouncy like the exy brands
      but you can't tell which is which until it breaks or doesn't.

      But when I break, I go after the airline warranty right? Which eg ANA repaired a broken wheel, Qantas poked a hole thru the plastic and said that's normal wear and tear. Would brand warranty cover wilful damage?