This was posted 6 years 2 months 7 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Xiaomi Smart4u SH50 Cycling Helmet for Children & Adult US $39.98 (~AU $56.16) Delivered @ DD4

112
Xiaomi Smart4u SH50 Cycling Helmet for Children & Adult US $39.98 (~AU $56.16) Delivered @ DD4
Go to Deal
MarketingMaxCooler on 15/10/2018 - 20:09 dd4.com (1271 clicks)
Last edited 16/10/2018 - 01:27 by 1 other user
MI4UMET4

Xiaomi Smart4u SH50 Smart City Commuter Bling Helmet

PC shell for great impact resistance which will become spider mesh rather than debris and EPS foam for great buffer action, dual protection ensures great safety during sports. Super lightweight with 12 intake and outlet air vents for a comfortable wearing experience.

Feature:
PROTECTIVE: Integrated PC shell for great impact resistance and EPS foam for great buffer action, dual protection ensures great safety during sports.
VENTILATED: 12 intake and exhaust vents create an air circulation system to keep the head cool and comfortable.
COMFORTABLE LINING: Superior absorbent and washable lining for comfortable wearing experience and detachable for cleaning.
SAFETY TAILLIGHT: Built-in rechargeable taillight with tidal lighting, strobe and fast flash, and automatically sense the brightness of environment and lighting for safety, and lasting lighting for about 36 hours.
ADJUSTABLE: Rotate the adjustor for proper tightness and head circumference is 22.4-24.0in(L) / 21.2-22.8in(M) .
LIGHTWEIGHT: Only 13.2oz ultralight does not add extra weight on your head for freely cycling and other sports.

White, Black (L):
Shell size: 275 * 214 * 159mm
—for Head Circumference 57-61cm

Red, Blue (M):
Shell size: 282 * 224 * 160mm
—for Head Circumference: 54-58cm

There will be a pleasing experience with this helmet during cycling, riding, roller skating and skateboarding.

Have a good shopping time on www.dd4.com. Any question be free to let us know!

Sports & Outdoors Bicycle Helmet Xiaomi

Related Stores

DD4
DD4
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • Unacceptable on 15/10/2018 - 20:14

    I will consider if there is XL size.

    • MarketingMaxCooler @ DD4 on 15/10/2018 - 20:16

      They only have 2 size

      • klownvandamn on 15/10/2018 - 20:47
        +1

        He has a BIG head!

      • boonhowe on 16/10/2018 - 00:33

        Too big and Too small :)

  • seedyrom on 15/10/2018 - 20:14
    +4

    If you’ve got a $50 head, use a $50 helmet

    • MarketingMaxCooler @ DD4 on 15/10/2018 - 20:19

      Treatment costs would be more than $50 if you head injuries….

      • cruiseronroad on 15/10/2018 - 20:21
        +6

        I think what seedyrom is trying to say that he values his head more than $50.

  • CheapDave on 15/10/2018 - 20:25
    +18

    In most if not all states a bike helmet needs to have a sticker showing it is safety approved and meets the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2063.

    Pretty sure this one wont so if you get checked you can be fined for not wearing an approved helmet.

    • Maverick-au on 15/10/2018 - 20:32
      +9

      In most if not all states a bike helmet needs to have a sticker showing it is safety approved and meets the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2063.

      And you can have an old POS helmet but it's OK as it has a sticker.

      Pretty sure this one wont so if you get checked you can be fined for not wearing an approved helmet.

      I expect nothing less from the nanny country where we have high death rates in areas like electrical and roads but it's OK as we'll continue to enforce laws that do nothing to reduce death rates.

      • RockyRaccoon on 15/10/2018 - 22:19
        +9

        Its not just death rates, it head injuries. Dead is dead, just bury them and move on. A serious head injury can be a lifetime sentence.

        The "nanny state"saved me a major head injury. Didn't save the helmet which was fractured badly. So I guess personally I am happy Nanny was there!

