This was posted 7 years 7 months 24 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Nikon D3400 DSLR Camera with 18-55mm Lens Kit $397 (after $50 Cashback) @ Harvey Norman

1260
Nikon D3400 DSLR Camera with 18-55mm Lens Kit $397 (after $50 Cashback) @ Harvey Norman
Go to Deal
Ljack5 on 30/03/2017 - 14:39 harveynorman.com.au (3421 clicks)
Last edited 31/03/2017 - 17:08

I picked one up from Harvey Norman today. Price on the box was $729, payed $447 (will get $50 cashback from Nikon). Unreal deal, almost half price.

$447 Harvey Norman price: 30th of March - 3rd of April 2017

$50 cashback from Nikon: 1st of April - 31st of May 2017

  • The cashback link is located near the bottom of the item listing page on the Harvey Norman website under "Terms and conditions".

  • Info on the cashback situation courtesy of 2stroksmokr, 31/03/2017 - 4pm

"Spoke with Nikon and Harvey Norman.

Tomorrow the Nikon website will show the cashback for this.

Anything before purchased from Harvey Norman they had an exclusive deal and will be honored.

Confirmed by both Harvey & Nikon."

Electrical & Electronics Camera DSLR Nikon

Related Stores

Harvey Norman
Harvey Norman

closed Comments

  • Merlict on 30/03/2017 - 14:46
    +3

    A better camera than 99% of shooters out there.

    • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 16:38

      Ugh.

      A camera is a tool. How do you compare a camera to a photographer?

      As for the tool it depends on what you're shooting. If you used a D3400 to shoot sports when you had a better option I'd say you have rocks in your head. For landscapes the camera would do almost as well as something much more expensive. For a beginner who's just starting to get into photography and isn't photo mad it's great. But use it for the things it works best for.

      • dasher86 on 30/03/2017 - 16:51

        you compare a camera to a photographer by giving the photographer different cameras and comparing like shots.

        • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 17:01
          +5

          Unless you gave the photographer time to get use to the equipment that would be a worthless comparison.

          There were some great photographers who were very much wedded to their gear.

          I shoot Nikon (D7100, D7200) and Canon (600D, 700D) and I can tell you even though I know how to use both systems, they behave differently enough that I have to be careful and am sometimes caught out by the Canon gear, which I use as my "holiday" camera. I blew out a good couple of dozen shots on the 700D on my last holiday (out of perhaps 6000 pictures, so it wasn't terrible). In particular the way auto-ISO affects exposure is wildly different.

          The controls are also located differently and there are unique settings on each that can have a very dramatic effect on the final image. And they have different quirks. (I find the 700D locks up occasionally and needs the battery pulled for instance and on one occasion the eye sensor stopped working and only came good after resetting the camera). Given that I had gone months without using the Canon it wasn't such a surprise that I had to familiarize myself with the controls (especially focus points) and custom settings menu.

          Furthermore the cameras have different strengths and weaknesses. I'd rather shoot video on the Canon if I did that much and the articulating screen makes it better for family selfies without using additional screens.

          So am I a good photographer shooting Nikon and a bad photographer shooting Canon? No I'm just less familiar with the Canon and the cameras have different strengths and weaknesses.

        • [Deactivated] on 30/03/2017 - 17:42
          -4

          @syousef: If you are spending your holiday taking 6000 photos, you really need to reconsider what a holiday is. It's not something you should observe through a viewfinder. Might as well just google the destination and look at someone else's photos.

        • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 18:37
          +3

          @thorton82:

          Thanks for the concern, but there were some days I didn't even use the camera. 500 photos a day on average isn't very much at all. I'm guessing your the sort of photog that takes their time setting up a shot etc. I tend to shoot things that move quite a bit, so I'll take bursts often and in some cases, especially with wildlief, you never know what you're going to get till you've shot it. When you own cameras the shoot 5fps I might shoot 500 watching a dolphin show. I've shot 6000+ photos in a single day at an airshow.

