Use CUT20 for 20% off. T&Cs apply.
Maximum $1000 discount per transaction ($5000+ spend), and up to 3 transactions per person.
See all CUT20 deals
See all CUT20 Bing Lee deals
See all CUT20 Dick Smith deals
Don't forget up 1.25% Cashback
Use CUT20 for 20% off. T&Cs apply.
Maximum $1000 discount per transaction ($5000+ spend), and up to 3 transactions per person.
Don't forget up 1.25% Cashback
eBay needs to start hiding these sales better. It gets earlier and earlier that people find out about these :P
Or the people that pre-emptively release these are paid ebay trolls
They also need to get more sellers involved than just two. Standards are slipping.
that's previous sale; it's not current i think.
yay any bargains?
Only required if the deal stinks.
Think I need to start deciding on which baby monitor I am going to get, pronto
Consider this before using a baby monitor near your baby.
Manufacturers of wireless devices warn consumers to keep their phones, tablets, baby monitors or other devices away from their bodies.
The BabySafe Project: Reduce Your Exposure
http://www.babysafeproject.org/reduce-your-exposure.html
Ten Ways to Reduce Your Wireless Exposure
1) Avoid carrying your cell phone on your body (e.g. in a pocket or bra).
2) Avoid holding any wireless device against your body when in use.
3) Use your cell phone on speaker setting or with an “air tube” headset.
4) Avoid using your wireless device in cars, trains or elevators.
5) Avoid cordless phones, especially where you sleep.
6) Whenever possible, connect to the internet with wired cables.
7) When using Wi-Fi, connect only to download, then disconnect.
8) Avoid prolonged or direct exposure to Wi-Fi routers.
9) Unplug your home Wi-Fi router when not in use (e.g. at bedtime).
10) Sleep as far away from wireless utility meters (i.e. “smart” meters) as possible.
ROFL - what a load of absolute hogwash.
Manufacturers of wireless devices warn consumers to keep their phones, tablets, baby monitors or other devices away from their bodies.
NO, THEY DON'T :-D
The sun causes Cancer - never allow children to see daylight.
Water contains bacteria, and bacteria can KILL. Make sure never to give water to babies.
Children lead to poverty. Do not have children.
Yes, manufacturers do say to keep devices away from bodies.
Do you have an iPhone or baby monitor? Read the fine prints.
http://www.showthefineprint.org/see-the-fine-print
Learn the facts before you make silly comparisons.
Baby Monitor Motorola MBP33
"The Baby unit shall be installed and used such that parts of the user's body other than the hands are maintained at a distance of approximately 20 cm (8 inches) or more."
Yes, manufacturers do say to keep devices away from bodies
So the manufacturers of Smart Watches say to keep devices away from bodies?
Mobile phones?
Bluetooth headsets?
Learn the facts before you make silly comparisons.
Learn the facts before blindly believing idiotic internet propaganda.
https://www.apple.com/legal/rfexposure/iphone5,1/en/
From the iPhone legal section:
Carry iPhone at least 10mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels.
I think your arrogance and ignorance is stopping you from learning the facts.
think your arrogance and ignorance is stopping you from learning the facts.
What facts? Your quote from that silly website doesn't have anything to do with safety. It's just saying that they tested the RF levels at 10mm.
Anyway, the OP is talking about BABY MONITORS. Nobody shoves a baby monitor inside their body.
I am 100% sure that the baby monitor will remain at all times at least 10mm away from the operator.
You seem to blatantly dismiss the FACT that manufacturers of wireless devices DO ACTUALLY warn consumers to keep their phones, tablets, baby monitors or other devices away from their bodies.
Anyway, the OP is talking about BABY MONITORS. Nobody shoves a baby monitor inside their body.
Exactly, it's about BABY MONITORS so why mention unrelated silly things like:
The sun causes Cancer - never allow children to see daylight.
Water contains bacteria, and bacteria can KILL. Make sure never to give water to babies.
Children lead to poverty. Do not have children.
and other devices like:
So the manufacturers of Smart Watches say to keep devices away from bodies?
Mobile phones?
Bluetooth headsets?
The website I showed you quotes from the Motorola Baby monitor manual and then I quoted directly from the Apple website. These are the FACTS.
Do you have kids?
You seem to be missing the knowledge that these devices are tested in terms of adults and the skull thickness of adults.
Babies are more sensitive and vulnerable to RF / EMF as their cells are rapidly dividing and bodies constantly growing hence the need to be more mindful and aware when using these devices near babies and children. This is actually the MAIN point I want to bring across to the OP when using BABY MONITORS.
