This was posted 4 years 3 months 28 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • out of stock

adidas Face Covers M/L 3-Pack (Blue, Limit 1 Per Customer) $12 + $8.50 Shipping @ adidas

1427
adidas Face Covers M/L 3-Pack (Blue, Limit 1 Per Customer) $12 + $8.50 Shipping @ adidasAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
LPopoy on 25/08/2020 - 14:22 adidas.com.au (14390 clicks)
Last edited 25/08/2020 - 16:20 by 2 other users
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Hi Ozb.

I know this is RRP but last time this was released, it was gone in a day.
Seems like good value even when considering shipping.

FACE COVERS XS/S 3-PACK (black, 13.80 cm x 15.50 cm)
https://www.adidas.com.au/face-covers-xs-s-3-pack/H13185.htm…

Only allowed 1 each per order.

Don’t forget Cashrewards/Shopback - 6%
CR may stack with this: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/560938

Feel free to remove if not a bargain. Thanks

Cheers.

Specifications

  • Dimensions: 15.25 cm x 17 cm
  • 93% Recycled polyester / 7% elastane
  • Tight fit for coverage
  • Stretches around ears
  • Two layers of fabric
Fashion & Apparel adidas Cloth Face Mask

Related Stores

adidas
adidas

closed Comments

    • firecaller on 25/08/2020 - 14:52
      +37

      Wasn't this explained to you on another post that a bargain doesn't need to have a reduction in price?

        • firecaller on 25/08/2020 - 16:28
          +11

          From a moderator on that post I was refering to:

          "I don't think a store selling an item for $1.85, down from $3.70 should be allowed to post, but a store that sells that item $1.85 all the time can't. Similarly, having a poor quality item or poor price be allowed to post because it was discounted (as mentioned above), whilst a better quality/cheaper item not be allowed because it's always that price. Items can also be of interest to the community whilst not being discounted due to availability or other factors and that's fine.

          We should judge a deal on it's own worth and the users will decide whether it's a good deal or not via the voting system and comments, whether that be good or bad."

          Seems pretty valid to me.

          • jv on 25/08/2020 - 16:30
            -6

            @firecaller:

            and the users will decide whether it's a good deal or not via the voting system and comments

            Thanks for justifying my comment…

            • MuddyClear on 25/08/2020 - 16:46
              +6

              @jv: The voting system has spoken. Please lay off the drugs.

              • jv on 25/08/2020 - 17:30
                -8

                @MuddyClear:

                The voting system has spoken.

                Reminds me of Trump's election…

                • MuddyClear on 25/08/2020 - 17:44

                  @jv:

                  Reminds me of Trump's election

                  I doubt the votes will trend in the opposite direction…

          • Yummy on 25/08/2020 - 17:24

            @firecaller: This is a TRAP. Jv's trap. Congrats.

        • shiznit on 25/08/2020 - 22:49

          All the bargains here, except the freebies, require spending money, not saving money.

      • scud70 on 25/08/2020 - 15:24
        +2

        Hasn't it been explained to you that jv will continue to try for the most neg'd comment crown? .. haha there is no need to ever point out obvious things to jv … haha

      • brendanm on 25/08/2020 - 15:31
        +1

        He's right though. Something available at RRP is not a bargain.

      • SF3 on 25/08/2020 - 16:12
        +4

        that's jv, you'll see he has a reputation around here… I think he enjoys people reactions with his comments.

        Welcome to OzB.

        • mickeyjuiceman on 25/08/2020 - 17:29
          +1

          And he's a protected species because people continually comment on how stupid it is and the mods get all excited because there's more traffic.

      • Nuggets on 25/08/2020 - 16:34
        +4

        This will greatly improve your quality of life.

        • 51722 on 25/08/2020 - 18:38

          Thank you nuggets. I can't believe I never tried the "hide" button on JV's earlier comments.

        • Eggsperential on 25/08/2020 - 18:58

          I quite enjoy the banter.