        • [Deactivated] on 30/03/2017 - 18:39
          -4

          @syousef: … 'and i didn't see one plane'

        • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 18:40
          +6

          @thorton82:

          I was there to photograph them as much as I was there to see them. Why are you so concerned with how I choose to enjoy myself or use my camera? If it's not for you, that's fine. I'm not asking you to be like me.

          p.s. It's a lot more fun with a photographer's pass.

        • Suspect420 on 30/03/2017 - 19:17
          +3

          @thorton82: could have had 10 photos a day and been on a 600 day holiday.

        • zealmax on 31/03/2017 - 10:40
          +1

          @thorton82: It's not a holiday unless you are taking 20,000 photos per week.

        • Jake D on 31/03/2017 - 11:36

          @thorton82: what, why? When I go on holiday I love indulging my hobbies.

          If someones hobby is photography, and they've now got access to new things to photograph, how is that a problem?

      • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 18:44
        +2

        So sick and tired of being downvoted just because Ozbargainers don't like what is said, regardless of the usefulness or truth of it. If the camera didn't matter at all pro photographers would be out there shooting with entry level cameras. Why would you drop tens of thousands on lens and camera needlessly when you're trying to run a business?

        • Suspect420 on 30/03/2017 - 19:19
          -5

          Who cares if u get down voted…

          Bet no one will down vote this comment

        • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 21:08
          -1

          @BKZ:

          Downvoted comments are not visible unless you're logged in and have elected to see them. It's a gag.

        • Suspect420 on 30/03/2017 - 21:39
          -1

          @syousef:
          FTW

        • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 22:19
          -1

          @BKZ:

          That wasn't me that downvoted you btw.

    • Haulien on 01/04/2017 - 07:34

      Yeah you're right, a good picture is ultimately up to the skill of the photographer, not the gear used. However, that doesn't mean the camera from your phone, or a disposable film camera is right for everyone. Just because it's enough for you, great.

      The more you spend on a body is to utilise the higher resolutions (eg 42mp sony a7r ii, 50mp Canon 5DS, 50/100mp hasselblad/phase one, etc), or to utilise faster shutter speeds (eg Canon 7D, Canon 1D series, Nikon D500, Nikon D5, Sony a7S, etc), to utilise better low light performance when pushing ISO limits, to utilise higher res video with higher framerates, dynamic range, colour reproduction from the sensor, etc.

      And then we come to lenses, why spend so much on a lens? There's a variety of reasons. Maybe you want to take pictures of a far subject (where you can't get get closer for whatever reason). Or want to get in really really wide shots in cramped spaces. Better glass means sharper images, which is a must for the higher megapixel censors. Or maybe you want faster/quieter autofocus. Or maybe you want the lens to let in more light. Or maybe better image stabilisation. Take your pick.

  • kungfupanda on 30/03/2017 - 15:02
    +36

    $447 Harvey Norman price: 30th of March - 3rd of April 2017

    $50 cashback from Nikon: 1st of April - 31st of May 2017

    It means you need to purchase the camera on Saturday the 1st of April 2017 to receive the $50 Cash back…
    if you buy now, you may not get the cashback :)

    • AussieDaddy on 30/03/2017 - 15:23
      +10

      This post needs more +votes so that some poor souls see it before they pull the trigger and regret it later. But then again, this will probably be sold out before Saturday. Catch 22.

      • ilikeradiohead on 30/03/2017 - 15:46
        +2

        Go to TGG or JB and price match on the 1st?

        • AussieDaddy on 30/03/2017 - 16:38
          +1

          Yeah, that's another option, unless they try to pull "That's below our cost" or some other bullshit like that.

      • kungfupanda on 30/03/2017 - 18:00

        Agree…
        If you don't care about the cash back then buy now.
        If you care about the cashback, don't buy now and pray there are stocks on the 1st of April.

        I don't think Nikon cares about Harvey Norman incorrectly posting the cashback on website. It's Nikon who provides the cashback hence we need to follow Nikon T & C.

    • pw2002au on 30/03/2017 - 15:55
      -1

      Can we get the op to update this as going to the cashback site doesnt allow you to select this model presently.

