This was posted 4 years 4 months 20 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • out of stock

50pk of 3 Layer Disposable Face Masks $19 with Free Shipping (Metro Areas) - Luxor Linen MyDeal

1677
50pk of 3 Layer Disposable Face Masks $19 with Free Shipping (Metro Areas) - Luxor Linen MyDealAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
Associatedmishmistake @ Luxor Linen on 15/07/2020 - 18:00 mydeal.com.au (11609 clicks)
Last edited 16/07/2020 - 15:43 by 2 other users
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Hey OZbargainers,

Just quickly wanted to share this, seems like a great price from one of our trusted sellers. Only $0.38 per mask

Local Aussie Stock with Fast Dispatch

50pk of 3 Layer Disposable Face Masks - Only $19 with Free Shipping (Metro Areas)

  • Aldi selling 50 pack for something around $30 and Chemist Warehouse is selling 50 pack for $49
Health & Beauty COVID-19 Surgical Mask

Related Stores

MyDeal.com.au
MyDeal.com.au
Marketplace
Luxor Linen
Luxor Linen

closed Comments

  • rinzlertaken on 15/07/2020 - 18:07
    +1

    Thanks OP.

  • bird380 on 15/07/2020 - 18:11
    +5

    Any details on bfe pfe vfe?

    • FatTofu on 15/07/2020 - 19:50

      If not medical/surgical blah blah, I wonder if they have BFE etc at all

  • Pringles666 on 15/07/2020 - 18:13
    +2

    Where are these made?

    • astarman on 15/07/2020 - 18:15
      +6

      Probably the same place as the diy tshirt masks

  • Digitalco on 15/07/2020 - 18:19
    +1

    Made in china?

    • gimme on 15/07/2020 - 18:27
      +12

      What do you think?

    • Herbse on 15/07/2020 - 18:39
      +11

      Does it matter? These are basic material masks, no risk of fake mask ratings

    • BlitzR on 15/07/2020 - 18:47
      +29

      Look at how they make make masks in India. https://youtu.be/KFziEl_GW18

      • frewer on 16/07/2020 - 00:45
        +1

        LOL, it is ok. The health official said it is ok to reuse the mask anyway. RIP health …

    • Scrobo on 15/07/2020 - 19:15
      -2

      The masks the testers are wearing at the COVID drive through testing are all made in Wuhan, I could read the label on the box from the car. Cracked me up.

      • ca6leguy on 15/07/2020 - 21:40
        +5

        At least they wear masks. To many don’t wear that why they end up at the drive through testing.

    • James Wong on 15/07/2020 - 19:35
      +27

      Look at how they make make masks in China. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCudSkIeqdM

      • mun4 on 15/07/2020 - 20:51
        +3

        Look at how they make (possibly used as per the title) masks in China https://youtu.be/7k7ogGUA-Po

        • James Wong on 15/07/2020 - 21:12

          Can't tell whether its china or any other country in the world. BTW, most "traditional Chinese" written titles are anti-china.

        • argo1230 on 15/07/2020 - 21:39
          +1

          how can you tell its in China though, the dude in the video were not even speaking chinese.

          • mun4 on 16/07/2020 - 00:01

            @argo1230: Look at the small shrine at 00:01. It's definitely somewhere with a strong Buddhist culture. Definitely not India, Indonesia, Philippines, etc. Of course, one could always try to argue that it's just Chinatown. You just have to think for yourself.

            Alternatively, here's news on toilet paper masks from pro-CCP sources: https://bit.ly/3fvTuNd

            • argo1230 on 16/07/2020 - 00:08
              +1

              @mun4: chill dude, there are many Asian countries have strong Buddhist culture. I have no doubt there are many similar dodgy underground places in China, i'm just saying this particular video might not shot in China.

              • mun4 on 16/07/2020 - 00:32
                -3

                @argo1230: Like I said, you just have to think for yourself. Technically, there's no definitive evidence about the source country of any video, but it can be deduced from an educated guess. For this one, it's very likely somewhere with a strong Buddhist culture and out of all major mask manufacturing countries in Asia (China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Japan, Korea), China and Taiwan are very much the only two. Also note the timing of the video — during the peak of the outbreak in China and the Wuhan lockdown. What's more interesting is the workers' attire, which seems to be suitable for temperature around 10C - 15C. For a mild winter in late Jan or early Feb, the latitude would be somewhere between 20N and 40N. Thus, it's almost beyond doubt that it's Central, Central Eastern or Southern China.

                • argo1230 on 16/07/2020 - 00:41
                  +4

                  @mun4: sorry dude, I just can't agree with you. I like how you jumped the conclusion that this video had to be shot in either mainland China and Taiwan. these workers were working in a tiny area, not much bigger than a home garage, and it could be literally anywhere in the world.

