I'm looking for a new 65" TV.
was eyeing off an OLED but probably still a little more than what I wanted to spend. considering the amount I really use it.
After having 4 LG tv's I ended up at a Sony X9500H
I then saw that the Samsung Q80T had some decent reviews that it was better than the Sony.
also looked at the LG Nano but there's a lot of technical jargon that doesn't mean much so hard to compare. it has HDMI 2.1 but don't feel I really need it although would be nice to futureproof as I don't go buying a tv every year.
not sure what else is comparable to either of them.
I'm partial to the Sony due to Android TV (not that I really use the smart functions on the TV's) but with android I might have a few apps on it.
I have a HTPC connected to it and its basically just a computer screen, plays my KODI library in smaller file format x264/x265 videos. Nothing super quality. The missus watches a bit of FTA TV.
Don't play many games on it. I do have an old SNES, Wii and PS2 hooked up but they get covered in dust more than used.
Just waiting for hopefully a decent boxing day sale to pull the trigger.
Can anyone recommend one or another choice?
I've been looking into this recently:
LG Nano91 is not worth it - IPS bleed and poor HDR brightness / performance. Not in the same league as the other two.
Sony X9500H - probably the best HDR and dimming implementation right now. Would stand out as absolute class leader but lacks HDMI 2.1- so not future console proof. If you don't care about gaming 4K/120 or variable refresh rate then it's probably the best option
Samsung Q80T - disappointing lack of DolbyVision HDR. Good image quality, but very aggressive dimming to control blooming leaves image dull / less bright compared to the Sony. The local dimming is apparently very poor in games.
In summary, I would go the Sony. Also it's Android so very future proof and doesn't spam you with ads like the Samsung.