  • 2stroksmokr on 30/03/2017 - 15:02

    Really worth it? I've been searching for a camera for my wife for her birthday and next month our baby boy is due (first one) so was going to suprise her with this.

    Opinions greatly appreciated :) Wanted to not spend over $500 so this definitely ticks the boxes.

    • mafmouf on 30/03/2017 - 15:07
      +1

      Will she be using it a lot? Cus these cameras are kinda bulky, esp if you take around multiple lenses.

      I got the D3100 ages ago for my partner and she was happy with it. She really only used it for auto mode, but I used manual a little which was fun.

      Note this kit only has the single lens. I regret not getting the 75-200mm (or something like that) as part of the twin lens kit.

      If your wife is just getting into photography and may not use it all the time, this could be a really good option. Some people prefer the much smaller mirrorless ones though. Maybe scope out a camera store and take a few pics to get a better idea.

      • 2stroksmokr on 30/03/2017 - 15:10

        Thanks for the reply, I've bought a farm so she'll just be taking photos here of the scenery and animals. Main goal was for her to take photos of the new born as she's totally obsessed.

        For the price its very cheap, she prefers the bigger ones so this fits the criteria.

        • mafmouf on 30/03/2017 - 15:11

          It seems like a good entry point for your wife. Take the plunge I guess. The camera isn't by any means bad, I was more concerned about how she would be carrying it around and using it. You'll definitely get good baby shots!

        • harkoliar on 31/03/2017 - 07:46

          I was going to suggest mirror less camera's to take with you traveling. Having a new born means you have quite a few things bringing around and camera gear is at the bottom of my list normally. I have two entry levels, one is d3300 and other is canon Eos m10. I normally use my m10 more for travel and casual occasions and bring out my Nikon on special occasions only because of the bulkiness. (got 3 lenses and speedlite on it)

          But if your wife is happy with the big cameras by all means go for it. It's a good price. Not the best price but its still a decent deal.

    • dm01 on 30/03/2017 - 15:08

      These are a highly capable camera and definitely worth considering. Being a DSLR, it's bigger than a compact camera, but as long as your wife isn't likely to mind the size, I'd say go for it.

      • 2stroksmokr on 30/03/2017 - 15:11

        Great, thanks for the reply :)

      • serpserpserp on 30/03/2017 - 20:56
        +1

        ( ° ʖ °)

    • cala90 on 30/03/2017 - 15:19

      I bought my partner a D5100 about 5 years ago and it's still being used. It is a bit bulky for travelling but if she's only using it around the house it'll be more than good enough :)

    • BuyoTheCat on 30/03/2017 - 15:27
      +2

      While this is big compared to mirrorless cameras, it isnt BIG compared to other dslr.

      for $400 I think this camera will do more then most casual photographer require. and it will certainly take nicer photos than most compact cameras or phones.

      In a nutshell, it is not a lot of money to spend to explore if she likes photography

      • dm01 on 30/03/2017 - 16:01

        Spot on!

    • WillisAU on 30/03/2017 - 15:39

      Do it for sure! I got the D3300 last year and love being able to take high quality photos of our little one (3m old now). Its completely worthwhile as iPhone photos dont always cut the mustard especially in lower light. For next level pics I've been considering the nikon 50mm f1.8 lens too, its about $250.

      • 2stroksmokr on 30/03/2017 - 15:51

        Bought, cheers thanks for the replies guys.

        • punk000 on 30/03/2017 - 17:26
          +1

          This is DX camera, get the 35mm F/1.8 DX lens and you are set

      • dandandan on 30/03/2017 - 18:11

        I will probably buy and used to have a D90 however I wonder if it will take as good photos of my little one's compared to what my iphone now does with depth effect.

        • WillisAU on 31/03/2017 - 07:00

          Definitely yes, a lot better than an iPhone……

        • JMC on 31/03/2017 - 15:02

          Much better (particularly in low light). To get the same depth of field effect, grab the Nikon 35mm F1.8 ($200 or so IIRC) to go with it.

