This was posted 1 year 4 months 6 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

AMD P2 Respirator Masks: 1 Box (50 Masks) $88, 2 Box (100 Masks) $170, 3 Box (150 Masks) $250 Delivered @ Respirator Masks

210
AMD P2 Respirator Masks: 1 Box (50 Masks) $88, 2 Box (100 Masks) $170, 3 Box (150 Masks) $250 Delivered @ Respirator Masks
Go to Deal
Associatedjoenakat on 16/07/2023 - 09:52 respiratormasks.com.au (416 clicks)
Last edited 17/07/2023 - 14:54 by 2 other users
OZBARGAIN1OZBARGAIN2OZBARGAIN3

Coupon applied and price discounted at checkout.

Hi OzBargain community

Thank you for the support you have provided for our previous offerings on OzBargain.

We are having our OzBargain Winter sale on now. For the next week only, you can purchase the best selling AMD P2 respirator masks at the following low prices.
1 Box (50 individually wrapped masks) for $88 delivered.

https://respiratormasks.com.au/discount/OzBargain1?redirect=…

2 Box (100 individually wrapped masks) for $170 delivered

https://respiratormasks.com.au/discount/OzBargain2?redirect=…

3 Box (150 individually wrapped masks) for $250 delivered

https://respiratormasks.com.au/discount/OzBargain3?redirect=…

Whether you have run out of masks, or want to stock up for the rest of Winter or simply want to buy these quality P2 masks in case of a future outbreak, this offer represents great value. To Buy, follow these simple steps:

Step 1: Click on the relevant link above for the offer you like;
Step 2: Choose your colour (Black or White) and place your order ("ADD TO CART);
Step 3: Go to checkout ("VIEW CART" or press trolley icon in top right hand corner of page) where the discounted price will automatically appear and finalise your purchase.

Kind regards
Joe & the Respirator Masks Team

Health & Beauty Advanced Medical Devices Mask N95 Mask P2 Mask Respirator

Related Stores

Respirator Masks
Respirator Masks

closed Comments

  • Ham Dragon on 16/07/2023 - 10:00
    +1

    in case of a future outbreak

    Nice dash of fear thrown in to sandbag your marketing claim eh. Aren't these significantly cheaper at Bunnings etc?

    • Travelbug on 16/07/2023 - 14:59
      +1

      THE BIG PANDEMIC is coming. Only Scott Morrison and Stuart robber can save us. Send donations now to omgaussiesaredumb.com

      • Igaf on 16/07/2023 - 15:55
        +1

        AI will do better, and with more honesty, integrity and empathy.

  • spock on 16/07/2023 - 10:04
    +1

    5 pack at Bunnings $0.40 cent P2 mask .Just grabbed a couple.

    • Associatedjoenakat @ Respirator Masks on 16/07/2023 - 10:16
      +3

      There are cheaper P2 masks available. AMD P2 have been consistently reported as the best-on-market P2 masks by users Australia-wide.

    • fraxinus on 16/07/2023 - 10:18
      +1

      So a 5-pack for $2? These don’t appear to be available on Bunnings online (or show up in a search anyway)—in fact, no AMD masks at all.

    • RecklessMonkeys on 16/07/2023 - 10:26
      +1

      Do you have a link for that?

      • spock on 16/07/2023 - 11:36
        +1

        No I haven't got link I was in store sorry they had cartons of them post code 4217 Arundel.

    • markathome on 16/07/2023 - 11:51

      Based on spock and Igaf's comments - I'm downvoting - sorry. I really don't think this price is reasonable for masks and think the market will eventually resettle at a lower price point. Separate from spock's comment, there are sporadic deals that discount N95 and P2 masks quite steeply: usually retailers trying to shift them as demand subsides.

      • markathome on 16/07/2023 - 11:53
        +2

        Eh still skeptical, but keengeorge seems so happy with the deal it made me think twice. I guess username checks out.

