This was posted 7 years 1 month 25 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • out of stock

[Perth] 6x Free Tickets to the $1.45 Billion Perth Stadium Open Day

820
[Perth] 6x Free Tickets to the $1.45 Billion Perth Stadium Open Day
Go to Deal
PissLUR on 06/11/2017 - 15:02 perthstadium.com.au (2877 clicks)
Last edited 10/11/2017 - 12:33 by 2 other users

Ticket-holders will be the first to test out the stadium, take in views of the city and the Swan River and watch an audio-visual show displaying the venue's two giant screens – the largest of their type in the southern hemisphere.

Families can enjoy the nature playgrounds in the Chevron Parkland and sample entertainment, live music and food.

The tickets will entitle first-time viewers to free public transport to and from the Open Day, giving them a preview of world-class bus and train facilities.

Edit 10/11: 20,000 more tickets will be available at 10am WA time.

Sports & Outdoors Australia Perth Perth Stadium Western Australia

Related Stores

perthstadium.com.au
perthstadium.com.au

closed Comments

  • 4tran on 06/11/2017 - 15:07
    +14

    Probably closer to 1.6 billion

    • justtoreply on 06/11/2017 - 15:24
      +12

      That's the footbridge.

  • nartoab on 06/11/2017 - 15:41
    +1

    That's pretty cheap for a stadium

    • Make it so on 06/11/2017 - 15:44

      Yeah, it's basically a lawn surrounded by collapsible chairs from Officeworks, all paid for by our share of the GST :)

      P.S. adjusted title to say "Billion", nor "Million", for those wondering about the original remark.

    • MrZ on 07/11/2017 - 00:07

      Then why did Sydney's Olympic stadium only cost 700 million? Even adjusting for inflation over 18 years, that's well under 1 billion in today's dollars.

      • Make it so on 08/11/2017 - 19:00

        When is the last time you went shopping in WA?

  • Hypnotoad on 06/11/2017 - 15:57

    Awesome stadium - I'm jealous!

  • neil on 06/11/2017 - 16:05
    +2

    This was at the top of Reddit Videos the other day. Awesome lighting display.

  • DU99 on 06/11/2017 - 16:08
    +1

    Does the roof close for that price

    • Vool on 06/11/2017 - 17:07
      +2

      There is no roof, just a shade cloth.

    • Viper8 on 06/11/2017 - 17:34

      It doesn't rain often in Perth.
      Also its quite rare for a stadium of this size to have a closing roof. Very rare actually.

      • gasman70 on 06/11/2017 - 21:43
        +3

        I actually LOL’d at that remark. The weather is good now but we’ve had loads of rain over the last few months.

        • Viper8 on 06/11/2017 - 21:45

          Yea, it rains in winter, doesn't rain for the rest of the year.
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perth#Climate
          The number of rain days for most of the year is close enough to zero.

        • gasman70 on 06/11/2017 - 21:48
          -1

          @Viper8:

          But rain is hardly a rarity, as stated. It’s pissed down all winter.

          I was actually shocked to read that it’s actually wetter than London.

        • Viper8 on 06/11/2017 - 21:52

          @gasman70:
          Yes, but the total number of rain days is significantly less than England, and therefore the likelihood of it raining on any given day is significantly lower.

        • gasman70 on 06/11/2017 - 22:14
          -1

          @Viper8:

          Yes, I get it. It’s rains harder over fewer days…….but the past few months have not really followed this pattern.

          AFL is a winter sport.

        • Assclown on 07/11/2017 - 01:44
          +1

          @gasman70:
          Don't get me started on how West Australians react to a little bit of rain….please lol

    • get-innocuous on 06/11/2017 - 22:57
      +2

      we prefer not to play football in glorified aircraft hangers, thanks

  • The Hobo on 06/11/2017 - 16:18

    So this is just free transport to and from?

    It's an open day - everyone has free entry?

    • PissLUR on 06/11/2017 - 16:19
      +3

      anyone with a ticket can get free entry.

  • bargaino on 06/11/2017 - 17:02
    +2

    Holds 60,000 people. Take that Brisbane. We're number three!!!!