    • Jhonka on 31/03/2017 - 12:05
      +2

      I took these with a 6 year old D3100 earlier this year. 55-300mm lens.

      http://imgur.com/a/pc6xi

      • Munki on 03/04/2017 - 14:08
        -1

        The bokeh is so busy and quite distracting…

  • dm01 on 30/03/2017 - 15:05
    +4

    Good deal for a great camera! Pay no attention to HN's "regular" pricing though - just about any other retailer is selling this significantly cheaper everyday (~$600), and grey market can be had for low-$400's as well.

    • coolhand on 30/03/2017 - 18:29
      +2

      Yep I posted a deal for this near the start of the year for $398 @ TGG with an eBay code. No cash back required

  • unity1 on 30/03/2017 - 15:21

    Where's the cash back info? I'm on the mobile website and can't see it.

    • Hinee on 30/03/2017 - 15:27

      Cashback

      Offer ends 31st of May 2017. Offer is via redemption from the supplier. Terms and conditions apply. See supplier website for full details. http://promotions.mynikonlife.com.au/ $50 Cashback via redemption

      There is no information on that site yet for this particular promotion though. OP I really hope you actually looked into the cashback, as the very info you posted states April 1st.

      • 2stroksmokr on 30/03/2017 - 15:36

        Just spoke to the Harveynorman guys.

        Cashback

        Offer ends 31st of May 2017. Offer is via redemption from the supplier. Terms and conditions apply. See supplier website for full details. http://promotions.mynikonlife.com.au/ $50 Cashback via redemption

        Special Price

        Offer ends 3rd of April 2017 (11006114)

        • pw2002au on 30/03/2017 - 15:54

          Doesnt mean anything … if you go to Nikons site you cant select the D3400 for cashback at the moment. Therefore you may likely miss out having purchased prior to 1st April

        • unity1 on 30/03/2017 - 18:51
          +1

          @pw2002au: I called the Nikon promotion team and they confirmed the cashback starts 1/4/17

  • ankor on 30/03/2017 - 15:21

    I had the d3100 as well, and it's been a great little camera. I still really enjoy the photos out of it even after moving to another system. Have been really enjoying the 35mm f/1.8G lens as well. Very good for lower light situations.

  • Rifraf on 30/03/2017 - 15:25
    +2

    The D3400 is the smallest and lightest of Nikons current DSLR lineup.

    I love the weight of mine compared to my D7000 and its a no brainer which one I reach for typically.

    I think this is a good price for a great entry level DSLR.

  • rakhi on 30/03/2017 - 15:29

    i do have D3200 its great dslr for beginners. yes, its bit bulky but as your not a professional photographer you dont have to carry all the time, good for small occasions and some outdoor shoots as well. Captured all memories of my daughter since she was born,great output. D3400 For $400 it's worth buying with single lens.

  • Stolniik on 30/03/2017 - 15:36
    +8

    I have the Nikon D3300 with the 35mm fixed AF-S lens (Food) and a Sigma 10-20mm wide angle lens (Landscape) and absolutely love it!
    This was purchased for $500 with the same 18-55mm kit lens, so this looks to be an amazing deal. The kit lens however is handy, but you will find that there are better lenses out there and it will sit around collecting dust.

    The camera is perfect for beginners and depending on the intended use, can achieve really good results.

    Below are shots I have taken with the D3300. Note that Instagram reduses the quality of the pictures:
    Link to Instagram examples
    Link to blog examples

    Just keep in mind that the body is not full frame, so you are limited with the amount your camera can capture.
    Great find OP!

    • Jase2801 on 30/03/2017 - 17:06
      +1

      Great shots. Now I feel like eating something after all those shots of food :)

      • Stolniik on 30/03/2017 - 18:28

        Thanks Jase :)
        Sounds like the story of my life.. every time I see something gassy I MUST try it!

        • lostinsydney on 30/03/2017 - 23:36
          +1

          that made me hungry!

    • Stolniik on 30/03/2017 - 18:32
      +1

      Sorry I realised the second link wasn't working - Fixed now! :) Blog examples

  • jack5 on 30/03/2017 - 16:16
    +3

    For anyone confused about the cashback offer

    First of all, the cashback link is located near the bottom of the item listing page on the Harvey Norman website under "Terms and conditions".