The website I showed you quotes from the Motorola Baby monitor manual
So what? It quotes some text that is a selected extract from the manual of ONE Motorola baby monitor. However that text is actually a selective quote from the USA-mandatory FCC disclaimer that must be included for all such devices. So it is NOT the manufacturer's warning, despite your misleading claims in this thread.
Furthermore, that text is on page 23 of 27 of the manual. If you actually READ the User Manual like I have, you would see that there is a massive warning on page 6 which reads (and I quote):
1. Safety Instructions
!! WARNING:
STRANGULATION HAZARD - Keep the unit and adapter cord
more than 3 feet from the crib and out of baby's reach.
NEVER place camera or cords within the crib.
Secure the cord away from baby’s reach.
So, would you kindly explain why you consider there is any need to bother bleating warning that ""The Baby unit shall be installed and used such that parts of the user's body other than the hands are maintained at a distance of approximately 20 cm (8 inches) or more."
Hmmm?
In any case, that model Baby Monitor does not seem to be sold in Australia, as it is designed for overseas markets and safety standards. Therefore, it's even more irrelevant.
and then I quoted directly from the Apple website.
So why did you mention other devices like mobile phones?
These are the FACTS.
Errr, no. Facts need to be scientifically verified. Facts need to be factual.
The only facts involved in your posts is that you are quoting from a sensationalist scaremongering conspiracy theory web site. That is akin to quoting "facts" from a website that states that fluoride in drinking water is unsafe, or that immunisation of children is dangerous. Or quoting "facts" from a vegetarian website that claims that it's fact that eating meat will kill you. Or quoting from a religious text, and claiming that the story in there is a "fact".
At the very best, there are examples of beliefs. A conspiracy theory website is not a factual source, irrespective of how many people get sucked into it.
Perhaps you should try to be more balanced in your research. Read this Forbes article… http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2015/01/20/wi-fi-…
Babies are more sensitive and vulnerable to RF / EMF as their cells are rapidly dividing and bodies constantly growing hence the need to be more mindful and aware when using these devices near babies and children
Says WHO?
On what scientific and factual basis?
This is actually the MAIN point I want to bring across to the OP when using BABY MONITORS.
That is actually just your opinion, and despite it's misguidance I certainly appreciate that you are trying to be helpful and caring. My opinion is that if the OP believes all of that stuff, then they will already know that tin foil can be used to wrap the baby, both to maintain body heat and as proven protection against these kinds of harm.
The foil will be required until the kid reaches adulthood, when their body has developed sufficiently. Thereafter only a foil hat is required, like all the adults wear.
Errr, no. Facts need to be scientifically verified. Facts need to be factual.
Again, the FACT is that manufacturers of wireless devices DO ACTUALLY warn consumers to keep their phones, tablets, baby monitors or other devices away from their bodies. No matter how you try to twist it, this FACT does not require the scientific method. It is written in the relevant product manuals and printed on paper.
All you have are your typical programmed ridicules with terms like "Conspiracy Theories" and "Tin Foil Hat". I really wonder if you even know what the word Conspire/Conspiracy actually means and where/when the term conspiracy theory is first used.
Says WHO?
On what scientific and factual basis?
Seriously, do I have to spoon feed it to you?
Part 2 Martin Pall, PhD-How Wireless Devices Cause Cell Harm: Voltage Gated Calcium Channels.
https://youtu.be/J0zBoc0cL7I?t=29m32s
"The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" — Dr Devra Davis @ The University of Melbourne December 2015 (One of the scientists involved with the babysafeproject.org)
https://youtu.be/BwyDCHf5iCY
I know you will immediately reject it and willfully ignore it because you won't even have the attention span to watch lectures and study the information. I challenge you to watch these lectures and update your child like mindset.
Your link doesn't work BTW.
"We affirm our role as health and science professionals to inform the public about the potential dangers associated with early-life exposures to wireless radiation, and invite all professionals engaged in obstetric, pediatric, and environmental health advocacy to join us in our quest to ensure the safety and health of future generations."
http://www.babysafeproject.org/signatories.html
Again, the FACT is that manufacturers of wireless devices DO ACTUALLY warn consumers to keep their phones, tablets, baby monitors or other devices away from their bodies. No matter how you try to twist it, this FACT does not require the scientific method. It is written in the relevant product manuals and printed on paper.
In AMERICA it is a mandatory requirement to write those disclaimers.
It's similar to the reason why in Australia the food packets have "serving suggestion" written in fine print next to the photos.