  • Associatedjoenakat @ Respirator Masks on 16/07/2023 - 10:11
    +3

    Hi Judge. AMD P2 masks have a great track record and are used widely by Government bodies, Retirement Care Facilities and small businesses throughout Australia

    • MagicMushroom on 16/07/2023 - 12:06

      Is this used in any hospital caring for patients under airborne precautions like covid?

    • crayner on 16/07/2023 - 13:41
      +2

      These masks are Australian made too.

  • Homr on 16/07/2023 - 10:25

    Intel is better

  • cardiology on 16/07/2023 - 10:31
    +1

    Hi, can you confirm if the white P2 mask are with the black AMD logo on the front surface? I have checked with the manufacturer that new versions are EP26 with black logo which fits my face contour much better. The ones with the white AMD logo are older models?
    Thanks.

    • Associatedjoenakat @ Respirator Masks on 16/07/2023 - 11:57
      +1

      These masks are white with the black AMD logos ..all our stock from AMD (manufacturer) is current

      • cardiology on 16/07/2023 - 12:30

        Thanks, note that your photos of the boxes showed white logos on the masks.😅

  • zrmx on 16/07/2023 - 11:24
    +1

    A pity you guys don't sell the EP24 sizes.

  • lawyerz on 16/07/2023 - 11:27
    +4

    Start stockpiling for the bushfire season tbh

  • keengeorge on 16/07/2023 - 11:31

    @OP, Thank you Very Much for posting :)

  • victor766 on 16/07/2023 - 11:52
    +1

    Have the straps on these been fixed? I bought 2 boxes a few months ago. The straps were too short which made them very tight. My ears were sticking out like dumbo.
    Ended up returning them.

  • Associatedjoenakat @ Respirator Masks on 16/07/2023 - 11:55

    We havnt had any issues with straps, but i dont think any changes have been made….

  • shmahoo on 16/07/2023 - 12:21

    We love these masks for our (healthcare) work

  • zuuutoootuuu on 16/07/2023 - 13:48
    +1

    has the wire in the nose piece been upgraded or are they still flimsy?

  • Associatedjoenakat @ Respirator Masks on 16/07/2023 - 14:31

    We have not had any issues with the nose piece wire in the last 2 years….

    • ginmi on 16/07/2023 - 16:27
      -6

      With regards to the nanotech inside these masks:
      https://open.substack.com/pub/actionabletruth/p/nanotech-bio…

    • Igaf on 16/07/2023 - 17:47
      +5

      Oh ffs Dunning-Karen. You prefer to get your nanos via 5G presumably?

      These masks won't protect you from credulous gullibility or puerile ignorance but they will give you some protection from acquiring and spreading respiratory viruses.

      • ginmi on 17/07/2023 - 06:10

        I trust you are "up to date" with your injections against a certain "respiratory virus".

        Good luck with that and enjoy your myocarditis

        • Igaf on 17/07/2023 - 13:13

          Yes I'm up to date, thanks for your faux concern. I've had all the injections recommended, AND I've had mild covid, yet strangely I didn't get myocarditis. Why would that be 'Dr' ginmi?

          Covid conspiracists - like you - have rolled out pretty much every bit of tosh possible at this point, and pretty much every little bit of it has been shown to be ignorant nonsense in one way or another. So it's somewhat (only somewhat given the mentality involved) that you're holding on to your myocarditis security blanket. When you get time away from admiring your navel fluff collection look up the effects of covid-19.

          Apparently stats aren't your strong point so it's futile telling you what they say about death and serious illness rates and the efficacy of vaccines, masks, and other transmission limiters. Suffice to say that most people who believe in community and social responsibility - even if, like you, they understand sfa about vaccines and the virus' effects on the human body - have long since overcome their fears of the occasional needle.

          Yes we should understand ALL risks whenever we put anything into our bodies (or absorb ignorant conspiracies via our eyes, ears and brains for that matter), but equally, as adults, we should understand the benefits and what the statistics say. Ignorance is not just a huge blight on functioning societies but it's also a killer.