    Second, on the Nikon redeem page you can't select D3400. I Asked a Harvey Normal representative who looked into it and told me the cashback offer will be available for the D3400 from April 1st. I purchased the camera today and will check the Nikon website on Saturday to apply for the $50 cashback.

    If it doesn't work Harvey Normal will have some explaining to do but I'm sure it will, they clearly state the cashback offer on the item listing on their website.

    • pw2002au on 30/03/2017 - 16:26
      +2

      Jack - great response - might be worthwhile putting that in the description.

      • jack5 on 30/03/2017 - 16:30

        ^Disregard the above comment^

  • OhMaJuck on 30/03/2017 - 16:54
    +1

    I got my D3300 for $299 back 2 years ago with $100 cash back. Not bad

    • dm01 on 30/03/2017 - 17:15
      +1

      Despite your 40 years of being a "pro", you're giving poor advice here. The kit lens is perfectly fine for the the people targeted for an entry level DSLR, and the inclusion of 35mm or 50mm prime lens makes it a very flexible little kit.

      And "Getting a few lenses and then changing lenses is a real pain" certainly doesn't sound like the talk of a professional - takes me all of a few seconds to switch lenses on my systems.

      • BuyoTheCat on 30/03/2017 - 17:26

        abacus has certainly valid points. something like a 18-200mm is what I usually recommend for beginners.

        However this can be explored later.

        • abacus on 30/03/2017 - 22:49
          -6

          Thanks for the support, I won't be wasting my time commenting again. I agree a zoom starting at 18 is much better than 24 which is not always wide enough. I should have mentioned the 18-200 instead. I bought the 24-105 f4 as a semi professional cheaper lens than getting two bodies and then the 24-70 and 70-200 2.8s which is what most professionals carry around with them because as I said it's a pain to swap leneses. I have the 18-55 on a cheap Nikon and it's really bad without much range if you want to zoom in on a child etc. Can't compare to the 24-105 f4. Thanks anyway.

    • TechAddict on 30/03/2017 - 18:16
      +2

      @abacus: You are advising beginners to buy FX lenses for DX cameras? Great "Pro" advice…!

    • zorrt on 30/03/2017 - 20:19
      +2

      18-55mm is a close equivalent to 24-70mm which is a popular choice for FF and that 18-55 is in no way crap. Also why is a 35mm prime for normal use bad advice? I'm a beginner and my 35mm almost always stays on my body and only gets swapped out if I'm planning on shooting something specific. In a way it's better to be restricted to shooting a single focal length since you plan a bit more.

      24-105 will be good as a travel lens since you don't need to change lens but doesn't mean no other lens should matter.

      • syousef on 30/03/2017 - 21:19

        I agree the 18-55 lenses these days are very good, and while they have limitations - especially the slower kit lenses - they can be used to great effect in a lot of the kind of everyday shooting the beginner DSLR user tends to do.

        That said they teach you very little about optical zoom/focal length. In particular I know a lot of people who should but don't understand angle of view and background compression. You also don't learn how to use a fast enough shutter at longer focal lengths. You also don't learn about isolating the subject and nailing focus if you can never get a shallow depth of field. So you can get very sloppy without knowing you have an issue.

        The trouble with the primes is all of the above (except subject isolation) plus sometimes you can't move to frame the shot as you like…especially indoors.

        You can learn to take a good photo with any lens. But you can't learn what kinds of photography you like most if your lens isn't suited to that style of photography.

        I think the 18-105, 18-135 and 18-140 lenses tend to be a good compromise rather than the 24-105 on an APS-C camera. The Canon 18-135 STM is great if you can handle dealing with the extreme CA in post. The Nikon 18-140 is suppose to be very good too but I've never owned one. I grew up with the Nikon 18-70DX and it's still my walkaround lens and short lens of choice BUT I don't shoot it wide open.

