Should You Fear RBA's Patience and Inflation Targets? (Lots of Text inside.)

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/rba-holds-cash-rate-at-0-…

RBA have recently announced that they are “prepared to be patient” and to keep pouring gasoline on the red-hot economy while looking past extremely high inflation figures (that many would call under-reported). Now this loose RBA’s stance on inflation poses a hard question for YOU (as a citizen and taxpayer): are you prepared to be patient as well? In other words, should you fear the new (and much higher) inflation targets that our central bank has announced?

For those folks who don’t want to read the whole text, the short answer is “YES, you should be sh@tting bricks by now given the speed and velocity of inflation expectations”. If you feel like you have been royally screwed and keep running on a hamster wheel while getting a little bit poorer every day – keep reading, you will find your answers below.
The longer answer below has what no government official will tell you and the key-words are “financial repression”, “currency de-basement” and “rising wealth inequality”. Put simply, governments have taken a political decision to decrease the purchasing power of your hard-earned dollar (not only current but also all future earnings as well) which equals to robing you off in a clear daylight, and the most affected would be the ones who could afford it the least.

Why would any government want to do it? Few reasons but the most obvious are few: they need to inflate away the massive government and private companies’ debt (that was a result of complete incompetence and mismanaging the pandemic and the decade prior), to inflate the nominal economy growth rate through pushing up the prices of goods and services higher which in turn should entice business to keep investing and consumers spending. In essence, our government have made a political decision to kick the can down the road and to pretend that population’s wealth is growing, provide you with incentives to spend more at the margins and to get you more and more indebted while motivating all kinds of “zombie” business to keep expanding their operations at any cost to the taxpayers (which will ultimately fail in a spectacular way at some point in the future, but it will be on someone else watch).

Does this explanation smell like a “conspiracy theory” to you?

Well, if it does then let me break-down just two of the many tools that our government used to spur nominal growth and get all of us (as a nation) into a MASSIVE debt.

  1. Do you remember that “Jobkeeper payment” that was touted by the Treasurer as “best 70 billion spent to support the life of ordinary Australians”? While it provided a few of us with another hundred of AUDs per week, a bunch of enterprises have booked a few extra billions in profits from it while maintaining the business operations and keeping the windfall of Jobkeeper’s money. Next, after all those profits were exposed, instead of demanding to pay back the mismanaged taxpayers’ money our government decided to look the other way and let them keep the profits. The ATO boss was even summoned before Senate as they did not want to name the largest beneficiaries from the massive waste of taxpayers’ money called JobKeeper.

    Why did they do that? Because of the fear that it will hurt business confidence (read profits), and businesses would be less prone to take more taxpayers money down the road to have for re-investment, hiring and developing. There is, however, one serious flaw with this lamest reasoning from the most wealth-supporting government - businesses do NOT invest based on the PAST performance, they do so based on the FUTURE projections. It does not matter what kind of profits were made in the past quarter – these profits have already been booked and distributed, what makes or breaks any investment decision revolves around what the future holds. And the future does not look bright with already high and higher inflation coming, with rising wages and pledges to keep interest rates low for longer which will ultimately create even more inflation (and that is exactly what RBA counts on, as they said).

  2. Low interest rates and Yield Curve Control (bond buying program from RBA where they come with a massive bag of money to purchase bonds in the open market in order to lower the yields of those bonds). We were told that this would lower the cost of money for the businesses that will need to grow in this challenging environment. In reality, this provided a few savvy fund managers with an exciting opportunity to front run the massive amount of taxpayer’s money coming into the market and walk away even richer than they already were (don’t blame the fund managers - they were just doing their job, but ask the government and RBA why they would even want to contemplate manipulating the supposedly “free market”?)

