SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND 4TB Internal SSD $384.51 Delivered @ Amazon US via AU

140

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

AAA-A on 20/03/2023 - 07:25 amazon.com.au (135 clicks)
Last edited 20/03/2023 - 07:25

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND 4TB Internal SSD down to $384.51 which is the lowest yet on Amazon according to CamelCamel

About this item

• Ultra fast: sequential read speeds of up to 560MB/s; sequential write speeds of up to 530MB/s
• Faster boot up and shutdown. Faster app load and response Times
• Greater Drive endurance and reliability, and lower power usage with new 3D NAND technology
• Cache 2.0 technology delivers blazing fast speeds
• Shock resistant to help keep your data safe even if you drop your computer.Operating temperature: 0 C to 70 C.Compatible devices: Smartphone

Price History at CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU

Marketplace

Amazon Global Store

• 

  Erwark on 20/03/2023 - 09:45

  +6

  If you're looking at spending $385 on a SATA drive, it's probably worth spending about the same on a budget 4TB NVME drive and PCIe adaptor. Hugely improved performance.

  NVME: https://www.amazon.com.au/Crucial-PCIe-NAND-NVMe-3500MB/dp/B…

  Adaptor: https://www.amazon.com.au/UGREEN-NVMe-Adapter-M-Key-B-Key/dp…

  Obviously there are cases when SATA is the only option.

  • 

    xmagic on 20/03/2023 - 11:14

    True, for quite a few use cases (server cache, appliances, gaming consoles) it has to be SATA drives. For example in my case Unifi UCKG2P only uses SATA drives while there's barely any choices for NVMe to SATA bridges.

  • 

    CarpeDiem295 on 24/04/2023 - 11:24

    thanks. that adaptor is nice. just a single one. double one will be even better.
    the crucial you mentioned is QLC

    • 

      Erwark on 24/04/2023 - 13:30

      +1

      Double NVMe adapters can get seriously bottlenecked, especially with PCIe 3.0. Plus some of them aren't even double NVMe - the second slot can be SATA m.2. Just be careful.

      The drive was just an example. There have been cheaper or better drives since my comment. But since we were originally talking SATA, the difference between QLC and TLC NVMe is pretty minor in comparison.

      QLC m.2 drive is going to outperform any SATA drive in general and TBW is arguably overblown.

      • 

        CarpeDiem295 on 24/04/2023 - 15:09

        thanks, luckily I did notice the ones on amazon were PCIe 3.0. Ill be ok with the 1slot since Ill have the 4tb above :)
        the P3 plus version is beast

• 

  fastnet on 20/03/2023 - 20:02

  +1

  The Endurance on this drive is quite low at 600 TBW

  • 

    Nom on 20/03/2023 - 21:53

    That's not low, it's gigantic.

    • 

      fastnet on 20/03/2023 - 22:43

      +1

      It's relatively low for a 4 TB drive. A WD SN850x 4 TB for instance has a 2400 TBW rating. Kingston
      Fury Renegade 4 TB is 4000 TBW. Even a 2 TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus is 1200 TBW.

      In reality though, I dont think it matters much as most people aren't going to be constantly writing to the drive.