Cheapest so far I guess. Comes to $809 shipped after promo code.
Further discount with ebay discounted gift cards
Cheapest so far I guess. Comes to $809 shipped after promo code.
Further discount with ebay discounted gift cards
It appears to be "webcam capable" being that it has official USB camera capability and clean HDMI out for capture. It will probably require a dummy battery for AC power.
I got the mark i version of this camera late last year and it’s such a great first camera for me! Wish I got the mark ii version but I got a good deal for the mark i second hand. If anyone has any questions let me know I’m more than happy to answer them :)
How did you learn to take good pictures without using the "auto" mode?
Videos on youtube. Lots and lots of videos.
That is usually how I learn these things. Things like composition, rule of thirds, exposure, 180 rule, there's a lot, but if you're interested, videos will cover it.
Also just going out and taking random photos helps you figure out what works and what doesn't imo
my 2 cents
Also just going out and taking random photos helps you figure out what works and what doesn't imo
That was the hardest thing for me to learn, I wanted to take a good photo every time. Trick is to take 300 photos and you might get 3 good ones. Look at what works, what doesn't, keep trying to capture the bits that work each time. I got back into photography recently, out of the 500 shots I've taken so far I really like one of them.
Youtube was also incredibly helpful for post-processing as well. Post-processing is witchcraft.
The great thing compared to when I first learned is seeing videos for the exact lens/camera combo I use on youtube. That definitely didn't exist 12 years ago.
Don't worry, I know a 12-year-old who figured that all out. If you're genuinely interested, you'll find it quite easy.
That's the key though; the best and quickest way to learn photography IS to get out of auto modes and shoot manual and take plenty of images. You have full control of what you're doing that way you understand and see how different settings affect the images you take.
Do you use kit lens or any other?
I am planning to go with 22mm lens as that is much slimmer than the kit lens
My first legit cam was a Canon 800d/T7i and I used the canon aps-c 24mm pancake lens more than anything else - a really great focal length on a crop sensor and really splits the line between “you need to move and practice to get the shot” and “auto will do”.
22mm lens is worth every cent. I just bought it, and its soooo much sharper than the kit lens.
The 22mm is the best of the best. Sharp, compact, great at low light and at an incredible price. A must buy for this camera. I also highly recommend everyone purchase a ef to ef-m adapter because it opens up so many options. I have the ef 50mm f1.8 STM, ef-s 55-250 f4-5.6 IS STM, and the tamron ef 150-600mm f5-6.3 with the Viltrox (non-speedboosting) adapter and they all work fantastically.
Just wondering - what does the speedbooster do?
@parker1: Allows the sensor to see more to mimic full frame sensors.
Theres very little difference between the mark 1 and the mark 2. The mark 2 just lets you use it as a webcam, otherwise its functionally the same.
Not quite, you can use it as a webcam on the mark i as well, just if you decide you want to go through hdmi instead you won’t have a clean feed without taking off on-screen elements + auto focus.
DigiDirect also can do a good deal, especially if you buy a lens at the same time
seriously consider getting 22/2 pancake lens, it's awesome and cheap walk around lens
also 11-22 is awesome if you want landscape/architecture
also 32/1.4 is awesome for portraits
also 18-150 is just an awesome one lens to have on your camera forever if you mostly shoot outdoors during the day
also 55-200 for (outdoor) sports and wildlife, although 18-150 is much more versatile
haven't tried the macro.
I have the original M50 MK I and most of the EF-M native lenses alongside a couple third parties, it's a good and easy camera for starters. The lens options are obviously not as wide as others but some EF-M lenses are truly special.
22mm f2
32mm f1.4 (best native lens)
11-22mm f4-5.6
15-45mm kit lens
50mm f1.8 (to EF-M mount)
Third party lenses:
Sigma 16mm f1.4 - my favorite third party lens
Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 (to EF-M mount) - my latest entry, no complains yet
I would like to try the Sigma 16mm but it looks bulky. that's one limitation of this model, body is smallish so you only want smallish lenses to go with it
trust me I tried a number of ef-s with adaptor on it, works super well but looks silly and cumbersome
It is quite bulky, but actually not as bulky as I expected, I have a EF 70-300mm as well and that shit is HUGE.
Looks like a great little DSLR, if I weren't already with Fuji this would be my sub $1000 choice paired with a niftyfifty 50mm
xt20 or 30?
you don't like your Fuji? why?