Also, this massive inflow of liquidity was destined to inflate the asset prices which we all are very aware of (financial markets and house prices). But do you really think that this price appreciation is sustainable unless the RBA will continue pumping more money into the system? I do not think so and, moreover, RBA will need to increase the “dose” every quarter to just keep them growing the same pace. And if they do continue to pump, this will again push the inflation figures even higher and this will be the END of business confidence and business investment which is exactly the OPPOSITE of what RBA said they want to achieve with low interest rates and YCC.

Just think about it - as a business owner, in this highly inflationary environment, you would NOT want to invest into anything long-term because you cannot project your future cost due to rampant price increase on all commodities and bottle-necks created by the government shut-downs. You would NOT want to hire more people due to rising wages and people leaving workforce en-masse because the government made it much more profitable for an individual to stay on a well-paid jobkeeper/jobseeker payment or become a shut-down business (with a windfall of money for doing nothing). You would NOT want to invest into producing more goods and services when you know that your customers will soon have to CUT on consumption due to rising prices because this is when you will need to lower the prices (because now you have more goods on your hands than you can sell) and then you are royally screwed because your suppliers and employees will still want their inflated paychecks. And this is where STAGFLATION is born, and every savvy businessman knows that and will NOT invest more in the face of looming inflationary pressure. Moreover, lower interest rates incentivize business to NOT rush with investments decisions and be on a loose end of money management as there is NO pressure to deliver growth, to deliver returns that pay down debt and interest.

Contrary to the popular opinion (pushed down your throat via government owned mass-media), it is the higher interest rate that pressures business to keep growing and yield better return on a capital because there is a cost to procrastination and opportunity-waste. As a bonus, business would want to invest in the areas with the most potential which in turn removes those zombie-companies that are simply not able to survive in higher interest environment.

It is NOT the higher interest-rates that demote investment, but it is UNCERTAINTY that kills business activity and growth, and you get plenty of uncertainty in the environment with high inflation and low incentives for real growth in the most needed areas. Contrary to what the RBA wants you to believe, lose capital sloshing around and low interest rates incentivize speculation and chasing “momentum” which will result in bottle-necks in some areas and over-allocation in others (which is exactly the definition of capital misallocation).

And, in case you might have thought that Jobkeeper, low interest rates and YCC were the only smart things that this government has come up with. Hell NO, there were:

  1. TFF (Term Funding Facility) by RBA who literally printed 200 billion overnight from thin air (literally as you don’t even need a money printer anymore)
  2. JobKeeper payment ~100 billion AUD over 2 years
  3. Business cash flow boost ~32 billion AUD over 2 years
  4. Coronavirus supplement ~18 billion AUD over 2 years
  5. Economic support payments ~11 billion AUD over 2 years
  6. Different kinds of tax benefits, cut-offs, extra claims and write-offs would give you another ~60-70 billion AUD over 2 years

See the proof of figures here (official resource) https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Depart…

Overall, through extremely loose monetary and fiscal policies, this government has injected close to 400 billion extra dollars into economy while maintaining almost zero level interest rates. If this is not a recipe for a 1970s like stagflation disaster, then I do not know what is.

What does all of this mean for you?

Now YOU (as a taxpayer) will have to pay many times over for the higher inflation targets – through your taxes you will have to pay for all government subsidies (given that government debt is soon expected to be in TRILLIONS, you will need a few decades/centuries to pay it off) and through paying more for your everyday necessities with prices going higher and higher to accommodate for RBA’s higher inflation plans (this is indefinitely, and for the rest of your life).

As a result, the low and middle class will keep getting less and less for their hard-earned dollar while “zombie” businesses will thrive in government-subsidized incentives. But hang on, it is not the government officials who pay for all those subsidies, it is YOU (the taxpayer) who will have to pay. Your hard-earned dollar will lose its value (meaning that it will buy less and less goods and services with every day passing by) with prices on everyday necessities rising much faster than your wages. Also, in case you did not know that, you have already become a proud co-owner of nation’s growing debt burden (feel free to send a thank you note to ScoMo and Co).
What can you do about this?

Call for and vote for higher interest rates and tighter monetary and fiscal policies!