    It is a bit controversial due to the state debt, which is heading for $40 billion, while NSW is almost debt free.
    Stamp-duty on million-dollar average Sydney house prices helps, as does pokie revenue and toll roads.

    • raybies on 06/11/2017 - 17:27
      +9

      And the fact that we take their GST, and share their mining royalties. If WA secede suddenly they'd be rich and half Australia would be moving over for all the new government jobs.

      • Tiggrrrrr on 06/11/2017 - 18:49
        +1

        Heaven forbid you are criticising the extremely fair GST redistribution system…

      • Meconium on 06/11/2017 - 22:29
        +3

        WA has been a net recipient of tax money throughout most of Federation’s history, and only a net donor a few times when there have been brief mining booms of one sort or another. There is no provision for a state to secede in the constitution. It takes more than a few mining dollars to run a country, let alone defend and police vast amounts of territory and run the economy fairly.

        It’s a wide brown land we live on, and it may feel like the two major cities and the capital are far away at times, but WA is better off in than out. But they are welcome to speculate all they like about being independent - the arguments for it though are pretty poor and based on misinformation.

        • Matslurpee on 07/11/2017 - 07:20
          +1

          Thank you for talking sense, some of the people on here live in fantasy land.

        • Tiggrrrrr on 07/11/2017 - 12:36

          Do you have any references for the historic tax distribution? I for one would be very interested to see the historical distribution and how it has averaged itself out over the years.

          To clarify, I'm not being sarcastic or argumentative. Just I keep reading about this "seventy years of revenue" before the mining boom, but no-one seems to put any clear figures of a state by state breakdown over that time.

          I found this link which gives metrics for GST redistribution for 2000 to 2017; however this gives the average GST ratio as:

          NSW: 0.93
          Vic: 0.90
          Qld: 1.01
          WA: 0.77
          SA: 1.22
          Tas: 1.60
          ACT: 1.18
          NT: 4.78

          Then if you factor in actual GST revenues (note metrics only available for 2007-2016):

          NSW: 0.95
          Vic: 0.91
          Qld: 0.99
          WA: 0.62
          SA: 1.25
          Tas: 1.63
          ACT: 1.21
          NT: 5.17

          So for the last 17 years it indicates that WA on average comes out the worst. And in terms of actual dollars from 2007 to 2016 even lower.

          Hence historical distribution of other taxes would be great information to put this into perspective.

        • Meconium on 07/11/2017 - 14:43

          @Tiggrrrrr: Greg Jericho, economist, former federal public servant and political blogger (Grog's Gamut) wrote the following piece for the ABC and provided evidence going back to federation. As certain graphs show, the past 17 years have seen a major deviation from the norm for WA due to the resources boom. If this were to continue for several decades to come, WA may have a stronger case for independence or at least a separate fiscal policy for that state. Historical data suggests, however, that they are better off within the federation. In fact, all states are - that's why we decided to federate in the first place!

          http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-15/jericho-western-austra…

        • raybies on 07/11/2017 - 16:52

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Australian_states_and_…

          GSP per capita (A$, 2013–14)
          New South Wales 66,966
          Victoria 60,413
          Queensland 63,209
          Western Australia 107,247
          South Australia 58,253
          ACT 89,975
          Tasmania 49,329
          NT 92,107

        • Tiggrrrrr on 07/11/2017 - 17:23
          +1

          @Meconium:

          Can I just note that I merely commented on the fact that the GST distribution has not been evenly distributed (based on a dollar raised, dollar received ratio).

          Frankly secession is a crackpot idea.

          But a quick look at the article and the linked data indicates that the although the graphs in the article stop at 2013 (WA = 0.65), the ratio drops to 0.54 in 2014 and again to 0.39 in 2015. Who knows what it will be for 2016/2017?

          Also the article is somewhat biased in that it does not consider the actual dollar per capita revenue, which currently sits at $2253 in NSW, $2131 in Vic and $939 in WA. In 1970 it was $79 in NSW, $78 in Vic, and $132 in WA.

