My broker just gave me this analysis which I'm struggling to understand and there is no info on the net. Talking about a "principal + interest loan" AND an "Offset account" (which I originally thought you could only either have one or the other, not both).
So currently for $500k loan:
Bank A: 4.19% for investor, interest only, fixed.
Bank B: 3.88% for investor, principal and interest, fixed.
Without offset:
Monthly payment using Bank A = approx $2000 ($2000 interest + $0 principal)
Monthly payment using Bank B = approx $2600 ($2000 interest + $600 principal)
With 250k cash in offset:
Monthly payment using Bank A = approx $1000 ($1000 interest + $0 principal)
Monthly payment using Bank B = approx $2600 ($1000 interest + $1600 principal).
The last line I don't understand.
Youre paying $1600 off your loan balance when you have an offset
VERSUS
Youre paying $600 off your loan balance when you dont have an offset. This true?
Meaning I'm worse off with an offset? (assuming I dont want to reduce loan balance yet)
Well your payment is fixed at $2600, so that will be applied regardless.
In the offset scenario, less interest is charged (lower balance), so more of that $2600 goes to the principal amount.