This was posted 2 years 11 months 12 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

20% off First Subscription of Toilet Paper eg 48 Rolls $41.60 Delivered (23c/100 Sheets) @ Who Gives A Crap

784
20% off First Subscription of Toilet Paper eg 48 Rolls $41.60 Delivered (23c/100 Sheets) @ Who Gives A Crap
Go to Deal
Cashback
sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:04 au.whogivesacrap.org (1655 clicks)
Last edited 20/01/2022 - 13:14 by 1 other user
TWENTYLOO
Product Rolls Price c/100 sheets
Recycled 48 $41.6 23.2
Recycled 24 $25.6 26.6
Bamboo 48 $48 25
Bamboo 24 $28.8 30

New customers, requires account. Subscription required. Subscription may be cancelled at any time by emailing.

Free shipping for orders over $30 for select areas. Tissues also available (but no discount).

100% money back guaranteed. 50% of profits donated to build toilets in developing nations.

Update: Next day delivery for me - in a Melbourne eastern suburb. Ordered 10am Wednesday, arrived 1pm Thursday.

Referral Links

Referral: random (51)

Referrer and referee get $10 credit, after referee spends $58 or more.

Health & Beauty Toilet Paper

Related Stores

Who Gives a Crap
Who Gives a Crap

closed Comments

  • ozizoy on 19/01/2022 - 11:16
    +5

    Bargain here?

    • GuestShopper on 19/01/2022 - 11:18
      +10

      A better world

    • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:27
      +14

      Cheaper than this popular deal from yesterday which was 24.7c/100 sheets. And they're not made from recycled paper nor do they donate profits.

      • Master Bates on 19/01/2022 - 12:19
        +1

        22.2c/100 sheets, if you were doing it correctly.

        • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 12:27
          +1

          Oh, via sub and save. Fair enough. Too bad that deal expired.

    • Laziofogna on 19/01/2022 - 11:29
      +2

      Just the newest faction on OB after iOS/Android, WD/Seagate, Aldi/Costco. We can now enjoy Quilton vs WGAC.

    • HeWhoKnows on 20/01/2022 - 13:16
      +3

      Super expensive if you ask me

      You can buy a 24 pk of high quality 3 ply toilet paper at Aldi for around $9.

      hence for the same money ($41.60) you get around 100 rolls from Aldi.

      And not much more in the big supermarkets (around $12 for 24)

      Sorry but a big THUMBS DOWN from me.

      • sween64 on 20/01/2022 - 15:43

        How many sheets per roll?

      • mswiggles on 20/01/2022 - 19:55

        My Aldi has no stock

      • abctoz on 21/01/2022 - 16:44

        crazy people upvote deals like this on a bargain website tbh

        then again front page is pretty much just advertising these days, how far this place has fallen

  • Nintendo on 19/01/2022 - 11:27
    -4

    Who gives a crap selling loo roles 🤭

  • Birdyzone on 19/01/2022 - 11:30
    +38

    Most dunny rolls sold in Australia are made in Australia
    Sadly these are not.

    • Laziofogna on 19/01/2022 - 11:33

      List bro?

    • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:43
      +5

      Yep, Made in China so they can get the packaging (paper not plastic) they want, use recycled paper tomake the TP and extra long roles. They try their best to ensure the factory workers are looked after. Shipping is also carbon neutral.

      • GuestShopper on 19/01/2022 - 11:53
        +2

        It is a very good point. However, the containers are already coming I guess. Why not fill them with a very light sustainable product? I would call it the lesser evil…

        • ltwo on 19/01/2022 - 11:56
          +6

          why does "Made in China" have so many negative connotations?

          • R4 on 19/01/2022 - 12:06
            +8

            @ltwo: Have a look at the world in 2022 and see what the CCP has done/is doing.

            There is a slowly growing movement to not buy Chinese-made products - something I'm making a big effort to be part of.

