I bought a mobile phone from a big telco about 6 years ago and have used it continuously since. It is getting pretty old now and starting to become unreliable (its one with mechanical keys). I am also planning to use it overseas later this year where I know it will need to be unlocked to use a local SIM. I didn't want to take a failing phone with me overseas. So I went out and bought another phone from the same telco which is also locked to that telco to replace my current failing/failed phone.
Since I knew that my original phone was eligible for free unlocking because I had used it for many years and with many dollars spent, I called the telco to get my replacement phone unlocked. I only gave them the EMIE of the new phone, not the old. They said that they would not unlock it for free and that I had to pay $85 since it was near new. They admitted that if I want to unlock the old broken phone there would be no cost!
I argued that the eligibility should be with the phone SERVICE and not the DEVICE used. They would not have it! Who is being unreasonable here? I would appreciate some arm's length opinions.
no… you're the unreasonable one. Don't even need a poll to tell you that