        • ONEMariachi on 17/07/2023 - 13:19

          you're 10 times more likely to get myocarditis from COVID than you are from the vaccine. 1-2 in 100,000 people got it from the vaccine. 20 in 100,000 from covid.

          • Igaf on 17/07/2023 - 13:26
            +1

            @ONEMariachi: Some studies in targeted age groups (12-30) put it as high as 17 times. Doubt this commenter is in that age group though.

          • ginmi on 18/07/2023 - 09:22
            +1

            @ONEMariachi: You probably still think your government and health authorities have your best interests above all else and there is nothing else at play here.

            That's ok. Ignorance is bliss sometimes.

            As I keep saying: we can't save everyone.

            Best of luck to you in the years ahead (and I genuinely mean it). You're gonna need it.

            • Igaf on 18/07/2023 - 10:21

              @ginmi: Roflmao. There's a huge disconnect between what you think is real and what actually is real. Rationality - usually absent in conspiracists - requires acceptance that individual knowledge and understanding is limited - very limited in many cases - and that not everyone is acting for selfish or nefarious reasons.

              No society, govt, organisation or individual is perfect and we need to be ever vigilant as a result. At the same time we ought not to allow uneducated, ignorant lies and half-truths, hyperbolic conspiracy theories or even despondent cynicism to get traction in our society. We tolerate many harmless whacky views but we need to constantly rebuff dangerous fatuousness and the notion that all views are equal. False equivalence, rejection of knowledge and expertise, the elevation of self importance and the embrace of ignorance is a trait of particular demographics. Thankfully that cohort exists in tiny numbers in Australia.

              • ginmi on 18/07/2023 - 12:10

                @Igaf: You live in Victoria or WA I presume. Right?

                • Igaf on 18/07/2023 - 14:14

                  @ginmi: I'm a bit slow. You'll have to explain what my location has to do with my comments. Should I have a PhD in Geography?

                  • ginmi on 19/07/2023 - 09:18
                    +1

                    @Igaf: VIC and WA is where the Covidians roam free in their natural habitat 😂

                    • Igaf on 19/07/2023 - 09:35

                      @ginmi: Thanks for that fabulous insight. Did your alter ego Musky have similar thoughts?

                      You may have noticed that those states gave their govt's covid mgt a HUGE - unprecedented in WA's case - vote of confidence at recent elections, despite the privations endured by many in "commie" Dan's state. You may also have noted that those states had completely different approaches to lockdowns, for fairly obvious reasons.

                      You and Musky should get your heads together and see how Australia fared comparatively with management of the great 'con' virus. Then you should try joining the dots between the policies and actions of our govts and health authorities - the same people you attempted to besmirch above - and that outcome. Were mistakes made? Undoubtedly. But as an educated adult you'd know (if not understand) that humans are far from perfect.

                      • ginmi on 19/07/2023 - 09:59
                        +1

                        @Igaf: I would love to continue this conversation ad infinitum but have more pressing matters (respectfully).
                        I am going to make some assumptions on you as a thought experiment and (respectfully) end the conversation with that. All I ask is that you tell me how many of those I got right (if you don't mind).

                        • You support the brave people of Ukraine in their fight against the Russian invaders…and might even have the Ukraine flag on your SM profiles.
                        • You will vote yes in the upcoming referendum
                        • You think Albo is doing a bloody terrific job
                        • You use pronouns in your email signature and/or LinkedIn Profile
                        • You believe that "trans rights are human rights"
                        • You think that using cash is a bit odd in this day and age
                        • You got the flu shot this year or intend to get it.

                        Please do let me know (if you don't mind) how many of the seven points above I got right. Either way, we'll part way as friends. Have a great week.

                        • Igaf on 19/07/2023 - 11:15

                          @ginmi: You presumably want one word answers because it fits your black and white view of the world and distrust of people?

                          (Respectfully) I have no intention of adding to your struggles with reality or reinforcing your perverse perceptions. Based on your comments on this website your need to feed your stereotypes and justify your illogical opinions is corrupting whatever analytical ability you possess, but likely only where it applies to particular issues.