    • skinny on 25/08/2020 - 20:19
      +1

      for once, I agree with @jv

      if you start to post full price deals, then its not a bargain.

      PS: there are another 2000 items on Adidas website to post as bargains!

  • YadaYadaYada on 25/08/2020 - 14:27
    +12

    Only two layers of fabric

    • flashi007 on 25/08/2020 - 14:28
      +72

      Wear all three at once?

      • SF3 on 25/08/2020 - 16:14
        +1

        Genius hack. Hence, why sold as a 3 pack. ;)

    • JoKing on 25/08/2020 - 14:29

      How many layers is it good to get? I have managed to stay home/use disposable ones, but thinking some fabric ones would be a good idea.

    • Elias11 on 25/08/2020 - 15:53
      +3

      It doesn't matter as long as it's a face covering for the purpose they are trying to get to of not spreading fluids.
      A lot of people are using a bandana.

      3 layers etc is for somewhat viral protection

    • drezy on 25/08/2020 - 15:09
      +26

      makes sense as it is a mask, it would be in the same category as underwear, not returnable

      • Windows98 on 25/08/2020 - 16:12
        +10

        In a world where restaurants are not accepting unopened coke bottles to be swapped. Someone wants to return used face masks during a pandemic. Amazing.

    • Mel-waukee on 25/08/2020 - 15:10
      +12

      masks are like underwear, you don't share them, need to be washed regularly, not to be adjusted in public and cannot return them

      • beatsntoons on 25/08/2020 - 15:30
        +1

        just don't get them confused and wear your undies on your face and your mask on your bits.

        • Merlict on 25/08/2020 - 15:48
          +12

          Don't tell me what to do!

        • alcadive on 25/08/2020 - 16:21

          A jock strap would actually work as a mask.

        • orly on 25/08/2020 - 17:22

          It's my body, my choice!

    • first in line on 25/08/2020 - 15:13
      +13

      no need to shout geez

    • merivetio on 25/08/2020 - 16:10
      +3

      OK THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP

  • thorntonchan on 25/08/2020 - 14:29
    +2

    Link for Medium/Large Size (blue)
    Dont foget bonus $2 cb

    • Popoy on 25/08/2020 - 14:31

      Thanks. Would add.

      • Kangal on 25/08/2020 - 20:11
        +1

        …but why does this have to look like underwear for your mouth??

  • abhi900 on 25/08/2020 - 14:33
    +3

    (14-21 days. Due to newly implemented restrictions at our distribution centre in Victoria, we’re currently experiencing delays dispatching orders.)

  • lothus777 on 25/08/2020 - 14:34

    Kids size, no large

  • cheapiechips on 25/08/2020 - 14:38
    +1

    If you are close to an Adidas outlet, they are available in-store and the 1 pack limit may not be applied if they have sufficient quantities.

    Currently, blue is only available in M/L and black in XS/S. Staff said they may get black in M/L in the future.

    I found them to be a much better fit than the Cotton On and Kathmandu (avoid!) reusable masks.

    Only two layers, but you can insert a filter if you prefer.

    • Lionchu on 25/08/2020 - 14:53

      Which outlet did you go to? Lidcombe?

      • cheapiechips on 25/08/2020 - 14:55
        +2

        Burwood Westfield NSW (blue only) and Central Park Broadway NSW (both colours) had them yesterday.

    • mjf on 26/08/2020 - 01:03

      Does it have a pouch for inserting filters? It's hard to tell from the pics?

  • Mel-waukee on 25/08/2020 - 14:38
    +4

    I'd prefer cotton

  • toblerone21 on 25/08/2020 - 14:42
    +4

    shame there is no black, guys flogging these for $40 each on eBay will be furious lol

  • drezy on 25/08/2020 - 14:49

    Thanks, I got a pack as I am an Adidas fan

  • Lionchu on 25/08/2020 - 14:51

    Just wanted to share the shipping time for my last two adidas orders this month.
    1st order had 5 items and took 21 days to arrive.
    2nd order had only 1 item and took 5 days to arrive.
    Their shipping times are all over the shop!

