So I did a bunch of maths - I hope this helps someone…
I was in the market for a power bank. I wanted it to be as close to 100Wh (27,000mAh) as possible, so it was the maximum capacity that can be taken on a plane without having to muck around with declaring it and getting it approved at customs.
I was mainly interested in the Charmast 26,800mAh 20W power bank ($59.99 via Amazon), thinking that its 99Wh capacity fit my needs best. Then I learned there's more to the story…
The Charmast has been tested to around 69% efficiency, while this Baseus 20,000mAh 65W ($47.99 via eBay) has been tested to around 87% efficiency. This does vary depending on charging speeds. Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
What does this mean?
Charmast ($59.99)
Dimensions = 19.71cm x 9.60cm x 1.42cm = 268.69cm3 volume
Weight = 430g
Advertised capacity = 26,800 mAh / 99.16 Wh
Actual output @ 69.30% efficiency, 14W PD charging speed = 68.72 Wh
Wh per gram = 0.16
Wh per cm3 = 0.26
Wh per $ = 1.15
Baseus ($47.99)
Dimensions = 15.40cm x 6.50cm x 2.70cm = 270.27cm3 volume
Weight = 450g
Advertised capacity = 20,000 mAh / 74.00 Wh
Actual output @ 87% efficiency, 65W PD charging speed = 64.38 Wh
Wh per gram = 0.14
Wh per cm3 = 0.24
Wh per $ = 1.34
In conclusion, despite the Charmast having 34% higher advertised capacity, the actual Wh discharged from the two power banks is similar. And they come in a similar size/volume and weight, so similar Wh output relative to their footprint. However, the Baseus is cheaper and thus offers more Wh output per $ spent.
Other advantages of the Baseus 20,000mAh 65W:
- Much higher charging speeds - useful for devices like laptops, iPads, Steam Decks, etc.
- Much higher input speeds, allowing the power bank to be refilled much quicker (compared to overnight for the Charmast)
- LCD display to see the exact remaining battery % (compared to no LCD, only 4 LED light indicators on the Charmast)
- Cycling the power button shows the volts and amps you're getting so you know your charging speed
- Comes with a USB-C to USB-C cable included (unlike the Charmast)
The one advantage I will give to the Charmast is that it has an input port for lighting cables, which means you can charge the power bank up with a lightning cable and then swap that same cable around to charge your iPhone. Haven't seen this on any other power banks - I imagine it could be pretty convenient!
Also returns via Amazon would likely be a far easier process if you run into any troubles.
In the end I decided to pick up this Baseus 20,000mAh 65W for $47.99 via eBay :)
Disclaimer: my maths and understanding of electricity may be wrong
Advertised capacity = 26,800 mAh / 99.16 Wh
Actual output @ 69.30% efficiency, 14W PD charging speed = 68.72 Wh
vs
Advertised capacity = 20,000 mAh / 74.00 Wh
Actual output @ 87% efficiency, 65W PD charging speed = 64.38 Wh
Please explain?
14W PD charging speed = 68.72 Wh?????