Hi all,
I was talking to a friend the other day about working from home when sick. I was recalling when I used to work as an employee in an accounting firm a few years ago. Aside from the odd client meeting, and it being easier to just get up and talk to other staff about tasks we were working on together, our jobs could almost entirely be done from home. Our systems were all cloud-based, nobody really had to be in the office.
I was someone who never really got sick, but when I did take sick leave I would still do a few hours of work from home - sometimes it was important, sometimes it could have waited. It never bothered me though as I was happy to contribute. These days I'm a contractor so if I don't work I don't get paid, but I digress.
The focus of our conversation was around this one time when I called my former employer in the morning and told them I was sick; and they responded by rattling off a full days' worth of work they wanted me to get done. I was taken aback by this, as in theory I was on sick leave and 'wasn't well enough to work'. As I said, I was always someone who was happy to voluntarily work from home when sick, but being expected to work kind of struck a nerve with me. I thought the whole point of sick leave was so you could rest and return to work as quickly as possible.
So I pose this question to the brilliant minds of OzBargain - is it ok for an employer to expect you to work a full day from home when sick?
Understandably this question is targeted at employees who work jobs that can be performed from home. With COVID influencing businesses to move work online, I imagine that's more of us these days.
Poll because OzBargain loves polls.
No it's not.