• expired

[eBook] The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. $0 @ Amazon US

168116
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Free for a week thanks to Dr. Robert Malone. Also available

Amazon AU Link

Related Stores

Amazon Cloud Reader
Amazon Cloud Reader

closed Comments

  • I don't get it…… so are the negs pro- or anti-vaccine?

  • +7

    I'm linking any who says ozbargain leans left to this thread, myth busted.

  • +5

    I didn't join this site for such nonsense. Zero stars.

  • +3

    You're on a hiding to nothing posting this deal, but i think you knew what you were doing.

    There is next to no chance that a strict cult adherant thats made a booking for their 5th cookie is gonna bother reading this… They are too far down that road.

    • +4

      Cult adherants?

  • +6

    History sure rhymes with DPT, MMR, Polio vaccines etc all now looking back has their Andrew Wakefield moments. And yet we do not learn :(

  • +3

    Nothing on the arts of subterfuge, cherry picking and cooking yet?

  • +9

    Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  • +13

    Cookers gonna cook.

    I don't want to see lunatics encouraged here, even if they do so for free.

  • +6

    Have any of the neggers read the book?

    • +3

      I can assure you they only know what mainstream media told them.

    • +5

      Have read other works from the same author. All fiction masquerading as non-fiction from a guy whose entire career has been trading on his family name to sell tickets to see him speak and books of easily provable lies and misrepresentations that don’t survive the most basic of scrutiny. Anyone who reads it dumber for having done so.

      • +4

        "Read other works" aka saw a cherry picked headline and snippet from a CNN debunkoooor.

        • +5

          No, literally read directly what he published, something you either haven’t done or haven’t been able to comprehend. You don’t need to believe anyone but the author’s own words and sources to debunk him, but you do need to actually read and understand them instead of just getting erect.

  • +7

    This book causes plaque that no vaccine can ever cure

  • +9

    Great thing provoking and interesting read

    All backed by citings and evidence breaking down how Fauci spearheads the CDC efforts in suppressing valid covid early treatments in favor of pushing vaccines he benefits directly financially from

    • +3

      If you ignore the early treatments were proven not to work and take the proven fraudulent study RFK sites as the evidence while ignoring the thousands that prove him wrong, sure.

      There’s also no evidence he benefits from vaccines but RFK’s entire career is being against them, so we can take the mountain of independent evidence they work vs the guy selling the books saying they don’t?

      Guess it must be ‘thing provoking’ because I don’t think anyone reading it or writing it has had an independent thought.

      • +9

        You obviously haven't read even a page of the book

        • +2

          You obviously haven’t understood it. Just held it one handed while staring at the cover. His own references disprove him, assuming you actually read and understand what they are.

    • +5

      Lol you mean the horse dewormer and fish tank cleaner that all conclusively now shown to do nothing 😂

  • +8

    FMD. Did the OzBargain thing - saw a free deal, saw the Kennedy name and ordered. Only then I saw the title.

    Can delete it from my Kindle library but my biggest fear is that I'm now on a cooker member list and will get constant email updates on contrails.

  • +13

    This is a deals website, not an antivax Facebook group.

    • +3

      I collect free Amazon kindle books and this free book is a good deal.

      Those who are thinking about queuing up for their next "free" covid vaccine discuss here instead:
      https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/96ppyl69

    • Agree. This is overflow pus from Wpool rejects.

  • +2
  • Never realised this community was so deluded until I read all the ignorant comments from sheep who have done 0 research themselves.

    • +20

      Yeah, I did some facebook browsing, now I'm more of an expert than the people who dedicate their lives to working in the fields being talked about.

      • +16

        cmon whose research would you trust more, qanon soccer mums on facebook or actual scientists?

        • +7

          Sorry dude, some guy who is an optometrist told me that after spending some time in a telegram group he had decided that in his professional opinion covid vaccine = death.
          So…. I dunno if I can take the guys who spend decades of their lives studying viruses and vaccines seriously.

          • -1

            @[Deactivated]: I would never take a a vaccine researcher seriously on the back of Fauci’s crimes

            • +8

              @Lululuke: Ah yes, because vaccine researchers across the globe are all magically under fauci's control.

            • +5

              @Lululuke: Would you take a guy who professionally sells books about vaccines being bad above empirical fact?

              Even if he makes up crimes people who disagree with him did in his mind?

      • +1

        Oh you mean someone like Philip Lowe?

      • You prove my point. Bet you didn’t even do any Facebook research!
        Your comment also proves you haven’t followed any of this material AT ALL. If you had, you’d realised it’s far from that simple. But you don’t want to think differently do you, so enjoy your ignorance while you can.

        • +6

          No, you are right. I didn't do facebook research.
          I talked to family members who are all science and medical professionals instead.
          :)

          • @[Deactivated]: Meaning what? That they know the truth of it all? Why would you think science and medical professionals would know that?!?