          • TheOtherLeft on 19/01/2022 - 13:44
            +10

            @ltwo: Because Australia is perfectly capable of making TP, Sorbent is made in Melb, and Kleenex is made in South Aus.
            Why support overseas products if we can make it here?

            • FredAstair on 19/01/2022 - 20:34

              @TheOtherLeft: Maybe because the nut jobs have pillaged the supermarketsmahain and the toilet roll aisles are friggin empty again. Wtf

              Also bottled water.
              Like people can't drink from a tap . double wtf

        • gromit on 19/01/2022 - 12:06
          +9

          I got no problems with made in china and will happily buy made in china products, But does seem rather silly and non environmentally friendly to import toilet paper, it would seem to significantly offset the savings made by recycling.

          • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 12:13
            +2

            @gromit: Did you read WGAC's blog? It's linked above.

            • ESEMCE on 19/01/2022 - 12:26
              +4

              @sween64: Yeah, it's good that they've outlined their reasons.
              But I dislike that they reference US data on Tissue sourcing.
              Australian Tissue is from Plantation timber, so flat out wrong through that section and borderline intentionally misleading IMHO.

              • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 12:28
                +3

                @ESEMCE: Recycled is still better than plantation timber.

            • gromit on 19/01/2022 - 12:27
              +1

              @sween64: yes I did, nothing in their contradicts what I said. We use plantation timber here not native and buying carbon offsets does not equal environmentally friendly in my book.

              • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 12:29

                @gromit:

                One thing that’s important to know about making toilet paper is that the production process and raw material sourcing, rather than the transport process, makes up the vast majority of the carbon footprint. The absolute best thing you can do for the planet is to switch to recycled toilet paper. The National Resource Defense Council’s report on the damage that virgin toilet paper is having on our native forests does a great job of explaining this further.

                Is relevant though.

                • gromit on 19/01/2022 - 12:37
                  +4

                  @sween64: yes and if it were cutting down native forests to make it I would agree. That equation changes massively with plantations, yes not as good as recycled but light years ahead of native. It is the problem when you use US data to try and represent us.

                  • abb on 19/01/2022 - 15:38

                    @gromit:

                    if it were cutting down native forests to make it I would agree. That equation changes massively with plantations

                    While I do understand and agree, the land under the current plantations was once a native forest too…

                    Surely recycled paper is the way to go, leaving more timber for making furniture or other durable goods. Especially toilet paper, it's not like it's holding state secrets or works of art in an archive for decades.

                    (I buy 100% recycled Aus-made TP, but I'm looking into WGAC…)

                    I agree with you about carbon offsets not being great either but, ceteris paribus, I'd choose the company that offsets their emissions any day over the company that doesn't.

                • spaceflight on 19/01/2022 - 14:32
                  +1

                  @sween64:

                  The absolute best thing you can do for the planet is to switch to recycled toilet paper. The National Resource Defense Council’s report on the damage that virgin toilet paper is having on our native forests does a great job of explaining this further.

                  But plantation timber, which is what Australia uses means that trees are planted with the intention of being cut down.
                  We are not cutting down our native forest.

                  Those plantation trees are absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere while they are growing and the average Pine tree absorbs about 10 kilograms of CO2 per year.

                  Using this toilet paper also means a delivery truck will make a trip just for you.
                  That's emitting CO2 that wouldn't happen if you went to the supermarket and got toilet paper as part of your grocery shop.

                  • magic8ballgag on 19/01/2022 - 14:53
                    +1

                    @spaceflight:

                    Using this toilet paper also means a delivery truck will make a trip just for you.

                    Do you honestly believe that they are driving a truck back and forth from a single warehouse to deliver one order at a time?

        • Binchicken22 on 19/01/2022 - 13:47
          +2

          That's really not how container shipping works… Did you even think about what you just wrote?

