• expired

[QLD,NSW,SA,WA,ACT] 6.6kW Risen MONO PERC Solar Panels + 5kW Solis Inverter $3,190 Fully Installed @ Solar Link Australia

30

Hello, Ozbargains community!

We have another exclusive and compelling Autumn deal πŸ‚πŸ‚ for $3,190.00 upfront cost for QLD, NSW, SA, WA, and ACT! Enquire now and you might have a fully functioning Solar PV System before we head into Winter!

Considering the current economic situation, the sunny weather, and the federal incentives, this deal will fast track you to an affordable solar system with performance and quality whilst reducing the increasing cost of electricity bills, especially for those who work from home.

6.6kW Solar PV System fully installed for $3,190.00 upfront after STC Rebate.

What does this exclusive deal include?

18 x Tier 1 Mono PERC Risen BLACK FRAME 370W Panels (15-year Product Warranty and 25-year Performance Warranty).
Australia's largest Solar Farm (132 MW) in WA was installed using Risen Panels late last year: https://www.merredinsolar.com.au/ & https://youtu.be/d_uQltQcjUA

1 x 5kW Solis Inverter. Equipped with a 10-year warranty for peace of mind!

5-year Workmanship Warranty

Professional and Knowledgeable CEC-accredited retailer with 10 years of industry experience

Risen BLACK FRAME 370W MONO PERC Panel Datasheet: https://tinyurl.com/solarlinkaustraliarisen370
Solis 5kW Inverter Datasheet: https://www.ginlong.com/Uploads/file/Solis-1P5K-4G.pdf

To get this special exclusive deal you will have to email your full name, address and contact number for the proposal directly to
[email protected]

If you have an old switchboard with a ceramic fuse please mention it in the email.

Note: Deal is quoted for single-phase properties. Additional charges may apply, these include: Concrete & Terracotta tile roofs +$200, 2-Storey +$200, 3-Phase +$550, Freight (Over 100km), Cyclone racking (for properties North of Bundaberg) +$300

*Referral Scheme
We also have a tantalising referral bonus if you refer a family or friend! What's better, we will provide a $100.00 bonus to both you and a family/ friend if both of you place an order with us!

Kindly submit your queries to [email protected] with your full name, address and contact number.

Thank you for your interest!

Related Stores

Solar Link Australia
Solar Link Australia

closed Comments

  • -1

    Do you accept Qoin?

    • Hello lovebargains123,

      Thank you for your interest!

      Unfortunately, we do not accept cryptocurrency at this time.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

    • what's with that? I "participated" as a seller, but there's still no fiat ramps? super sus.

  • +1

    What's your ABN?

    What's your electrica licensed?

    • Hello Fauxsuede,

      Thank you for your query.

      Our ABN is 87 117 053 666.

      You may refer to our website for our licences & accreditations,
      https://www.solarlinkaustralia.com.au/

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

      • +1

        I notice your advertisement here says risen but you website refers to eating, is risen guaranteed or will you swap for a different panel?

        • Hello Fauxsuede,

          Thank you for your query.

          We are currently offering Risen panels for this bargain. In the event we do not have stock for the Risen brand, we will provide prior notice and offer other available brands including Eging.

          Kindly note that at this stage, our supply of Risen black frame 370W panels is still available for this offer.

          Regards,
          Ryan
          Solar Link Australia

  • Hi, can you tell me a realistic timeframe for ROI with this system? Just bought a new house and potentially looking at getting solar. Thanks!

    • Hello Jiomariano,

      Thank you for your query.

      We expect on average a 4 - 6 week turn-around after deposit payment.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

      • He means Return On Investment. General amount of time it would take to pay off this system with savings by using Solar.

        • Hello Millzy,

          Apologies for that, the ROI is dependant on household consumption and the energy plan you are on. We recommend contacting us so that we can confirm a more specific ROI.

          Regards,
          Ryan
          Solar Link Australia

    • It depends on where you are, My System in Bathurst NSW is saving me approx $2200 PA with a really good FIT. With a FIT of about 9.5c/kwh I would be looking at saving about $1000 pa. So ROI could be anywhere between 2-5 years for this system depending on your situation (usage and location).

  • How much would this normally cost

    • +1

      Hello Deme,

      Thank you for your query.

      Our usual price for this package is $3,990.00. The price indicated on this post is an exclusive deal we are offering to the Ozbargains community.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

  • Do you contract out installers or do you have your own staff

    • Hello Impoze,

      Thank you for your query.

      In order for us to operate nationally, we have a core group of contracted installers with whom we work closely with.

      For peace of mind, we are always the first point of contact if there are any issues.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

  • Can you install on apartment buildings (7th floor roof)?

    • Hello Nemesis,

      Thank you for your query.