                  • mun4 on 16/07/2020 - 00:48
                    -4

                    @argo1230: No bother. I just presented my reasoning. Like I said, it's an educated guess, but the counter-argument would be relatively difficult to construct. Some could well think it's just Sussex St if they wish.

                  • mun4 on 16/07/2020 - 16:55
                    +1

                    @argo1230:

                    I like how you jumped the conclusion that this video had to be shot in either mainland China and Taiwan

                    If you grab yourself a map and lookup latitude 30N (average) or somewhere with mild winter during that time and a strong Buddhist culture, it can only be China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30th_parallel_north

    • endotherm on 15/07/2020 - 20:03
      +12

      Probably best to avoid Thailand, where they washed used masks, ironed them and sold them as new. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92TTXZe77E Extra points for not wearing gloves and liberal use of motorcycles and dogs in the work area.

    • [Deactivated] on 15/07/2020 - 20:46
      +5

      Nope. Made in Switzerland by retired Lindt Artisans. 99.99% Cacao filtration guaranteed.

      • dlovep on 16/07/2020 - 09:14

        hope it's not typo, made in Swaziland…

        • bex000 on 19/07/2020 - 11:29

          could this comment be possibly racist?

    • jaycasanova on 16/07/2020 - 11:04
      +1

      Your apple logo stick is made in China.

  • Melb69 on 15/07/2020 - 18:21

    Thanks OP

  • limafoxtrot on 15/07/2020 - 18:22
    +12

    That is extremely cheap - which automatically makes on suspicious about the quality.
    If you get them, see this video on some crude ways to test mask quality at home - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC0Hga10nbk
    It would be interesting if you reported back to the group on your findings!

    • mun4 on 15/07/2020 - 20:00
      +9

      Decent 3ply masks in China go for around $0.20 each. With shipping and overhead taken into account, I'd say don't bother with anything priced less than $0.50 each.

  • gimme on 15/07/2020 - 18:26

    If the claims are correct, looks good for the price. Grabbed one.

    • Tiggrrrrr on 15/07/2020 - 19:20
      +12

      Disposable masks are effective against filtration of infectious pathogens.

      definitely effective against filtration…

      • massafiri on 16/07/2020 - 10:13
        +1

        You're missing the point of wearing of mask, which is the reduction of infectious pathogens that YOU spread.
        The amount of viral load you're exposed to also matters, so if everyone wears a mask, it's extremely effective.

        • gimme on 16/07/2020 - 13:54

          shhhh don't say that… I bet most people assume it's the other way around, otherwise I'm pretty sure most won't wear it. Sad but true.

  • Ben Kenobi on 15/07/2020 - 18:27
    +12

    A lot of masks imported to Oz are faulty\fake Chinese crap and have been removed from the TGA lists https://www.tga.gov.au/post-market-review-face-masks-cancell…

  • OpayuOnam on 15/07/2020 - 18:27
    +2

    Well masks used to be $25/50pk in Aldi pre covid.
    And around $15/50pk wholesale.
    This does seem too cheap but I guess we shall see how it is.

    • Tiggrrrrr on 15/07/2020 - 19:21
      +1

      Depends what you need the masks for.
      I'm sure these are great for keeping out the pollution we will now be getting with extra cars on the road post lockdown.

    • desperate on 15/07/2020 - 20:02

      Saw some today at Aldi for that price

      • OpayuOnam on 16/07/2020 - 12:29

        My ALDI just stocked some masks for $29 now.

        Anyways I will be tearing one of these masks open and see what the quality is.

    • TigerWoops on 15/07/2020 - 21:12

      Even Costco sells 50 pack masks for 49 dollars. Wonder why these are too cheap…

    • Breamo808 on 15/07/2020 - 21:33

      pre-covid. Quality masks that are used by dentist sold for $5 for a box of 50. Now the same masks are selling for $50. Not complaining. It is what it is.

  • Lancerx on 15/07/2020 - 18:32

    What is the spec?

  • cheapbloke on 15/07/2020 - 18:33
    -1

    Miniso is selling a 10 pack for $5. That is, if you can find stock.

    • skido on 15/07/2020 - 18:36
      +30

      we're like 7 months into this thing and you still don't see how masks are useful and necessary?

      • This Guy on 15/07/2020 - 19:22
        +1

        "These masks"

        They are advertised as breathable dust and fluid masks.

        They are better than no face covering, but so is a tee shirt.