          • GuestShopper on 19/01/2022 - 14:40
            -2

            @Binchicken22: Please illuminate us mate. I suggest you also do the same about thinking what one writes. It was merely an opinion.

            • gromit on 19/01/2022 - 16:29
              +2

              @GuestShopper: His point is the containers AREN'T just coming anyway, containers only come if they have been ordered or are filled for a delivery, ships don't cart empty containers around hoping to fill them up. Filling a container means a container that otherwise wood NOT have been transported, is transported.

              • GuestShopper on 19/01/2022 - 16:42
                -4

                @gromit: Don't worry about it. Thank you for taking your time to explain his/her point of view. I was not ignorant to the stuff you mentioned already. I guess we need to talk over these things face to face like civilised social beings rather than limiting ourselves to the shallow meaning of texts. (Please note that this is not an invitation for a coffee)

      • Laziofogna on 19/01/2022 - 14:22
        -4

        Awww lucky we have soldiers like you fighting for a better world.

      • spaceflight on 19/01/2022 - 14:28

        so they can get the packaging (paper not plastic) they want

        Or they could wrap them in nothing and save paper and ink.

        • magic8ballgag on 20/01/2022 - 11:25

          So people like you can complain that they are being too tight or that their product arrived tainted?

      • demod on 19/01/2022 - 14:46
        +4

        Yeah, this. Why sent TP half way across the world?

        I buy icare/safe/duvey(sp?). 100% recycled, made in Melbourne. Aussie owned. Encore is the company I think. There might be other brands they do.

        Not sure why they're not more well known for this?

        (Not affiliated.. just wipe my behind on their stuff)

      • Rob-4x4 on 19/01/2022 - 16:27
        +1

        I would rather give people in Australia jobs than people in China.

        My only grip with China is the government there … definitely not the people, as many of them also suffer at the hands of the Chinese government, even the wealthy like Jack Mao have suffered ..And of the small Chinese businesses I have dealt with via ebay and Alliexpress I have found they are often better to deal with than some of the Australian ebay sellers I have had the misfortune to deal with. …

        Only ones I don't like are the fake "Australian" ebay sellers who are really based in China. Seems to be a rising number of them recently.

      • BartholemewH on 19/01/2022 - 17:24

        You can get paper packaging without importing. You can also get recycled paper without importing. You can easily get extra long rolls without importing. Thus is some of the cheapest paper available retailed as an environmental exercise. It is brilliant marketing and I wish I'd thought of it.

        Source: Have purchased/sold more paper than everyone in this thread will use in their lifetime.

      • Bargain4U on 19/01/2022 - 23:19
        +3

        China rang, they said thanks for supporting their recycling and manufacturing industry and letting Aussie paper go to landfill.

    • oldrocker on 19/01/2022 - 11:45
      +10

      Time to support locally-made products

      • magic8ballgag on 19/01/2022 - 12:06
        +1

        Why can't we do both? Or are we only allowed to buy products manufactured exclusively in our home land from now on?

      • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 12:17
        +1

        It's Australian owned and employ many Australians.

        • factor on 19/01/2022 - 12:38
          +3

          Toilet paper for virtue signalling idiots who think they are green - just doesn't add up. Let's freight a bulky item to your door — yeah that's green smart!

          Anyway, at least they plaster their branding all over, so it's easy to pick who isn't the sharpest crayon.

        • Bargain4U on 19/01/2022 - 23:24
          +1

          You mean all 15 office people on LinkedIn that are in Australia? We all know most jobs are created in the manufacturing in these type of products, directly and indirectly.

      • kiddingmyself on 19/01/2022 - 14:11
        -1

        International 👏trading 👏benefits👏 everyone👏

        • oldrocker on 19/01/2022 - 14:29
          -1

          You're kidding yourself right?😉

          • kiddingmyself on 19/01/2022 - 15:27
            -1

            @oldrocker: No, I am absolutely not. Australia is benefiting immensely from international trading, netting hundreds of billions in trade surplus. The tax pay for essential government services, welfare and amenities. Just cause you all are willingly ignoring the fact doesn't make it less true.