            • +7

              @Lululuke: Meaning that they've got more experience and education that helps in processing the information required to fully (or at least mostly) understand the stuff at hand than someone whos "research" involves logging in to facebook and twitter each day.

              • @[Deactivated]: That’s like saying my cop friend knows what the CIA is up to because he Carrie’s a gun like they do.
                Science and medicine is but one part of this whole saga. If you think it’s the biggest part, you’re mistaken.

                • +6

                  @Lululuke: You being a facebook expert is really showing right now.
                  Goodnight.

          • +1

            @[Deactivated]: Oh you mean like Dr Kerry Chant…

    • +2

      Are you more of a Facebook or Twitter researcher?

  • +13

    Seeing the downvotes and the awareness that this book and author are steaming piles of poo goes a little way to restoring my faith in humanity.

    • -4

      Ooo wow, your big words are so impressive

      • +13

        Which word did you have trouble reading? lol

      • +4

        Lol, which of those regular words did you think were the "big" ones? 🤣

        • -1

          Sorry, I should be more clear. Their statement is a pathetic waste of words, meaningless, ignorant, and stupid. Fancy someone trashing someone else to have they faith in humanity restored!

          • +6

            @Lululuke: Given the damage done by moronic anti-vaxxers like RFK Jnr, @leyton01 made a good point.

          • +5

            @Lululuke: The complete irony of your statement is only lost on you.

        • +3

          Try drawing him a picture. Keep it simple, basic lines and primary colours only. He might understand it then.

    • +3

      Thinking the same about the upvotes 😁

  • +12

    This is misinformation garbage. Even at free, not a deal.

  • +10

    Cooker shit

  • +6

    he just won the lawsuit for children health defense against New York on mandates.. well done!

    • +2

      I wish I could understand this sentence. Cooked.

    • +3

      What lawsuit are you talking about? I looked here (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/legal_justice/legal-effor…) and they don't seem to be having much success.

        • +1

          he just won the lawsuit for children health defense against New York on mandates.. well done!

          The author of the book didn't win anything.

          On Tuesday, in what could be a first-of-its-kind ruling, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Erika Edwards rejected the city’s argument in one such lawsuit — filed by NYPD Sgt. Patrick Agugliaro after his request for a COVID-19 vaccine exemption on religious grounds was denied.

          So basically NYC tried to get the case thrown out because there is no longer vaccine mandate and the judge said 'no'.

          The case is still ongoing (and won't have an impact on anyone unless claiming an exemption from being vaccinated on religious grounds - ignoring the fact you don't need to be vaccinated anymore anyways) so it's a huge stretch to say "omg a win, well done!!!"

          It's basically the equivalent of your footy team being 1 point in front at half time - in a friendly off season game - and saying "congrats legends on the win!!"

  • +9

    New theory on FB. Throughout school, teachers have always told us that 2+2=4. But we all know that schools are controlled by the Gov and nasa, trying to brainwash us into believing nonsense. Even big tech like Google is trying to brainwash us, censoring every other number except for 4 for the answer. MSM isn't reporting on this because they're clearly in bed with all of them, hiding data from us. Why are people being sheeps and just accepting that 2+2=4, we should be questioning it and do our own research.

    • +2

      it took hundreds of pages to prove 1+1=2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysNyWFQstto&ab_channel=Halfa…. However, I am not sure they actually prove that 2+2=4 specifically. I think you may be onto something mate !!!

    • +1

      If only someone could write a whole book on how 2+2 doesn’t equal 4 we’d find out the truth. Better yet if some major world event happened that made it important that we all know how to do simple addition, you could make real money on appearance fees claiming it wasn’t important to know, especially of most of the world’s mathematicians disagreed, it’d be a niche market.

      • +1

        2+2=4?

        LIES!!!!!

        • This argument just shows how cooked some people are 😁

  • +5

    Not a bargain for anyone with even half a brain

  • +13

    In the book, Kennedy calls Fauci "a powerful technocrat who helped orchestrate and execute 2020’s historic coup d’etat against Western democracy".

    WTAF.

  • +6

    I came across an interesting article some time ago that provides some insight into the minds of those who deny science and medicine in favour of ideology-driven nonsense like that of what many refer to as “cookers”. I found it helpful in understanding why these people have such a hard time accepting the overwhelming majority of the science and medical community.

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-people-fly-fr…

  • +11

    The biggest irony here is that for the first few years of the pandemic you cookers were all about everyone just "getting on with their lives" and yet here you still are when we've all gotten on with our lives. Still fixated on your echo chamber circle jerks from "doing your own research".

  • +9

    Book contains misinformation, not a bargain

  • +8

    Not a bargain until I can get horse dewormer for free

    • +7

      Whoever told you about horse dewormer lied to you…
      You can get it at Chemist Warehouse Stromectol 3mg Ivermectin Tablets

      Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 95 studies

      • +11

        Ivermectin, the drug designed for humans that saved human lives and got a Nobel prize for it that the tga blocked?