Anyone that owns this camera. Would this be a good starting point to do real estate photography? I was considering getting a djo OM5 and using my s22 ultra but think I need a better camera??
One issue with the kit lens with this is at 15mm it's not the best and that's where you'd probably leave it most of the time, you'll get dim edges and a bit of barrel distortion. It will be a crisper image but it's not necessarily a good thing, you're trying to hide the flaws with the house. So it's not just buying a camera, you probably want a wide angle prime to go with it (or a really good zoom) which involves more cost.
Another reason I'd want a DSLR/mirrorless is using a flash if it's a dimly lit house, but then that's probably possible to do with phones these days (I just don't use them).
I haven't used the S22 Ultra, reviews of the ultrawide camera are a bit of a mixbag. Photo examples I looked at seem pretty good (albeit wide lit). I'd try the phone out for a bit, do some samples and if you're not getting any distortions and unevenness I'd still with the S22 Ultra.
I use this for a lot of my pro work and as my primary travel camera (it took almost every one of the photos on my portfolio site) - it's well suited for real estate work but you'd need the 11-22 lens as the 15-45 will probably be a little tight for a lot of smaller rooms.
nice work mate
Brings me back to 2013 when HN had the EOS M twin kit lens plus flash camera bundle for $399. I miss that camera, solid build quality with metal lenses all in a compact size. Also reminds me of my Pentax Q and it's super fast f1.0 kit lens. Kind of wish I didn't sell either. Currently using my Sony A7 mk1 as a webcam for work via a HDMI capture dongle. Not much use otherwise
EOS M was such a great kit at the clearance price, most of my coworkers at HN at the time snapped up TLK's for themselves and friends/family, but I was adamant Nikon SLR at the time so didnt grab 1. Fast forward to nearly 10 years later…and Canon hasn't really done much with this format really..
I bought and sold my Pentax Q 3 times. Was such a love hate relationship but kinda wished I held onto it just for my display cabinet that I have now for my cameras…
Word of advice - EOS-M seems to be a dying format, with very few native lenses available. This may be an appealing camera if you're otherwise invested in the EF/EF-S ecosystem, and want to use those lenses with an adaptor, but I'd suggest Fujifilm/Sony are probably better bets if you're going fresh into mirrorless.
Super relevant.
EF is still viable today as they provide excellent value with an adapter on their RF mount body's.
But EOS-M? I don't think they ever really tried.
I'm waiting for a fire sale again then maybe I'll buy back in
While this is true, these lenses have retained some value over the years because they are such great lenses, so yes it is 100% more convenient if you are planning to upgrade later (and I’d suggest buying many ef lenses and just getting the adapter) but don’t be too afraid because there are benefits with buying some ef-m lenses too, particularly if you’re not upgrading any time soon like I am
Get a Canon EF to EOS-M Adapter and you can use ALL Canon lenses with your EOS M camera.
It won't be compact but otherwise fully functional.
Defeats the purpose of this camera. Might as well go for the DSLR
Not necessarily. Also it is still reasonably compact even with adapter + lens. Not quite pocketable but there are still reasons to go for this over DSLR
@ThatNintendoKid: I didn't think this thing is pocketable even if it's just the body…
@smartazz104: I could definitely fit my m50 and the 22mm lens in my jumper pocket. Although you're right if you're thinking of like jeans pockets or something
that's what they said 2 years ago
this line is very popular in Japan
Canon was going to release more lenses for this mount in 2020, plans altered by the pandemic
let's see if it still happens. for now this has 5 years warranty, 5 years of worry free shooting
I can't find a Fuji at this price point, except perhaps x-t200. But reviews for this model seem a bit middling.
Does this come with a memory card or do I have to purchase it seperately?
You’ll have to purchase one separately
Thank you
So if moving from photo shoot using mobile phones, is this the right DSLR to get? Or is there a better beginner camera?
This is an absolutely terrific beginner camera. Think about what your priorities are though, as there may be a cheaper option depending on what you like. Or if you can borrow one from someone to try out maybe? Regardless, the M50 is a brilliant beginner camera.
This is a great little camera - I use this for a lot of my pro work and as my primary travel camera (in fact it took almost every one of the photos on my portfolio site) and it's absolutely fantastic value for money and a good balance between price, size and performance.
The lenses in the EF-M ecosystem are far cheaper than the sony / fuji compact lenses too.
This or micro four thirds? Hmm decisions…
Just in case this deal wasn't sweet enough already, it's $772.50 shipped with the afterpay sale now!
Price in title plz