This was posted 7 years 2 months 8 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Xiaomi Mi Home iHealth Non-Contact Digital Thermometer - White US $26.99 (after 50% off) plus delivery @ Zapals

130
Xiaomi Mi Home iHealth Non-Contact Digital Thermometer - White US $26.99 (after 50% off) plus delivery @ Zapals
Go to Deal
Jamesph on 14/10/2017 - 17:36 zapals.com (688 clicks)
Last edited 14/10/2017 - 21:56 by 1 other user

Got an email for this deal. Not sure how long.

Don't forget Cashrewards.

Regular non tracking shipping is 1.99 USD.

This non-contact thermometer is powered by two regular AAA batteries that bring along plenty of usage time. Built-in German Heiman and other improved sensors, simply hold it at a 3CM distance from your forehead, then the Xiaomi Mi Home iHealth thermometer will instantly provide you the result with a 0.1C degree accuracy.

1-second Quick Detection

Different from mercurial thermometer that need waiting for 5 seconds, Mi Home iHealth thermometer only need 1 second to get the data.

High Accuracy

Apart from German Heimann Sensor aims to accurate measurement. iHealth thermometer is advanced with indoor temperature and environmental temperature-compensated sensor to guarantee accurate measurement under the circumstances where other probe-type sensors cannot be used or do not produce accurate data for a variety of reasons.

Non-Contact Thermometer

Aimed at forehead and pressed to measure body temperature, which minimizes the chance of spreading illness, so that it can be used at multiple users without needing to be cleaned.

LED Display

The LED digital display shows the reading clearly.

Easy to Use

Press the measurement key for one second, keep distance away from forehead into 3 cm, done with vibration reminder.

Specifications

Brand Xiaomi
Model FDIR-V14
Measuring Position Forehead
Measuring Distance 3cm and less
Power Source DC 3V, 2 x 1.5V AAA battery
Measuring Range 32 ° C - 42.9 ° C
Measuring Accuracy +/- 0.2 Deg.C ( ranged 35 - 42 Deg.C )
+/- 0.3 Deg.C ( other range )
Resolution Ratio 0.1 Deg.C
Clinical Repeatable +/- 0.3 Deg.C
Operating Environment 16 - 35 Deg.C, 85pct RH and less, 70 - 106kPa
Product Weight 90g
Screen Size 25.7 x 19.1 mm
Product Size 137 x 34 x 3 mm
Package Contents 1 x Thermometer
1 x Manual

Electrical & Electronics Thermometer Xiaomi

Related Stores

Zapals
Zapals

closed Comments

  • Shoocat on 14/10/2017 - 17:58

    Seems decent for the price, can anyone who owns one comment on real-world accuracy?

    • kahn on 14/10/2017 - 18:25
      +8

      It confirmed I was hot, so it's very accurate.

      • homersyd on 14/10/2017 - 21:34

        was….ok…. :)

  • CyberMurning on 14/10/2017 - 18:11
    +3

    It's AuD 25 in China so I will buy if under 30, this is new product therefore price is still high. Wait don't give into greedy sellers.

    • Bellpop on 14/10/2017 - 18:30
      +1

      Intense

    • havebeerbelywillsumo on 14/10/2017 - 18:53

      Seems a reasonable not rash post. Can't fathom this feverish rush to neg you.

      • CyberMurning on 14/10/2017 - 19:11

        No worries. was giving advise not anger but I know world isn't fair

  • bargainsniper on 14/10/2017 - 18:24
    +15

    No Band 28 for those wondering

  • wfdTamar on 14/10/2017 - 19:42
    +1

    I got the expensive Braun equivalent of this (they sell for around $100) and it was dangerously inaccurate. A cheap digital under tongue type was much better. I compared both to a hospital one. So if you do get this one make sure to compare it to a known good one.

  • BiG BoY on 14/10/2017 - 20:00

    So is this good or not and is this the best price available

    • wfdTamar on 14/10/2017 - 20:17
      +4

      The big reason to get a non contact one is to take temperatures of sick kids. That’s the way they sell them, but if this one is as inaccurate as the Braun one I got (which you’d think would be excellent given the brand and price) it’s not only useless, it is actually very dangerous. Maybe Xiaomi know something Braun don’t and it’s ok, but when a $20 digital under tongue one works fine and won’t be responsible for your death why bother?

      Here’s the one I got which is rubbish:

      https://www.amazon.com/Braun-NTF3000US-Touch-Forehead-Thermo…

      Something like this is all you need and very accurate. It does take about a minute to take a reading, but at least it’s correct. $6.50

      https://www.chemistwarehouse.com.au/Buy/60358/Omron-MC246-Di…

      • BiG BoY on 14/10/2017 - 23:52

        Firstly thank you very much for your advice / input and secondly I won't be buying this as accuracy will be the key point here for me

    • killabob on 14/10/2017 - 21:33

      I'd be interested in knowing the accuracy as well, I have two kids.

      In the meantime do yourself a favour and buy this…measures temp quickly (important with wiggly kids) and accurately. Put on to it by a nurse.

      https://www.chemistwarehouse.com.au/buy/68659/Vicks-Insight-…

      • BiG BoY on 14/10/2017 - 23:53

        Our midwife also recommended this model so this will be my next purchase as I already have the omron one above ^^

  • aNoPHeLeS on 14/10/2017 - 20:41
    +4

    Doctor here - did a quick read of literature and the evidence is a bit sketchy on how accurate these are. Hospitals and GP's use tympanic membrane thermometers (your ear drum) which are the most accurate. These appear to use IR sensors to test skin temperature over the forehead which will not be as accurate as mouth/rectal/axillary temps.

    • chewbot on 14/10/2017 - 21:21

      The last two times a gp took my temperature was with a touchless forehead style one. Same for my two kids. That was 4 occasions across 3 different doctors. So they seem to be gaining popularity. I have been keen to get one but the reviews of the retail ones have been pretty rough. I assume doctors get a better quality product. It's been a couple of years since I have been in a hospital scenario but the nurses were all using the ear ones then.

      • plasmapuff on 14/10/2017 - 21:43

        Sorry to be cynical but they use it as its fast enough to facilitate their 5 minute appointments and they don't have to pay for disposables.

        Accuracy has nothing to do with it…

      • wfdTamar on 14/10/2017 - 21:47

        I could imagine an advantage for a GP is not having to clean it or keep a supply of tips (which they use in hospital for the ear ones) which they’d have to pay for and are a pain to keep on hand. Add to that the incredibly dodgy freebies system in the medical biz. Also a GP is just as susceptible to BS advertising as we are, unless they take the time to research it like the one above did.

      • aNoPHeLeS on 14/10/2017 - 22:11

        There may be reasons for using these - they're quick and non-invasive. If you were doing stacks of kids in a day then you might accept the inaccuracy for the convenience.

  • Rayve on 14/10/2017 - 23:38

    One serious flaw in these is that the normal evaporative cooling of the body could potentially cause very inaccurate readings. As the sweat on a forehead vaporises the skin can be chilled by several degrees. The tympanic ones are not that expensive (I can see cheap ones for under $20), and the basic oral ones are more accurate. This would best be used as a VERY quick and dirty approximation.

  • sintro on 08/11/2017 - 15:49

    With these IR Thermometers, I tend to take multiple readings around the head:
    ie forehead, between the eyes, behind and under the ear to look for the highest reading.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join