        • Maverick-au on 15/10/2018 - 23:20

          Its not just death rates, it head injuries. Dead is dead, just bury them and move on. A serious head injury can be a lifetime sentence.

          Why does Australia have higher death and injury rates in many areas? Is it because people think that if they follow the requirement they will be safe no matter how they act on the road?

          The "nanny state"saved me a major head injury. Didn't save the helmet which was fractured badly. So I guess personally I am happy Nanny was there!

          Your safety is your responsibility. You can make the decisions that keep you safe. Rather than the government saying you must wear a helmet and you'll be safe why not educate and train so you can decide what level of risk you're prepared to take? So if you're riding on the footpath in a park you don't wear a helmet etc but if you decide to ride at 11/10th's on the road you take appropriate steps.

          Legislation does nothing, we have a high road toll because we have a government that relies on speed cameras with little enforcement of other laws instead of appropriate speed limits and driver training, our electrical deaths are much higher than other equivalent countries because we once again don't educate and say any work is illegal and in this case our bicycle riders die and are injured at higher rates for similar reasons.

          Is this helmet safe? Most likely yes and it's up to the individual to decide if they think it's suitable for them. Do we need Australian Standards for many things? No as there are international standards that cover the same products and nearly always Australian Standards fall way behind like EU vehicle standards and baby seats.

          • jackspratt on 16/10/2018 - 01:36
            +2

            @Maverick-au: So endeth the lesson for today.

          • robberbutton on 16/10/2018 - 09:09
            +1

            @Maverick-au:

            we have a high road toll

            High compared to what? We're 16th out of 187 countries for road deaths (wiki - per 100k motor vehicles)

            Rather than the government saying you must wear a helmet and you'll be safe why not educate and train so you can decide what level of risk you're prepared to take?

            Because the Government will be the ones paying when you crack your skull open, so they have a vested interest in keeping you safe.

            our electrical deaths are much higher than other equivalent countries

            I struggled to find any sort of citation for or against this, so would love to see how you confirmed this.

    • quickling on 15/10/2018 - 20:33
      +6

      Completely correct and for this reason should be avoided. Negging until told otherwise.

      • [Deactivated] on 15/10/2018 - 21:08

        But Chinese design quality is much more rigorous than Australian regulations /s

        • Make it so on 15/10/2018 - 22:12

          Yes, but that's not the point. You may be liable for your own medical costs after an accident if your helmet was not compliant.

          • [Deactivated] on 15/10/2018 - 22:18
            +1

            @Make it so: /s

          • Maverick-au on 15/10/2018 - 23:21
            -1

            @Make it so:

            Yes, but that's not the point. You may be liable for your own medical costs after an accident if your helmet was not compliant.

            Yeah sure, this is Australia where even the most stupid people get massive payouts and care for their stupidity.

    • heyimsu on 15/10/2018 - 21:32
      +2

      So you reckon my 30 year old Stackhat is safer than this?

    • altomic on 15/10/2018 - 22:25

      Queensland - Queensland Road Rules—Section 256(1) - The rider of a bicycle must wear an approved bicycle helmet securely fitted and fastened on the rider’s head.
      Maximum penalty—20 penalty units.

      though, unlike other "approved" devices under the Road Rules act- e.g. motorcycle helmet, there is not definition of what defines an "approved" bicycle helmet.

      if we examine the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (QLD) then there is no definition of what constitutes "Approved".

      thus it may be argued that the term "Approved" is undefined and therefore the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2063 is not necessarily the "approved" standard.

      therefore , the requirement to only wear a helmet that is "fitted and fastened" is only required to avoid a fine - the context of it being "approved" is untested and not defined by legislation.

      the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2063 is not a requirement of the usage of the helmet, it is a requirement for the sale of helmets.

