This was posted 3 years 11 months 11 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

WD Blue 6TB PC Desktop Hard Drive, WD60EZAZ - $177.52 + Delivery (Free with Prime) @ Amazon US via AU

80
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

WD Blue 6TB PC Desktop Hard Drive, lowest price according to Camelcamelcamel.

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
Amazon Global Store
Amazon Global Store

closed Comments

  • $202.72 for me.

    • I’m also seeing $177.52

    • Down below the price there is a bit that says "Willing to Wait", with the lower price + shipping if you dont have Prime… I assume if you have Prime it just shows the lower price up the top?

  • +4

    SMR drive, no go for me.

    • The penalty is basically non existent in a Raid1+0 and minimized in a Raid6.

      • +1

        I think this article gave a fairly balanced view on SMR usage in NAS/RAID applications, which is WD's SMR firmware did a good job in managing data overwrites, but it could not overcome the limitation of SMR in every situation. In particular, it failed spectacularly with ZFS-RAID-Z.

        https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/06/western-digitals-smr…

        Conclusions

        We want to be very clear: we agree with Seagate's Greg Belloni, who stated on the company's behalf that they "do not recommend SMR for NAS applications." At absolute best, SMR disks underperform significantly in comparison to CMR disks; at their worst, they can fall flat on their face so badly that they may be mistakenly detected as failed hardware.

        With that said, we can see why Western Digital believed, after what we assume was a considerable amount of laboratory testing, that their disks would be "OK" for typical NAS usage. Although obviously slower than their Ironwolf competitors, they performed adequately both for conventional RAID rebuilds and for typical day-to-day NAS file-sharing workloads.

        • Interesting, my RaidZ3 does quite well with shingled drives. Odd.

          • @MasterScythe: It depends very much on the what kind of writes make up your normal usage.

            • @roller: They should probably just be called YMMV drives. At least the implementation in the Reds was done so well that it stayed under the radar for a long time. Other models may implement SMR more aggressively and not respond so well even to less demanding use cases (my WD 4TB portable seems to be a good example).

    • Ok thanks

    • Always good to know

  • +1

    Was $150.84 during previous prime day sales.

Login or Join to leave a comment