This was posted 3 years 3 months 25 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

1000 AIA Vitality Points for Fully Vaccinated Members @ AIA Health Insurance

1403
1000 AIA Vitality Points for Fully Vaccinated Members @ AIA Health Insurance
Go to Deal
screensaver on 08/09/2021 - 08:47 aia.com.au (3134 clicks)
Last edited 08/09/2021 - 09:50 by 2 other users

AIA Health & AIA Life Insurance will also give 1000 rewards points in their AIA Vitality Health & Wellness program to fully vaccinated Australians, in the same way they currently reward customers for regular health check-ups and flu vaccinations. AIA Vitality members can access partner discounts of up to 50% based on the number of points they accrue.

Source: One Big Switch

One Big Switch has compiled a current list of freebies and offers when you are vaccinated. You do not have to be a Big Switch member to read the offers, Just scroll down to the list. You do not have to sign up to read it.

Mod: COVID Vaccination Freebies & Deals

Health & Beauty COVID-19 Vaccination Reward Points

Related Stores

AIA Vitality Australia
AIA Vitality Australia

closed Comments

  • trevor99 on 08/09/2021 - 10:08
    -5

    Wrong, it has not been approved. It cannot be until 2023 when longer term data is available.
    They're claiming it has been approved but it's evil deception. They've approved a different one called "Comirnaty" that has not even been used.
    Look it up.

    Did you know that the package inserts are blank and nobody knows what's in them? This is because they don't have to as it's not approved.
    Did you know different batches have different ingredients?

    • p1owz0r on 08/09/2021 - 10:20
      +4

      Maybe you could provide some sources for this information?

      • trevor99 on 08/09/2021 - 10:23
        +1

        What I said right there is public domain can easily look up.

        Blank packaging:
        https://www.bitchute.com/video/veREM17I9j16/

        It's up to them to prove it is safe, not for me to prove it is not safe.
        Like I said there hasn't been enough time.

        However, anecdotal data is becoming massive and very widespread. Can look up for yourself, despite the censoring going on.
        Adverse reaction databases in Europe, USA and Australia going nuts.

        Doctors conferences with whistleblowers such as this:
        https://www.bitchute.com/video/TsdTTHJteilw/
        Whistleblowers in general like this:
        https://www.bitchute.com/video/YVfQribXCEsX/

        • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:28
          +6

          That website looks like a collection of videos banned by YouTube, you couldn't possibly be relying on that as a source.

          • trevor99 on 08/09/2021 - 10:31
            +2

            @clang823: Youtube is owned by vested interests, massive vested interests.

            • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:33
              +2

              @trevor99: Youtube is where vulnerable people go to discover their tin foil hats. If even they think the video shouldn't have a platform, you know it's ridiculous.

          • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 10:43

            @clang823: Too busy trying to find a fault with the source eh?

            How about this?

            https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b…

            Hopefully not too lazy to read.

            • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:55
              +3

              @RocketSwitch: It seems like you might be too lazy to think critically though, you've linked a document with no author, publish date, or platform claiming to aggregate a number of sources including "Dr" Robert Malone who is actually known to be spreading misinformation about mRNA vaccines.

              Not to mention the level of mental gymnastics that lead to the commentary on direct quotes from reputable sources. THe one about the FDA press release approving the Pfizer vaccine quotes efficacy data with a large sample size only to turn around and be like … "yea nah, well that's all shit because these studies were based on the alpha and beta variants which we're long past. Where's your data for the delta one?" I mean seriously, for a mob that's calling for long term evidence, they're sure quick to discard some real important data sets in this topic.

              • p1owz0r on 08/09/2021 - 11:20
                +3

                @clang823: Spot on. It's a word doc ffs!

                • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 11:25
                  +1

                  @p1owz0r: If you read it, it links directly to the source, oh but that required reading, another one who quickly looks at the source and discards it. By the way, it's by Malone. FFS wanna have a go at discrediting the guy who made the technology. Go ahead. Go shit on someone who has over 12,000 citations in scientific research and 100s of patents on this topic.

              • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 11:23
                +1

                @clang823: Ah yeah, let's shit on Malone who has been the father and inventor of mRNA technology.

                Just curious, NSW Health Minister pretty much confirmed your vaccine passport will expire every 6-8 months depending on the data. You happy getting 1-2 boosters every year for your vax passport to be valid? Because you know, they have so much data on this, they know exactly what they're doing to give informed advice on effectiveness.

                I almost forgot we were living in the analogue age. US is up to 3 and Israel up to 4.

                Is that an effective vaccine for you? 3-4 jabs and hasn't even been a year yet!

                OH, but the TGA has said, this has gone through our rigorous testing for EFFECTIVNESS. AH, OF COURSE, IT HAS!!

                • p1owz0r on 08/09/2021 - 11:30

                  @RocketSwitch: I can't find any links of NSW health minister 'pretty much confirming' expiration of Vaccine Passport - but I'm keen to read it if you can supply a link.

                • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 11:49
                  +2

                  @RocketSwitch: Science builds on science, Malone may have been one of the pioneers who worked on the mRNA platform before it was cool, but he was not the inventor of mRNA vaccines. So many hurdles had to be broken to go from his work to where the vaccines are now and to credit him as the sole inventor is nonsense.

                  If anything Dr Katalin Kariko and Dr Drew Wiseman have put in much more work in the field of mRNA vaccines, yet you choose to focus on the views of Malone.

                  If they make it available to me, I'll keep getting boosters as needed. I'm going to live my life and be able to work, travel, dine in at restaurants and go to the movies. It was easy and quick enough for me to get my first two shots in April and I have no issues with getting more if it keeps me out of the ICU. I know two people who caught COVID on the Ruby Princess, one was in the ICU and a medically induced coma for months and the other still feels the ongoing effects in day to day life.

                  • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 11:54

                    @clang823: As long as you have made an informed decision and it looks like you have. That's all you can ask of yourself.

            • Melb69 on 11/09/2021 - 04:20

              @RocketSwitch: No wonder why we have anti vaxer's. There are a group of 12 influencer's that have generated this big anti vax miss information. No wonder why we have such confusion on the truth

          • p1owz0r on 08/09/2021 - 10:51
            -1

            @clang823: Pretty damning summary of it on wiki:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitChute

            • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 11:26
              +1

              @p1owz0r: Why are you throwing a smokescreen and not looking at the content? It's a platform, like YouTube that doesn't ban every video not following the narrative. Try again.

              • p1owz0r on 08/09/2021 - 11:31
                +1

                @RocketSwitch: Because I have considered and rejected that the source is going to be well-researched and unbiased.

              • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 11:37
                +4

                @RocketSwitch: If you look around and all you see are Alex Jones supporters, far right extremists, proud boys, and neo nazis … you need to reconsider your stance.

                • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 11:48
                  +1

                  @clang823: I don't agree with the platform hosting those videos, but on this topic, it hosts videos that could be of interest.

                • sidoz on 08/09/2021 - 16:35
                  +1

                  @clang823: I can speak from personal experience its not all those people you are considering "right wing" being anti-vax. There are plenty of them getting jabs just look at the numbers and demographics in NSW. And there are plenty of die hard lefties & socialist types that are anti-vax…. I'm speaking from personal experience in my own family/wider friends on that point too. Just look at some of the rich and hippy areas shows it.

                  The way i look at it is It's one thing to be cautious and skeptical, it's a part of being diligent, but its another to carry on like a dismissive flat earther.

    • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:35
      +2

      Comirnaty is the exact same Pfizer vaccine that's been approved, I got both shots in April this year and the needle had Comirnaty labelled on it - that was long before people even bothered arguing semantics on names and approvals.

  • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:27
    +1

    This comments section reads like the ones on a Channel 7 COVID facebook post. What a shit show.

    • screensaver on 08/09/2021 - 10:29

      and you are adding to it

      • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:31
        +7

        Yea I'm going to continue to call out people who spread misinformation on a public forum, what of it?

        • screensaver on 08/09/2021 - 10:43

          this is a post about some bonuses to vaccinated people, not about the pros and cons of the vaccination.