    • Chicken Kyiv on 25/08/2020 - 15:07

      true, theres been major issues with adidas orders, especially to Victoria, and some orders go missing

    • ego22 on 25/08/2020 - 15:01
      +15

      Username checks out.

    • rekabkram on 25/08/2020 - 15:01
      +8

      If everyone that has an issue with the restrictions would follow them temporarily they’ll just go away.

      • SaddenAscentAspirin on 25/08/2020 - 16:25

        "BUT MAH FREEEDUM"

        Says every anti-masker who buckles their seatbelt and stops at stop signs.

        • tpup1 on 25/08/2020 - 19:28

          To be fair, on the whole, the restrictions on freedoms are clearly more overbearing than your examples

          • [Deactivated] on 25/08/2020 - 20:37
            -1

            @tpup1: To be fair, having to wear a mask is hardly onerous.

            His logic is nonsensical and sociopathic.

            • astarman on 25/08/2020 - 20:58
              +1

              @[Deactivated]: yeh there shouldnt even be any "medical condition" exemptions for mask

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaL7gIMemrU

              • [Deactivated] on 25/08/2020 - 21:14
                -1

                @astarman: The exemptions should be much tighter. First world pusillanimity should definitely not be an excuse.

                • astarman on 25/08/2020 - 21:26

                  @[Deactivated]: imagine youre getting open heart sugery and your surgical teams like, yeh nah its tough to breathe in these. let me remove and spit in you

            • tpup1 on 25/08/2020 - 21:41
              -2

              @[Deactivated]: How about being forced to stay at home for 23 hours a day? Might be okay for you but for a lot of people that is bitter suffering

              • [Deactivated] on 25/08/2020 - 23:14
                +3

                @tpup1: Yeh it's tough. Not quite as tough as dying or suffering permanent damage to your health though eh. Ever give a thought to how tough it is for health workers whose lives are at risk? How are their families coping I wonder?

                • tpup1 on 25/08/2020 - 23:52
                  -5

                  @[Deactivated]: Worst case death rate asymptotes at around one in 1000. Yes that's sad, but in Melbourne it's already up to six months for everyone. How much are we going to sacrifice to try to lower the death toll?
                  As far as health workers, if they're young and healthy the risk is extremely low. And if they're not comfortable with the risk to them or their families, they're not obligated to work

                  • [Deactivated] on 26/08/2020 - 08:12
                    +1

                    @tpup1: Not obligated to work. Lol. Imagine the chaos to society and the economy if people had your fy I can do whatever I want attitude - in any industry, let alone one which deals in starting, saving, and improving lives every hour of every day. Thank heavens most of our health workers are more dedicated and responsible than you. By all means keep your suggestion in mind when you eventually need urgent medical care yourself though. It might be many years away but just don't bother them eh.

                    Good to see you've outed yourself as one of the many self-centred people in our society. As long as your own risk is low there's no need for current govt action apparently.

                    Melb hasn't had such tight restrictions for anywhere near 6 months. The reason it had to do so is because of irresponsible, ignorant and self- centred idiots who figure they're not likely to be seriously compromised themselves.

                    • tpup1 on 26/08/2020 - 10:48
                      -1

                      @[Deactivated]: Lot of baseless insults, good sign there's nothing to your argument.
                      I didn't say my own risk is low, but what's selfish is forcing everyone to suffer to protect yourself from that risk.
                      Nor did I say I wouldn't work, but they have that option if they're worried about the risk. I expect most of the health care workers still work, which I am very grateful for, but we shouldn't all have to suffer to protect them from a risk they opt into.
                      Even if the restrictions haven't been as tight until recently, a lot of people have been heavily affected the entire time. Consider uni students for example, or people who have lost their job