                          You presumably would draw conclusions based on your own narrow definitions and acutely biased views of people's professionalism, integrity and honesty, and how our imperfect society functions, and use those conclusions to shore up what are quite abnormal suspicions and mistrust. I suggest you move from your cocooned comfort zone of generalised mistrust and despondent cynicism to a position of informed skepticism. No-one is completely impartial but it will help if you discard some of the blind ideology you use to justify not criticising or rejecting particular behaviours and characters of the political class you favour.

                          Respectfully, I'm not your friend by any measure. I'm an anonymous person responding to what I perceive as intentionally uninformed, ignorant and by inference anti-social opinions.

            • ONEMariachi on 18/07/2023 - 12:14
              +1

              @ginmi:

              You probably still think your government and health authorities have your best interests above all else and there is nothing else at play here.

              and you probably think meaningless statements like this constitute some level of intelligence. You are no where near as intelligent as you think you are. There's a reason you dropped out of school in year 10, and it's not because education systems are bad.

              • ginmi on 18/07/2023 - 12:17
                +1

                @ONEMariachi: I have a master degree and two graduate diplomas (one distinction and one high distinction) but thanks for your concerns… 🤣

                • Igaf on 18/07/2023 - 14:28

                  @ginmi: From where and in what exactly? Having qualifications in anything doesn't preclude you from being ignorant, or a fool, or being ideologically blind, or being wilfully ignorant outside your (apparent) area of expertise. Nor for that matter does it preclude anyone from lying, as was the case of a UK epidemiologist who completely misrepresented what his extremely limited co-authored paper on mask efficacy actually said. What it did NOT say what what he told a credulous right wing American reporter, whose article was subsequently taken as gospel by another conservative covid denier who was given space in the NY Times to further disseminate the lies of the epidemiologist. Neither of those conservative opinion writers bothered to even read the summary of the paper involved. No surprise there. The epidemiologist's lies fitted their own narratives so it must be true. Just one of many examples of ideology and lack of professional integrity trumping qualifications.

                  Your "convid" [sic] comment elsewhere and your ignorance here suggests the institution you attended failed to educate you in a lot of basics - eg the importance of evidence-based opinion. The link you posted showed that gullibility/a willingness to swallow bs and tertiary qualifications aren't mutually exclusive.

                  Your broad brush dissing and distrust of professional people doing their jobs because their advice or actions don't fit your own narrative is sheer arrogance.

                • ONEMariachi on 18/07/2023 - 16:57

                  @ginmi: sure you do champ, sure you do.

                • Igaf on 18/07/2023 - 17:07

                  @ginmi: Any reason why you need two nics Musky?

  • hokonfan on 17/07/2023 - 10:32
    -1

    still believe in this ?

    • Igaf on 17/07/2023 - 13:16

      There's no belief involved, something you should have realised years ago. It's a matter of accepting reality and what medical science and stats say.

  • sn00ze on 19/07/2023 - 09:37
    -1

    covidian sheep who think these do anything to prevent a respiratory virus after there being no science supporting this claim are polluting the environment with plastic crap and damaging their health breathing recycled air, higher CO2, bacteria, mould

    • Igaf on 19/07/2023 - 11:35

      covidian is a dead giveaway Musky/ginmi/sn00ze, as is the list of topics your current nic has inserted yourself into (I didn't bother reading your comments, I can guess their general tenor. The topics were instructive enough).

      You really are obsessed with something you know sfa about eh? I asked you already but you couldn't think of a credible answer so I'll ask again - why do you need to have multiple nics? I'll have a stab in the dark at answering for you. You want to give the impression that there are many more supporters of your other-worldly views than actually exist. Although you know this is essentially devious and dishonest it helps you justify your indefensible opinions in your own mind? Fascinating, in a perverse way.

