This was posted 9 years 18 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

200GB SanDisk Ultra microSDXC Class 10 Micro SD Card $222 (US$158) Delivered @ Amazon

700
200GB SanDisk Ultra microSDXC Class 10 Micro SD Card $222 (US$158) Delivered @ AmazonAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
OldBugger on 06/11/2015 - 17:59 amazon.com (475 clicks)
Last edited 06/11/2015 - 18:16 by 1 other user
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

When bigger is better, you will be the Lord of the Manor with this 200GB beauty and sure to win some hearts. If your phone can't handle the capacity, get a new one. Throw this beast in to any of your devices and enjoy the freedom of holding up to 20 hours of Full HD video. Transfer up to 1200 photos a minute with premium transfer speed of up to 90MB/s. Love the beach? So does this card. Rest assured with its water, temperature and shock proof capabilities. It comes with an SD card adaptor which makes this a real bargain.

Amazon Reviewer

$309 @ Scorptec
$349 @ PC Byte

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
Computing 200GB Memory Card MicroSD Card SanDisk

Related Stores

Amazon US
Amazon US

closed Comments

  • hilariouspowerr on 06/11/2015 - 18:00
    +12

    Oh my lorde.

  • [Deactivated] on 06/11/2015 - 18:02
    +18

    What an odd capacity….

    • hamwhisperer on 06/11/2015 - 18:28
      +3

      I got the impression they couldn't fit that final 56gb in there :/ those things are tiny after all.

      • scrimshaw on 06/11/2015 - 18:43
        +2

        I would love to see the vertically stacked 3D NAND flash memory array under a microscope and compare it with something we had back in the days when flash memory topped out at 32megs. Storage tech is progressing so fast these days..

        • hamwhisperer on 06/11/2015 - 18:49
          +9

          I still don't even understand 3D Nand, I keep reading about it but it just baffles me.
          "omg omg omg we're so doomed, we gotta go to smaller lithography, which means flash will wear out fast and it blowssssss"
          Suddenly they can go back to 40nm and stack it on top of itself - shouldn't it be at least physically taller? or hotter?
          Isn't the pins the same? So it's kinda going to become slower? because the signalling pin to memory size ratio is out?
          I dunno, I don't understand the stuff. Good tho

        • bargaino on 07/11/2015 - 04:09
          +3

          In my day you didn't need a microscope to see a 3D array:

          http://wilsonminesco.com/SRAMmodules/4Mx8_a.jpg

        • [Deactivated] on 27/11/2015 - 01:29

          @hamwhisperer:

          Lol someone was playing vertical Scrabble and thought "Hang on…!"

      • Click_It on 13/11/2015 - 14:20

        I remember googling this when I first saw the 200GB arrive >12 months ago, I remember thinking it must be a chinese fake coz SanDisk would never release such an odd sized MicroSD. Turns out you are spot on, current technology prevented them reaching 256GB. I suspect they can probably far exceed that mark now (256-512GB) but market demand would be another thing.

        So yep, your impression was correct.

  • wildstone on 06/11/2015 - 18:07
    +10

    Waiting for TA…

    • Utopian on 06/11/2015 - 22:49
      +2

      Funny and disrespectful at the same time.

      Well played.

  • scrimshaw on 06/11/2015 - 18:10
    +4

    If your phone can't handle the capacity, get a new one

    Goodness. Does Sandisk expect us to toss away our iPhones and Nexus's with no SD storage?

  • lgacb08 on 06/11/2015 - 18:13
    +1

    In 2 year this card is 1/4 of this price.

    • stumo on 06/11/2015 - 18:40
      +4

      not until after the 512GB one comes out.

      • ATangk on 06/11/2015 - 23:33

        I wouldn't doubt the current existence of 512Gb or even 1Tb. Just a matter of market viability

  • CodeXD on 06/11/2015 - 18:14
    +3

    Which android phone supports this card?

    • Spending2Much on 06/11/2015 - 18:16
      +1

      LG G4

    • ozdavo on 06/11/2015 - 18:32
      +2

      Sony M4, Z4, C5, M5, Z5 & variants

    • ozdavo on 06/11/2015 - 18:43
      +1

      HTC One A9, Desire 828, 626, 526

    • DealJohnDoe on 07/11/2015 - 08:29

      Been using it with my HTC One M8 and M9 for 8 months, no problem at all

    • Haulien on 21/11/2015 - 16:42

      Any phone that supports the microSDXC standard should be able to support up to 2TB microSD cards (whenever they eventually come onto market), or basically this one as its the current highest capacity.

  • blighst on 06/11/2015 - 18:14

    Anyone know if SJCam Action Cams would support this?