          • Timetraveler on 19/01/2022 - 17:03
            -1

            @oldrocker: Whoosh …….lol
            He didn’t get it!

            • oldrocker on 19/01/2022 - 19:12
              -2

              @Timetraveler: Hahahaha 😆

              • Optimusprimetime on 19/01/2022 - 22:10

                @oldrocker: Instead of throwing dismissive remarks at this guy, might be worthwhile taking a crash course in macroeconomics 101 and the concept of comparative and absolute advantage. International trade does in fact increase standard of living. The logic of moving manufacturing to countries with cheaper labour, is that businesses in Australia that sell these goods at cheaper prices to the public, remain open. Imagine a scenario where a product is sold on the market at 4 times what it is sold for overseas because wages in Australia are 4 times what they are overseas, the natural conclusion is that people end up sourcing those products overseas rather than locally, hurting the Australian economy further.

            • kiddingmyself on 19/01/2022 - 20:37
              +1

              @Timetraveler: Haha, I got the pun, it's just not very good or clever.

    • Optimusprimetime on 19/01/2022 - 19:47

      I think this whole movement towards not buying ‘made in China’ is a populist movement led mostly by those without a sufficient degree of understanding of economics. I’m all for pushing back on any threats to our sovereignty, China or otherwise but boycotting ‘made in China’ will mostly hurt local businesses, who realistically can’t survive without outsourcing part of their supply chain to China. Outsourcing manufacturing to China seems fine to me so long as marketing, r&d, retail, admin and other necessary functions remain in Australia. Also just because something isn’t ‘made in China’ doesn’t mean there aren’t other aspects of the supply chain going through China, especially with most multinationals having regional headquarters in China.

    • HeWhoKnows on 20/01/2022 - 13:17
      +1

      Probably why they are so expensive!

  • magic8ballgag on 19/01/2022 - 11:30
    +7

    I find it funny that they also sell coffee beans.

    Seriously though, thanks OP. Missed out on yesterday's deal, and why not do something good for the planet?

    • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:31

      Yes, the coffee bean inclusion is weird…

      • PurchaseAnxiety on 19/01/2022 - 14:27
        +3

        Tbf my morning routine usually has me on the dunny ~20 minutes after drinking my coffee, so maybe I'm the target market here?

    • Laziofogna on 19/01/2022 - 11:31

      Who's stopping you?

    • magic8ballgag on 19/01/2022 - 11:35
      +2

      EDIT: free shipping (for orders above $30) appears to be only for certain areas, i.e. metro and surrounding suburbs.

      You can check your eligibility here.

      • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:45

        Thanks, amended the OP and added the link.

    • dylanando on 19/01/2022 - 12:06
      +1

      Because coffee makes you shit Aparently.

    • todmanpla on 22/01/2022 - 13:31

      "A bold aroma with a satisfying finish" - could apply to both product lines

  • CDG on 19/01/2022 - 11:42
    -1

    what a waste!

  • vchoy on 19/01/2022 - 11:43

    ahhh crap! - voted +

  • Trantor on 19/01/2022 - 11:44

    How many ply are the sheets? And size of sheet the normal 11cm x 10cm?

    • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:45
      +1

      3 ply, 10 cm x 10 cm

  • ozbargainer998 on 19/01/2022 - 11:44
    +7

    Anyone else find the texture of 'who gives a crap' rough and taint-hurting?

    • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 11:46

      Some do, their Bamboo range is softer yet more expensive.

    • pauly85 on 19/01/2022 - 13:46
      +1

      Yes! No idea why they're so popular.

      I went with spacewhite when they were doing a deal.
      It's like wiping my proverbial taint with a cloud.

