Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD Lens for Sony E-Mount - $1089 (Was $1469) @ CameraPro + other great savings

130

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

Store RepCameraPro on 23/12/2020 - 17:56 camerapro.com.au (273 clicks)
Last edited 24/12/2020 - 12:34

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD Lens for Sony E-Mount - $1089 (Was $1469)
https://www.camerapro.com.au/6326-tamron-28-75mm-f-2-8-di-ii…

Tamron 17-28mm F/2.8 Di Ⅲ RXD Sony E-mount - $1329 (Was $1659)
https://www.camerapro.com.au/8829-tamron-17-28mm-f2-8-lens-d…

Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Camera Body - $5798 (Was $6499) *$250 Cashback from Canon via redemption
https://www.camerapro.com.au/9584-canon-eos-r5-mirrorless-ca…

Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm f/2.8 II Lens - $999 (Was $1433)
https://www.camerapro.com.au/5224-panasonic-lumix-g-35-100mm…

Phottix M200R RGB LED Light - $169 (Was $199)
https://www.camerapro.com.au/9539-phottix-m200r-rgb-led-ligh…

Reduced price for Boxing Day Sales

Related Stores

CameraPro

• 

  Jimothy Wongingtons on 23/12/2020 - 18:13

  Dang that’s a tidy price

• 

  Bluebench on 23/12/2020 - 18:21

  -1

  Why is a lens with such a short focal range so expensive? What's the "speciality"?

  • 

    aeon on 23/12/2020 - 18:22

    +7

    The constant f/2.8 throughout the range

  • 

    p1 ama on 23/12/2020 - 18:42

    Why is a lens with such a short focal range so expensive?

    Lol, you've clearly not seen the big tele primes.

  • 

    eecan on 23/12/2020 - 18:57

    +2

    This is a budget f2.8 lens lol. Not that there is anything wrong with that (I own one) but look at the Sony/Canon equivalents before you call this one 'so expensive'.

    • 

      yoloxswag on 23/12/2020 - 19:07

      +2

      I gotta say this is pretty decent lens. The only neg is not wide enough lol

      • 

        euk on 23/12/2020 - 19:14

        +1

        Ther is a wide angle Tamron 2.8 for the E mount as well though. They've been smart about the range they've chosen for maximum size savings and reasonable image quality.

        • 

          yoloxswag on 23/12/2020 - 19:21

          @euk: I have been thinking to get that FE 20 f1.8 instead.

• 

  Ausdave on 23/12/2020 - 19:35

  Good lens, but please aware it doesn't have image stabilisation.

  • 

    eecan on 23/12/2020 - 19:47

    The Sigma/Sony 24-70 2.8 do not have IS either for what it is worth.

    • 

      Ausdave on 23/12/2020 - 20:02

      Damn didn't know that pricey Sony equivalent doesn't have it also.

  • 

    p1 ama on 23/12/2020 - 21:16

    +1

    Most Sony bodies have IBIS so you'll be alright.

• 

  Krayzii on 23/12/2020 - 19:48

  Took this on a proper event on the weekend and have amazing shots. Taken this around international travel prior covid and is usually my all-in-one lens and I've no regrets.

  I def recommend :)

  • 

    sax on 27/12/2020 - 22:51

    Do you have full frame or crop sensor camera?

    I don't see this lens being an all-in-one for a crop sensor…

    • 

      Krayzii on 27/12/2020 - 23:29

      Sorry should have mentioned - FF Sony A73

      • 

        sax on 28/12/2020 - 00:57

        Ok thanks a lot for clarifying.

        Tamron just released a 17-70mm f2.8 for crop sensors. That one would be good for crop sensors once it comes in stock.

• 

  AL008 on 23/12/2020 - 20:11

  Wouldn’t the 28-200 be the better option?

  • 

    eecan on 23/12/2020 - 20:18

    +3

    You are buying this lens for the constant 2.8 aperture.

  • 

    tariqsaleem on 23/12/2020 - 23:25

    Different beasts….both are awesome lenses but for different purposes