My house has a rain water tank, and like all good homeowners, I completely ignored it until it started leaking. It's a ~1000L galvanised steel tank.
According to the building code, houses in my area need to have RWTs plumbed in to laundry or toilet. I didn't know this when I bought the house, so did not check, but turns out it's not plumbed in to either (and I don’t believe it ever was), and has just been sitting there collecting water not being used for any purpose. It has the pump etc already there, but not connected.
On the one hand, I could just bypass it and optionally remove it. That’s the cheap option. Alternatively, I could replace the tank. If I was going to do this, I would get a plastic tank and get it plumbed into the house like it’s supposed to be. This option will likely cost about $1500, maybe a little less. Any saving from the water used from the tank will be negligible (maximum of $5-10 per quarter I reckon).
I am leaning towards the “replace it” because I guess I see it as part of property maintenance, while my wife seems to be favouring the “who cares” option.
So I guess the question is: to replace, or not to replace?
Edit: Updated to add poll option for "replace but don't plumb into house"
1000L whats the point.
Its not like you are going to have enough water for anything other than occasionally filling a bird bath.
At 50L a washing machine wash that's only 20 loads.