I am not arguing with you that the words are written. What I am saying is that YOU are quoting them yet YOU aren't actually reading those words in context. I already explained the Baby Monitor once for you… since the baby monitor must be placed a minimum of 3 feet (over a metre) away from the baby at all times, there is absolutely zero need to concern yourself with the warning people not to have the monitor within 200mm. Surely this is not too hard to comprehend?
I know you will immediately reject it and willfully ignore it because you won't even have the attention span to watch lectures and study the information. I challenge you to watch these lectures and update your child like mindset.
I want scientific fact, not lectures and opinions.
Anyway, I don't care if you use a Baby monitor or not. Personally I won't buy one because I think that they are stupid devices.
As a parent I know that there are FAR greater risks to my child than this doomsday scaremongering bullshit about "WiFi radiation". If you worry about the risk of this, then I cannot fathom how you will cope when you eventually have to let them cross the road by themselves one day.
Your link doesn't work BTW.
Yes, it does. Switch on your WiFi and try again http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2015/01/20/wi-fi-…
Like I said, zero attention span.
They are lectures presenting scientific facts and opinions, this one by a Professor of Medicine.
https://youtu.be/BwyDCHf5iCY
You seriously lack knowledge on this topic. Don't talk about RF/EMF anymore.
Anyway, I don't care if you use a Baby monitor or not. Personally I won't buy one because I think that they are stupid devices.
Totally agree with that one.
doomsday scaremongering bullshit
Again this is about Care, Awareness and Precaution. It's not bullshit, scaremongering or doomsday, I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. There is no worry, simply take Action when required to reduce exposure.
It's very simple, if a baby monitor or any wireless device is not absolutely nescessary then don't use it. If using one, keep it as far away from baby as possible, when not in use turn it off.
Like I said, zero attention span.
No, I have a fantastic attention span.
They are lectures presenting scientific facts and opinions, this one by a Professor of Medicine.
https://youtu.be/BwyDCHf5iCY
Woopty doo! Those who can, do; those who can't, teach :-)
You seriously lack knowledge on this topic. Don't talk about RF/EMF anymore.
I know significantly more about this subject than you could possibly grasp. A significant part of my daily work involves RF/EMF/RFI and similar. I am also involved with other things like photobiological hazards of light, which is another part of the spectrum where there MIGHT be some chance of risk under some circumstances. I have even sat on Australian Standards committees that cover these subjects in the context of electrical device safety and hazards.
The thing that professional and scientific people know is that the studies of risks to humans are totally inconclusive. Since they are inconclusive, that means that there are no facts one way or the other. WiFi might cause harm, or it might NOT cause harm. Wifi has not be proven not to cause harm, but WiFi has not been proven to cause harm either.
Since you have blindly requoted some of their mandatory warning text (from product manuals) you probably should read the FCC website about the subject, and get yourself some impartial knowledge and perspective.
https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/electromagnetic-c…
At relatively low levels of exposure to RF radiation, i.e., levels lower than those that would produce significant heating, the evidence for production of harmful biological effects is ambiguous and unproven. Such effects, if they exist, have been referred to as "non-thermal" effects. A number of reports have appeared in the scientific literature describing the observation of a range of biological effects resulting from exposure to low levels of RF energy. However, in most cases, further experimental research has been unable to reproduce these effects. Furthermore, since much of the research is not done on whole bodies (in vivo), there has been no determination that such effects constitute a human health hazard. It is generally agreed that further research is needed to determine the generality of such effects and their possible relevance, if any, to human health.
In my opinion you seriously lack knowledge on this topic. Please don't inflict your well meaning yet misguided and sensationist ravings about RF/EMF on us any more.
No, I have a fantastic attention span.
Good then watch it.
Woopty doo! Those who can, do; those who can't, teach :-)
You want scienticific facts but performing scientitic research, studies and modeling is not doing work? That is what's being presented.
A significant part of my daily work involves RF/EMF/RFI and similar
That's good and bad, it's bad if you think you already know everything that there is to know on this subject in terms of the biological effects and immediately reject any new information that is in contrary to your exisiting belief.
I have even sat on Australian Standards committees that cover these subjects in the context of electrical device safety and hazards.
Maybe that is why in some ways Australia will be slow at updating these standards.
It is generally agreed that further research is needed to determine the generality of such effects and their possible relevance, if any, to human health.
Do you smoke? I remember there was a time when studies on the ill effects of smoking were inconclusive. Which meant more work/study is required and use with CARE and Precaution in nescessary the mean time. Majority people DON'T CARE, Lack CARE, that is the current condition.