      • sn00ze on 19/07/2023 - 22:38

        Wrong again.
        Lockdowns, masks, mandates, and the jab - what else will you get wrong?
        No, I do not have multiple logins.
        Is it so hard to accept that there's many people that see through the msm propoganda?

        • Igaf on 20/07/2023 - 09:52

          again? I may be mistaken but I can't recall interacting with you before, although I've confronted many wilfully ignorant ideologists and conspiracists previously so it's quite possible you were on the receiving end of a reality check in one of your many online guises. Odd that your alter ego appears on this deal after it I called you out above eh? Seems your Masters didn't help one little bit.

          What have I said about lockdowns, masks, mandates and vaccines which gets up your nose?

          "Is it so hard to accept that there's many people that see through the msm propoganda?"

          How many exactly? Fortunately the numbers of conspiracists and science deniers are miniscule in this country. There are very likely many more racists and probably as many white supremacists. Here's some free enlightenment for you about "msm". msm contains a mix of good, bad and indifferent information, comment/opinion, and in some more extreme cases (Fox, SKY, and many other sections of Newscorp are exemplars) what you childlishly call "propaganda". If msm is your only source of information you're highly likely to be misinformed, depending on how you approach the content and presentation. Taking articles by msm reporters as gospel is a trap for young players and fools of all political persuasion.

          Similar to what I said to your alter ego above, you'll have to explain what msm has to do with global pandemics, and medical evidence that even a junior primary school kid could understand. In your confused mental fog do you include medical systems, workers, and specialists, universities, and government officials of all political flavours in the 'msm' label? Brain fog is a symptom of some covid illnesses but I doubt that's your issue.

          While you had your head buried where the sun don't shine (scientific fact I believe) hospitals have been overrun and about 6.8M people have died - including, ironically, many covid skeptics.

          As is well documented (in msm and in numerous respected organisations around the world - organisations you no doubt know nothing about but who you just "know" are lying to us), conspiracy theory disease blinds particular people to even the simplest things. As yet there is no vaccine which can help that particular problem. Willful ignorance is a particularly nasty disease. Thankfully, unlike corona viruses, it has a very low transmission rate.

          So here's another question for you. What other scientific and medical things do you deny, or are you that rare breed of particularly discerning deniers?

          • sn00ze on 21/07/2023 - 09:37

            @Igaf: Whoa, lighten up there !
            You write well but with a spiteful and vindictive tone which doesnt help anyone (but is quite entertaining !).
            My guess you're at the denial / anger stages of accepting this shamdemic reality - a sneaking suspicion you've been sold a big fat covid lies lemon?
            We see each other as 'willfully ignorant ideologists', although for me it is not a willful position. It was quite a big pill to swallow with a considerable amount of cognitive dissidence to sort through.
            Hopefully your position isn't willful also. Apply that open minded critical thinking (which we accuse each other of lacking) and maybe we'll end up on the same page…
            The scientific consensus is slowly unraveling the political lies, the big pharma paid for science, the 'expert' opinion, the MSM shills, and the mob mentality. Give it a few years.

            • Igaf on 21/07/2023 - 21:30

              @sn00ze: Bingo! Sorry just checked my Conspiracist Parroting Handbook game card and ticked off the meaningless evidence-free motherhood statement box, a classic if I may say so: The scientific consensus is slowly unraveling the political lies, the big pharma paid for science, the e 'expert' opinion, the MSM shills, and the mob mentality. Surely you could find some examples for each of those 5 claims to make your case? Rhetorical question because it's VERY well known that the game for your ilk is to not be specific about anything. And why waffle? Because when you try, your claims are easily rebutted by anyone with a modicum of knowledge, intelligence and experience in the topic - something your cohort generally lacks if I may say so.

