hi all
Hoping to seek your opinions on an insurance claim. I was knocked off my bike by a car recently and the driver was found liable for the accident.
My mobile phone was in my pocket and got crushed, and the mobile repair shop advised it's not fixable. The driver's insurance company say they are prepared to pay 2/3 of the current replacement cost for the same model, as the phone was somewhere between one and two years old so they are paying a depreciated amount. They explained this would be the cost to buy a used phone, and was the usual practice with insurance claims like this one.
Just seeking a reasonable-person check whether this is a good outcome or not? The choices are to buy a secondhand phone, buy a cheaper model or pay the difference for a new phone of the same model.
thanks
You are entitled to be put back into the same position as you were in before the accident.. ie. Working phone. This will cost you more than just the phone but hours of restoring and configuring the new phone. I think you should write that this is unacceptable and you will be writing to the ombudsman for a resolution if they can't replace with a new phone as yours was working fine…