        • dm01 on 31/03/2017 - 08:38

          I wonder how anyone learned anything about taking photos in the days before we had superzoom lenses…

          Try this for an alternative point of view: The trouble with superzoom lenses (24-120, 18-200…whatever) is that they teach you to be lazy when framing a shot - not need to move closer or further away from your subject…just turn the zoom ring and let the lens do the work. No need to use your feet to go hunting for a shot.

          Their optical quality tends to be worse than lenses with a more restricted zoom range (or primes) due to the comprises that need to be made in order to cover such a wide range, plus they also tend to have narrower aperture ranges ranges, along with the compromises that can bring.

          The lens that opened my eyes most to the possibilities of photography when I was starting out was a Nikon 50mm 1.8 - I would strongly recommend anyone starting out with an ILC to grab a prime lens in that range to go along with their kit zoom.

        • syousef on 31/03/2017 - 09:04

          @dm01:

          If you don't know the difference between changing the focal length and moving closer or further from a subject, you shouldn't be calling people lazy. Zooming with a zoom lens is not the same as stepping back and forth with your feet AT ALL. It will NOT give you the same picture.

          http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/how-focal-length-affects-…

          I can get better subject isolation with a 70-200 2.8 than your 50mm 1.8. I can also get more pixels on a smaller subject from further away. Think about birding. You don't always have the luxury of moving right up to a bird without it flying away.

          Superzooms are an excellent teaching tool. The problem is the image quality is not as good as a zoom that doesn't cover as large a range. If you pixel peep, print large, or crop you will quickly become unsatisfied with that.

          The 50mm 1.8 are good lenses and worth having. I have had both a G and D version of the Nikon and the non-STM and STM on the Canon side. The newer lenses are definitely better for sharpness wide open or close to it. I'd actually rate the Canon STM slightly better to work with. I really like them but don't use them anywhere near as much as my zooms. On the other hand if I want to take wide field astro photos my zoom lenses are worthless compared to the 50s. The 50s are also great for shooting hand held in low light indoors. The right tool for the job is important. I don't know why people use them for a walk around lens in good light when a zoom is much more versatile.

        • syousef on 31/03/2017 - 09:16

          @dm01:

          And if that link was too theoretical for you here's a solid problem that you can solve with an xx-200 or xx-300 zoom that you can't with a 50 1.8.

          I want to take pictures of my friend who is visiting from overseas. He's in Sydney across the harbour from the Opera House on the foreshore. I use a 50 1.8 and notice that the Opera House is tiny in the background. If I step back or forth I'm not changing my distance to the Opera House very much as a percentage so it doesn't get much bigger or smaller in the frame. I can make my friend's head smaller by stepping back from him, but the picture I want is a headshot with the Opera House about the same size as his head. If I stepped right back and cropped the image the quality would be awful.

          With a 70-200, I zoom in on the Opera House until it fills half the frame, then I step back until his head fills the other half. If there's enough light I can control how in focus the Opera House is with the aperture.

        • dm01 on 31/03/2017 - 12:54

          @syousef: You've completely misunderstood my point and spent all that time explaining theory I've known for years.

        • syousef on 31/03/2017 - 14:23
          -2

          @dm01:

          I haven't misunderstood your point at all. It is just that my opinion is that you are completely wrong. "Zoom with your feet" should be a phrase that gets you thrown out of camera clubs!

  • Ghogger on 30/03/2017 - 17:34

    I've got the D3300 (the previous model) and it's a great camera.

    Cheapest DSLR camera to shoot 1080p at 60FPS!

  • Suspect420 on 30/03/2017 - 21:35

    Anyone recommend an SD card?

    • [Deactivated] on 30/03/2017 - 21:43
      +1

      Any reliable card will be fine for your need. A lot of samsung sd card deals lately.

  • [Deactivated] on 30/03/2017 - 21:39
    -2

    :) always enjoy lovely "camera advice" from weekend warriors.

  • abacus on 30/03/2017 - 22:41
    -1

    So I took 10 minutes to write a comment to help budding photographers and got negged so my comment disappeared. I wrote it thinking it would be helpful and I could have been doing others things instead. Perhaps write why you disagree instead of negging the comment so that people can read it and make their own decisions. I certainly won't be making anymore comments on ozbargain as this has happened a few times now.