            • Igaf on 21/07/2023 - 22:00

              @sn00ze: Pt 2

              A few obvious questions spring immediately to mind.
              What scientific consensus is unravelling?
              What political lies were you thinking about (there are so many)?
              Why shouldn't pharmaceutical companies be paid for their research and life-saving products? Would you prefer say Craig Kelly, George Christensen and Donald Trump pool their knowledge? Or maybe a select bunch of film/pop/sports stars? Or perhaps some world renowned astronomers/engineers/car designers? Some salt of the earth mums and dads? A bunch of religious conservative bigots maybe?
              Is it only covid-19 vaccines that you're concerned about big pharma being involved in or should we be equally disturbed by their involvement in all medicines? Regulators are already aware of their failures (not including covid vaccines afaik) and have quite stringent - yet obviously imperfect - checks and balances.
              What expert opinion do you dispute and why?
              Who are these msm shills, why are they shills, and who do they shill for? Names and examples will help?
              What mob mentality were you thinking of? The Trump rabble who trashed Capitol Hill? Or perhaps that's your term for rational people who accepted the clear and obvious impacts of a devastating and lethal pathogen?

              I recognise all the usual ignorant egoistic denier traits in your comments so no surprises there but I'm still intrigued about your multiple nics. Did all three of you come to the same erroneous conclusions or do your personas take it in turns as they sometimes do with DID sufferers?

              In case you were wondering what gives you away here's a couple of the obvious tells.
              - Suggestive but essentially meaningless word salads without context or even basic elaboration. Lockdowns, masks, mandates, and the jab is a classic example
              - Unsubstantiated opinion presented as fact, aka motherhood statements, eg The scientific consensus is slowly unraveling the political lies, the big pharma paid for science, the 'expert' opinion, the MSM shills, and the mob mentality.

              Lots of analysis has been done on the behaviours of conspiracists and deniers to try and ascertain what drives them (you) to distrust and disrespect targeted organisations and individuals FAR more than is warranted, to shun knowledge and expertise, and ignore easily proven realities. That analysis is highly complex because while the numbers here are small there is a wide range of irrationality involved and a variety of agendas (including simple wealth acquisition by enablers, as we've seen in the USA with the likes of Carlson and Jones. As obvious as their motives were to most unblinkered people, we now have undeniable - to rational people - proof from their own mouths).

              Broadly I think of your grab-bag mob as cherry-picking, capitalist, pseudo-nihilists. Commonalities include, but are not limited to, meritless opinions, an oddly elevated view of the value of your views yet no answers to how things would work better for the greater good, and hypocrisy of the highest order - "I have no expertise and very limited knowledge but you can trust me or such and such a group, but don't trust or respect govt or anyone who would shine the light on our inadequacies".

              I give respect where it's merited and pull no punches with dangerously and wilfully ignorant people who attempt to pervert facts, and gullible minds, and who clearly place their own grossly ignorant opinions above the combined wisdom, knowledge, experience and expertise of others. There are already enough credulous and witless fools who swallow the sort of garbage you attempt to disseminate. Some unfortunately become unwitting carriers of your distrust disease.

              So here's another simple question on your "convid/shamdemic".
              What exactly do you think happened/is still happening (is there actually a pathogenic virus or not would be a good starting point) and if so what precisely would you have done? The huge advantage of hindsight and the enormous amount of information and studies ironically generated by people you don't rate or trust should help, but somehow I doubt it.

            • Igaf on 22/07/2023 - 16:42

              @sn00ze: Lost your multiple tongues or having a sn00ze?

              No answers to these very simple questions?
              Some might take that as confirmation that your opinions are no more than hollow regurgitations of the guff you've been fed.

              Congratulations on living up to expectations.

              As a Dunning-Karen candidate once opined (sort of): My guess you're at the denial stage of accepting reality and undrstanding that humans are fallible - a very real suspicion you've been sold a set of empty hypocritical homilies when you actually ordered virtual reality for beginners.