          Now considering AU$100 in 1970 was worth AU$1000 in 2015, this changes the figures to (1970/2017):

          NSW: $790 / $2253
          VIC: $780 / $2131
          WA: $1320 / $939

          So explain again using REAL figures how the past 70 years negates the current inequity?

          So whereas the conclusion in the article (published 2015) that the distribution was "fair" in 2013 does have some merit (although if you run the actual numbers it does not), it doesn't hold true in 2017 given the continued decline in $/capita. Also given the Federal Government has stated there will be no further relief for WA, and the growing population I can't imagine any improvement for the next 3 years.

          It is no wonder that our economy is screwed if this is what passes for economic justification. Greg Jericho is reputed for using skewed statistics. Just review his take on a Flat Rate Taxation system for instance.

          But I'll shut up now, given I'm a left wing socialist who is against negative gearing and tax minimisation.

        • Meconium on 07/11/2017 - 17:31

          @Tiggrrrrr: I don’t think he’s too far off in that article when he says this:

          The only reason WA is getting less now is because of that mining boom you may have heard about. That has massively increased WA's capacity to raise its revenue, and as a result the Commonwealth Grants Commission has massively cut back its share of GST.

          Now sure, Western Australians might think they are being penalised for being successful, just as they may also think that success is due to their great skill in living on top of a shirt load of iron ore. But being part of a nation means that when you have been relying on other states for the better part of a century, and then the times come good, you also return the favour.

          The way I see it is that they’re not being given an equitable amount of GST relative to population… for the last ten years or so. Never mind that they were a net recipient (and a major one) throughout the 20th century.

          Don’t forget the other taxes states can collect - payroll tax and stamp duty, both of which increase when prosperity increases and land values follow. WA’s Doug all right - this is a state vs commonwealth thing, political posturing really. Good thing they’re investing in this magnificent stadium!

        • Tiggrrrrr on 07/11/2017 - 18:15
          +2

          @Meconium:

          What can I say? The WA Government is a cashed up bogan that likes to spend money on flashy new toys without considering that their may be a time when their fortunes turn.

        • ilikeradiohead on 10/11/2017 - 13:55
          +1

          One of the reasons for the formation of the Commonwealth Grants Commission in the 1930s was that the imposition of punitive tariffs (to support east coast manufacturing) made WA agricultural exports very uncompetitive/unviable and lowered incomes, with redistribution brought in to quiet secessionist discontent (didn't work, we voted to secede haha). It's impossible to say what would have happened otherwise, but it's not simply a case of WA being a mendicant state throughout most of Australia's existence, then suddenly crying poor when it has hit a mineral boom/Chinese demand jackpot.

          It's also not simply a matter of GST redistribution. WA has higher incomes and higher employment than average, but receives below average commonwealth government spending on services (eg lower unemployment = less centerlink funds flowing this way).

        • Meconium on 10/11/2017 - 20:52

          @ilikeradiohead: Fair points.

    • MrZ on 07/11/2017 - 00:08

      60,000 people, and… 0 cars. Is Wikipedia correct - the stadium doesn't so much as even have a car park?!

      • petestrash on 07/11/2017 - 11:09

        Correct. The station has 6 platforms to clear the crowds in 30 minutes.

        • MrZ on 07/11/2017 - 11:17
          -1

          And what does this have to do my comment about there being no car parking?

        • bargaino on 07/11/2017 - 12:12

          See http://www.pta.wa.gov.au/projects/current-projects/perth-sta…

          That diagram shows they expect less than half the crowd to use the train, and will take over an hour to clear.

          They expect 23,000 to walk across the bridges, and 8000 to take buses.

        • petestrash on 08/11/2017 - 13:32
          +1

          @MrZ: Your question asked if wikipedia is correct. I answered that it was… can't see the confusion.

        • MrZ on 08/11/2017 - 13:54

          @petestrash:

          I'm referring to the second sentence in your reply.

        • petestrash on 09/11/2017 - 02:46

          @MrZ:
          Ok sure, the second sentence was the government justification as to why there was no parking at the stadium. People are supposed to park at their nearest train station and catch a train. They built the biggest station in Perth just for stadium use.