        • KangaDrew on 15/07/2020 - 19:32

          Actually, that's incorrect. The weave for cotton and cotton/poly blend t-shirts is much larger.

          • This Guy on 15/07/2020 - 19:34
            +3

            @KangaDrew: Did you read what I wrote? I said both a tee shirt and a no name non rated mask are better than no face covering. I did not compare the two.

            • KangaDrew on 15/07/2020 - 19:42
              +5

              @This Guy: Ahhh, yes, my mistake. I did misread what you wrote, sorry :-)

              • This Guy on 15/07/2020 - 19:49
                +2

                @KangaDrew: Sorry for being aggressive. This is a very important topic with poor messaging from our leadership.

                • KangaDrew on 15/07/2020 - 21:20
                  +4

                  @This Guy: Nah mate, no worries! You're absolutely correct though. There is way too much misinformation out there, and sadly, way too many lemmings jumping over the cliff.

    • Godric on 15/07/2020 - 18:36
      +1

      Ok Doc

    • dixy on 15/07/2020 - 18:37
      +2

      U came forward.

    • plmko on 15/07/2020 - 18:39
      +4

      Don't listen to this garbage.

      Zero proof here but yet willing to call out statements with zero proof.

    • craigd on 15/07/2020 - 18:40
      +7

      Viruses don't just float around on their own, they travel with water droplets which do get stopped by masks. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/11/fac…

        • craigd on 15/07/2020 - 18:53
          +6

          Just the first link I found. Is the CDC more credible?
          https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-si…

          • Tiggrrrrr on 15/07/2020 - 19:24
            +2

            @craigd: "Cloth face coverings may help prevent people who have COVID-19 from spreading the virus to others."

            Nowhere in this "article" does it say that they protect YOU from OTHERS with COVID-19, unless THEY are also wearing a mask.

            i.e. "However, the protective effects—how well the cloth face covering protects healthy people from breathing in the virus—are unknown"

        • R-Man on 16/07/2020 - 08:51

          Ok boomer

      • Tiggrrrrr on 15/07/2020 - 19:28

        These are not N95 filters.

    • pork chop on 15/07/2020 - 18:42
      +7

      Any mask is better than no mask. While your argument stating this mask offers 'literally useless' in your own words because it has no REAL protection, what is your justifications? The highest rate protection is N95 and as I understand, the general publics does not require N95 mask.

      • Tiggrrrrr on 15/07/2020 - 19:31

        "Any mask is better than no mask"

        Maybe you need to tell the Health Department that?

      • BartholemewH on 16/07/2020 - 02:40

        N99 is technically the highest rated disposable mask.

    • ExtraSalt on 15/07/2020 - 18:44
      +4

      well no, its not completely 'useless'. nor are they 'literally, literally useless'. Yes the particles are smaller than what the N95 is capable of catching but was it also not said that it's rare that the COVID19 strain would not be taxiing off other larger particles? thus the N95's efficiency would be back into play.

      Yes they are not a 100% preventative but nobody is saying that it is. the suggestion is to wear them in areas where 1.5m distancing is not an option or in busy areas where it may fluctuate quite a bit. It's a preventative…much like that Flu shot you take annually. that's not a cure, thats just several strains that scientists think we are most at risk that season.

      Just chill mate

      • This Guy on 15/07/2020 - 19:45

        That's not how N95 masks work. They are tested against a Sodium Chloride vapour. This is what is what they let 5% of though. Think pesticides like roundup, which may or may not cause diseases with large exposures.

        I have seen numbers like 99% or greater efficiency for covid thrown around for properly fitted N95 respirators. I have not seen any proper studies yet (and would not expect respectable studies in this area for a few more months at least) but I am also not looking (except for a quick google to see if I was missing anything before posting this comment). I am also unsure if this research is needed as I thought N95 efficiency with smaller vapour particles was already known (hence MDS's can give hours of N95 use before a filter needs changing).

        But I am not a chemist, sooooo…

    • bargainwhore on 15/07/2020 - 18:47
      +4

      Dont know where the circus is but the clown's right here.

    • wombat1955 on 15/07/2020 - 18:59
      +5

      That may be, but those particles are usually distributed in droplets when someone sneezes or coughs. Those droplets can be contained in these masks, thereby reducing the risk of transmission. Used in conjunction with physical distancing and regular hand washing or sanitising, makes these a reasonable option.

    • FLICKIT on 15/07/2020 - 19:28

      Maybe you could school us? put us on the right path?
      (don't forget to provide links to credible information)

    • KangaDrew on 15/07/2020 - 19:30

      There's an award/badge for Most Popular Comment when you get 30 upvotes.

      Is there an award for Most UNpopular Comment when you get 30 downvotes?

