This was posted 3 years 7 months 3 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Fujifilm Instax Mini Film Sheets 60 Pack $45.12 Delivered @ Amazon AU

730
Fujifilm Instax Mini Film Sheets 60 Pack $45.12 Delivered @ Amazon AUAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
eman resu on 05/04/2021 - 20:52 amazon.com.au (2446 clicks)
Last edited 05/04/2021 - 21:24 by 2 other users
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

This instax mini film offers stunning-quality instant pictures that fit in a purse, wallet or mini photo frame. Professional quality instant film technology ensures accurate colour and sharpness with every frame, not to mention a unique and highly attractive way to capture and share your memories. Instax mini film is compatible with any instax mini camera or printer including mini 9, mini 11, mini 90, mini LiPlay, SHARE SP-2, mini Link and older mini film devices. Film size: 54(W) x 86(H) mm. Picture size: 46(W) x 62(H) mm.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
Electrical & Electronics Fujifilm Instagrampost Instant Film

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • Kafkaesque on 05/04/2021 - 21:16
    +1

    Thanks for the deal but the title gives me a headache

    Kafkaesque on 05/04/2021 - 21:16 (Collapsed - Offtopic. Show)
  • pichxlonco on 05/04/2021 - 21:16
    +2

    wow, this is REALLY cheap! I was litteraly about to go to officeworks and buy these https://www.officeworks.com.au/shop/officeworks/p/fujifilm-i… as they come up at $0.84 per photo, but your deal is $0.72!! I mean, for the money i was going to spend, i can get now 120 photos! Thanks!

    • Hansi on 06/04/2021 - 07:20

      Wow $0.72 per photo is still crazy, I'm surprised this is so common.

      Can't you just take retro photos on your phone and get them printed? Similar result for much cheaper?

      • dojomojo on 06/04/2021 - 07:31
        +3

        Instant photos are about fun in the moment with your friends, they're not about cost per photo.

      • 1st-Amendment on 06/04/2021 - 08:17
        -2

        Can't you just take retro photos on your phone and get them printed?

        You must throw fun parties…

  • Simplicityy on 05/04/2021 - 21:17
    +1

    Thanks op finally pulled the trigger and got the mini link too !!

  • pichxlonco on 05/04/2021 - 21:22

    It's showing at $45.12 now!

  • 0 0 0 on 05/04/2021 - 21:30

    Is it worth getting one of the Instax printers or just go for a conventional inkjet? What's cheaper in the long run?

    • The Value on 05/04/2021 - 21:59
      +1

      Canon Selphy is a lot cheaper.

      However, Instax is a particular style of photography that cannot be replicated.

    • Fiximol on 05/04/2021 - 22:04
      +8

      They are very different products. Instax is for instant sharing and works well with strangers and acquaintances (e.g. parties and functions). I have used the mini link on holiday (e.g. printing photos for kids to illustrate their travel journal or sharing photos with table partners on a cruise), at weddings, kids birthday parties etc. They are a lot of fun and almost always puts a smile on someone's face - usually inciting a mix of amusement and amazement - there is just something a little magical about seeing the photo develop and appear in one's hands. Instax prints are of an acceptable optical quality (you will be able to tell the persons and the setting, but the colour science can be a little off).

      Inkjet printing is not for instant sharing. They would be for viewing with closer family and friends and you can post process the images before printing. I have played around with these on a consumer printer but I must say printing at home is not really economical given how cheap 4 X 6 prints (few cents each) are.

    • somewherewest on 05/04/2021 - 22:59

      In terms of what's cheaper? Definitely the Inkjet. However, an Instax printer is more for the experience and quickly sharing memories. I bought the printer for my birthday party - sure the photos would probably end up on Instagram and Facebook anyway but having the printer to print a couple of memories to put in wallets at the end of the night feels like you've walked away with some cute memories. It's definitely about paying for the experience and the novelty. I also have a lot of the photos on my vanity of my friends and family.
      If you have the spare cash and can afford to splash out on the film for those special occassions, I would recommend getting an Instax printer :)

    • mudkipz on 06/04/2021 - 04:24

      Instax is all about the novelty and style. It does not make economical sense per print. The print doesn't come out perfectly sharp; and as others have pointed out, the colour science can be a little off. However, you just can't get the same style in other methods. It has a very unique charm to it.