It might seem counter to what the press and officials want you to believe but that is the ONLY way to save the purchasing power of your hard-earned dollar (not only your current savings but also all your FUTURE earnings) and drive the business growth in areas with the most potential. Low interest rates and government subsidies incentivize capital misallocation and higher inflation. High interest rates incentivize proper capital management and ensure that growth is sustainable.

Next, think about your choices in the looming federal election – I will vote for those who call for a tighter monetary and fiscal policies and proper incentives for business growth. Remember those “zombie” companies that I talked about before? If we do not STOP mismanaging the capital through improper subsidies, YCC, different kinds of grants designed to only inflate asset prices and low interest rates, then we will become a “zombie” nation – a country that cannot earn enough to even pay the interest on its debt.

Finally, I would like you to understand that we are already way past all economic signals for tighter monetary policy and other developed countries have either already raised interest rates or announced tapering of stimulus and plans to raise interest rates (countries like New Zealand, UK, Canada, US). It is only Australian politicians who keep kicking the can down the road and it will be the political pressure that will push them to do the right thing and raise the rates.

Keep that pressure on!

P.S. Want to see how it will end when extremely easy monetary policy gets matched up with a stubborn political decision of “rates must be lower for longer” then look at Turkey – their “head of Central Bank HR” has delivered a few rate-cuts against all economic reasons to tighten monetary policy and hike rates. The result: a former high-growing economy with stable currency and low unemployment that targeted to get accepted into the EU block got into a spiral of hyper-inflation that led to stagflation and a complete collapse of every business system in the country with ridiculously high unemployment figures, rock-bottom low business confidence, absolutely no investment into the future growth and decimated currency.

Thanks for reading this and Happy New Year.

Comments

  • +35

    TL.DR

    • +4

      Never has a +1 vote been more justified.

      • +1

        Guess it wasnt typed on an old Nokia
        .

      • +1

        @ Xyzzy +1 for your +1

    • +1

      Good for your.
      Less knowledge - better sleep

      • +7

        Excessive text - lesser understanding…

        If you need that wall of text to explain your point on a forum, you don't clearly understand the point you're trying to make.

  • +1

    What is your concern with inflation?
    The most common person in Australia is an over indebted wage earner. These people are big winners from inflation.

    Wage growth has been terrible for a decade plus, bring on some inflation.

    EDIT: skimming your text, you seem to have swallowed the billionaires argument that inflation somehow is bad for you. Be clear, inflation in AU will only happen if there is wage growth, benefitting you, at the expense of capital holders.

    • +2

      I think you're right mskeggs. But OTOH, I do think the Reserve Bank is failing to properly how devastating the dramatic rise in Australian house prices are for first home buyers or even properly acknowledge their role in that rise.

      The RBA's targets for raising rates would be easily met in the United States economy, but here in Australia, I think we're going to struggle to meet them. The RBA seems to like to throw out hypotheticals that are unlikely to be realised. Like the best way to solve housing price issues is to reform government policy that incentivizes investment: great not going to happen.

      I think there's something to be gained for society from a reasonable moderation in house prices. And I too will be patient; so that hopefully I can get out of the rental market before I turn sixty.

      • +9

        House prices are a cancer on young people’s future, and will prove to be one of Australia’s longest and worst problems.
        My first home loan was 7 or 8%.
        Inflation was 4ish %.
        Each year my house and pay went up around that much. My mortgage stayed the same, but the payment was higher.
        After a decade, it was half the size it started with because my income had grown.

        Now you buy a $1m and after ten years the million dollar mortgage is barely any lower. 30 years of the mortgage being a huge part of your pay. Nobody who owns only one house is better off, because they still need a place to live.
        So we have seen massive impoverishment of the kids for the benefit of property speculators.

        If inflation makes real estate investment a poor choice, it will be a great thing for Aussies.

      • +2

        And I too will be patient; so that hopefully I can get out of the rental market before I turn sixty.