          • clang823 on 08/09/2021 - 10:46
            +2

            @screensaver: It was made about the pros and cons of the vaccination when a number of people decided to spread misinformation regarding the cons of the vaccination. All of that discussion was sparked by misinformation.

  • trevor99 on 08/09/2021 - 10:34

    Consider the tactics of those who attack the messenger, rather than the message.

  • Woodyo on 08/09/2021 - 10:40
    +3

    Ah yes the medical apartheid. I wonder will they offer the same for non smokers, or those who are not bariatric, or those who dont drink.

    • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 10:48
      +4

      Nah, because they say you cannot catch it. However, smokers continue to smoke, and we all suffer from it via second-hand smoke. Proven to cause cancer and NO ONE GAVE A SHIT.

      All of a sudden, everyone is like, take the shot to save your family, your friends blah blah blah, but they allowed smokers to continue to kill themselves and others around them.

      What a joke.

      • p1owz0r on 08/09/2021 - 12:00

        They is significant investment at state and federal level to prevent people from smoking. There are huge taxes on tobacco which offset some of the damage it causes.

        If smoking came out now, you can be sure it would be banned from the get-go.

        • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 14:32
          +2

          They're saving lives with this virus by locking us down and getting us vaccinated. And yet, people can still smoke and give cancer to people outside.

          I will never understand this logic. Life is a life right, so unless they lock people up, quarantine them, home arrest, fine them $5,000 for smoking, it's double standards. What the government really means is, smoking makes money, let's put lung cancer images on the packet and increase the cost of the packet by 5, ha, that would teach them. Meanwhile, I have been second-hand smoking all my life (could get cancer from it). Because smokers (unvaccinated in this case) keep smoking killing people and themselves quite freely.

          In fact vaccinated smokers will have more rights than unvaccinated non-smokers lol, love it. They can smoke outside the venue potentially giving people cancer.

    • carra on 08/09/2021 - 12:17
      +5

      Well yes actually, the vitality app offers 1000pts for a non-smokers declaration.

  • screensaver on 08/09/2021 - 10:45

    The virus is here to stay, so it is inevitable that vaccination is too. Hopefully they will come up with an effective anti viral treatment in future.

    • RocketSwitch on 08/09/2021 - 10:49
      +2

      Antivirals will be the future. You cannot keep jabbing people 3-4 times a year. The vaccine works, but its safety and effectiveness is poor.

        • screensaver on 08/09/2021 - 12:02

          not an effective one to stop this virus from replicating otherwise there would be no one in intensive care

  • pennypincher98 on 08/09/2021 - 10:56
    +9

    Why the f##k did I open this post, knowing full well what the comments would be like.

  • drazenm on 08/09/2021 - 12:50
    +4

    A new study from Israel suggests immunity gained after recovering from a bout of COVID-19 is more protective against the new Delta variant than vaccine-induced immunity. Natural immunity was estimated to be about 13 times stronger than having two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.30 Aug 2021

    What's fascinating to me is how dead COMMON SENSE is and that no one wants to even a bit use their own brain and ask simple questions that are like 2 + 2. Just serve me with what you think i must do for my own freedom and ill do whatever you tell me tv.

    Overnight, when 70-80% fully vaccinated numbers are reached EVERYTHING we've been doing last 19 months will become insufficient.

    Till yesterday we've ALL been unvaccinated, working from home, shopping from home, going to work, going to shops, followed mask rules, social distancing rules and that was enough.

    Overnight unvaccinated people that still continue doing all that (vaccinated will have to do it also,what's the point of the vaccine then?) distancing, masking, staying at home if unwell are DANGEROUS to people that were also till YESTERDAY unvaccinated, then had survival rate of 99%.