There are actually more things that are already in effect in nature undiscovered/unproven by science compared to what has already been discovered. It's a long process and constant work is required.
What you are leaning towards is the misguided idea that it has yet to be proven and inconclusive so there is probably no harm and no need to exercise any precautions, just wait until Someone else to do the reseach/work in the next many years. Even when/if poroven it'll take you years to accept and change your mind.
Why do you think the RF safety warnings for an Apple device is hidden in the legal section? It's a precaution to cover them from a lawsuit in the future, there is absolutely nothing sensational about it.
Time to go back to bargain hunting and spend my $25 TGG voucher.
YAWN.
There are actually more things that are already in effect in nature undiscovered/unproven by science compared to what has already been discovered. It's a long process and constant work is required.
There are far more important "risks" than some scaremongering about things that might or might not be a risk or maybe have not even been discovered yet.
The bottom line is that there is no scientific proof of what you claim about the dangers of WiFi exposure. And despite all the radio waves, our population continues to live longer and longer. That's all there is to it… so can't you find something more important to fuss about?
I have a feeling the TVs will go fast
caryards and ebay
a haiku
somewhere
It's up on the front page code is CUT20
The code is CUT20. Ends 26/09. max discount 1000.
I tried using it but it says "Looks like this code isn't ready yet. Please try again later."
When does it start?
The 15% started at 10am so maybe this one will too
Does Bing Lee give gst receipts?
Remember most of the times, you can find something cheaper elsewhere without the coupon. Just search wider and always switch to world or go to aliexpress. Never trust these local retailers coupon, 99% of the times they jack up the price but a seller in another country does not know anything about a coupon here.
You might think these local retailers jack up the price to make up the discount but no, they jack it up to make up for their greediness! Ebay provides the discount by waiving off the administration fees and PayPal fees, which is just more 20% and that's why the coupons are never more than %20 discount. So nobody is actually losing but local Australian retailer are GREEDY!
C10AUS 10% off code seems to be back in action too
I am getting following error when using 10% OFF CODE "C10AUS" - "This code can't be applied to some of your items."
It may be a targeted code.
If i buy an item over $1000 through dicksmith, should I be required to pay tax? (10% for imported goods)? if thats so, then not worth it :/
Depends on where its shipped from.
If I cancel my other from Bing Lee and order it again will it affect my the other item in the previous order which I have 15% off from overseas seller?
Have you tried cancelling before? I bought a fridge during the 15% as well.
No, will try later when they call me to pick up.
But mine is only $5 difference yours a lot more you should try.
I cancelled and reordered already, simply contacted Binglee on Ebay and asked to cancel.
Just emailed them hope it will not affect my the other order, my the other order was less than $75 during the 15% off special.
EDITED:
Done and they have refunded super quick and didn't affect the price of my another order.
Reckon this is confirmed now.
I hope there will be more than Bing Lee and DS. You can already be certain there won't be any bargains with DS.
Not sure if I should buy an air conditioner from here or the good guys who have $300 cash back. I think Good Guys also have an installation service as well
The KDL65W850C for $1600 for those that can pick up is a great buy!
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/NEW-Sony-KDL65W850C-65-FHD-SMART-…
noticed a number of ppl watching and being a victorian .. well a bit too far to travel.
Any tablet bargains?
32GB WiFi iPad Pro 9.7 for $609 delivered from Dick Smith (Kogan)
Hoping to get an iPad to replace an old Nexus 10.
I think this has been asked to death, but if I get it from Dick Smith Grey Stock, what would the warranty process be for any issues?
I think this has been asked to death, but if I get it from Dick Smith Grey Stock, what would the warranty process be for any issues?
Open the Ebay Listing. Go to the bottom of the Description page and check the NAME OF COMPANY who is selling to you.
Then scroll down a bit lower and click on TERMS OF SALE link.
Read that.
In this way you get the facts that apply to the particular product that you intend to purchase.
But in extremely general terms, there is no warranty if you grey import an item yourself. YOU are the importer, so it is YOU who provides the local warranty.
If I didn't decide that I'd get the Google Pixel I'd be jumping on the 20% off Samsung S7 Edge bandwagon as part of this deal.
155 upvotes and no bargains. Dick, you've done it again!
Aw man. Just bought a $900 lens with the 15% yesterday. Could've saved another $40 with this :(
Which one?
Canon 24-70mm f4L. Posted the deal on OzBargain not long ago.
Cool deal.
Goes to check Apple products at Dick Smith
Everything is marked up by about 20%. Yeah, this s**t needs to stop.