  • umadbrahhhh on 06/11/2015 - 18:40
    +6

    +vote for deal description effort

    • digitalbargain on 06/11/2015 - 19:59
      +2

      Yep.. got me with the "It comes with an SD card adaptor which makes this a real bargain." .. sold.

  • malouphix on 06/11/2015 - 18:48
    +5

    Wow! So big!

    That's what she said

  • juzz0 on 06/11/2015 - 18:58

    Maybe this is a silly question but are the Micro SD cards sold on eBay (Sandisk as well) the same or are they known to be duplicates? It's hard to tell because although cheap and the sellers seem to have good enough feedback (99.5-99.9%) the listings seem suspicious with a lot of superimposed watermarks and australian flags.

  • Ruriko on 06/11/2015 - 19:00
    +4

    why don't they make 256GB? 200GB just breaks the pattern… 8,16,32,64,128…200!

    • Utopian on 06/11/2015 - 22:51

      If they could, they would?

    • skillet on 07/11/2015 - 12:45

      So they can milk the cow longer

    • Click_It on 13/11/2015 - 14:24

      Their official explanation was technology didn't allow 256GB at the time. Whilst 200GB sounds new, this MicroSD has been around for awhile.

      Market viability would be the reason nothing has happened since, plus the second 256GB comes out nobody will want the odd 200GB step (aka milking the cow)

  • [Deactivated] on 06/11/2015 - 19:13
    +2

    At first I thought this was $222 for the 2TB micro sd card. $222 for 200GB is a little less impressive.

    • hahaboy on 06/11/2015 - 20:26
      +2

      yes, but this is still smaller than your finger nail.

      • [Deactivated] on 06/11/2015 - 20:30

        A 2TB micro sd card is the same size as any other micro sd card.

        • hahaboy on 06/11/2015 - 20:32

          i meant, the smallest 2TB storage you will currently get is about the size of an external hard-drive. Whilst 200GB is small in comparison, the size of the microsd card is also super small. It's still pretty impressive.

    • bchliu on 06/11/2015 - 22:16

      There's probably about 32GB worth of redundancy on this card that allows the bad blocks to be reallocated to this reserve. This is usually the same reason why SSD's sometimes comes in odd amounts too (eg. 480GB = 512GB with redundancy).

    • lostn on 07/11/2015 - 10:25

      $222 for 200GB is a little less impressive.

      It's not the size, it's how you use it.

  • Dcseah on 06/11/2015 - 19:18

    Lord of the NAND - the (micro) Flash to rule them all!

  • engineeringprof on 06/11/2015 - 19:51
    +1

    A+ bargain description

  • Polde on 06/11/2015 - 19:56
    +1

    What a time to be alive, back in my day…

    • Cluster on 07/11/2015 - 15:34

      Back in my day we had 64kb of RAM! And we loved it! (no, we didn't, it was annoying)

  • [Deactivated] on 06/11/2015 - 20:28
    -3

    Why would you want that much storage? My only thoughts would be a dash camera but for a mobile phone the capacity is overkill and if I am correct the speed is not that fast.

    • caprimulgus on 06/11/2015 - 20:48
      +1

      Not overkill if you take a lot of photos/videos on your phone, and/or if you want to load your whole large/flac music library or lots of videos on your phone.

      Or if you want to add more storage for media on an ultrabook/tablet/MacBook/etc.

      Or if you want to use it in a DSLR or video camera.

      Or if you want to use it in a wifi usb drive for sharing media to an iPad/tablet/laptop/etc.

      Or if you want to use it in an audiophile grade DAP (Astel & Kern).

      There are many reasons one might want a 200gb card…

      • malouphix on 06/11/2015 - 20:52
        +2

        To stash massive amounts sensitive info. Off the line even off the cloud, could hide virtually anywhere.

        • caprimulgus on 06/11/2015 - 20:54
          +4

          To stash pr0n and hide virtually anywhere.

          Fixed it for you! :)

        • malouphix on 06/11/2015 - 21:15
          +1

          @caprimulgus: Tanks. :)

    • caprimulgus on 06/11/2015 - 20:58

      Replace a broken hdd in an 160gb iPod classic (exactly what I plan to do one day with a 200gb or larger microsd).

      • Draxxx on 07/11/2015 - 15:54
        +1

        PROTIP: If you got the right iPod, go an SSD
        http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/407552,how-to-revive-your…

        • caprimulgus on 07/11/2015 - 17:48

          EVEN-MORE-PROTIP: m-sata SSD is the way to go for higher capacities (greater than 512GB), however the battery life is not as good as SD, and the speed increase is negligible (faster to load files onto the device, but negligible in usage). see Tarkan's (the guy who makes the m-sata/SD/CF adapters) website for his own benchmark testing. ;)

          but yeah, for 512GB+ definitely SSD is the way to go. for 256GB (1x256GB or 2x128GB) or 512GB (2x256GB), i would probably go for dual or single SD.

          https://www.tarkan.info/20150921/tutorials/modding/runtime-s…

          Conclusion

          I think all the devices performed well and will provide most users with plenty of musical enjoyment between charges, and how far are you from a USB charge port in your day-to-day life?