                      • [Deactivated] on 26/08/2020 - 12:25
                        +1

                        @tpup1: You didn't have to say (you think) your risk is low, it's obvious. Despite your opinion no responsible health worker has the option to just walk away, especially in the current crisis. That's what juveniles might do. It isn't just health workers who are at risk btw. Insults? Truth hurts obviously. Frankly I'm sick to death of the pusssy-footing around with self-interested individuals and businesses who keep putting us all at risk and setting back timeframes for easing of restrictions. I'm surprised (mildly given their politics) the BCA hasn't called for much tougher penalties for businesses which don't comply with rules. The requirements aren't difficult to understand, nor are the restrictions. We all want to get back to a new normal but unless people are responsible and govts start to really crack down we're going to be stuck on the off and on again roller coaster for quite a while.

                        • tpup1 on 26/08/2020 - 13:58

                          @[Deactivated]: It's not obvious, that's just your assumption. As far the insults, they don't hurt at all (another 'obvious' assumption lol) but they are insults. Also, I'm aware health workers aren't the only ones at risk. You brought them up.
                          So, explain then why they don't have that option?

                          • [Deactivated] on 26/08/2020 - 14:50
                            +1

                            @tpup1: Despite your beliefs it is painfully obvious that you think you're not likely to be seriously affected by Covid-19.

                            Why don't health workers and others have the option to walk away? That also ought to be obvious even without my previous comments about social responsibility and dedication. Here's another clue - where would we find trained health workers/doctors/surgeons/specialists to fill the gaps? We've seen what putting mindless fools in charge of quarantine security results in. We've seen the results of supposedly trained and aware aged-care workers turning up to work while ill - because of resource shortage, lack of Fed govt action to provide paid C19 leave, and selfishness. Yet you apparently think we could just pluck intelligent trained people from thin air.

                            The initial lockdowns were put in place so that the health system wasn't massively overtaxed. We saw that worked and so restrictions were eased. Then we had a second wave because of complacency, businesses not policing rules, and culpable individual stupidity and indifference.

                            • tpup1 on 26/08/2020 - 16:43
                              -2

                              @[Deactivated]: No it's not, you just believe it's obvious. Even some people who are most at risk wish there were no restrictions so they could do things like seeing their family.

                              If someone leaving healthcare were to make a gap that couldn't be filled, then yes the quality of healthcare would go down. A lot of people won't leave for that reason, and good on them. But they absolutely do have the option to leave if they wish. BTW I'm not advocating for them to quit their jobs. The point is simply that ultimately they can choose whether to put themselves at risk.

                              Should we do what we can to minimise the risk? Of course, but we need to balance that against the drawbacks of our response, which at the moment is absurdly disproportionate.

                              • [Deactivated] on 26/08/2020 - 17:20
                                +2

                                @tpup1:

                                Even some people who are most at risk wish there were no restrictions so they could do things like seeing their family.

                                Long odds on you aren't in that category. In addition to your disregard for societal responsibility you have a very immature concept of choice. Yes most health workers have choice - Hobson's choice.

                                The only thing absurdly disproportionate is your attitude, and the attitudes of others who put their own welfare and wants ahead of others. It is their ignorant actions which have led to the situation in Melb. Address your angst towards them, not others trying to fix the mess and distress they've caused.

                                • tpup1 on 26/08/2020 - 18:07
                                  -4

                                  @[Deactivated]: Hobson's choice my ass. Better they have the very reasonable option of leaving their job if they wish, than forcing way more to lose theirs.

                                  BTW, you are also putting your own welfare and wants ahead of others in supporting these lockdowns.

                                  • [Deactivated] on 26/08/2020 - 22:35

                                    @tpup1: When did this country become so ego-centric and mentally soft I wonder?

                                    Health workers have the very reasonable option of leaving their job? Roflmao. Not sure what universe you currently inhabit but it has little connection to reality. Try opening your mind a little further, you might be surprised at how much it can absorb and analyse.