        • MrZ on 11/11/2017 - 22:26

          @petestrash:

          You can't tell people what they're "supposed" to do, it just doesn't work. This country has a lot to learn from the USA. Typically, stadiums there have at least 20,000 parking spaces, usually sprawled out over 100 or more acres. They're usually built in areas further from the city where land is cheap.

      • Tiggrrrrr on 07/11/2017 - 13:03

        "The Northern Oval in the north is available for public use on non-event days, as well as providing event-day parking."

        "The yet-to-be-completed $91.5 million Swan River Footbridge will shift nearly 14,300 people on game day across the river to carparks and bus shuttles."

        “There will be some parking near train stations and people can use the special event shuttles to get to these parking areas”

        Yeah. It's going to be a shambles day 1.

      • ilikeradiohead on 10/11/2017 - 13:56

        It has something like 2,000 bays. It's been designed to be public transport focussed.

    • Diji1 on 10/11/2017 - 13:11

      Here I was thinking WA had all these lovely mining resources … oh wait, yeah, this is Australia where the largest mining businesses pay almost no tax whilst they remove the common wealth.

      Do not vote for Liberal or Labour if you want this to continue.

  • thydzik on 06/11/2017 - 17:08

    thanks.

  • wengerboy on 06/11/2017 - 17:21
    +1

    Looks amazing, going to be the 2nd best maybe the best if it has good atmosphere. As a football fan, I'm envious of the AFL/cricket stadiums.

  • raybies on 06/11/2017 - 17:28
    -7

    All that money to watch people running after a ball???? And people think I'm retarded for wasting money on my racing quads (drones).

    • hoxygt on 06/11/2017 - 18:12

      No you pay extra for that! Does anyone know (want to try estimating) the worth of that real estate in Subi?

  • hoxygt on 06/11/2017 - 18:11
    +1

    Is it really a deal though, us Sandgropers have already paid. In fact if you count the minerals that paid for this all Aussies have paid a share.

    Ok time for the grouch to sit down.

    • bargaino on 06/11/2017 - 18:37
      +8

      No, the minerals money was blown elsewhere years ago. This is funded on pure debt.

  • Tiggrrrrr on 06/11/2017 - 18:53
    +2

    Although this sounds like a great way to waste an entire day, I think I'll wait and see it when not surrounded by thousands of screaming bogans and their wives/kids.

    I'm almost 100% certain I'll get a chance to have a look around at some point. (Don't worry Richard, I still plan to visit the Bell Tower at some point too. Honest. And Elizabeth Quay.)

    • animal on 06/11/2017 - 19:00

      Let me know what they’re like and I might finally go see them too.

    • ilikeradiohead on 06/11/2017 - 19:16
      +2

      I think I'll wait and see it when not surrounded by thousands of screaming bogans and their wives/kids

      Better not go to a Freo game then.

      • Assclown on 07/11/2017 - 01:46
        +1

        Or Eagles lol

    • Hunter14 on 07/11/2017 - 00:10

      To be fair Elizabeth Quay has potential. At it's current state, it's mediocre but if they expand it and put more restaurants, attractions, and events then it could be spectacular. We should be copying Singapore's design and not just do a half assed job and leave it. The Bell Tower though. Lawl. Nothing can save that joke of a decision.

      • Tiggrrrrr on 07/11/2017 - 13:11
        +2

        Isn't a half arsed job what WA does best?

        • Hunter14 on 07/11/2017 - 19:44

          Yes it is. That's why I'm pleasantly surprised by the Perth Stadium. Looks good from what I've seen but yet to see it close up.

  • swalloweda on 06/11/2017 - 19:04
    +1

    Will 'The Doctor' still be able to get in?

    • Tiggrrrrr on 06/11/2017 - 19:32

      Probably not, but I'm sure the mosquitoes can though.

  • AlextheMeertkat on 06/11/2017 - 19:37
    +6

    When I was a kid, I played SimCity and always built the most expensive stadium (after an airport though) regardless my financial situation.

    • Tiggrrrrr on 06/11/2017 - 19:40
      +6

      Wait, is that you Colin?

  • Bluberry on 06/11/2017 - 21:30
    +1

    Lol. SA spent 2.5 billion on a hospital and we thought that was too much. WA spends 1.5 on a stadium!!