      We can install on apartment buildings provided you have obtained the necessary permits and approvals from the building owners.

      Kindly email me at [email protected] for a further discussion on your situation.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

  • Hey Ryan, do you have any deals for residents of Victoria?

    • Hello JLCC,

      Thank you for your query.

      We definitely have a deal for Victoria!

      Kindly refer to our Victoria Ozbargain post for more information on how you can take advantage of the state and federal incentives!

      https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/607931

      Regards,
      Ryan

  • +2

    I just bought a system, I think buyers should take account of potential for export charging in their future ROI calcs:

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-25/australians-with-roof…

    • Saw the interview.
      It's a proposal at this stage.
      Something to consider!

      People could be slugged a fee if they export when the grid was busy, but Mr Barr insisted that would not be the default position.
      "It'll only happen when there is congestion on the network, not at all times when you're exporting into the grid"

      Modelling estimates charges of $30-$100 per year per household, depending on size of installation. (Outlined in abc link above)

      Rationale seems to be that there is "congestion on the network" which was designed for delivering power to consumers, as it now has to deliver power back into network.

      Rather than also slugging those without solar to remedy this, a charge is proposed to encourage solar households to install a battery, produce output at other than peak time, & help fund upgrades to network to handle increased roof top solar exports.

      The interview pointed to some installations currently not able to export at all into congested network!

      There has been an idea floated to install solar panels on East & West facing sides of buildings, to provide more roof top power in mornings & afternoons. North facing produces most solar output in middle of day. It would even out / extend the peak of production. But would likely lower ROI for those installations. But should avoid the congestion charge.

      • Just saw this too, such a farce, just like NBN.

        Instead of modernizing Australia's power ANY infrastructure, just tax the populace more to maintain the status quo instead! genius.

        • +1

          Well. That's already been happening with the electricity network!

          Improving the network at a cost to all on the network - to benefit only the minority with roof top solar exporting into the network - is not equitable.

          It's a charge on those who benefit from the sale of electricity at times when it is least able to be used - the middle of the day when few are home.

          You are proposing slugging those who aren't already benefiting, to benefit those who are selling their roof top solar exports!

          That is just tax the populace to benefit the few.

          • @INFIDEL: $ to modernize infrastructure? OH NO WHERE WILL IT COME FROM? UNSUSTAINABLE!

            $ to bail out Qantas 3 times a year? blank checks.

            • @xrailgun: How about trying to understand s complex issue.

              Who should pay to benefit one group on the network?

              Government money to improve private electricity networks?

              Renters & low income groups usually can't benefit from solar export income.

              Its a proposal for discussion.

              • @INFIDEL: the complex issue is the rich lobbying our government to dominate budget spending, and leaving scraps for what is actually good for the country but not directly in the immediate interest of billionaires.

                and they have the money and influence to spin the "issue" however they like.

                • @xrailgun: When has it not been like that in history??
                  Think you are on about a very different political issue!
                  And missing the point!!

                  Instead of modernizing Australia's infrastructure, just tax the populace more to maintain the status quo instead! genius.

                  This proposal is to charge only the minority who benefit, not the populace! The complete opposite of what you claim!

                  If you saw / read the interview, you would have seen it proposes to lower costs to non-solar exporters - the majority of the populace.
                  Again, the opposite of your misguided claim!!

                  So very wrong there!

                  $ to modernize infrastructure? OH NO WHERE WILL IT COME FROM? UNSUSTAINABLE!
                  $ to bail out Qantas 3 times a year? blank checks.

                  Strange you seem to think the public should pay to upgrade mainly privately owned networks to benefit a minority of mainly wealthier households with solar installations. Richer suburbs generally have a higher uptake of roof top solar.

                  That's just not equitable!!
                  That's what your "rich lobbyists" would want! Public money to improve their assets' worth & increase their profits!

                  Best to take your political ideas over to a Forum Post.
                  And read the proposal rather than jumping automatically to your biased opinion.

                  • @INFIDEL: honestly scratching my head over why you think Australians don't deserve a more robust energy grid?

                    they're scapegoating solar to be the baddies when it's only 5% of total energy on the grid, this 5% is exposing how vulnerable and overextended the energy grid is, and you're lapping it right up, and believing this to be an actual solution?

                    unless population growth plummets, we'll be back at the same issue within a couple years.

                    • @xrailgun:

                      why you think Australians don't deserve a more robust energy grid?

                      It's generally a problem of the (wealthier) suburbs - not the entire distribution network!

                      Charging those sellers a small fee for exporting at peak times should bring about a slow change in timing of exports to suit the network.

                      …and you're lapping it right up, and believing this to be an actual solution?

                      No. Upgrading networks is only one of many solutions. I don't think upgrading the network is the main aim of the proposal.