      • CheapDave on 15/10/2018 - 22:35
        -1

        Taken from: https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/safety/rules/wheeled-device…

        Bicycle helmets
        When you ride a bicycle, motorised foot scooter or a personal mobility device like a segway, you must wear an Australian Standard (AS) approved bicycle helmet. You must securely fit and fasten it. An approved bicycle helmet means a helmet that complies with AS 2063 or AS/NZS 2063.

        • altomic on 15/10/2018 - 22:44

          where does it say that in the Act? the actual "enforceable by the courts" Act.

        • Maverick-au on 15/10/2018 - 23:09

          When you ride a bicycle, motorised foot scooter or a personal mobility device like a segway, you must wear an Australian Standard (AS) approved bicycle helmet. You must securely fit and fasten it. An approved bicycle helmet means a helmet that complies with AS 2063 or AS/NZS 2063.

          The website text means nothing as atomic pointed out.

            • altomic on 16/10/2018 - 00:07

              @whooah1979: that's about wearing a hat Vs wearing a helmet.

              • whooah1979 on 16/10/2018 - 00:11

                @altomic: wearing a hat as a protective headgear without an AS/NZS 2063:2008 sticker isn't an approved bicycle helmet.

                • altomic on 16/10/2018 - 00:13

                  @whooah1979: show me where it says that in the legislation. in any legislation.

                  • whooah1979 on 16/10/2018 - 00:16

                    @altomic: it's already in case law. the sa dpp may now use this case for all future prosecutions.

                    • altomic on 16/10/2018 - 00:19

                      @whooah1979: that is an appeal regarding a fine/charge over not wearing a helmet and wearing a hat instead.

                      wearing a hat is not wearing a helmet.

                      and vice versa

                      the SA legislation requires the use of a helmet whilst riding a bicycle.

                      as to the AS/NZS 2063:2008 requirement of a helmet that you are wearing - please show me where it says that in the legislation. in any legislation.

                      my point is-
                      whilst the legislation states "approved helmet", I am focusing on the "approved". what is the definition of approved under the legislation?
                      the AS/NZS 2063:2008 is the Fair Trading Act "definition" of the minimum quality standard for helmets that are being sold-subject to certain exclusions - e.g. racing helmets that have clearly defined warnings.
                      No where does it say that you must wear a AS/NZS 2063:2008 approved helmet. The AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES act talks about having to wear an approved helmet but fails to provide a definition of "approved".

      • whooah1979 on 15/10/2018 - 22:54

        it is a requirement for the sale of helmets.

        overseas retailers selling goods to australian consumers are subject to australian laws. the abf may not be able to prosecute overseas retailers, but they've the power to seize the goods and have it destroyed.

        https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/regulation/2000/520/id…

        https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2009C01271

  • hitman47 on 15/10/2018 - 20:31
    +5

    RoboCop called, he wants his helmet back

  • klownvandamn on 15/10/2018 - 20:49

    I will wait for V2 with headlight and indicator feature with connectivity to the mi cloud.

    • [Deactivated] on 15/10/2018 - 21:08
      +2

      And ban..

      oh forget it

      • Xiaomi on 15/10/2018 - 21:18

        d

        • [Deactivated] on 15/10/2018 - 21:29
          +1

          28

  • SBOB on 15/10/2018 - 20:56
    +11

    This helmet adds IPX4 supporting the corrosion of the water.

    good.. i hate helmets who dont support corrosion of the water

  • Sage on 15/10/2018 - 22:18
    +1

    Gotta love the way Xiaomi needlessly adds technology to every day items.

  • marquise on 15/10/2018 - 23:55

    This is great for anyone dressing up as a cylon for Halloween!

  • eDust on 16/10/2018 - 09:44
    +2

    I'm also downvoting this helmet because it doesn't comply with AS/NZS 2063.

    It doesn't matter if you think it's good or not, it's just not legal to use here for cycling.

    More info here from the ACCC

    • MarketingMaxCooler @ DD4 on 16/10/2018 - 13:07

      Thanks for your note. We will take it into consideration

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join