    I suppose if you are blowing tax payer money then whats a few billion.

    • arcticmonkey on 06/11/2017 - 21:36

      Be thankful that Labor invested in a hospital. At least a hospital can save lives. All Liberals give us are cuts to health and education, privitisation and they ruin our NBN.

      Many Liberals can't even get their citizenships sorted.

    • TheZohan on 06/11/2017 - 22:41

      We spent a billion or two on a hospital in WA too. It was completed a couple of years ago, and can't be used! Schamozzle.

      • DH on 07/11/2017 - 00:19
        +1

        Thank goodness you are speaking about that Hospital and not the other one.

      • ilikeradiohead on 07/11/2017 - 11:31

        Yeah one hospital is ok and the other one is full of lead and legionnaires disease.

        • SimbaGirl on 10/11/2017 - 13:29

          Don't forget the asbestos and the non-compliant fire doors.

    • Tiggrrrrr on 07/11/2017 - 13:22

      Never fear, we spent 2 billion on a hospital too…

  • gasman70 on 06/11/2017 - 21:44
    +1

    Nice looking stadium. Wrong shape though.

    • bargaino on 07/11/2017 - 00:28

      Don't worry, the field is big enough for a standard rectangular football field (as defined by FIFA.)
      The oval stadium means better views from the corners.

      • gasman70 on 07/11/2017 - 08:36
        +2

        I was just reading up on it. Should be a fine stadium once she's finished but it's a damn shame it wasn't ready for the Ashes.

      • ilikeradiohead on 07/11/2017 - 11:32

        It's been designed so that retractable seating can be brought in to make it rectangular.

  • PerthectDeal on 09/11/2017 - 12:09

    Great thanks, a 3-4 minutes "searching please wait" but came through in the end!!

    • [Deactivated] on 09/11/2017 - 12:15

      Are you in Perth?

      • PerthectDeal on 09/11/2017 - 12:16

        Let me check my Ozbargain username - hang on a sec..

        • [Deactivated] on 09/11/2017 - 12:24

          I wasn't sure so I had to check

  • [Deactivated] on 09/11/2017 - 12:10

    Thanks OP. Got my tickets!

  • AnonyMiss on 09/11/2017 - 12:52

    What do you think the best time is?

    • PerthectDeal on 09/11/2017 - 12:58

      I would recommend the last 2 sessions seeing the lighting will be the star of the show. We got 6.30 to 7.30 that will be good as getting dark.

      • Gaz1 on 09/11/2017 - 17:42

        Isn't the lighting on the outside, so you can see it from anywhere around the area?
        (saw it the other day from East Perth - maybe they were doing testing)

  • NotJustChickenDinner on 09/11/2017 - 13:01
    +1

    all sold out ..

  • cheesecactus on 09/11/2017 - 15:56

    Too slow :/

  • marketingpolice on 09/11/2017 - 16:14

    Any spare tickets please PM me.

    • PissLUR on 09/11/2017 - 16:34

      IMPORTANT ALERT : There is a delivery delay on this event. Please check the Event Detail Page for information on when the delay will be lifted. Once the delay has been lifted, your tickets will be available via your selected delivery method.

    • NotJustChickenDinner on 09/11/2017 - 21:09

      more go on sale tomorrow morning 10am for earlier sessions

      • marketingpolice on 10/11/2017 - 13:13

        Thanks OP and thanks maxchange. Got some!

  • PissLUR on 10/11/2017 - 11:58

    20,000 tickets will be on sale at 10am

  • SupeNintendoChalmers on 10/11/2017 - 13:24

    panem et circenses

  • get-innocuous on 10/11/2017 - 15:25

    They really should have charged a $1 fee and given it to charity to stop people securing bucketloads of tickets they'll never use. I'd be surprised if half the 110k allocated tickets actually show up.

    • marketingpolice on 10/11/2017 - 15:36

      That would have been a good idea. I noticed they required a confirmation that I am not a robot this morning. Didn't see that yesterday? Wouldn't be surprised if people only want tickets for the free transport either.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join