                      You have a fixed view of the problem. Open up your biased mind to the possibilities! Ridiculing others because you don't bother to understand is simply ignorance.


                      Other solutions include:

                      Encouraging installation of local storage (expensive batteries) was part of that proposal.

                      Local area networks are being trialled, but seem to require storage.


                      Changing local consumption to the middle of the day will lower surplus exports congesting the network.

                      It's a problem of orienting the panels North to maximise output & increase income - all at the same time! But it's not where or when the electricity is needed!
                      And few in all those empty houses to use the surplus electricity.

                      [It's something I've advocated for decades!
                      Changing patterns of use rather than employing costly engineered solutions.

                      For example, I'd work at night in my Uni office, freeing it for use by others during the day. My work was then not interrupted.

                      I've demonstrated distributed power production many decades ago. And talked on alternatives to conventional work. My business gave advice & ways to think about problems differently - finding new solituons.]

                      So more working from home, small businesses in the suburbs, moving household controlled off peak electric hot water production from night to middle of the day, etc can soak up local production.

                      That lowers network congestion.


                      As I suggested - changing the orientation of panels to spread the peak export times & therefore congestion on the network is another.


                      The above are generally no cost solutions to network congestion.

                      When a centralised power plant is commissioned, the distribution system is designed to meet it's output. It is costed in by the producer.

                      And it is paid based on the lowest price available when there is high demand.

                      Very different system of payment to roof top solar - which could be paid based on demand. Which would mean most would receive a much lower income!

                      However, ad hoc decentralised roof top solar exporting into an existing network not designed to distribute local production causes a problem.

                      In general older wealthier areas with high roof top solar exports will likely cause the most network congestion.

                      So who should pay for this problem??
                      Surely the producer, not the populace through taxes or higher electricity prices!

                      Installed my own off-grid photovoltaic system over 40 years ago.

                    • @xrailgun:

                      why you think Australians don't deserve a more robust energy grid

                      Where will the money magically come from?? You haven't told us that part of your grand scheme!!

                      You've ruled out the populace being "taxed".

                      Which rules out the Government - who would pay for it from taxes on the populace.

                      I assume you don't think the populace (who pay for electricity) should pay through higher charges from electricity suppliers etc.

                      You've ruled out those benefiting - roof top solar electricity exporters, needing to pay during limited peak times under this proposal.

                      So who pays for your "more robust energy grid"??


                      they're scapegoating solar to be the baddies

                      Other power suppliers use their expensive dedicated high voltage power supply lines to deliver electricity into the distribution system. That's how it was designed to work.

                      Roof top solar does not provide any expensive distribution network.

                      Rather the network designed only to distribute electricity to consumers is not designed for a large number of decentralised producers feeding back into the system.

                      To maintain a robust electricity supply system you are wanting, parameters (voltage, phase, etc) need to be controlled. That's much easier with few large supervised producers rather than thousands of cheaply made & unsupervised inverters!
                      My studies in heavy power generation area in Electrical Engineering showed me that's not so easy. But I was only interested in Solar.

                      And those solar electricity producers purchase much less from the network. It wasn't designed for this major change.

                      But as I've outlined, a complete overhaul isn't the only solution.
                      Just like with changing behaviour with more efficient lighting, insulation, etc, electricity demand fell.

                      Household solar electricity producers are already favoured by an agreed sales price - compared to other electricity suppliers (which are only paid when there is demand, & only if they can supply at the lowest price)!

                      They are paid for their electricity production despite little demand where they are & often a local oversupply at that time. Almost no one in the local area wants what they are selling at that time.

                      Smacks of old time Communism! Producing an oversupply of something few want in that area.

        • This proposal is designed to ease local congestion, not overhaul a massive archaic distribution network not designed for the current use.

          Upgrades to distribution networks have been announced. But that will take years to build.
          If you know anything about this field - you will already know that & realise this proposal deals with a very different problem!

          Welfare groups have welcomed the proposal. So much for "taxing" the populace.

          Maybe you should examine the proposal instead of criticising what you don't bother to understand!!

  • Do you have any deal for a ~10kw system?

    • Hello Brianp,

      Thank you for your query!

      We recommend contacting us directly at [email protected] so that we can give you a specialised quote for your property.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

  • Sent you email requesting quote.

  • Hi OP,
    Just curious if the offer is still running or if you have any other offers for SA residents

    • Hello Tobia,

      Thank you for your query!

      I can confirm we have a few spaces left for this offer in SA :) We recommend emailing us at [email protected] for a more detailed discussion.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

  • Hi Op,

    is this deal still current?

    I am interested.

    • Hello Tyken,

      Thank you for your interest!

      We still have a few spaces left for this deal. We recommend emailing us at [email protected] with your address and contact number for a further discussion.

      Regards,
      Ryan
      Solar Link Australia

Login or Join to leave a comment