        Apologies if this sounds like a flippant question, but I'm curious as to why this is a goal of yours?

        FWIW, in my experience, I've found that the whole "home ownership" thing is very much a cultural / societal pressure that actually does not work out all that well for many people. I've asked the same question of many people who want to purchase a home and their answers never sounded that convincing to me. Probably the most convincing argument someone told me was that he was willing to pay the price to not have to deal with landlords.

        Some of the happiest friends I know never bought houses - one of my closest friends worked across 5 / 6 countries by the time he was in his 40s, came back to Australia and leased a harbour-side property in Sydney for many years. Lives a great life without having ever lived in a house he owned.

        • I feel like having a house will make it easier for me to take a step back from work. Rentals in Australia feel quite uncertain. Retirement also seems slightly more practical in your own home.

          That said, I've been in my current rental for three years and my rent has decreased not increased. So maybe it is all perception.

          A final issue is the jumps between rentals (which are often forced up you) aren't always easy. So far I've always had a job and steady income, which I think makes the jumps much easier. I haven't yet tried to change rentals without a job and I'm really worried about how difficult that will be.

          • @markathome:

            I feel like having a house will make it easier for me to take a step back from work.

            This doesn't make any sense to me - you're saying that taking on a large mortgage and committing to regular repayments makes it easier to step back from work?

            A final issue is the jumps between rentals (which are often forced up you) aren't always easy.

            This is a double-edged sword, yes rentals are less stable, but I feel that a lot of people miss the positive side as well. Want to move to a new city for a job? How about moving to a different suburb with a better school? Want to try out living in a regional area whilst you're WFH? Easy-peasy with rentals, very difficult in your own home.

            I haven't yet tried to change rentals without a job and I'm really worried about how difficult that will be.

            Then the problem is not having a job, not rentals. It's not easy to make your mortgage repayments without a job either.

            • @p1 ama:

              This doesn't make any sense to me - you're saying that taking on a large mortgage and committing to regular repayments makes it easier to step back from work?

              Yes. People that own hard assets like real estate can use the equity when their lifestyle changes.

    • +1

      Eh, not sure you understood the definition of inflation.
      It is NOT so much about the wages growth (which is what RBA wants you to believe), it is about too much money chasing to few goods and plenty of money have been pumped by fiscal and monetary policies (read above) .

      Rising wages is called the "sticky part of inflation" but it does not man that ANY inflationary scenario will eventually be followed by wages rise and also wages rise come last and late (if it comes)

      • My experience is mskeggs is pretty smart individual and probably understands inflation better than either of us. Which is why it's so scary to write a response to them. But sometimes you ask a very smart person a stupid question in the hope to one day become a wiser person.

    • +2

      Also I don't on any level buy this crypto-bro idea that inflation is absolutely ruining the economy. Making hard work, good businesses and fiat currencies worthless.

    • Be clear, inflation in AU will only happen if there is wage growth, benefitting you, at the expense of capital holders.

      Will it not also happen if there is a shortage of goods? You can have stagflation.

      • +1

        The concern expressed here is for systemic inflation.
        When the GST was introduced, we got a once off 10% inflation in goods and services.
        Right now, your opportunity to haggle for a new car or an Xbox is very limited, but nobody is suggesting these constraints are permanent.
        So the question is whether the inflation visible in the last 12months, especially in America, is a result of the pandemic, or the result of loose money supply over the last 12 years since the GFC.
        It seems an incredible coincidence to me that monetary policy didn’t fuel inflation until there was a temporary snarl in supply systems.

        Which is why wage inflation is the only measure I think is “real” in that it needs some consideration, not short term price changes.

        You also need to read this against the last 13 years of people who support economic theories that say inflation “must” come after loose money supply. They may yet be proved right one day, but have been wrong in the worst way for 13 years.
        I personally missed a bunch of upside listening to them in 2009-10, and I would rather make money while I’m alive rather than be proven right a generation or two after I’m dead.

