Read Speed: 2,400 MB/s - Write Speed: 1,800 MB/s
Not a bad SSD, not the fastest but gets the job done.
~$93.159 each if you purchase 2, 10% discount will be added at checkout. Thanks @MagnamoniousRex
CamelCamelCamel.
Good much for pair in nas?
I'm curious to hear what other's say - i don't think these are the typical choice for nas…?
Be a great cache disk with those read/write speeds but massively overkill for storage, no home network can even get close to their read or write speed.
No, not for NAS. Based on Tomshardware's review:
the QLC variant averaged USB 2.0-like speeds of just 40 MBps after the SLC cache was full.
Unless you intend to use less than 70% of the SSDs all the time, and never fill the SSD over its SLC cache limit every time, it's a bad choice for a NAS. Furthermore, you generally prefer to have higher endurance SSDs for NAS.
The ideal scenario to use this SSD is for situations where you read from this SSD a lot and don't write too often. Gaming is one such use case because our NBN cannot do 40MB/s normally (that's 3200Mbits/s).
It depends on your use case, "NAS" doesn't give much insight. These are QLC drives, which would mean that large sequential writes would not be its strength, i.e. if you are dumping large amounts of data and just want to go faster, it will get really slow once the SLC cache is out.
On the other hand, it'll be great for read-intensive applications, or if you only do short "bursty" random writes.
If you're using as a L2ARC over a HDD ZFS pool, for instance, then this will work pretty well since it's fairly read intensive and will give you much snappier performance especially when you have lots of users accessing commonly used files.
I've had one of these for months now, no issues and the software is really easy to use. Good budget m2
QLC electronic rubbish.
Warning: I just installed this into my b450 Gigabyte Aorus elite mobo and it died within 2 weeks. Got a refund and got a 1tb Samsung 2.5" instead. Make of this what you will.
$90 if you buy two.