      As you're asking about the printer specifically, I have a Square printer, and I use it to print very specific photos that I want to either share or display. It's not cheap, but I do enjoy it. The Mini printer works out cheaper per print, and I believe the unit itself is cheaper as well. However, I find the Mini just a little too small for my preference. The Square has a larger print; which I prefer for displaying. But it's also an unconventional size and bit awkward to frame up prints. There are also Wide cameras, which print an even larger wide photo, but there is not a printer yet (that I am aware of)

      • 1st-Amendment on 06/04/2021 - 08:25

        It has a very unique charm to it.

        Film cameras seem to be making a comeback, I dusted off my old 35mm camera and bought some film last month. The lady at the camera shop said they've been selling film like hotcakes lately.

        • mudkipz on 06/04/2021 - 17:57

          Film has been making renaissance for a while now. There's always a following around it, so it'll probably keep going. It's cool to see.

          • 1st-Amendment on 07/04/2021 - 10:06

            @mudkipz: I think we've got the first generation of kids raised on digital finally coming-of-age, and they're rediscovering the unique character of analog.

    • Hinee on 06/04/2021 - 10:19

      I have the HP instax printer and it's honestly great

  • ol mate on 05/04/2021 - 21:34
    +5

    Cheap. For those with access, $41 for the 60 pack on TGGC

  • Jimothy Wongingtons on 05/04/2021 - 21:42

    Dang felt like only yesterday you could buy 1 pack for sub 40c a shot with free delivery from HK.

    And if this is 'stunning quality' I hate to see the average..or entry level quality instant shots..

    • eman resu on 06/04/2021 - 11:45

      Be careful getting from overseas on the cheap as they have a use by date. The older the film the more likely they will come out dark or not developed.

      • Jimothy Wongingtons on 06/04/2021 - 11:47

        I haven't bought for approx 5 years lmao. I dumped it in favour of fp100 which is insanely expensive and discontinued now but the results..wowwwww

        • eman resu on 06/04/2021 - 11:50

          I dont like the concept as it runs against every ozbargain urge I have. But the kiddies love them and exchange photos with kids at school. So I grudgingly buy when I can get a deal!

        • Makka on 06/04/2021 - 15:14

          Fp100c and fp100b use to be so cheap! Maybe around .90c a shot. I used so much back in 2009 I wish I had a fridge filled with it. It was great fun to use! And you can reclaim the negative!

          • Jimothy Wongingtons on 06/04/2021 - 16:03

            @Makka: Yep I had grand plans circa 2013 of doing an fp100 project. It fell through and I got sidetracked.

            I sold a pack of fp100 untested and stored room temp for $100 2 years ago. Unreal.

            I bought b and H's last pack of fp3000 back in the day too…conflicted between shooting it and selling for a decent profit.

  • Ruckmauler on 05/04/2021 - 23:20

    Any advice on how to safely store this film.

    • pichxlonco on 06/04/2021 - 07:15

      They come in sealed wraps, and i keep mine in cardboard box under the bed. Never had any problems but never stored them for more than a year before using them.

    • RocketSwitch on 06/04/2021 - 09:47
      +1

      No advice. Had mine stored for 2 years before using the last set in a room not temperature controlled. No issues.

      • eman resu on 06/04/2021 - 11:46
        +1

        Anything beyond 3 years and you will get too many photos coming out darker than usual.

    • Jimothy Wongingtons on 06/04/2021 - 12:47

      Apparently ideally fridge…

      • eman resu on 06/04/2021 - 15:04

        really? how can that be

  • RocketSwitch on 06/04/2021 - 09:47
    +1

    Was running low, thanks.

  • langitbiru on 06/04/2021 - 11:14
    +1

    Thanks OP, just got another 1

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join