    Claimed by world health organisation with vaccination survival rate is even higher, so how are unvaccinated people all of a sudden dangerous to vaccinated. You, your daily living, existence, survival and health? :)

    On another note, next place where our government will create fake and fabricated battlefield is schools. Once kids are back to school we'll have fake outbreaks in schools, war between parents of vaccinated and unvaccinated children and of course as always till now government will shift the responsibility to schools=teachers=parents and we have a new divide. pressure on unvaccinated children parents to get them vaccinated or home-school them. Then it will be preschool when they soon make vaccination also available for age 6 months and up :)

    This is all turning ape SH mad.

    • firecaller on 08/09/2021 - 13:27
      +1

      Here's a source fact checking the non peer reviewed study you reference.

      https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/sep/01/gateway-pu…

      tl:dr

      A study done in Israel that is not yet peer reviewed found that people who had been infected with COVID-19 had greater protection than vaccinated people against becoming reinfected with the virus’ delta variant.

      The claim suggests that people are better off going unvaccinated. But peer reviewed studies repeatedly have found that vaccinated people are more likely to avoid hospitalization or death if they become infected.

    • buckster on 08/09/2021 - 14:31
      +2

      And, how's the post infection immunity level compare to vaccinated people who catch covid?

      If you don't have a figure for that, it's not a valid argument.

      I can tell you there's a big difference between mortality rates and hospitalisation rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated

  • Spets on 08/09/2021 - 13:00
    +1

    Imagine if companies actually promoted an all-round healthy lifestyle instead. Clean foods, exercise, quality sleep etc.

    • trevor99 on 08/09/2021 - 13:02
      +2

      Even Vitamin C and D3 alone. Most deaths are Vitamin D deficient.

      How odd that they can talk hours of nonsense EACH DAY but this is never mentioned.

      • Spets on 08/09/2021 - 14:01
        +1

        Exactly. Those that think the Government/ Media has our health interests in mind are diluting themselves.
        I wont even mention the "Horse De-wormer" that's been used for decades in Africa for humans…

    • drazenm on 08/09/2021 - 13:08
      +4

      Our government hasn't said once not even ONCE one healthy thing to do for yourself last 19 months, not 1, not a single one at any single daily conference.

      • buckster on 08/09/2021 - 14:32
        +1

        Not even wash your hands?

  • splitatom on 08/09/2021 - 13:41
    +1

    Serious question, will they insure you against health issues resulted from the vaccine? I genuinely want to know

    • stingykent on 08/09/2021 - 15:19
      -4

      no because the vaccine isn't FDA approved and is still under trial until 2023

      • drazenm on 08/09/2021 - 15:39

        EXACTLY!!!

      • tarken on 08/09/2021 - 15:59
        +3

        Pfizer has been FDA approved
        https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-appr…

      • firecaller on 08/09/2021 - 16:54
        +3

        https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccines-trials-id…

        Have a read, you might learn why your 2023 date is incorrect.

        "Ultimately, the claim likely stems from misinformation shared elsewhere which equates “estimated study completion dates” for vaccines to the end dates of clinical trials. For Pfizer, this estimated date is Jan. 31, 2023 (here), while Moderna is Oct. 27, 2022 (here). However, these dates do not mean clinical trials are ongoing, rather they reference continued safety monitoring after the vaccine has been approved and rolled out, which is standard practice within the industry. "

      • reu on 08/09/2021 - 17:15

        Make your own choice. Just be honorable and deny health care should you need it to treat COVID if you get a severe case. Not that I want you to die, I just don't want you to needlessly deny someone with some other life threatening condition the treatment they need.

        • Woodyo on 09/09/2021 - 20:06
          -1

          Yea right on!
          Why stop there though… as a tax payer I want to pick and choose where my tax dollars go, in terms of health care for those who access the public health system. Maybe we should rethink drugs users, bariatric and those who smoke, those who drink in excess. And those who drive like idiots on the road, and cause accidents to name a few.

          Im sure you dont want them to die though.

          If we applied your logic, we should apply it to those listed above.

          • reu on 10/09/2021 - 19:36

            @Woodyo: Actually, I'm not here to convince you and there's a decent chance that you are trolling to my mind. Am I certain that the vaccine is 100% safe in the short and long term? No, I can't be. However, I don't understand how you can be so sure of your position given every expert worth their salt has an opposing opinion.