          I should point out mSata drives have varying levels of power consumption, several mSata drives in the 240Gb – 256Gb range will return runtimes approaching that of the HDD. In the 500Gb range again there is varying power consumption levels to contend with.

          The single SDXC and DUAL returned excellent runtimes, and I think the DUAL requires a special mention – considering in this test you have double the capacity but only a 15% reduction in runtime, the MP3 playlist on a single SDXC running for over 49hours, while the DUAL managing an impressive 43hours.

          With mSata, you do trade runtime for the best price per GB, which maybe the choice you have to make if you need the highest capacity while keeping costs down. However the iFlash-DUAL does challenge this idea – 2 x 256Gb SDXC can be bought for less than the price of a single 512Gb mSata!!!

        • Draxxx on 07/11/2015 - 21:57

          @caprimulgus:
          Interesting! I was looking at a 1Tb conversion, but in the end I found I had the 6th Gen Classic, not the 7th.
          Disappointing. Maybe should have considered the 2x 256Gb SDXC.
          Ended up opting for a Fiio X5 Gen2. (So loving the price drop / capacity increase on these microSD's).

    • Utopian on 06/11/2015 - 22:53
      +1

      Store Videos, Images, Music…

      and… it's gone.

    • lostn on 07/11/2015 - 10:26

      I'm going to guess that you own a 16GB iPhone?

  • Baebs on 06/11/2015 - 20:54
    +1

    Holy smokes Sandisk…

  • Hiphopopotamus on 06/11/2015 - 21:06
    +3

    bigger than my ssd D:

  • starwarsfreak on 06/11/2015 - 21:12
    +2

    this just aint right, i would look at it and think i got ripped off wondering where the other 56gb is gone.

  • Izefyre on 06/11/2015 - 21:26
    +2

    Who would need this much space on their phones? Just put your porn collection somewhere else :)

    • carwashhair on 06/11/2015 - 21:40
      +3

      Ate you kidding? That's like trying to play favourites with family…

  • Black Hole on 06/11/2015 - 21:36
    +1

    How can they cramp so much in such a small space?

    • Vampyr on 07/11/2015 - 08:56
      +5

      Are you talking about the porn or the SD card?

      • Black Hole on 07/11/2015 - 10:54

        Haha, I mean the electronic circuits.

  • seniordoc on 06/11/2015 - 22:13

    Does anyone know if this card is compatible with Surface Pro 3?
    Officially MS said it supports up to 128G SDXC …and my 128G SDXC card is now full …

    Thanks.

    • Ruriko on 06/11/2015 - 22:33
      +1

      your best bet is to go with samsung. Sandisk has issues on Surface Pro devices they tend to randomly dismount probably cause sandisk cards are thinner than normal microsd cards

  • lucksmith on 06/11/2015 - 23:10

    Anyone know if this will work with the GoPro Hero 4 Silver?

  • xiuhan83 on 06/11/2015 - 23:15
    +1

    2×128 gb microsd card cost less and more compatable to most devices. Although 200gb is much easier to carry :p

  • AMLagonda on 06/11/2015 - 23:59

    "The actual usable storage is 183 GB"

    • lostn on 07/11/2015 - 10:29

      That's down to the difference in what storage manufacturers define as a GB, and what a computer defines as a GB. There's some dishonesty going on, but the manufacturers are honest about their dishonesty. They do print it somewhere on the box that 1GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. It's just that your device defines 1GB as 1024^3 bytes, which means you will get less than the 200GB advertised.

      Neither side is going to change their definition. It's too late now.

  • Freek on 07/11/2015 - 00:04

    Thanks op. Just what I was looking for.

  • iNeedMoreMoney on 07/11/2015 - 00:16

    Is this for real?

  • Wokka Flappa on 07/11/2015 - 08:14

    i'm in love now!!!

  • Wokka Flappa on 07/11/2015 - 10:13

    Australia won't be able to handle this technology for another 5 years
    I can see a lot of blown devices, I hope people have their warranty before usage.

  • ju2au on 07/11/2015 - 12:42

    I remembered paying over $160 for a 64MB Multimedia Card; that was about 15 years ago I think.

    • Click_It on 13/11/2015 - 14:27

      Let it go, time to move on

      :)

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join