        That said, I think increased debt is a dumb plan, for a lot of the reasons above, but you can’t fight everyone.

    • Inflation doesn’t hurt capital holders, they are by definition holding capital. Inflation hurts you proportionately to your exposure to cash, sticky contracts and defined brackets. That’s the poorest members in our society. A billionaire has proportionately a much lower exposure to cash than I do. I don’t have enough cash to safely diversify into real capital.

      • I think the poor don’t have much to worry about from inflation hurting the lazy lobster in their wallet, and the vast majority have plenty of debt that will look better after some wage inflation.
        This article from Scott Sumner, who quotes Matt Yglesias for balance (!)
        https://www.econlib.org/why-is-inflation-bad/

        Pretty much says the issue is investment returns are disproportionately taxed in a high inflation environment. Since this explicitly repairs the government budget, and provides for inflated welfare payments, it might be ok to try that for a bit.
        After all, the heavily distorted returns to capital over the last decade haven’t resulted in anything but hand wringing. Maybe circumstances that see more corporate earnings devoted to wages and taxes would be a refreshing change.

  • +1

    someone is salty they didn't invest their money and it's losing value due to inflation!

    • Missed.
      I am fully invested into stock market (90% US, 10% AU)

      I guess you just did not live through the late 70s-early 80s to make these kind of comments.
      My guess, you will have your chance soon though.

      • +2

        I lived through the 70s and 80s.
        There is the barest hint of inflation in Australia, and still low wage growth.
        Why are you so scared? Inflation could double, and double again and it wouldn’t be particularly high.
        We have had insane asset price inflation over the last few years, why not let some wage growth catch up a bit.

        • I think you need to check source of your stats. Inflation has DOUBLED! and will double again.

          • +2

            @ALesha77: Were you worried about inflation when it went negative last year?

        • That is a strong assumption that wages growth will even come. It's never happened for several years. You need to wake the heck up.

          • @Kellaggs: Are you a ghost user?

          • @Kellaggs: If your model for inflation is 70s stagflation, then I think you fundamentally misunderstand the difference in the way the world works in modern times.
            Note, I'm not making a value judgement about whether loose credit is sensible.

            In Australia, the only way we will get any meaningful inflation is via wage growth.
            We have already seen stupid levels of asset price inflation in this country, which has been a massive benefit to investors. If we do get wage growth, and it does flow through to CPI growth, I don't see that as a problem.

            In the USA, where a lot of the panic about inflation originates, they scream in terror at the idea a worker might scrape above the poverty line. If we need some of the capital holders in Australia to a have a few years of poor investment returns to remind them the greater good is for distributed wealth, it can't come quick enough.

          • +1

            @Kellaggs: Wage growth is very two speed at the moment. Some sectors are experiencing 20%+ while others are stuck on 1% and effectively going backwards.

        • +2

          Does the government want wages to grow? Because it seems they don't given they consistently refuse wage increases to nurses, teachers, and other government workers. VEU has been asking for a wage increase for the past year and they won't budge. Yet they'll scream wages need to increase.

          • +2

            @[Deactivated]: A few years ago the RBA was pushing for employers to increase wages yet when their own employees EBA was under negotiation they refused to lift wages significantly.

            • +1

              @JIMB0: I just don't get it. You'd think if you're the one calling for wage growth, you'd set an example by increases wages of your own workers. Otherwise who else will? You can't just 'call' for wage growth.

    • It's sad you have to 'invest' your money which often involves buying shares you have no idea about to make the share holders richer just so you don't lose your hard earned money.

      • A financial system that encourages people to invest is good. It fosters entrepreneurship, ownership, risk management and it drivers people to work smarter and better.

        People that convert fiat money that does nothing to assets that have a utility and grow helps separate the successful from the mediocre.

        "Idle fiat is dead fiat."

        • Yeah, just keep investing. Wage growth isn't going to come save us. The blind sheep don't see it.

          Furthermore, people don't understand that wage growth in Australia as services does little or nothing to actual imported inflation, as almost all the goods we use are produced overseas.