      There's a solid reason why you're sitting at -36 at the time of me writing this, but based on your way of thinking, you'll never truly understand the reason why… smh

      • sauce2k on 15/07/2020 - 22:27
        -1

        Man you are so dumb lol. I see these news about people being retarded not give a fk about covid then end up either in icu or dead. You could be next.

        • KangaDrew on 16/07/2020 - 15:30
          +1

          You do realise I was replying to drazenm's comment, right?

    • This Guy on 15/07/2020 - 20:10

      Mate. Stop. Breath.

      A fresh, correctly fitted P2 or N95 with 1.5 metre social distancing almost eliminates all risk.

      A fresh, correctly fitted P2 or N95 mask or 1.5 meter social distancing greatly reduces risk of transmission but can not eliminate it.

      A fresh face covering, a cloth or a used P2/N95 is better than nothing but is nowhere near as efficient as just social distancing or a fresh P2 or N95 mask.

      A P2/N95 surgical mask has a barrier that helps stop streams of vapours, but we should really be leaving them for our health care professionals who have to get within 1.5 metres of infected people. The rest of the PPE they wear is to further reduce the risk of both infection and spread.

    • astarman on 15/07/2020 - 20:24
      +2

      even if it doesnt protect yourself, youre protecting others from yourself

    • Freestyle on 16/07/2020 - 00:44

      idiot

    • plmko on 15/07/2020 - 18:40
      +2

      So you're going to throw your shirt in the bin everyday?

      • Mokr on 15/07/2020 - 18:47
        +6

        No just wash it

    • FrugalNotStingy on 15/07/2020 - 19:33

      Every style of N95 from any different brands and model needs a proper fit test. If there is a gap between the N95 and the wearer’s face then it can be more dangerous than without a mask because the wearer thinks they are protected.

      Everybody’s face shape and size is different so not everyone suits wearing N95 masks.

      • This Guy on 15/07/2020 - 19:47
        +1

        The advice is social distance with a mask.

        The messaging I have received personally is rubbish.

  • hashtagbargain on 15/07/2020 - 18:44
    +10

    Sneaky website, the word medical is blurred in the photos. Must be trash quality.

  • brian77 on 15/07/2020 - 18:45
    +7

    Decided to take a punt. It qualifies for the AMEX Shop Small program, so use AMEX if you can for those who have saved the Shop Small deal!

    • captain smash on 15/07/2020 - 18:54
      +3

      So it is! Confirmed email. thanks!

      • brian77 on 15/07/2020 - 19:28

        No worries, all good. Hopefully the masks are also good lol

    • captain smash on 15/07/2020 - 18:51
      +7

      I listen to medical advice from OzBargain like I do legal advice…

      • nahkk on 17/07/2020 - 19:58

        How can you ignore financial and relationship advice?

    • klonky on 15/07/2020 - 18:54
      +23

      Loosen your mask mate, it's cutting off the circulation to your brain.

    • FlatulentFrank on 15/07/2020 - 18:55
      +9

      If you're that adamant on conspiracy theories you owe it to yourself to educate yourself through reputable sources and information on whatever nonsense you've found to be 'true' - it's really hard seeing such passion from people that don't go to any effort to validate such strong opinions.

      • seamonkey on 15/07/2020 - 19:00
        +1

        The only opinions I listen to is anything recommended by Alex Jones.

        • FlatulentFrank on 15/07/2020 - 19:02

          Internet Comment Etiquette (Youtuber) has an interesting take on this fellow i think you'll enjoy

    • AFAR85 on 15/07/2020 - 19:04
      +2

      Stuff protection.
      If they help prevention and gives someone a 1% chance of not getting Covid as you walk past then I'm all for it.

    • [Deactivated] on 15/07/2020 - 19:30
      +2

      Ancient news @drazenm, which you'd know if you spent more time reading and absorbing credible information in lieu of swallowing garbage from conspiracy websites. Google SARS MERS (also corona viruses) and immerse yourself in some of the research on how corona viruses spread. Aerosol transmission has always been a likely factor. There's a lot more to be be learnt but it appears that masks may help limit aerosol release and intake. Here's a VERY basic discussion of aerosol transmission with differing views from experts: https://www.smh.com.au/national/how-a-chinese-restaurant-exp…

    • ti6331 on 15/07/2020 - 19:33

      Hongkong University has made experiments proving masks help to stop spreading if virus. Especially medical staff and age care workers.

    • KangaDrew on 15/07/2020 - 19:38
      +3

      I wish I could be as as woke as you. You must get your tin foil information from Q Anon and YouTube?

      And you you think we're the sheep? lol

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join