        Chairman Dan and co, what a bunch of lovely people they are.

        • +3

          The fact that they(including the FDA in the US) simply try to portray this as just a horse dewormer says a lot.

          • +3

            @ozhunter: It’s also human dewormer, you just need a smaller dose to deworm yourself, people buying it ‘for their horses’ died.

            Of course even human doses can be fatal

            https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/12/13/pennsy…

            Some medications are better than the disease they treat and most have risks, but taking unproven, and in this case thoroughly disproven
            medications for your condition is potentially hazardous to your health for nothing.

            It’s always the way, people pointing out every person that had a potentially adverse event (eg usually headache), within 6 weeks of having had a vaccine as definitive proof vaccinations are bad while ignoring all the deaths from the relatively few doses of a medication they know nothing about beyond what their false prophets sold them.

            • @JumperC: It's safety profile has been know for quite some time.

              It doesn't need to stop/cure covid at all, just help the body fight against it, like taking panadol/ibuprofen. The body's immune system would protect it from covid.

              https://c19ivm.org/meta.html#fig_fpp

              https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/aussies-…

              The most vaccinated group(the elderly) had hundreds if not thousands more deaths than the least vaccinated group(young kids). Vaccines basically useless for vast majority of the people.

              The very specific wording that the media and politicians use to try to diminish it and other alternatives to get everyone to think anything but vaccines as the only way to fight covid makes them highly suspicious.

              • +3

                @ozhunter: Sure it’s safety profile is ‘sometimes fatal’ and your completely fictional ’proof any old idiot can make a website’ (anonymous registration in oct 2022) that has been thoroughly debunked by actual large scale studies. Real, not fictional made up numbers show it had nil to negative effect in helping people fight Covid, it made it worse. It’s no wonder you believe this tripe of you’re that bad at checking sources.

                Just look at what you’re saying, old people die more so vaccines = bad. Think about that for second. Except the unvaccinated have 20x the death rate from Covid despite the old and sick already being more likely to be vaccinated. Vaccines train your immune system, so vaccines are actually more not less effective if you are young and healthy. But you need them more as you get older because your immune system declines.

                Importantly even the vaccine doesn’t help if you’re severely immunocompromised so you rely on the people around you not getting it or having fewer symptoms so they’re less likely to spread it to you. Something the vaccines help greatly with.

                And vaccines aren’t the only way to fight the virus, they’re the most effective s and cheapest though. Paxlovid is also effective if taken early but way more expensive and many people can’t take it because it interacts with other medication.

                • @JumperC: Drinking water can be fatal too. Not like those in power couldn't pay people to have studies show what they want it to show. Almost half of the FDA comes from drugmakers and other medical developers

                  Just look at what you’re saying, old people die more so vaccines = bad.

                  I'm saying an unvaccinated young person has a much higher chance of survival than a multi-jabbed old person.

                  Vaccines train your immune system

                  And they can kill you. The immune system doesn't need to be trained for almost everyone. It's like saying wearing a hard hat an steel cap shoes offer more protection. Yea it does, but people don't go around wearing in their everyday lives because it's basically useless.

                  Except the unvaccinated have 20x the death rate from Covid despite the old and sick already being more likely to be vaccinated

                  Maybe if they are old/sick/obese. A person's age and health made so much more of a difference than the vaccine.

                  Something the vaccines help greatly with.

                  Importantly even the vaccine doesn’t help if you’re severely immunocompromised so you rely on the people around you not getting it or having fewer symptoms so they’re less likely to spread it to you

                  They can stay home or get more jabs.

                  They do not. Pro-vaxxers seem to have conceded that long time ago lol. Also, an unvaccinated person who doesn't have covid isn't spreading anything.

                  And vaccines aren’t the only way to fight the virus, they’re the most effective s and cheapest though.

                  Lol, do you think there is any way without taking any of the new drug(after 2019) that are able help the body fight covid?

        • +4

          Ivermectin won a Nobel prize for treating parasites, not viruses. This is like treating a headache by removing your appendix.

          Some doggy unverified studies by doctors who patented a treatment using ivermectin who were trying to sell it as a cure early in the pandemic polluted meta studies and were later proven false when larger studies were done.

          https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o917

          Many studies actually suggested it made Covid worse.

          But it probably just did nothing as you’d expect from a drug designed to do something completely different.

          https://www.smh.com.au/national/major-study-confirms-ivermec…

          https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/ivermectin-does-no…

          It’s ironic people who think the vaccines are the conspiracy for money ignore this when it’s the real $$$ for unproven treatment.

          https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/oct/18/docto…

          • +1

            @JumperC: It's a repurposed drug, it's not limited to anti-parasitic.
            Antiviral effects: https://c19ivm.org/

            Use of the Anti-Parasitic Drug Ivermectin to Treat Breast Cancer
            https://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/fulltext/2021/05050/…

            • +1

              @sintro: But why would you take horse dewormer? Isn't covid just a cold and nothing to be afraid of?