            Do you not have a shadow of a doubt that you are wrong?

            You could be a genius trying to alert us all to our mistake or something quite different.

            • Woodyo on 10/09/2021 - 20:02

              @reu: I never said that I was all knowing and that I can't be wrong. I was just pointing out that you inadvertently have set yourself as the moral standard of a highly subjective definition of what is 'honorable'.

    • sparkanum on 09/09/2021 - 06:50

      Yes, they will. (Source: I work in life insurance)

      Probably also worth noting, though, that the payouts for COVID-related sickness and death far, far, far outweighs the payouts for vaccine-related sickness and death both for Aus and other countries. In spite of the fact that the % of people vaccinated is greater than the % of people that have had COVID.

  • stingykent on 08/09/2021 - 15:20
    -2

    unfair for the people who can't have the shot

    • ozbargainer88 on 08/09/2021 - 16:30
      +2

      Those poor 5 people. I think they have more to worry about.

    • Lucille Bluth on 08/09/2021 - 23:11

      It's best an insurance company doesn't insure potential customers like you. So it's a win for them.

  • ozbargainer88 on 08/09/2021 - 16:32
    +3

    Imagine, in late 2021, after seeing literally billions of people be vaccinated, and thinking the vaccines are unsafe. You can't help brainlets who can't help themselves. See you guys at the pub! ;)

    • drazenm on 08/09/2021 - 18:38

      Here, tell them that 👍

      https://nomoresilence.world/

      Do you seriously think just because mainstream media and these sect political crooks try to hide everything and just chuck it under a magical carpet it's just gonna disappeared as it never happened!?

      Does it have to happen to you or someone you love, know, so you'd believe in it? Or even then you'll come back and say "it's extremely, extremely rare chance to happen, extremely rare… "

      • screensaver on 08/09/2021 - 19:25
        +1

        and Eric Clapton and many others

      • buckster on 16/09/2021 - 19:58

        So a few shills post videos about their side effects, and the very few people who have a fatal reaction?

        When the vaccine related deaths match the 4.5million covid deaths (which they won't, as they're 99.999999% safe) maybe you can post this again.

        • screensaver on 17/09/2021 - 06:27

          As long as its not you, who cares

  • Jec on 08/09/2021 - 18:19
    +1

    These comments are killing me. Covid's probably killing them in return, but I appreciate the laughs all the same

  • ro0sta on 09/09/2021 - 05:34
    -2

    Don't be discouraged from posting OP. But I cannot support or upvote a deal that creates segregation in society based on a health choice, whether you are for or against vax. Wuats next, special deals for non smokers, vegans?

    • sparkanum on 09/09/2021 - 06:57
      +1

      AIA Vitality does already reward you for not smoking and eating healthily. And there are "special deals" for non smokers and healthy range BMI in that premium rates are substantially cheaper. The premium rate deals have been a standard feature of life insurance for decades.

    • tarken on 09/09/2021 - 07:46
      +4

      What's next? Car insurance companies discriminating against bad drivers by lowering the premium of good drivers?? Madness.

  • lew380 on 09/09/2021 - 08:37
    -1

    The vaccinated should get a golden star, stitch it onto armbands so we know they are more morally superior, or just a 666 tattooed to the forehead, can't miss either of those!

    • tarken on 09/09/2021 - 09:58
      +1

      I think its the other way around.. The unvaccinated think that they are smarter and more knowledgeable than 80% of the population and the rest of the population are just sheep.

      • lew380 on 10/09/2021 - 18:20

        The sheep always carry the majority? Being in the majority is nothing to celebrate over, that just means you believe the propoganda.

    • netjock on 15/09/2021 - 13:23

      666 tattooed to the forehead

      Bible scholars says no

      If you are the Pope, better give him a call to correct.

      • lew380 on 15/09/2021 - 20:38

        It's the beast system, can't buy or sell based on politics or some worldwide cult. Almost there! NSW are trying it haha

  • screensaver on 22/09/2021 - 21:12

    Now updated to 2000 points, see One Big Switch Link at top of page

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join