    • lostinsydney on 30/03/2017 - 23:27
      +2

      welcome to the interweb!

      maybe if you backed it up with some photos, it would have helped your cause…
      you can still do it!

  • ptl93 on 31/03/2017 - 00:47

    Thanks ops. Bought 1 + 1 Sandisk SD Card 64 GB for $29. The sales guy price matched it with ebay price.

  • zhen on 31/03/2017 - 07:46
    +3

    Just chatted to Harvey Norman Support Agent online this morning, this was what said:

    "Harvey norman had a exclusive offer where we could claim earlier, Nikon has informed us that they would be updating the site today"

    And the link to the Nikon Cash Back promotion is here: http://promotions.mynikonlife.com.au/Redeem

  • melonbargain on 31/03/2017 - 08:49
    +1

    A question for existing owners of the D3400 or D3300.

    It appears that outside of Australia, Nikon includes the VR (Vibration Reduction) version of the 18-55mm lens in the D3400 kit (AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR), whereas the AU version comes with the non-VR lense (AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G). The previous D3300 model came with a VR lens in the kit.

    I am interested to hear the thoughts of any existing owners as to their experience with and with-out VR / Image Stabilisation.

    Press release covering the two versions of the lens is here.

  • desafinado74 on 31/03/2017 - 09:51

    Although i already have a mirrorless camera (Olympus EPL8 )and an old Nikon DSLR (D70)
    i am very tempted to pick this one up.

    I had a look at the Nikon redeem link above, and i could not find the D3400 under the Nikon Model option.
    Just things such as KeyMission 360 etc,,,,am i looking at the wrong place ??

    • CVonC on 31/03/2017 - 12:54

      i could not find the D3400 under the Nikon Model option.
      am i looking at the wrong place ??

      You're looking at the wrong date.

      $50 cashback from Nikon: 1st of April - 31st of May 2017

  • [Deactivated] on 31/03/2017 - 10:10
    +1

    https://www.flickr.com/groups/3020300@N20/pool/

    what this camera is capable of

  • PAOK11 on 31/03/2017 - 10:30
    -6

    Mirrorless is way better. With the lens on mirrorless cameras are already big enough. You see these dorks rocking these huge dslr cameras with massive lenses you think to yourself you should on centre court at the tennis not friggen taking a photo of a koala at the zoo.

  • TomGum on 31/03/2017 - 10:42

    Paid $344 back in Jan from JB.

    • jack5 on 31/03/2017 - 11:47

      D3300?

      • TomGum on 02/04/2017 - 12:46

        D3400

        • tgame on 02/04/2017 - 16:29

          missed on that deal. eh…

  • ptl93 on 31/03/2017 - 12:32

    Any bargain good case, bag for this camera?

  • subywagon on 31/03/2017 - 13:06

    Anyone price matched at Officejerks yet? I'm going to try on Saturday, but I'm always apprehensive as they take it really personally down there at my local…

  • 2stroksmokr on 31/03/2017 - 15:58
    +1

    Spoke with Nikon and Harvey Norman.

    Tomorrow the Nikon website will show the cashback for this.

    Anything before purchased from Harvey Norman they had an exclusive deal and will be honored.

    Confirmed by both Harvey & Nikon.

    Picked up mine today.

  • hanhanyu2015 on 31/03/2017 - 16:39
    -1

    any promotional code for Harvey Norman I can use in this deal?

  • hanhanyu2015 on 31/03/2017 - 16:47

    It seems that you can redeem the cashback now,
    https://promotions.mynikonlife.com.au/Redeem/Claim/Step_1

  • 2stroksmokr on 01/04/2017 - 07:08
    +1

    Just did redemption with no problems and bought yesterday.

  • RooAvery on 01/04/2017 - 13:42

    bought it today, price matched in JB at $447

  • desafinado74 on 04/04/2017 - 09:18

    How long does it take Nikon to process the cash redemption and deposit the $50 into your bank account ?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join