            • +1

              @sintro: Antiviral effects: https://c19ivm.org/
              I suspect you're way beyond redemption but you might want to check the discussion below his "study". If you can find credible peer reviewed papers on Ivermectin's success against covid I'm all ears. It's by no means beyond the realm of possibility.

              I have a couple of question for you. Your second link re breast cancer simply states that in their opinion further investigation is warranted (a clinical trial being a significant step). How is this relevant to covid where studies have already been done, and do you understand that individual scientific papers are usually NOT definitive or necessarily reflective of current wisdom/consensus (why is sometimes why a paper is done in the first place)? And, why do you apparently accept some published research but ignore anything which doesn't fit your narrative?

            • +1

              @sintro: Repurposed drug. Yes. It has been proven to work as an anti-parasitic. The only proof it did anything anti-viral was in a Petri dish in a dose that would kill a horse. All the ‘repurposed’ used have either not been proven to work, or in the case of Covid been thoroughly proven not to work or even make it worse.

              All medicines have side effects and potential side effects. All are about weighing risk vs benefit. The risks may be worth it if you have a parasite, it might be a high chance of serious complications or death from the parasite vs a low chance from ivermectin.

              But ivermectin still kills people at a substantially higher rate than the vaccine and has been repeatedly proven not to help on humans.

              References from institutions that were founded in 2020 by people seeking speaking engagements isn’t proof of anything other than gullibility. “ The facts presented are offered as information only in order to empower you – our protocol is not medical advice ”

              Yep, they have lawyers covering their asses.

              You too can donate to their disproven ‘protocol’ of throw everything at it and hope something sticks.

              If you want a drug that does reduce fatalities from Covid, Paxlovid works. Unfortunately like all medicines it’s not that simple and you can’t take it if you’re on a number of other common medications as it interacts.

              Drug interactions is why people should get medical advice from their GP, not the internet. Things that may suit some people can be fatal for others.

        • +2

          Ivermectin wasn't designed as an anti-viral and there is currently no definitive evidence that at safe consumption rates it's effective against covid. Cookers raiding sellers of the drug caused significant problems for livestock producers in the USA and temporary shortages in this country for people who rely on it for other problems.

          "Chairman Dan" (classic example of what SKY brainwashing can achieve) had nothing to do with the TGA deciding to limit its prescription to approved conditions.

      • +1

        Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 95 studies

        lmao I just had a look at that 'article'. It's not written scientifically and very poor referencing/citing in-text and at the end. On top of that,
        used Twitter, Wikipedia and random obviously biased blogs as their source/reference! The only people you're fooling are people are haven't been to Uni and lack critical thinking.

  • +13

    People love to think that they are smarter than the average.

    Watching some edgy youtube videos designed to get views then parroting about how the world is out to get you with vaccines does not make you an expert over people who have studied medicine for their entire lives.

    Sit down.

  • +7

    Who heres getting thier next booster! Getting mine tmrw before I head to the PRC for work

    • Please tell me you're not an English teacher.

    • +3

      Say hi to the commies, ask them why they never deployed mRNA shots & why the Wuhan Institute of Virology was shutdown on September 12 2019

      • +1

        I dont want to be executed, maybe next time :-)

      • +7

        say hi to the other qanoners who abandoned their families to wait for jfk to resurrect with you

      • +1

        Say hi to the commies, ask them why they never deployed mRNA shots & why the Wuhan Institute of Virology was shutdown on September 12 2019

        Which commies? China? I don't know but here are my best guesses.

        They didn't have the technology or capacity to produce their own mRNA vaccine in the timeframe required.
        Was the lab shut down? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/report-sa…
        If you're still plugged into the Wuhan lab conspiracy you might be interested to know that recent analysis strongly suggests that the virus originated in the wet markets at Huanan.

  • +16

    8 reports for illegal/inappropriate - hahahahahaha the bootlicking softcocks are out in force

    • +7

      The Redditooors are downvoting in force.

      • +1

        OOI, what do you have against Reddit?

        Was it a bad experience on r/australia or something?

        Reddit is a pretty big place. There are even subs for… cookers.

    • Wow 8 reports! What a force!

  • +9

    People who love Fauci wrongly believed the 'vaccine' stopped transmission
    (as their masters lied to them) and haven't seen Pfizer's ceo admitting it was all a sham.

    They even injected themselves with an untested drug from a company that has legal immunity and every incentive only to make money.

    Your drug didn't stop transmission and the lockdown killed more people than this cold.

Login or Join to leave a comment