Hi Guys,
Guys I need help here. If anyone can please share there knowledge in regards to my issue then it will be big help. I know I screwed up big time.
I bought a unit at auction but when the bank did the valuation that's what they said
"As discussed, the subject property shows obvious signs of non-compliant building codes issues (ceiling height). We are aware property has been registered and have investigated further.
The property was certified by a private certifier by the name of Anthony Allen, who we have confirmed was reprimanded on 03/05/2016 on a separate issue regarding a strata development.
This is very concerning and affects the certifiers credibility. We are not willing to accept this certifiers recommendations and request cancellation of report.
As per my Solicitor Conveyancer:
This is the email I received from my solicitor Conveyancer which will explain everything in detail.
I understand from Kathy from —- bank that the findings of the bank's valuer about the unit you have purchased does not comply with the BCA due to the ceiling height being 1.8 meters from floor to ceiling and therefore, due to the bank's valuer assessment, your loan application has been declined.
Unfortunately, you have exchanged contracts under auction conditions and under the contract must complete the contract upon the vendor's solicitor serving notice of registration and an occupation certificate.
We were notified by the agent that the strata plan was registered as Strata Plan —— on the 18 November 2016.
To date, the vendor's solicitor has not formally served me with notice of registration nor the occupation certificate.
I note your instructions that you will continue to apply for another loan to secure adequate finance to purchase the property and at the same time, you wish for me to obtain more information about the original development application of the building, so we can determine what was approved by council. This morning I have sent to council an Informal Access Application under council's Government Information Public Access (GIPA) to obtain copies of the original Development Approval and other documentation that may assist.
I note that you have also instructed me to obtain a Building Certificate, a copy of the application is attached herein.
In order to terminate the Contract, we must determine that the contract is a latent defect that is a fault in the property that could not have been discovered by a reasonably thorough inspection before the contract was entered into. This can be challenging as if you conducted a building inspection prior to the auction, the issues may have been discovered before you purchased the property. Furthermore, terminating the Contract will lead to court action and you will need to consult a qualified solicitor who has experience in these sort of matters.
The problem here is that if we are served with an Occupation Certificate then you must complete the contract as the certificate certifies that the property as being fit for habitable occupation and further, the vendor will rely on the contract to enforce your obligations under the contract. As far as the vendor is concerned, he would say that he went through the right channels to obtain strata subdivision and obtain an occupation certificate.
The whole process in trying to prove that the property is not a unit but a storage space will take time as you will need to prove that the error or misconduct or failure is on the part of the certifier or the vendor.
If you purchase the Building Certificate perhaps we can try to prove that the property sold is not a unit but a storage space and therefore, the contract is misleading on the part of the vendor as you did not get what you bargained for, that is, a unit. The other alternative is that if we establish that it is a storage space, that the contract price reflect the true value of a storage space and therefore, the price should be reduced, however, this alternative is not recommended as you may not be able to obtain a loan for a storage space.
The other alternative is to approach the private certifier and ask him to explain what evidence he has to deem Lot 10 as being a unit.
I highly recommend that you seek the advice's of a qualified solicitor to discuss your legal rights should you wish to terminate the Contract.
If someone can please explain what can be done here then it will be big help. I don't have enough knowledge about all this stuff but just wondering anyone think if there's any chances for me to win this case if i go to the court?
Thanking you all in advance.
Regards and best wishes
Imdad
@infinite: errrrr. Before the auction you can ask for the contract of sale and is typical practice. Last three auctions I have been too and did bid had the clause that it was your responsibility and was not a clause of termination of the contract.
Secondly if you're the winning bid, and have second thoughts they can take you to court for fraud and can be sued for the difference in price from the highest bidder is willing to pay and your bid.