      • Laziofogna on 19/01/2022 - 14:24

        Just treehuggers thinking to save the world with recycled tp

  • Behappy on 19/01/2022 - 11:48
    +2

    How it's compared to quilton 4ply

    • fredz0r on 19/01/2022 - 12:00
      +5

      Add 2 ply onto Quilton 4ply then divide the ply by 2 then subtract 2ply

      • magic8ballgag on 19/01/2022 - 12:03
        +10

        Instructions unclear, toilet clogged.

  • stripe on 19/01/2022 - 12:00
    +12

    Quilton is cheaper and made in Australia as opposed to China.

  • corky on 19/01/2022 - 12:00
    +1

    Who gives a crap about toilet paper?? Geez mankind survived millennia without it, panic about food is understandable

  • ruztynail on 19/01/2022 - 12:04
    -2

    wattt the… lol

  • nagel on 19/01/2022 - 12:14
    +2

    Individually wrapped TP rolls seems like a waste of paper to me…

    • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 12:15
      +3

      Long story short, we have to wrap our rolls in something to keep them moisture-free and hygienic. We could wrap 6 rolls together (that’s the limit), but we’d need to use a much thicker paper. The net paper used (by weight) to wrap a 6 pack in heavy duty paper vs. six individual rolls in the thin tissue paper we use is effectively the same. It’s either this or plastic — and we hate plastic.

      read more

      • factor on 19/01/2022 - 12:41
        +6

        Well shit - you believe every single one of their green-washing claims!

        • sween64 on 19/01/2022 - 13:25
          -2

          Yeah, because I'm better off believing nagel… /s

    • oldrocker on 19/01/2022 - 12:34
      +2

      Also each wrapper is printed in colour! and to ship all the way from China???

  • KaraZorEl on 19/01/2022 - 12:20
    +12

    "… in total the toilet paper disrupter has given away more than $10 million to date."
    "Last year Who Gives a Crap donated $5.9 million to clean water and sanitation projects in developing countries. "

    "Who Gives a Crap donated more than some of Australia’s best-known brands, Coca-Cola Amatil ($5.2 million) and Sydney Airport and Qantas ($4.4 million each)."

    Source: AFR article, paywalled, so not adding a link.

    I'm all for supporting local Australian business but business like this, who donate such significant portions to good causes would definitely get my $. And this is really good TP.

    • TheOtherLeft on 19/01/2022 - 13:47

      Or you could buy Aussie made TP and also make a donation to a charity.

  • decc0 on 19/01/2022 - 12:55
    +3

    Funny how they've got recycled TP but likely have more environmental impact flying out all those boxes from China, individually packaged than simply buying Australian made TP.

    50% of profits donated to build toilets in developing nations.

    Makes you wonder how much profit they must be making out of this if they're happy with donating 50% of it..

    It seems like buying this is less of an environmental good and more of a social good.

    • KlyJuly on 19/01/2022 - 13:02
      +1

      It wouldn't fly, it would be on a ship

      • decc0 on 19/01/2022 - 13:18
        +1

        That's not exactly much better..

        • spaceflight on 19/01/2022 - 14:50
          +1

          Why?
          And yes it is much better because ships emit less CO2 than any other commercial transport.

          To transport a tonne of goods emits the below amounts of CO2

          Air plane (air cargo) B747, 500 g
          Modern lorry or truck, 60 to 150 g
          Modern train, 30 to 100 g
          Modern ship (sea freight), 10 to 40 g
          Airship (Zeppelin, Cargolifter ), 55 g

          • decc0 on 19/01/2022 - 16:09
            +2

            @spaceflight: Find it quite convenient how you've chosen an air pollutant such as CO2 to compare airplanes to sea freight.

            How about we use water pollution to compare airplanes to sea freight instead and see who fares better.
            Take into account things like: nitrous oxides, sulphur oxides, ballast water, oil spills, damage to marine life etc

            Or is it who gives a crap about our oceans?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join