                                    I'm not doing anything like you claim, I'm following the advice of people entrusted to make difficult health and economic decisions on behalf of the community. It isn't people like me who are ignoring public health rules and advice. It isn't people like me who go to work sick, refuse to be tested, and object to wearing a mask. It isn't people like me who gather in social groups and spread Covid-19. The problem is that politicians haven't woken up to the fact that you can't herd ignorant egoists.

                                    • tpup1 on 26/08/2020 - 23:36
                                      -4

                                      @[Deactivated]: There are healthcare workers who have done this already. The coronavirus supplement has been pretty generous and available even if you voluntarily leave your work (not to mention this situation has been forced on tonnes of people). Try opening your mind.

                                      All I claimed you did was support the lockdowns, which are literally causing suffering to others and protecting you. So just keep spamming your bs about all the 'ignorant egoists', the irony is not lost on me

                                      • [Deactivated] on 27/08/2020 - 11:11

                                        @tpup1:

                                        All I claimed you did was support the lockdowns, which are literally causing suffering to others and protecting you.

                                        Three fundamental facts - 1) lockdowns aren't protecting me, I'm protecting myself; 2) you clearly have no concept of health workers' dedication and commitment to responsibilty towards others. Someone who still hasn't grasped those basics is in no position to advise heath workers what they can/can't/should/shouldn't do; 3) you believe your age/health will protect you but if not you can always rely on hospital staff.

                                        I support evidence-based decision making and unlike you I don't claim to have better knowledge and experience than those charged with the task. I also don't have to directly bear the consequences of taking those decisions for the greater good. Like 99.9……% of the population I'd like to see restrictions eased asap but I understand that because a small cohort of self-interested, ignorant, greedy, complacent , indifferent and sociopathic people exists - people who think they're not likely to be significantly compromised themselves - that's going to be extremely difficult and drawn out far more than it needs to be.

                                        The vast majority of us are fully aware of the huge issues plenty are facing - economic, social and mental stress related - but we're following advice and rules. Ignoring the numerous mistakes made by Fed and State governments and their agents, if everyone had done so we wouldn't be in this position. While you were sleeping govts eased restrictions, mindful of the effects on the economy and the populace in general. I'll leave you to find out what happened in Vic - and elsewhere - and why.

                  • mickeyjuiceman on 26/08/2020 - 14:37

                    @tpup1: People who only talk about "the death toll" and not about all of the well-documented problems that follow with a lof the "not dead" victims clearly aren't following along anything like closely enough to be keeping on posting about it.

      • tpup1 on 25/08/2020 - 19:26

        Maybe the restrictions will die down temporarily, but just look at Melbourne / NZ.

        • [Deactivated] on 25/08/2020 - 21:16

          May be a good idea to ask yourself why they're in place.

    • Chael Sonnen on 25/08/2020 - 15:03
      +11

      Show your support for common sense by downvoting the comment

    • sauce2k on 25/08/2020 - 15:23
      +4

      You are a gimp mate. Wear a mask

    • smartazz104 on 25/08/2020 - 15:42
      +2

      If only idiots who are upset by restrictions would just hurry up and become infected and bedridden, we wouldn’t have to read their tripe.

      • astarman on 25/08/2020 - 20:59
        +1

        they should also sign to not be intubated or treated - cos its a "99%" recovery or they might get microchipped in icu

    • merivetio on 25/08/2020 - 16:12

      Yes, show your support for more restrictions to keep the population safe, by wearing a mask.

    • tdw on 25/08/2020 - 16:40

      ooh we have Free Thinker royalty amongst us.

      even your avatar has more intelligence than you and wears a mask.

  • norkle on 25/08/2020 - 15:12

    While only 2 layers, I bought in the hope I can use them riding - better than nothing and 3 layers make me fog up.

  • first in line on 25/08/2020 - 15:15
    +6

    I think it's a bit weird to put branding on face mask.

  • squaredonut on 25/08/2020 - 15:15
    +2

    It's really funny, the reusable masks really does look like you've got a bra on your face.

    • Morven on 26/08/2020 - 00:14
      +1

      Half a sports bra.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join