        • sn00ze on 22/07/2023 - 22:10

          Yeah ok, not sure if I can help you here.
          Your 'multiple nics' / 'personas' belief kinda exemplifies the issue. I only have the one login, one nic, i know the truth of this but how do I convince you? Maybe an admin could prove it with IP address logs but would you be satisfied?
          You want to slug it out with a points scoring covid debate citing research, data, professional opinion (on a Bargain site !) but will you consider anyone's information if it differs to yours?
          We've had years of debate now and the old covid narrative is crumbling, conflicting information is easy to find, it's even eeking into the mainstream now after years of suppression and censorship…
          But I think there's a bigger issue here. Your dogged determination to hold back the tide of conflicting info/data/opinion with combative, abusive, and sometimes delusional discussion isnt healthy (on a couple of levels !) and it's too insulting to sway anyone anyway.
          So who are you trying to convince? me or you? no one else is reading this…
          Maybe take a break, do something else for a while.

          • Igaf on 23/07/2023 - 14:47

            @sn00ze: It's possible you are a separate entity to the other two (who are one), but you have all the same traits.

            I have no interest in 'point scoring' as you put it (that deflection is an obvious euphemism for 'I have no argument and I don't like people pointing it out'), nor do I have any interest in changing your views. The former is puerile and the latter is futile. You've had, and still have, the chance to "validate" your opinions with specifics, but can't or won't because - as has been documented ad infinitum - you know that your gross ignorance would be exposed and your sources of "information" rightly scrutinised.

            Your latest comment continues in the same vein, despite me challenging you to do better. Why is that?
            We've had years of debate now and the old covid narrative is crumbling, conflicting information is easy to find, it's even eeking into the mainstream now after years of suppression and censorship…
            What conflicting information? If its easy to find then why can’t YOU find it? What suppression? What censorship? Be specific, so I can reply appropriately.

            But I think there's a bigger issue here. Your dogged determination to hold back the tide of conflicting info/data/opinion with combative, abusive, and sometimes delusional discussion isnt healthy (on a couple of levels !) and it's too insulting to sway anyone anyway.
            Combative? What did you expect, meek acceptance of your ignorant drivel? Abusive? Don't like the truth being pointed out, don't accept that your views are extreme and irrational, that what you do in disseminating garbage is appalling and dangerously anti-social in some circumstances? Re-read my penultimate paragraph in this post . Seemed clear enough but if you want clarification, ask away.

            Informed adults with real concerns about vaccines and criticisms of certain public health actions don't spruik puerile garbage such as 'convid', 'convidian sheep', and arrant, context- and evidence-free motherhood statements like 'the scientific consensus is slowly unravelling', or the even more laughable 'the old covid narrative is crumbling, conflicting information is easy to find, it's even eeking into the mainstream now after years of suppression and censorship…' They should, and probably do, accept reality, that the vast majority of politicians and public health experts were acting for the common good to the best of their abilities. They also acknowledge that there was a great need to act with caution because we had very limited knowledge of this corona virus AND critically we had no previous exposure which might build up a level of community immunity NOR did we have any vaccine or anti-viral medicine which could mitigate the effects. We DID have information about the Spanish flu and related SARS outbreaks - which were good enough indicators for most responsible experts and administrators to press the red alert button, a little belatedly in many cases as you (cough) know.

            Your grab-bag mob made an industry out of misquoting, inventing, lying, distorting medical science, data and opinion, all of which was was freely available to anyone with access to the internet. So unless you can provide evidence, your claims of suppression and censorship are entitled to be considered as delusional or lies. Which is it?

            You have the floor. Feel free to answer a few of my questions or 'validate' your statements. As I've said already, my questions ought to be simple for you to answer given your repeatedly strident statements.

          • Igaf on 25/07/2023 - 10:33

            @sn00ze: Cat got your tongue or did the dog eat your homework sn00ze? Surely you aren't having trouble backing up that waffle you've written? Admittedly there's a lot of it. As Sir Wally's truism says: "O, what a tangled web we weave,
            When first we practise to deceive!            " And yet you continue to put your opinion not just equal to but above that of people with actual knowledge, expertise and experience AND, critically, responsibility and societal awareness. False equivalence - look it up - is another disease of this millennium, possibly more dangerous in the long term than that proven pathogen you irrationally believe is a 'con'.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join