          I'll let you guys figure out which one is the fool leading the blind sheep.

        • you mean just throw everything into ETF or cryptocurrency? No one is actually investing in anything beneficial

          • @[Deactivated]: People that can't find assets to invest in are looking in the wrong markets.

            I've found what I want and are now sitting on my hands waiting for the rest of the sideliners to FOMO.

  • 70's style inflation would be excellent.

  • It’s going to be very interesting to see where inflation heads in the next 12 months. Anecdotally I’ve heard and seen prices of every day goods go up much more than the reported inflation numbers, for example milk has gone up by 30% from $1 a litre to $1.30.

    Looking forward to seeing how house prices move when interest rates are inevitably forced upwards due to inflation (although banks have already hiked rates recently). We are in between a rock and a hard place; China hates us, rates have decreased steadily over the past decade, some people have purchased houses at 6-7x income.. if the RBA raises rates that could very well result in people defaulting on mortgage payments but because of all the loose monetary policy and QE taking place during the pandemic inflation is likely going to rear its ugly head and rates have to go up.

    All that and climate change really makes it feels like times are harder than ever. But hard times create strong people and I’d say that’s what we need right now.

    • if the RBA raises rates that could very well result in people defaulting on mortgage payments

      prudential regulation for bank lending is going to test serviceability at 5% at least, and i would expect that serviceability testing to go up to 7%. I dont think the current lending is anything like the NINJA loans from the GFC days.

      There would still be people defaulting of course - but not large scale defaults imho. Or if that would happen, why would the RBA raise rates? Inflation also affect wages, and if this is happening, i don't see people defaulting en mass.

      • Yeah I don’t think that we’re on the same level as the US was when it came to irresponsible lending pre-GFC luckily.

        I think the people hardest hit will be those who purchased in the past year or two at high LVRs.

        I think the RBA will be forced to raise rates to counter inflation, but that’s still to be seen. The banks have already raised rates anyway I guess.

  • -3

    To long.

    Anyways, I'm not worried.

    I've (guess what)?

  • This is a very complex topic, especially as we are in uncharted waters with rates at practically 0 along with the YCC/TFF implemented by the RBA. There's no empirical evidence on where we could end up by the end of this.

    Overall I agree with most of your thoughts and feel it's better for the long term if YCC was scrapped immediately and rates are increased (even slightly will have the effect of dampening speculators). I think if the average person was more educated about what this actually means for them now and in the long term (whether they benefit or not from what has transpired) this would be receiving much, much more debate. Unfortunately from my experience the people who have very little understanding are either huge losers and don't realise it, or have benefited massively due to speculation/leverage and now believe they are the next Warren Buffet. The average person also has no idea how YCC is performed - the "laundering" of freshly created $$ from the RBA to the government is an interesting concept to learn.

    My biggest gripe is what you mentioned re: zombie companies and the mis-allocation of capital, which hurts the real economy big time. Investors aren't able to price risk appropriately and moral hazards are created as people are aware they can't fail.

    • Yeah agreed, anyone who thinks this can be condensed down into two paragraphs for the mainstream sheep are not going to be happy. Yet, look above and we see many comments with upvotes that itself reveal the dark underbelly of ozbargain.

      It cannot be undone, and yet we have these mainstream views and democracy itself is sheep leading the sheep. Democracy is just mob rule dressed up in a suit.

      The mob can be wrong. lol.

      Inflation is definitely a problem. Most importantly to the underclass which seems to be subsisting on Centrelink. I'm surprised not many of them are siding with the OP, instead they side with someone who has gamed the system (or at least from their comments appears to have gained - but in reality they just have the same house they had before.)

      • Lifetip: The reason people don't like talking to you is because you insist on calling other people 'sheep'.

        The 'if only the sheep would wake up' mindset is for conspiracy theorists and Daria-wannabe teenagers - and the latter grow out of it.

Login or Join to leave a comment