I don't have evidence of pre-sale prices though, otherwise I'd right a complaint to the ACCC.
which ones? The ipad pro 9.7" 32gb wi-fi is still $762.99.
I don't have evidence of pre-sale prices though, otherwise I'd right a complaint to the ACCC
Why would the ACCC care?
They have no jurisdiction over a company in mainland China.
I have just used this code and it works at Bing Lee
Working now at DS eBay.
Congrats on your new job.
Haha took me a moment. Thanks! 😎
How long did cashback take to come from cashrewards?
I put an order through last night and I still haven't received a notification. It can take up to 2 days, apparently.
Might be the case then… My recent order from Banggood took about 5 mins to show up which was unexpected? :)
So am I the only one getting a "Something went wrong. Please try to check out again." error when proceeding to checkout?
I had this happen heaps yesterday.
Close your browser and try again. Also, might be a good idea to login again and select the "Stay signed in" option.
Was still happening when I logged in again in a new session. Removed one of the items and then started working, added second item and still working, so who knows why.
Does anyone know if purchases from dick smith are covered under Kogan warranty?
Subject to the terms and conditions set out below, Dick Smith and Dick Smith Electronics agree to repair or replace the DS Product or DSE Product (as the case may be) which it supplied to you at its own cost, in circumstances where the Product does not perform in accordance with Dick Smith Group's specifications during
1. the Standard Warranty period of 12 months; or
2. the applicable Extended Warranty period, commencing on the date of delivery of the Product. Where there is no proof of delivery, this date will be assumed to be 3 business days from the date of dispatch of the Product.
I just wonder if Dick Smith support is as good as Kogan. I had a good experience with Kogan when my LG G4 had the boot loop issue. It was very easy to chat to customer support and I received a full refund which was very nice.
Purchases are covered by what ever warranty applies
Read the TERMS OF SALE linked at the botton of each listing description. At the bottom also tells you which company each item is sold by… you need that to know which secation of TOS you must refer to.
It's not hard… and DO NOT TRUST random answers here, check for yourself.
Thanks , bought iPad Pro 9.7 32gb for $610
Could you please let me know if you receive a tax invoice that you could use to claim TRS on…a bit confused as not sure if dick smith/kogan are registered as an AUS company.
Good point!
Does TRS come into play for these vendors? I'm sure everyone else is curious too :3
a bit confused as not sure if dick smith/kogan are registered as an AUS company.
There is no confusion.
Each listing SPECIFICALLY states what company you are purchasing from.
Most of them seem to be in Hong Kong.
If so there is no ABN, no Tax Invoice, no Tax, and no GST.
dam didn't buy the UE boom last night…bing lee sell them more than GG
Any ideas if all the 4g bands will work of buying an iPhone from dick smith?
What about the warranty? If anything goes wrong can I just walk in in an apple store? Thanks!!
:( shame that Bing-Lee changed the freight options for the LG & Samsung 5.1 Home Threatre systems from $20 delivery fee to Pick up only. But no Melbourne stores!
Cheers. iPad Pro for $610. 3 weeks to deliver tho. Bummer.
Possibly from Hong Kong… Kogan import their stuff from Hong Kong.
Do they ever sell local stock?
i need a washing machine (just died!) any bargains?
code worked for me got 20% off iphone 64gb se
MSI GTX 980ti for $486 after 20% discount…seems like an ok price? they're still going for about $400+ used on OCAU…
Bing Lee postage kills it for me :(
iPhone 7 is also available, and combining with Cash Rewards, that is over 21% off on brand new iPhone 7,
don't know how much stocks left there.
anywhere selling pre-orders on the ps4 pro with 20% off?
Try searching ebay. You might find a deal.
Bing Lee doesnt deliver to Perth :(
bing lee not in WA…DS ..well it's DS…hard to excited after last night..
Is there a link to search eligible products on ebay?
Yes
Just scroll down a bit on the main deal link http://www.ebay.com.au/rpp/bing-lee-dick-smith
You'll see a searchbox with a blue button 'search the sale', that will search only Bing Lee & Dick Smith items.
If you just want it to list everything then click the blue button without writing anything in the searchbox.
Thank you OP - you just saved me $500 or so.
That's a big saving. What did you buy for 2k?
Actually I bought a fridge for 4k (cheapest alternative was 3.8k or thereabouts, so I saved around $500 from the 20% off code.
Wouldn't that save you $800?
Well based on pure dollar value from RRP yes, but what I was trying to say is the cheapest I could get for the fridge is around 3.8k and I almost bought it.
But now with Bing Lee 20% off, I got it for $3.3k so the promotion saved me $500.
Ozaybargain.